https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94553
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2a8565fa1182ed326721a50c700f9f5275355d40
commit r11-529-g2a8565fa1182ed326721a50c700f9f5275355d40
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94553
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
The structured binding part is now fixed, but the variable template part isn't
yet, so not closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #8)
> Thanks for the reports. This should now hopefully be fixed with r11-522.
r11-526 PASS for me.
Thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95240
Bug ID: 95240
Summary: calloc() false positives
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3872a519c8fa65318efa1b481d331ef91b3ff044
commit r11-528-g3872a519c8fa65318efa1b481d331ef91b3ff044
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95241
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223
--- Comment #10 from Bill Seurer ---
It works for me, too, now. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2cf6f31527c6d8dd2cc96f4efe8ff70d60d5fb44
commit r11-527-g2cf6f31527c6d8dd2cc96f4efe8ff70d60d5fb44
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95244
Bug ID: 95244
Summary: GCC 10 no longer builds on RHEL5 [trivial patch]
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95243
Bug ID: 95243
Summary: libgomp documentation should specify GCC Runtime
Library Exception license as applicable
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95241
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95242
Bug ID: 95242
Summary: [10 Regression] spurious "warning: zero as null
pointer constant [-Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant]" on
comparisons with -std=c++2a
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95241
Bug ID: 95241
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
integer_cst, have range_expr in to_wide, at
tree.h:5900
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Built by
>
> #5 0x020c4504 in gen_rtx_fmt_ee_stat (code=VEC_SELECT,
> mode=E_V2SImode, arg0=0x0, arg1=0x76ad92e0) at ./genrtl.h:49
> #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335
kal.conley at dectris dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kal.conley at dectris dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Note a 'use' is not something that needs to be preserved, so
(define_insn_and_split "*2"
[(set (match_operand:VF 0 "register_operand" "=x,v")
(absneg:VF
(match_operand:VF 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > The "i" constraint shouldn't be used for flag_pic since symbolic constant
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Built by
#5 0x020c4504 in gen_rtx_fmt_ee_stat (code=VEC_SELECT,
mode=E_V2SImode, arg0=0x0, arg1=0x76ad92e0) at ./genrtl.h:49
#6 0x0211e242 in gen_sse4_1_zero_extendv2siv2di2 (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 20 May 2020, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
>
> Uroš Bizjak changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> The "i" constraint shouldn't be used for flag_pic since symbolic constant
> leads to writable text in 32-bit mode and invalid in 64-bit mode.
Just a typo. "i" should be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> So perhaps pre-reload splitter of that into the UNSPEC form?
Vector insns should be able to use pre-reload splitter, but scalar instructions
depend on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95219
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2f26af32b5b031fce761aa090de9476a53e6e5a
commit r11-519-gb2f26af32b5b031fce761aa090de9476a53e6e5a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8358ac9bbc57d6986c9bd5dd17c0331a60114f45
commit r10-8160-g8358ac9bbc57d6986c9bd5dd17c0331a60114f45
Author: Mark Eggleston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c9bfd404691e5dac7e32830ae6d9726ccf59683
commit r9-8608-g7c9bfd404691e5dac7e32830ae6d9726ccf59683
Author: Mark Eggleston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > The "i" constraint shouldn't be used for flag_pic since symbolic constant
> > leads to writable text in 32-bit mode and invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94335
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0, 11.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
There's partially reduced test-case:
$ cat fma.i
double res_test0101[] = {
-3,1, 17,51,109, 197, 321, 487, 701, 969, 1297,
1691, 2157, 2701, 3329, 4047, 4861, 5777,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
I think I found the issue.
Before the patch, we had:
(insn 375 373 2574 7 (parallel [
(set (reg:V4DF 21 xmm1 [orig:1681 vect__45.441 ] [1681])
(neg:V4DF (mem/c:V4DF (plus:DI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:610ae2dbbf98a291782cb05c0fb31e056193e5e2
commit r11-522-g610ae2dbbf98a291782cb05c0fb31e056193e5e2
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
The "i" constraint shouldn't be used for flag_pic since symbolic constant
leads to writable text in 32-bit mode and invalid in 64-bit mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org|
--- Comment #14 from Uroš Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 39695, which changed state.
Bug 39695 Summary: [F03] ProcPtr function results: wrong name in error message
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:15e518600a9ef82b55d2ec75d8d41d767132f475
commit r8-10261-g15e518600a9ef82b55d2ec75d8d41d767132f475
Author: Mark Eggleston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237
Bug ID: 95237
Summary: LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL
gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95238
Bug ID: 95238
Summary: [11 Regression] Invalid *pushsi2_rex64
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> That fixes the testcase. But simplify_subreg is used in a lot more places
> so leaving to Uros to match up with expectations.
Oh, yes... We don't have hard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39695
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb069ae8819c3a84d7f78becc5501e21ee3a9554
commit r11-524-geb069ae8819c3a84d7f78becc5501e21ee3a9554
Author: Mark Eggleston
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> Note a 'use' is not something that needs to be preserved, so
>
> (define_insn_and_split "*2"
> [(set (match_operand:VF 0 "register_operand" "=x,v")
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95239
Bug ID: 95239
Summary: Unable to ignore -Wattribute-warning in macro
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137
--- Comment #18 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
(In reply to Avi Kivity from comment #17)
> Is that the test were a lambda coroutine is called from future::then()? In
> that case it's a real use-after-free.
It was reduced from that to just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95247
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95249
Bug ID: 95249
Summary: Stack protector runtime has to waste one byte on null
terminator
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083
--- Comment #2 from Hana Dusíková ---
Same error is also triggered by template partial specialization:
```
template struct literal {
constexpr literal(const char ()[N]) noexcept { }
constexpr literal(const literal &) noexcept {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 48575
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48575=edit
Patch in testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95198
--- Comment #3 from Witold Baryluk ---
> The main example to demonstrate the current behaviour is correct would be the
> following:
```
extern(C)
private final int f() {
return 5;
}
auto pubf()() {
return f();
}
```
I see, I guess you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95246
--- Comment #2 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Looks like I misread it, LLVM compares `dil` and `sil` with that
transformation, not `edi` and `esi` as it does without it. I should stop making
bug reports at 1 am... I suppose I should mark thtis as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137
--- Comment #17 from Avi Kivity ---
Is that the test were a lambda coroutine is called from future::then()? In that
case it's a real use-after-free.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95246
Gabriel Ravier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95247
Bug ID: 95247
Summary: Backport the DRIVER_SELF_SPECS implementation of
-mdejagnu-cpu= to GCC 9
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95005
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95246
Bug ID: 95246
Summary: Failure to optimize comparison between differently
signed chars
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95245
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
[algorithms.requirements] paragraph 10 says:
[Note: Unless otherwise specified, algorithms that take function objects as
arguments are permitted to copy those function objects freely. Programmers for
whom
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95248
Bug ID: 95248
Summary: GCC produces incorrect code with -O3 for loops
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
The problem is with commutative operands, these somehow confuse postreload
pass.
I'll commit partial revert that basically puts back:
(define_insn_and_split "*2"
- [(set (match_operand:VF 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95137
--- Comment #16 from Rafael Avila de Espindola ---
> @Rafael: Can you please append output with:
> export UBSAN_OPTIONS="print_stacktrace=1"
I also added halt_on_error=1:abort_on_error=1:
It is
../tests/unit/coroutines_test.cc:11:5: runtime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95249
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker ---
Indeed, using an extra zero pad byte could bump the stack frame size by 4 or 8
or 16 bytes, or could leave it unchanged, depending on alignment prior to
adding the byte and the alignment requirements of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95213
Seth Robertson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95245
Bug ID: 95245
Summary: std::sort copies custom comparator
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95005
--- Comment #7 from Michael Kuhn ---
Took me a while, sorry. I have just sent the patch to the list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95245
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95213
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||in-gcc at baka dot org
--- Comment #22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95246
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
On which version of LLVM did you see that? For me, gcc produces
movzbl %dil, %edi
movsbl %sil, %esi
cmpl%esi, %edi
setg%al
while clang skips the first 2 lines (but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95249
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I doubt you could skip one byte as the protector location has to be aligned.
So the trade off is adding at least 4 or 8 bytes (depending on which ABI is
used) or 8bits less of the randomness.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95250
Bug ID: 95250
Summary: [D] ICE instead of error when trying to use bad
template type inside template
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7797f5ec58078523a452e5cf239596e13d77d885
commit r11-535-g7797f5ec58078523a452e5cf239596e13d77d885
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93295
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Lyberta from comment #0)
> #include
> #include
>
> struct Foo
> {
> Foo(const std::filesystem::path& p);
> };
>
> static_assert(std::copyable);
The problem is that copyable considers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983
--- Comment #8 from TC ---
(really from Tim)
This is https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3420
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95251
Bug ID: 95251
Summary: x86 code size expansion inserting field into a union
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70053
luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398
--- Comment #26 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
Had a test on spec2017 xz_r by changing the specified loop manually, on
ppc64le.
original loop (this loops occur three times in code):
while (++len != len_limit)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93983
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks, Tim. I'd forgotten about that issue and was about to reinvent the
resolution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95219
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Coalesce list: (4)ivtmp.15_4 & (22)ivtmp.15_22 [map: 2, 9] : Success -> 2
Coalesce list: (1)vect_vec_iv_.7_1 & (19)_19 [map: 0, 7] : Success -> 0
Coalesce list: (17)_17 & (18)vect_vec_iv_.8_18 [map: 5, 6] :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95199
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, there's already vinfo->ivexpr_map to aid simplifying the IL to a point
where IVOPTs can eliminate redundant IVs. Eliminating them in the vectorizer
is more complicated because of all the code for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
--- Comment #10 from Roland Illig ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9)
> That could work. I'm still trying to understand how an
> option names -Werror=char-subscripts could trigger an
> error. There are no subscripts.
The C standard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-20
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC 10.1 x86 issue with |[10/11 Regression] GCC 10.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95226
--- Comment #1 from Frantisek Boranek ---
Luckily, the behaviour is the same on old stable Stretch as on Buster. So this
version is also affected, but it is probably not serious as was my first
impression.
gcc (Debian 6.3.0-18+deb9u1) 6.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-20
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfa4fcdba374ed44d4aa1a22b2738f3f5c5b37af
commit r11-508-gdfa4fcdba374ed44d4aa1a22b2738f3f5c5b37af
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Tue Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|11.0|
Summary|[8/9/10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a88caf21a0a85129f6c985ca13ba3eb54ff5366
commit r11-509-g4a88caf21a0a85129f6c985ca13ba3eb54ff5366
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0
Summary|[8/9/10/11
, bool)
../../trunk.git/gcc/jump.c:1211
0xd588b0 mark_jump_label_1(rtx_def*, rtx_insn*, bool, bool)
../../trunk.git/gcc/jump.c:1211
The bug first seems to occur on today's gcc. Yesterdays seems fine:
/home/dcb/gcc/results.20200519/bin/gcc
/home/dcb/gcc/results.20200520/bin/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95231
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95231
Bug ID: 95231
Summary: [11 Regression] error: the first argument of a
‘vec_cond_expr’ must be of a boolean vector type of
the since r11-451-gfe168751c5c1c517
Product: gcc
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
