[Bug c++/95223] [11 regression] hash table checking failed: equal operator returns true for a pair of values with a different hash value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95223 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- r11-511 + this patch builds a stage1 debug compiler OK for me (issue reported on irc).

[Bug target/94959] Wrong code gen for MVE intrinsics vldrbq_s32 which fails with assembler `Error: lo register required`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94959 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by SRINATH PARVATHANENI : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d91524d5b117077b2f143e8aa3698ec585dafba6 commit r11-514-gd91524d5b117077b2f143e8aa3698ec585dafba6 Author: Srinath

[Bug c++/95233] Failure to compile regression in GCC 10.1 and 11 trunk with C++ 20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95233 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Without looking into properly, it's possibly a dup of PR 93983.

[Bug target/95234] [11 Regression] 416.gamess Miscompare of exam29.out since r11-455-g94f687bd9ae37ece

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95234 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Changed object files: objfolderdiff.py /tmp/good-objects/ /tmp/bad-objects/ 26/ 151: dgeev.o: different 27/ 151: dmulti.fppized.o: different 46/ 151: eigen.fppized.o: different 56/

[Bug c++/95233] Failure to compile regression in GCC 10.1 and 11 trunk with C++ 20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95233 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/95233] Failure to compile regression in GCC 10.1 and 11 trunk with C++ 20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95233 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|build | --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely

[Bug target/95235] New: Failure to properly optimize out register use in bit-twiddling code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95235 Bug ID: 95235 Summary: Failure to properly optimize out register use in bit-twiddling code Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86142] hard error for bad delete-expression in SFINAE context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86142 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0 Version|unknown

[Bug target/95234] New: [11 Regression] 416.gamess Miscompare of exam29.out since r11-455-g94f687bd9ae37ece

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95234 Bug ID: 95234 Summary: [11 Regression] 416.gamess Miscompare of exam29.out since r11-455-g94f687bd9ae37ece Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/94910] detect_stack_use_after_return=1 is much slower than clang's

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94910 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Rafael Avila de Espindola from comment #8) > I can confirm that the proposed patch fixes the issue for me. > > Thank you so much! I thank you for the bug report. We had the regression since the

[Bug tree-optimization/95231] [11 Regression] error: the first argument of a ‘vec_cond_expr’ must be of a boolean vector type of the since r11-451-gfe168751c5c1c517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95231 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/95233] Failure to compile regression in GCC 10.1 and 11 trunk with C++ 20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95233 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|c++-concepts|10.1.0 Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/95229] ice in mark_jump_label_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Reproduced with -march=znver1. It breaks quite some SPEC benchmarks.

[Bug middle-end/95229] [11 Regression] in mark_jump_label_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/95230] Failure to optimize bit-scatter pattern to and 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95230 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug target/94591] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: operand mismatch -- `rev64 v0.2d,v0.2d' (or `rev32 v0.2s,v0.2s')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94591 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/95229] ice in mark_jump_label_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/home/dcb/gcc/results/bin/gcc Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../trunk.git/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.20200520 --disable-bootstrap --disable

[Bug c++/95233] New: Failure to compile regression in GCC 10.1 and 11 trunk with C++ 20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95233 Bug ID: 95233 Summary: Failure to compile regression in GCC 10.1 and 11 trunk with C++ 20 Product: gcc Version: c++-concepts Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/95232] [11 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:279 since r11-283-gf315d1477d5164cb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95232 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/95232] New: [11 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:279 since r11-283-gf315d1477d5164cb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95232 Bug ID: 95232 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:279 since r11-283-gf315d1477d5164cb Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/95229] ice in mark_jump_label_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95229 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/95231] [11 Regression] error: the first argument of a ‘vec_cond_expr’ must be of a boolean vector type of the since r11-451-gfe168751c5c1c517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95231 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/95231] New: [11 Regression] error: the first argument of a ‘vec_cond_expr’ must be of a boolean vector type of the since r11-451-gfe168751c5c1c517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95231 Bug ID: 95231 Summary: [11 Regression] error: the first argument of a ‘vec_cond_expr’ must be of a boolean vector type of the since r11-451-gfe168751c5c1c517 Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/95230] New: Failure to optimize bit-scatter pattern to and 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95230 Bug ID: 95230 Summary: Failure to optimize bit-scatter pattern to and 1 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/95229] New: ice in mark_jump_label_1

, bool) ../../trunk.git/gcc/jump.c:1211 0xd588b0 mark_jump_label_1(rtx_def*, rtx_insn*, bool, bool) ../../trunk.git/gcc/jump.c:1211 The bug first seems to occur on today's gcc. Yesterdays seems fine: /home/dcb/gcc/results.20200519/bin/gcc /home/dcb/gcc/results.20200520/bin/gcc

[Bug target/92658] x86 lacks vector extend / truncate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92658 --- Comment #17 from Hongtao.liu --- Created attachment 48570 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48570=edit 0001-Add-missing-vector-truncmn2-expanders-PR92658.patch Seems there're only truncmn2 for truncate, not expander for

[Bug c/95141] [8/9/10 Regression] Incorrect integer overflow warning message for bitand expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0 Summary|[8/9/10/11

[Bug c/32643] [8/9/10 Regression] Wrong error message with unsigned char a = uchar&512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] Wrong

[Bug c/32643] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Wrong error message with unsigned char a = uchar&512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|11.0| Summary|[8/9/10

[Bug c/95141] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Incorrect integer overflow warning message for bitand expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95141 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a88caf21a0a85129f6c985ca13ba3eb54ff5366 commit r11-509-g4a88caf21a0a85129f6c985ca13ba3eb54ff5366 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/90811] [nvptx] ptxas error on OpenMP offloaded code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90811 --- Comment #23 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfa4fcdba374ed44d4aa1a22b2738f3f5c5b37af commit r11-508-gdfa4fcdba374ed44d4aa1a22b2738f3f5c5b37af Author: Kito Cheng Date: Tue Apr

[Bug tree-optimization/95199] Remove extra variable created for memory reference in loop vectorization.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95199 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Btw, there's already vinfo->ivexpr_map to aid simplifying the IL to a point where IVOPTs can eliminate redundant IVs. Eliminating them in the vectorizer is more complicated because of all the code for the

[Bug c++/95226] Faulty aggregate initialization of vector with struct with float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95226 --- Comment #1 from Frantisek Boranek --- Luckily, the behaviour is the same on old stable Stretch as on Buster. So this version is also affected, but it is probably not serious as was my first impression. gcc (Debian 6.3.0-18+deb9u1) 6.3.0

[Bug lto/95224] -flto -save-temps uses very unusual name for resolution file, looks arbitrary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95224 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/95222] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.1 x86 issue with function pointers with calling convention attribute and template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC 10.1 x86 issue with |[10/11 Regression] GCC 10.1

[Bug target/95219] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/x86_64/costmodel-pr30843.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95219 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Coalesce list: (4)ivtmp.15_4 & (22)ivtmp.15_22 [map: 2, 9] : Success -> 2 Coalesce list: (1)vect_vec_iv_.7_1 & (19)_19 [map: 0, 7] : Success -> 0 Coalesce list: (17)_17 & (18)vect_vec_iv_.8_18 [map: 5, 6] :

[Bug target/95219] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/x86_64/costmodel-pr30843.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95219 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/95218] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fma_run_double_1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95218 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-20 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libfortran/95177] error: array subscript has type char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177 --- Comment #10 from Roland Illig --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > That could work. I'm still trying to understand how an > option names -Werror=char-subscripts could trigger an > error. There are no subscripts. The C standard

<    1   2