https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318
--- Comment #1 from Brett Neumeier ---
Created attachment 48594
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48594=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95321
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I don't think this is valid:
> BY the time operator delete gets called the deconstructor is called and
> therefor the object no longer exists therefor:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
@egallager: Why did you add 'deferred' keyword? I sent a patch for it to GCC
patches mailing list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The assembler code works for me with binutils 2.33.1. So again which version
of binutils are you using for the cross compiler?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95211
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> This testcase is fixed by [1]
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546408.html
Interesting. I've done quite a bit of cooperlake specific
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95323
Bug ID: 95323
Summary: ice in compute_live_loop_exits, at
tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:247
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318
--- Comment #6 from Brett Neumeier ---
The host binutils (used to compile the cross-toolchain):
$ as --version
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.34.0.20200507
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70053
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I see no conversion there?
But, why does it it store to memory at all?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95317
Bug ID: 95317
Summary: [7 regression] ICE on valid C++14 code, in
tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:15649
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95320
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95321
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I think it is related to the fixes that was done for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 which was fixed in 2.34.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95089
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95252
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8 Regression] by-ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95323
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 48599
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48599=edit
Fortran header file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95089
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-05-25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95089
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch submmitted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-May/054385.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318
Brett Neumeier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0296697cf9893dc9509cdcd8e3fd4ba9fe422527
commit r9-8623-g0296697cf9893dc9509cdcd8e3fd4ba9fe422527
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90479
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e153e0ef3a35c2c72e8bf89bd905fe27f8877852
commit r9-8622-ge153e0ef3a35c2c72e8bf89bd905fe27f8877852
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93822
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91664c43c0acf56fd86643530e4b0be78a06446c
commit r9-8620-g91664c43c0acf56fd86643530e4b0be78a06446c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91529
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f76202e096fc0be4db21761399b55f10cd09b20d
commit r9-8621-gf76202e096fc0be4db21761399b55f10cd09b20d
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93822
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95306
--- Comment #1 from bouanto at zoho dot com ---
A similar error happens for the builtin "memcpy":
error: unimplemented primitive type for builtin: 38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95323
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> local.f90:3: Error: Can't open included file 'SIZES'
>
> Please include everything needed to reproduce.
Done.
> Are you sure this is a fortran bug, rather than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95323
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Brett Neumeier from comment #9)
> Confirmed, the issue does not occur with 2.33.1. Thank you for your
> attention and help!
Please CC me on the binutils bug (just so I can keep track of it).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91529
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09831707ce65606f951c97632d882f083ad3ed02
commit r8-10273-g09831707ce65606f951c97632d882f083ad3ed02
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93822
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:487f16a7f2a6f849497a0d2f8fff61225e2270f6
commit r8-10272-g487f16a7f2a6f849497a0d2f8fff61225e2270f6
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90749
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc721725161c6ee3813870a734c0b0c18429a922
commit r8-10274-gbc721725161c6ee3813870a734c0b0c18429a922
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95325
Bug ID: 95325
Summary: Support 128-bit integers
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Brett Neumeier from comment #6)
> I can try again with 2.33.1 and see if I get different results, if that
> would help?
If it works with 2.33.1, can you report this directly to binutils:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91529
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90749
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95324
Bug ID: 95324
Summary: Segmentation fault when using variadic lambda template
in concept definition
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95323
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90212
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa613a81831bdc044840a95a7a7803a235608503
commit r10-8183-gaa613a81831bdc044840a95a7a7803a235608503
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91529
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01ff88c5619897198117b1a460d48774cfcdf396
commit r10-8181-g01ff88c5619897198117b1a460d48774cfcdf396
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93822
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4cee81365ad32ef947f500e4cf4b3514d88236c9
commit r10-8180-g4cee81365ad32ef947f500e4cf4b3514d88236c9
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90479
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c79e664b153bd4cfdeec77b495d595e50b97c752
commit r10-8182-gc79e664b153bd4cfdeec77b495d595e50b97c752
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95211
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d0dc47de6ed9609fe7445ea0941a6a822c80f88
commit r11-621-g9d0dc47de6ed9609fe7445ea0941a6a822c80f88
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95256
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d0dc47de6ed9609fe7445ea0941a6a822c80f88
commit r11-621-g9d0dc47de6ed9609fe7445ea0941a6a822c80f88
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95326
Bug ID: 95326
Summary: UBsan can not detect signed-integer-overflow correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95326
Haoxin Tu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.0|10.0
--- Comment #1 from Haoxin Tu ---
I
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo