[Bug gcov-profile/95332] gcov-tool merge："not a gcov data file"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška

[Bug gcov-profile/95332] gcov-tool merge："not a gcov data file"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332 --- Comment #7 from John Dong --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > Fixed on master, do you want to backport the patch to active branches? yes, please backport to active branches. thanks.

[Bug web/95380] New: ipcp-unit-growth was renamed to ipa-cp-unit-growth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95380 Bug ID: 95380 Summary: ipcp-unit-growth was renamed to ipa-cp-unit-growth Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug gcov-profile/95332] gcov-tool merge："not a gcov data file"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95332 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:17d1594bfe08f3c768e024b180816cbe37ac08ac commit r11-679-g17d1594bfe08f3c768e024b180816cbe37ac08ac Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug c++/91304] maybe_unused attribute ignored on variable declared in if declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91304 fsmoke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fsmoke at mail dot ru --- Comment #6 from

[Bug testsuite/95363] [11 regression] bb-slp-pr95271.c fails on arm since gc0e27f72358794692e367363940c6383e9ad1e45

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95363 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |testsuite

[Bug lto/95376] [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/pr92088-1.c after r11-611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95376 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 CC|

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e2c7f9a29c212db4bf428799a2d62f79f392511 commit r10-8196-g4e2c7f9a29c212db4bf428799a2d62f79f392511 Author: Mark

[Bug testsuite/95363] [11 regression] bb-slp-pr95271.c fails on arm since gc0e27f72358794692e367363940c6383e9ad1e45

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95363 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/95363] [11 regression] bb-slp-pr95271.c fails on arm since gc0e27f72358794692e367363940c6383e9ad1e45

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95363 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07d77cc23953335c3539e2a86fc4a052d9845524 commit r11-680-g07d77cc23953335c3539e2a86fc4a052d9845524 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug lto/95376] [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/pr92088-1.c after r11-611

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95376 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/95380] ipcp-unit-growth was renamed to ipa-cp-unit-growth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95380 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/91304] maybe_unused attribute ignored on variable declared in if declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91304 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to fsmoke from comment #6) > I am sorry..I am new in gcc bugzilla. But.. i have gcc 9.3 and this issue > still takes a place. Because it's fixed in GCC 10.1

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug web/95380] ipcp-unit-growth was renamed to ipa-cp-unit-growth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95380 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/95273] [11 regression] many ICEs after r11-564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95273 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09df85393ce5501a28359d159670fd05c4d70abf commit r11-687-g09df85393ce5501a28359d159670fd05c4d70abf Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug lto/95362] [11 regression] pr34457-1.c and pr92088-1.c fail on arm and aarch64 since g:a746f952abb78af9db28a7f3bce442e113877c9c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95362 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug libfortran/95104] [9/10 Regression] Segfault on a legal WAIT statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/95090] ICE: identifier overflow: 129

#4 from Manfred Schwarb --- This breaks for me in i686, see http://gfortran.meteodat.ch/download/i686/nightlies/gcc-trunk-20200528-gfe7ebef7fe4f9acb79658ed9db0749b07efc3105-README.txt See also HJ's test in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2020-May/562121.html x86_64 seems is OK. Error

[Bug web/95380] ipcp-unit-growth was renamed to ipa-cp-unit-growth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95380 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48e872db11b27604f4993f9be8f67f40b1a40468 commit r11-684-g48e872db11b27604f4993f9be8f67f40b1a40468 Author: Martin Liska Date: Thu

[Bug web/95380] ipcp-unit-growth was renamed to ipa-cp-unit-growth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95380 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3) > Fixed for master, not planning to backport that. Why not? Are any of the parameters only in GCC 11? Should I prepare a special GCC 10 patch just to address the

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83b84b6ef84ffc0ca25aef5c91720d8f82212a5c commit r8-10280-g83b84b6ef84ffc0ca25aef5c91720d8f82212a5c Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug fortran/32834] [Meta-bug] 'Fortran 95'-only failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834 Bug 32834 depends on bug 50392, which changed state. Bug 50392 Summary: SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/95370] [11 Regression] ICE in execute, at adjust-alignment.c:74 since r11-508-gdfa4fcdba374ed44

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95370 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/95371] [10/11 Regression] ICE concepts with template template parameter since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95371 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2

[Bug target/95237] LOCAL_DECL_ALIGNMENT shrinks alignment, FAIL gcc.target/i386/pr69454-2.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/91304] maybe_unused attribute ignored on variable declared in if declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91304 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug fortran/95373] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in build_reference_type, at tree.c:7942

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95373 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c575cd2e0089cf2fcb11ffb7899e5fd472b3780c commit r9-8631-gc575cd2e0089cf2fcb11ffb7899e5fd472b3780c Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug fortran/95366] [10/11 Regression] TYPE IS(character(*)) no longer matches since r10-3605-gf61e54e59cda5a2e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95366 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2 Priority|P3

[Bug gcov-profile/95365] [11 Regression] Broken gcov since r11-627-g1dedc12d186a1108

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95365 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/95222] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.1 x86 issue with function pointers with calling convention attribute and template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95222 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95090] ICE: identifier overflow: 129

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090 --- Comment #5 from Manfred Schwarb --- gdb shows: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xf7aa5162 in __strlen_sse2_bsf () from /lib/libc.so.6 #0 0xf7aa5162 in __strlen_sse2_bsf () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x083e6def in

[Bug c++/95345] Fold expressions don't work properly when pack expression has co_await

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95345 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug tree-optimization/95356] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:3635 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95356 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09df85393ce5501a28359d159670fd05c4d70abf commit r11-687-g09df85393ce5501a28359d159670fd05c4d70abf Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c++/95311] [11 Regression] ICE in cp_ubsan_maybe_instrument_member_call at gcc/cp/cp-ubsan.c:136 since r11-578-g72af65b91cc2a2eb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95311 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/95361] Segfault when generating an epilogue for a partly-shrinked-wrapped SVE frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95361 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ccbfffb0fb614f09cf2b7b70f152d6e489cfd17 commit r11-691-g1ccbfffb0fb614f09cf2b7b70f152d6e489cfd17 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug tree-optimization/95356] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:3635 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95356 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/95356] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:3635 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95356 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Reopening as the following is ICEing: $ gcc /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr95356.c -c -O3 -mavx512dq during GIMPLE pass: slp

[Bug tree-optimization/95356] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_get_constant_vectors, at tree-vect-slp.c:3635 since r11-564-g79f0451c67e8ed56

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95356 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- OK, so vectorizable_shift doing else if (dt[1] == vect_constant_def) { /* Convert the scalar constant shift amounts in-place. */ slp_tree

[Bug tree-optimization/95273] [11 regression] many ICEs after r11-564

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95273 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/95380] ipcp-unit-growth was renamed to ipa-cp-unit-growth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95380 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:26a42e9df9689765831f018eb14f1ae885212335 commit r10-8197-g26a42e9df9689765831f018eb14f1ae885212335 Author: Martin Liska

[Bug target/95381] New: [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 Bug ID: 95381 Summary: [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 URL:

[Bug target/95355] [11 Regression] Assembler messages: Error: operand size mismatch for `vpmovzxbd' with -masm=intel since r11-485-gf6e40195ec3d3b402a5f6c58dbf359479bc4cbfa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95355 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31d827e98ab32060ef522fa5f3e42c1175e1a439 commit r10-8198-g31d827e98ab32060ef522fa5f3e42c1175e1a439 Author: Uros Bizjak

[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3ea6977d0f1813d982743a09660eec1760e981ec commit r11-693-g3ea6977d0f1813d982743a09660eec1760e981ec Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug fortran/50392] SIGSEGV in gfc_trans_label_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50392 --- Comment #23 from Vittorio Zecca --- The update proposed in comment #18 fixed the issue. Thank you!

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 --- Comment #35 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a patch series that deals with this issue, including proper adjustments to debug info, on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/546702.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/95382] New: [haifa-sched][DO_PREDICATION] execution test: wrong scheduling result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95382 Bug ID: 95382 Summary: [haifa-sched][DO_PREDICATION] execution test: wrong scheduling result. Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/95113] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95113 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3) > > Indeed, -fno-ipa-sra fixes it. So, a duplicate of PR93385? Similar, but not quite the same. I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:

[Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug debug/95343] IPA-SRA can result in wrong debug info about removed function arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95343 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a patch series on the mailing list to address PR 93385 and the last patch in it also addresses this issue and allows gdb to print the correct value of the removed parameter:

[Bug tree-optimization/88398] vectorization failure for a small loop to do byte comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398 --- Comment #34 from Wilco --- (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #33) > It would be relatively easy if the target supports unaligned access. like > read64ne in > https://git.tukaani.org/?p=xz.git;a=blob;f=src/liblzma/common/memcmplen.h >

[Bug target/95381] [11 Regression]: Bootstrap on m68k fails with ICE: in operator[], at vec.h:867

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381 --- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > can we have a backtrace? Working on it.

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/95385] GCC stop detect UBs after a divide by zero in for statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95385 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-05-28

[Bug c++/95383] New: Poor codegen when constructing a trivial Optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95383 Bug ID: 95383 Summary: Poor codegen when constructing a trivial Optional Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/95348] GCC records zero functions and modules in the profiling data file, ICC does NOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95348 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to qinzhao from comment #5) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)> > > Can you please share some statistics how big are the files and how many > > runs do you merge? > > There were on

[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e211b3da3899b3496add56ba45acb07569e7c15a commit r9-8632-ge211b3da3899b3496add56ba45acb07569e7c15a Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #6 from Asher Gordon --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5) > Since this warning is intended to work like sparse, introducing > a divergence here would seem to make the feature less useful, > in fact subverting the point of

[Bug c++/95181] [10/11 Regression] ICE in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:241 since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95181 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/95391] New: [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/vshift-5.c since r11-689

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95391 Bug ID: 95391 Summary: [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/vshift-5.c since r11-689 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/95353] [10/11 Regression] GCC can't build binutils

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95353 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- I test my warning changes with binutils and --enable-targets=all. But that apparently doesn't compile all source files, and I don't have a cross-build setup in place (or the resources to do it). If someone

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Asher Gordon from comment #6) > (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #5) > > Since this warning is intended to work like sparse, introducing > > a divergence here would seem to make the feature

[Bug libfortran/95390] _gfortran_{,m,s}findloc[01]_c10 not exported from libgfortran.so.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95390 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libfortran/95390] New: _gfortran_{,m,s}findloc[01]_c10 not exported from libgfortran.so.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95390 Bug ID: 95390 Summary: _gfortran_{,m,s}findloc[01]_c10 not exported from libgfortran.so.5 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/95090] ICE: identifier overflow: 129

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manfred Schwarb from comment #5) > gdb shows: > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0xf7aa5162 in __strlen_sse2_bsf () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #0 0xf7aa5162 in

[Bug debug/95387] New: inconsistent behaviors at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95387 Bug ID: 95387 Summary: inconsistent behaviors at -Os Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug c++/95388] New: C++20 & 17 Lambda capture of *this by Value causes ICE "in tsubst_decl at cp/pt.c"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95388 Bug ID: 95388 Summary: C++20 & 17 Lambda capture of *this by Value causes ICE "in tsubst_decl at cp/pt.c" Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/92652] function call to lambda expression that return true does not satisfy the constraint in requires-clause if using return type deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92652 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/93698] ICE on concept using generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93698 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2fe2ad8d379297dcf571b2b9c46200c5ae5391f commit r10-8200-gf2fe2ad8d379297dcf571b2b9c46200c5ae5391f Author: Mark

[Bug c++/94128] ICE on C++20 "requires requires" with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94128 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/95386] New: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 Bug ID: 95386 Summary: internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95386] internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 --- Comment #2 from Jiří Paleček --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Was the original code a valid code? > It seems the reduced code is invalid. Yes at least I believe so. I will attach the original code, it is not big. Note that

[Bug c++/95386] internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 --- Comment #3 from Jiří Paleček --- Created attachment 48629 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48629=edit Original code which fails to compile

[Bug target/95285] AArch64:aarch64 medium code model proposal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95285 --- Comment #15 from Wilco --- (In reply to Bu Le from comment #14) > > > Anyway, my point is that the size of single data does't affact the fact > > > that > > > medium code model is missing in aarch64 and aarch64 is lack of PIC large > > >

[Bug c++/95324] Segmentation fault when using variadic lambda template in concept definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95324 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/93698] ICE on concept using generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93698 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ivan.pogrebnyak at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/95384] Poor codegen cause by using base class instead of member for Optional construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384 --- Comment #1 from Barry Revzin --- Here's a simpler example: https://godbolt.org/z/FD7uEQ If the engaged member is an int instead of a bool (to remove the tail padding), gcc generates better code. This follows up on "PR 95383"

[Bug go/95389] New: Kubernetes build fails because of mangled PkgPath

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95389 Bug ID: 95389 Summary: Kubernetes build fails because of mangled PkgPath Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/95256] [11 Regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:278 since r11-263-g7c355156aa20eaec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95256 --- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha --- Is there some further work pending, or should this PR be closed now?

[Bug target/95211] [11 Regression] ICE in emit_unop_insn, at optabs.c:3622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95211 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- Is there some further work pending, or should this PR be closed now?

[Bug c++/95384] New: Poor codegen cause by using base class instead of member for Optional construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384 Bug ID: 95384 Summary: Poor codegen cause by using base class instead of member for Optional construction Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/95385] New: GCC stop detect UBs after a divide by zero in for statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95385 Bug ID: 95385 Summary: GCC stop detect UBs after a divide by zero in for statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/80361] [5/6/7/8 Regression] [OOP] bogus recursive call to nonrecursive procedure with -fcheck=recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80361 Antoine Lemoine changed: What|Removed |Added CC||antoine.lemoine@bordeaux-in

[Bug c++/95386] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c/95379] Don't warn about the universal zero initializer for a structure with the 'designated_init' attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95379 --- Comment #8 from Asher Gordon --- (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #7) > The feature was added specifically to mimic what sparse does. > If sparse changes, I think changing gcc would be appropriate. I just report a bug to Sparse here:

[Bug libstdc++/95392] New: Build failure on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95392 Bug ID: 95392 Summary: Build failure on MinGW Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug tree-optimization/95393] New: Failure to optimize loop condition arithmetic for mismatched types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95393 Bug ID: 95393 Summary: Failure to optimize loop condition arithmetic for mismatched types Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95368] gcc things that a lambda capture is both const and mutable

++ (GCC) 10.1.1 20200507 (Red Hat 10.1.1-1): Rejects it: test.cc:17:14: error: passing ‘const foo’ as ‘this’ argument discards qualifiers [-fpermissive] * gcc (GCC) 9.3.1 20200528 Rejects it: test.cc:17:14: error: passing ‘const foo’ as ‘this’ argument discards qualifiers

[Bug libfortran/95390] _gfortran_{,m,s}findloc[01]_c10 not exported from libgfortran.so.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95390 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48630 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48630=edit gcc11-pr95390.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/95386] internal compiler error: in satisfaction_value, while compiling function with a requires clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95386 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug fortran/94397] [9/10/11 Regression] the compiler consider "type is( real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94397 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/95394] New: [11 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3814

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95394 Bug ID: 95394 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3814 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/95392] [11 Regression] Build failure on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95392 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/95090] ICE: identifier overflow: 129

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95090 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug c++/94926] [9/10/11 regression] invalid use of incomplete type not recogniced for static self reference of templated struct since r9-297-g683be2f77b3ce4db

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94926 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7b599b9f9a1e036ff75a4daa06ac7036c6ebbe01 commit r11-703-g7b599b9f9a1e036ff75a4daa06ac7036c6ebbe01 Author: Jason Merrill Date:

[Bug libfortran/95104] [9/10 Regression] Segfault on a legal WAIT statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95104 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e1396ee72e68cc8fba99ce986f2910cd39e335b8 commit r10-8202-ge1396ee72e68cc8fba99ce986f2910cd39e335b8 Author: Harald Anlauf

  1   2   >