[Bug tree-optimization/95570] New: ICE: Segmentation fault in vect_loop_versioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95570 Bug ID: 95570 Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault in vect_loop_versioning Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/94743] IRQ handler doesn't save scratch VFP registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94743 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:635408da1eb1d441ef4d59fe00a038c920e51085 commit r11-1062-g635408da1eb1d441ef4d59fe00a038c920e51085 Author: Christophe Lyon

[Bug lto/95572] New: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_input_tree_ref, at lto-streamer-in.c:370

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95572 Bug ID: 95572 Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_input_tree_ref, at lto-streamer-in.c:370 Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/95571] xtensa stack unwinding doesn't work well with asynchronous register spilling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95571 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48699|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug d/95573] New: [11 regression] gdc.test/runnable/lazy.d UNRESOLVED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95573 Bug ID: 95573 Summary: [11 regression] gdc.test/runnable/lazy.d UNRESOLVED Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/95548] ice in tree_to_shwi, at tree.c:7321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95548 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:296d644b9f526e44fbe574426f24799c1d545fd3 commit r11-1064-g296d644b9f526e44fbe574426f24799c1d545fd3 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/95571] New: xtensa stack unwinding doesn't work well with asynchronous register spilling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95571 Bug ID: 95571 Summary: xtensa stack unwinding doesn't work well with asynchronous register spilling Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug d/95573] [11 regression] gdc.test/runnable/lazy.d UNRESOLVED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95573 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug tree-optimization/95569] ICE in tmmark：verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95569 --- Comment #2 from Qian Chao --- Bootstrap and tested on aarch64 platform. No new regression witnessed.

[Bug tree-optimization/95569] ICE in tmmark：verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95569 --- Comment #1 from Qian Chao --- Bootstrap and tested on aarch64 platform. No new regression witnessed.

[Bug target/95571] xtensa stack unwinding doesn't work well with asynchronous register spilling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95571 --- Comment #1 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 48699 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48699=edit minimal reproducer Reproducer spills active register windows in a substitute memcpy as could be done by

[Bug lto/95548] ice in tree_to_shwi, at tree.c:7321

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95548 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/95553] Incorrect/misspelled designators not triggering compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95553 Sergei Murzin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergey at murzin dot pw --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/95050] coroutine: no "mandatory copy elision" for prvalue await_resume expression.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95050 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/92929] OpenACC/OpenMP 'target' 'exit data'/'update' optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92929 --- Comment #7 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org --- Test case & further discussion in: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/547424.html

[Bug middle-end/95528] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3814

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95528 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 Regression] internal |[10 Regression] internal

[Bug fortran/92993] [8/9 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_comparison_1, at fold-const.c:8845

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92993 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4f719b4e1f14016dfc777227e42bd1080245248 commit r10-8263-ge4f719b4e1f14016dfc777227e42bd1080245248 Author: Mark Eggleston

[Bug jit/87291] Add support for inline asm to libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87291 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #48694|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/95580] [11 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_any_location_wrapper at gcc/tree.h:4011 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95580 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Known to work|

[Bug gcov-profile/95494] [11 regression] Several -fprofile-use tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #4) > > --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- > > Is there a compile farm machine I can test it on? > > Sure: gcc211 should do the trick. Thanks.

[Bug gcov-profile/93623] No need to dump gcdas when forking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93623 --- Comment #12 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to calixte from comment #11) > Why did you remove __gcov_flush ? It is not a supported __gcov_* library call: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov-and-Optimization.html You should rather call

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/95581] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3260 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/95577] New: Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577 Bug ID: 95577 Summary: Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/95572] lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_input_tree_ref, at lto-streamer-in.c:370

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95572 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/95579] internal compiler error: in sign_mask, at wide-int.h:855

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95579 --- Comment #1 from Nikolay Mihaylov --- Code compiles on 9.x

[Bug jit/87291] Add support for inline asm to libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87291 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug jit/87291] Add support for inline asm to libgccjit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87291 --- Comment #32 from Antoni --- Thanks; that looks really nice. The function gcc_jit_context_add_top_level_asm might be missing a location parameter. (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #31) > Created attachment 48704 [details] > v4 of

[Bug gcov-profile/95494] [11 regression] Several -fprofile-use tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #4) >> > --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- >> > Is there a compile farm machine I

[Bug testsuite/95577] Tcl error with testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95577 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug bootstrap/95555] [11 regression] bootstrap build failure starting with r11-959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1057cc0a8ad972e0a2218ab74038a56e5514c39 commit r11-1067-gc1057cc0a8ad972e0a2218ab74038a56e5514c39 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Mon

[Bug c++/95578] New: std::ranges::copy and std::views::take_while don't want to play together

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95578 Bug ID: 95578 Summary: std::ranges::copy and std::views::take_while don't want to play together Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/95579] New: internal compiler error: in sign_mask, at wide-int.h:855

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95579 Bug ID: 95579 Summary: internal compiler error: in sign_mask, at wide-int.h:855 Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/95580] New: [11 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_any_location_wrapper at gcc/tree.h:4011 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95580 Bug ID: 95580 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_any_location_wrapper at gcc/tree.h:4011 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f34 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/95581] New: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3260 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581 Bug ID: 95581 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3260 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug middle-end/95528] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3814

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95528 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8be374e02761c9d63d2753d71e4bd4874a1577b1 commit r11-1065-g8be374e02761c9d63d2753d71e4bd4874a1577b1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug debug/95574] New: line table entry in sequence with address after sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95574 Bug ID: 95574 Summary: line table entry in sequence with address after sequence Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug d/95575] New: [10/11 regression] gdc.test testnames lost gdc.test prefix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95575 Bug ID: 95575 Summary: [10/11 regression] gdc.test testnames lost gdc.test prefix Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/92993] [8/9 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_comparison_1, at fold-const.c:8845

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92993 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5dc3986103d8908c802e940dea8f2def3a6989c2 commit r11-1066-g5dc3986103d8908c802e940dea8f2def3a6989c2 Author: Mark Eggleston Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/88398] vectorization failure for a small loop to do byte comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88398 --- Comment #40 from Wilco --- (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #39) > I’m thinking to draft a patch for this optimization. If any suggestions, > please point out, thanks. Which optimization to be precise? Besides unrolling I haven't seen

[Bug debug/95574] line table entry in sequence with address after sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95574 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 48702 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48702=edit _absvsi2_s.c To reproduce: ... $ gcc -O2 -g -fpic -mlong-double-80 -fcf-protection -mshstk -fbuilding-libgcc

[Bug d/95575] [10/11 regression] gdc.test testnames lost gdc.test prefix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95575 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.2

[Bug c/93432] variable is used uninitialized, but gcc shows no warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93432 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/95576] New: [11 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O3 -fno-tree-forwprop -fvect-cost-model=unlimited

xx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r11-1029-20200608001623-g53d461e4e0f-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 11.0.0 20200608 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug middle-end/95551] [OpenMP, OpenACC] -fopenmp/-fopenacc also with -foffload=disable fails with: (.gnu.offload_vars+0x0): undefined reference to `A.10.2'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95551 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- See RFC patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/547500.html → Don't add read-only artificial variables to the offload table (no need to) And see experimental (but not working) patch

[Bug c++/67901] [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug fortran/93026] gfortran.dg/goacc/finalize-1.f – FAILs since r279626

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93026 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/95574] line table entry in sequence with address after sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95574 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug --- Comment #1 from Tom de

[Bug debug/95574] line table entry in sequence with address after sequence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95574 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Gdb currently silently ignores the offending entry. I've filed a gdb PR, PR26092 - "Complain about contradictory DW_LNE_end_sequence marker" to complain about this (

[Bug debug/95576] [11 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O3 -fno-tree-forwprop -fvect-cost-model=unlimited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95576 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug debug/95576] [11 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O3 -fno-tree-forwprop -fvect-cost-model=unlimited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95576 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- The important difference in *.slp2 dumps is: @@ -188,14 +201,17 @@ T::~T (struct T * const this) _15 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR( [(void *)&_ZTV1T + 16B]); _14 = {_15}; vect_cst__13 = _14; - vectp.24_16 =

[Bug fortran/92993] [8/9 Regression] ICE in maybe_canonicalize_comparison_1, at fold-const.c:8845

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92993 markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markeggleston at gcc

[Bug c/95580] [11 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_any_location_wrapper at gcc/tree.h:4011 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95580 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/86577] non-ADL name lookup for operator<< at instantiation time?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86577 Lénárd Szolnoki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leni536 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/95270] OpenACC 'enter data attach' looks up target memory object displaced by pointer size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95270 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jules at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libfortran/95195] gfortran poorly handles a program error of writing a namelist to an unformatted file.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95195 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cd239614e43c9dcc0838845aec504e5eb938dbd commit r11-1068-g8cd239614e43c9dcc0838845aec504e5eb938dbd Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/95091] ICE in gfc_hash_value, at fortran/class.c:538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95091 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8cd239614e43c9dcc0838845aec504e5eb938dbd commit r11-1068-g8cd239614e43c9dcc0838845aec504e5eb938dbd Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug middle-end/95270] OpenACC 'enter data attach' looks up target memory object displaced by pointer size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95270 --- Comment #2 from jules at gcc dot gnu.org --- TBH I've suspected problems with misuse of the bias for attach/detach before, but I've not come up with a test case. I'll have a look. Thanks!

[Bug c++/86577] non-ADL name lookup for operator<< at instantiation time?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86577 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Is this a dup of PR 51577 ?

[Bug c++/95589] New: missing warning initializing a reference with a dereferenced null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95589 Bug ID: 95589 Summary: missing warning initializing a reference with a dereferenced null Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/95581] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3260 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe --- BTW, this is a bootstrap break for powerpc-darwin9, it fires when building libgfortran (OK it's an 'all languages' bootstrap break).

[Bug tree-optimization/95527] Failure to optimize __builtin_ffs == 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95527 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 48705 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48705=edit gcc11-pr95527.patch Untested fix for ffs. Haven't touched others. I think parity can't be optimized that way, for

[Bug middle-end/95583] New: [OpenMP] Offloading – Missed optimization / before LTO stream out, do more IPA optimizations affecting host←→target ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95583 Bug ID: 95583 Summary: [OpenMP] Offloading – Missed optimization / before LTO stream out, do more IPA optimizations affecting host←→target ABI Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/95113] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95113 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:127bf4228d0cb21f28fd5ed4dd820fa4760fc771 commit r10-8264-g127bf4228d0cb21f28fd5ed4dd820fa4760fc771 Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug fortran/95587] New: ICE in gfc_target_encode_expr, at fortran/target-memory.c:362

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95587 Bug ID: 95587 Summary: ICE in gfc_target_encode_expr, at fortran/target-memory.c:362 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/95494] [11 regression] Several -fprofile-use tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95494 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Martin

[Bug middle-end/77432] warn about null check after pointer dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77432 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug c++/95579] [10/11 Regression] internal compiler error: in sign_mask, at wide-int.h:855

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95579 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95113] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95113 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- Fixed. Thanks for reporting.

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 Bug 93385 depends on bug 95113, which changed state. Bug 95113 Summary: [10/11 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95113 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/95113] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code w/ -O2 -fexceptions -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95113 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/95586] New: ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95586 Bug ID: 95586 Summary: ICE in gfc_validate_kind, at fortran/trans-types.c:773 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/95588] New: No warning in -Wformat for narrowing formats

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95588 Bug ID: 95588 Summary: No warning in -Wformat for narrowing formats Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/86577] non-ADL name lookup for operator<< at instantiation time?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86577 --- Comment #3 from Lénárd Szolnoki --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Is this a dup of PR 51577 ? Yes, seems like it is.

[Bug bootstrap/95582] New: [11 Regression] LTO lean + PGO bootstrap is broken in Ada

CC) version 11.0.0 20200608 (experimental) (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) compiled by GNU C version 11.0.0 20200608 (experimental), GMP version 6.1.2, MPFR version 4.0.1, MPC version 1.1.0, isl version none GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 GNU GIMPLE (GCC) versi

[Bug testsuite/95416] Several gcc.misc-tests/outputs.exp tests FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95416 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/95579] [10 Regression] internal compiler error: in sign_mask, at wide-int.h:855

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95579 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Summary|[10/11

[Bug c++/94955] [10 Regression] ICE in to_wide

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94955 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nmmm at nmmm dot nu --- Comment #9 from

[Bug fortran/95584] New: ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1260

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95584 Bug ID: 95584 Summary: ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1260 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/95581] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3260 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- gimple_call_arg(stmt, 2) asserts for this GIMPLE_CALL statement: vect__5.6_24 = __builtin_altivec_mask_for_load (vectp_a.5_8); The call is made with just one argument but the type of the function is

[Bug c++/95589] missing warning initializing a reference with a dereferenced null

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95589 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/93467] [concepts] getting "type constraint differs in template redeclaration" error after friend declaration in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93467 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/95580] [11 Regression] ICE in tree_strip_any_location_wrapper at gcc/tree.h:4011 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95580 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95585] New: ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4751

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95585 Bug ID: 95585 Summary: ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4751 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/89788] trunk/liboffloadmic/runtime/emulator/coi_host.cpp:175]: (error) Null pointer dereference (missed -Wnull-dereference)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89788 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544 --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Submitted for review here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054499.html

[Bug d/95575] [10/11 regression] gdc.test testnames lost gdc.test prefix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95575 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw --- Ah, for some reason I thought that moving the dejagnu .exp scripts from top-level gdc.test to one per each subdirectory would remove the need for that. I'll revert that part of the change then.

[Bug gcov-profile/95365] [11 Regression] Broken gcov since r11-627-g1dedc12d186a1108

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95365 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug libstdc++/95592] Collision with struct _Cosh when Cross compiling libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95592 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Stallard --- Please forgive the fat fingers. gcc 7.5.0 on Ubuntu 18.04.4 is the host used to build the cross compiler. (In reply to Kevin Stallard from comment #1) > I should also add that this was build with gcc

[Bug d/95573] [11 regression] gdc.test/runnable/lazy.d UNRESOLVED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95573 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:02:48PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544 > > anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug fortran/95584] ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1260

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95584 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug lto/94848] [Offloading][LTO] error due to only partially eliminated var / -ftree-pre causes link errors | libgomp.fortran/use_device_ptr-optional-3.f90 failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94848 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c0fdaf79e3618fd7512608a2e5c62b6b306e9e8 commit r11-1075-g1c0fdaf79e3618fd7512608a2e5c62b6b306e9e8 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/95581] [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at gimple.h:3260 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f341eae566af27e18e528cd29a7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- I posted a patch to avoid the ICE but it's not clear to me that it's the right fix: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/547548.html

[Bug testsuite/95538] Unfinished cleanup in the test suite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95538 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva --- More likely we've just always missed these lto dump files: IIRC they used to be created in tmpdir, even during -save-temps builds.

[Bug fortran/95542] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.c:1649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95542 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/95592] New: Collision with struct _Cosh when Cross compiling libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95592 Bug ID: 95592 Summary: Collision with struct _Cosh when Cross compiling libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug d/95573] [11 regression] gdc.test/runnable/lazy.d UNRESOLVED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95573 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5fceefeee9a10cfba621d215f011a58badc246ad commit r11-1070-g5fceefeee9a10cfba621d215f011a58badc246ad Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Mon

[Bug middle-end/95551] [OpenMP, OpenACC] -fopenmp/-fopenacc also with -foffload=disable fails with: (.gnu.offload_vars+0x0): undefined reference to `A.10.2'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95551 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c0fdaf79e3618fd7512608a2e5c62b6b306e9e8 commit r11-1075-g1c0fdaf79e3618fd7512608a2e5c62b6b306e9e8 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug lto/95224] -flto -save-temps uses very unusual name for resolution file, looks arbitrary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95224 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >