https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Incoming RTL:
(note 5 1 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn 2 5 3 2 (set (reg:SI 86)
(reg:SI 5 di [ a ])) "t.c":3:1 -1
(nil))
(insn 3 2 4 2 (set (reg/v:HI 85 [ a ])
(subreg:HI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|10.2|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96001
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Szabolcs Nagy :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0f62fa0320762119446893c67cb52934bc5a05e
commit r11-1963-gf0f62fa0320762119446893c67cb52934bc5a05e
Author: Szabolcs Nagy
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94087
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94087
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbf9d358ae2104a09fc1b61e2b818928b6591831
commit r10-8448-gbbf9d358ae2104a09fc1b61e2b818928b6591831
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94936
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b19640035d2df46758c7d31e5aab1186518e514
commit r10-8449-g6b19640035d2df46758c7d31e5aab1186518e514
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95804
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bin Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd21b03900085c4d60bf03207ad28bcbfbc86a4b
commit r11-1968-gdd21b03900085c4d60bf03207ad28bcbfbc86a4b
Author: Bin Cheng
Date: Thu Jul 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95524
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95488
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96127
Bug ID: 96127
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96127
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-09
Ever confirmed|0
> I'm not sure if this is the right mailing list for asking about
No it's not, this list is for automated mails from our bug database.
> (possible) g++ issues. If not, I'd appreciate it if someone can point
> me to the right one.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html which tells you that gcc-help
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
Bug ID: 96130
Summary: 10.1.1: segfault during IPA pass: fnsummary
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94080
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95683
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:01b774ff3adcae0e72548f050795c1cf6bf5b8fe
commit r10-8445-g01b774ff3adcae0e72548f050795c1cf6bf5b8fe
Author: Kito Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96129
Bug ID: 96129
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-alias-check.c etc.
FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96129
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
The ABI specifies 'a' is appropriately extended to %rdi IIRC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95581
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78288
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 48848
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48848=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95989
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13)
> I'm testing this:
>
> diff --git a/libgcc/gthr-posix.h b/libgcc/gthr-posix.h
> index 965247602ac..0af84a781e5 100644
> --- a/libgcc/gthr-posix.h
> +++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to François Dumont from comment #1)
> I'll check if we can be smarter here. A nice improvement would be to change
> std::hash operator signature to:
>
> size_t
> operator()(const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94087
--- Comment #25 from Avi Kivity ---
Requesting a backport to gcc 10. We're hitting this even when not called in a
loop.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
For recent gcc trunk, with this C++ source code:
template class a;
template class c {
a e;
void operator=(c d) { e = d; }
};
does this:
$ /home/dcb/gcc/results.20200709/bin/g++ -c -w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Simple case:
cat test.c:
int f(unsigned short a)
{
return a * 101;
}
gcc:
f(unsigned short):
movzwl %di, %eax
imull $101, %eax, %eax
ret
llvm:
f(unsigned short): # @f(unsigned short)
imull $101,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96128
Bug ID: 96128
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in do_store_flag, at expr.c:12247
since
r11-1445-g502d63b6d6141597bb18fd23c87736a1b384cf8f
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And in the LLVM bugs you'll find their unwillingness to change, we've been
doing it forever, let's convince psABI authors to change the psABI.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78288
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
As update with todays trunk 96b7f495f9269d5448822e4fc28882 I see for
not bootstrapped build of asan_interceptors.cc on x86_64 with -fno-checking:
callgraph ipa passes : 1.24 ( 11%) 0.11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96108
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Bisection says this changed with
r10-2587-gcc19f80ceb27cc3d31d259ebecaad12005acfd7e
The change was in forwprop1, instead of what we used to do:
_5 = a_4(D);
... = _5->b;
...
_5->b = ...;
we now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> The ABI specifies 'a' is appropriately extended to %rdi IIRC
I don't think so.
This is one of the things where GCC and LLVM use different ABI:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
jojo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjiejie at me dot com
--- Comment #35 from jojo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #36 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to jojo from comment #35)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #30)
> > A possible solution can be usage of '-flinker-output=nolto-rel -r' for huge
> > files.
>
> it's useful for splitting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Or use unordered_map, equal_to<>> which
> should perform better.
Good idea.
> We haven't implemented http://wg21.link/p0919r3 and http://wg21.link/p1690r1
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Shouldn't **a** be extended to int first?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96129
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 48846
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48846=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 vect-live-5.c.163t.vect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96131
Bug ID: 96131
Summary: ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2435
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r10-3199-g351e7c3b5fbd45bd, leaving to Feng.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96131
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-09
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96132
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159
--- Comment #5 from Toni Neubert ---
I don't think this one is valid.
But the code inside the duplicated issue could be valid:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96123
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96128
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
Bug ID: 96133
Summary: x86-64 gcc 10.1 using -O3 leads to wrong calculation
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95159
--- Comment #4 from Toni Neubert ---
I don't think this one is valid.
But the code inside the duplicated issue could be valid:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96123
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96130
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96134
Bug ID: 96134
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_uint64, at
tree.c:2985 since r11-1801-g9e5508c2d006f2d4
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96134
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
--- Comment #8 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Well, I don't mind that the ABI may be different from LLVM, but for me the bug
was also about the fact that the code uses k registers when I'd assume they
might impact performance/code size somewhat what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96132
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96128
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Just trace make_ssa_name ...
So this one is leftover from gimplify.c where we expand the first argument to
assignment to a SSA NAME and so we end up only with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.2
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:38250e577e26de7aace65b4d32a94a1404f076a9
commit r10-8450-g38250e577e26de7aace65b4d32a94a1404f076a9
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95963
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96135
Bug ID: 96135
Summary: [9/10/11 regression] bswap not detected by bswap pass,
unexpected results between optimization levels
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #37 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #36)
> (In reply to jojo from comment #35)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #30)
> > > A possible solution can be usage of '-flinker-output=nolto-rel -r'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 95804, which changed state.
Bug 95804 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in generate_code_for_partition, at
tree-loop-distribution.c:1323 since r11-1565-g2c0069fafb53ccb7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95804
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95638
Bug 95638 depends on bug 95804, which changed state.
Bug 95804 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in generate_code_for_partition, at
tree-loop-distribution.c:1323 since r11-1565-g2c0069fafb53ccb7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95804
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95804
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||95638
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. The i == 1 lane is different. We're using standard interleaving
vectorization here, the innermost two loops are unrolled and rgb_cam is elided.
Note eventually we optimize the whole loop at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Interestingly it works for int[4] but fails for int[2].
typedef int T;
static const T a[2][3] = { { 1, 2, 3 }, { 4, 5, 6 } };
typedef T v2 __attribute__((vector_size(2*sizeof(T;
int
main()
{
const T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96128
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96128
>
> --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89962
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95766
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 48849
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48849=edit
gcc11-pr95766.patch
For that, we could use something like this (even though:
FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78288
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> Created attachment 48848 [details]
> patch
statistics show it's not always a win for the overall number of processed
blocks. stage3 of a GCC boostrap for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95638
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88713
--- Comment #59 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fab263ab0fc10ea08409b80afa7e8569438b8d28
commit r11-1970-gfab263ab0fc10ea08409b80afa7e8569438b8d28
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Jan 23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96136
Bug ID: 96136
Summary: [11 regression] ICE in reduce_to_bit_field_precision
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96137
Bug ID: 96137
Summary: [11 Regression] GCC hang on in invalid function
definition
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96137
--- Comment #1 from Haoxin Tu ---
Also, I want to know are those cases (invalid code but makes GCC hang on) worth
reporting? If those cases can help improve the GCC FE or its performance, I
will continue to file more reports. Otherwise, I will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96105
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Other no_unique_address ABI issues: PR96052, PR95976
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c++
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96088
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> > Adding hash::operator()(string_view) is an interesting idea for the
> > standard though.
>
> Indeed. If we want to, I think it is possible to add some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96105
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96137
--- Comment #3 from Haoxin Tu ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> I would treat them just like ICEs. They are useful if the testcase isn't
> complete garbage. This one is sort of useful because it shows that my
> change above
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96139
Bug ID: 96139
Summary: Vector element extract mistypes long long int down to
long int
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96132
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:614662064ad4993a2aaecf190e7399ac5279e78e
commit r11-1971-g614662064ad4993a2aaecf190e7399ac5279e78e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95497
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:614662064ad4993a2aaecf190e7399ac5279e78e
commit r11-1971-g614662064ad4993a2aaecf190e7399ac5279e78e
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96137
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-09
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92171
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96080
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[OpenACC] 'acc_is_present' |OpenACC/Fortran runtime
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #5)
> The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ddea9306251b7d4e4fd1d67a5941ef7448b2e66
>
> commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96132
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96134
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ddea9306251b7d4e4fd1d67a5941ef7448b2e66
commit r11-1972-g9ddea9306251b7d4e4fd1d67a5941ef7448b2e66
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 96134, which changed state.
Bug 96134 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in tree_to_poly_uint64, at tree.c:2985
since r11-1801-g9e5508c2d006f2d4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96134
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96003
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> The warning in the test case in comment #3 looks correct to me.
Thank you! I'll try to re-reduce and not introduce new NULLs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96133
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ddea9306251b7d4e4fd1d67a5941ef7448b2e66
commit r11-1972-g9ddea9306251b7d4e4fd1d67a5941ef7448b2e66
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95322
--- Comment #15 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de ---
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96134
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
