https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95857
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ba192b5b7d2509b833f288000f21d6294420ace
commit r10-8466-g1ba192b5b7d2509b833f288000f21d6294420ace
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96174
Bug ID: 96174
Summary: AVX-512 functions missing when compiled without
optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96136
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95998
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> If we ever have three occurences of gfc_typename in a function list,
> like
>
> foo (gfc_typename(a), gfc_typename(b), gfc_typename(c));
>
> we will get the wrong result for the third one. We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |patch
--- Comment #15 from Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93678
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
A somewhat smaller test case, which of course does nothing useful,
but still reproduces the ICE:
module mo_a
implicit none
type t_b
integer :: n = 0
integer :: nr = 0
character, pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89417
Federico Kircheis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.2.0 |10.1.0
--- Comment #1 from Federico
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
--- Comment #35 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:267891bd3c7ce3e16662eb2be7273f0bc8be9e7e
commit r11-2041-g267891bd3c7ce3e16662eb2be7273f0bc8be9e7e
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri Jul 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 93492, which changed state.
Bug 93492 Summary: Broken code with -fpatchable-function-entry and
-fcf-protection=full
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93492
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96141
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Baumanns ---
Is there something missing in that if? What must be changed?
This is assert fails:
/* ??? If this is a local variable, and it has not been seen in any
outer BIND_EXPR, then it's probably the result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93678
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in 9.2/9.2.1 not|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93678
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[9/10/11 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93948
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93733
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93736
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96175
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96170
--- Comment #1 from Will Wray ---
Opened an equivalent enhancement request for Clang
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46691
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96175
Bug ID: 96175
Summary: Failure to optimize memory stores of double literals
properly
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96174
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96176
Bug ID: 96176
Summary: Failure to omit extraneous movzx in atomic compare
exchange with unsigned char
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96177
Bug ID: 96177
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (error:
unrecognizable insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
emit_move_multi_word
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20200712/work/gcc-11-20200712/gcc/expr.c:3721
0xabfc4e emit_move_insn(rtx_def*, rtx_def*)
/var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e300c3-linux-gnu/gcc-11.0.0_alpha20200712/work/gcc-11-20200712/gcc/expr.c:3929
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
--- Comment #38 from jojo ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #36)
> (In reply to jojo from comment #35)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #30)
> > > A possible solution can be usage of '-flinker-output=nolto-rel -r' for
> > >
26 matches
Mail list logo
