[Bug rtl-optimization/71309] Copying fields within a struct followed by use results in load hit store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71309 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:265d817b1eb4644c7a9613ad6920315d98e2e0a4 commit r11-2526-g265d817b1eb4644c7a9613ad6920315d98e2e0a4 Author: Xionghu Luo Date: Mon

[Bug d/96250] d: Field access in parentheses causes error: need 'this' for 'field' of type 'type'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96250 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:442b5a661e312b27fc87f769834a2b58412a847a commit r11-2493-g442b5a661e312b27fc87f769834a2b58412a847a Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Tue

[Bug bootstrap/96422] [11 regression] Comparison failure in some 32-bit libgomp PIC objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96422 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/96425] [8/9/10/11 regression] internal compiler error in maybe_process_partial_specialization()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Backtrace: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0069f0d6 in maybe_process_partial_specialization (type=0x0) at ../../gcc/gcc/cp/pt.c:976 976 if (CLASS_TYPE_P (type) &&

[Bug c++/96425] [8/9/10/11 regression] internal compiler error in maybe_process_partial_specialization()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425 --- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich --- Compiler version and target details: $ ./xg++ -B. -v Reading specs from ./specs COLLECT_GCC=./xg++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=./lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure

[Bug bootstrap/96404] [11 Regression] Bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96404 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #20

[Bug c++/96425] New: [8/9/10/11 regression] internal compiler error in maybe_process_partial_specialization()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96425 Bug ID: 96425 Summary: [8/9/10/11 regression] internal compiler error in maybe_process_partial_specialization() Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/96377] [10/11 Regression] GCC 10.2/11 doesn't build Linux kernel anymore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96377 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a216daaa30bc8949086a16e7656f2025b692d03c commit r10-8562-ga216daaa30bc8949086a16e7656f2025b692d03c Author: Richard

[Bug middle-end/96426] __builtin_convertvector ICE without lhs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96426 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Guess you need explicit knowledge somewhere, if only with a fake argument...

[Bug target/96402] [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -moutline-atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96402 Fabian Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@ritter-vogt.de --- Comment #4 from

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > > > The original pr26324a.o debug info contains reference to xxx. But >

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Note the symbol table entry should be "unused" (if there's anything like that). At least ld usually treats it like so. IIRC I left those dangling because UNDEFs into the copied .debug_info section are

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 --- Comment #19 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Thanks - this has been pointed out to me already by Dominique d'Humieres. I'll fix tonight or tomorrow. Paul On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 23:46, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: >

[Bug lto/96385] [8/9/10/11 Regression] GCC generates separate debug info with undefined symbols without relocations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/96325] Unclassifiable statement with syntax similar to a type-bound procedure call is accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96325 --- Comment #20 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- I got caught out by mime content blocking - trying again. Paul On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 09:26, Paul Richard Thomas < paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks - this has been

[Bug middle-end/96426] New: __builtin_convertvector ICE without lhs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96426 Bug ID: 96426 Summary: __builtin_convertvector ICE without lhs Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

<    1   2