https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 49055
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49055=edit
gzipped C source code
This attached file is preprocessed from libgcc/libgcov-driver.c.
This line is required to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96595
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b5490f5d1633fedf20e6eba87153c5963c61368
commit r11-2685-g2b5490f5d1633fedf20e6eba87153c5963c61368
Author: Matthew Krupcale
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96595
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Bug ID: 96597
Summary: valgrind error in do_hoist_insertion during O3 build
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96387
cents2823 at yahoo dot co.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96598
Bug ID: 96598
Summary: false NULL argument warning [-Wanalyzer-null-argument]
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96599
Bug ID: 96599
Summary: Failure to optimize self-stpcpy to strlen
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a2371497e9bed64aa4f46169127f3ea8e32e726
commit r10-8618-g4a2371497e9bed64aa4f46169127f3ea8e32e726
Author: Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96599
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96603
Bug ID: 96603
Summary: Failure to optimize memcmp out for more than one byte
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600
Bug ID: 96600
Summary: __builtin_modfl returns incorrect value
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96601
Bug ID: 96601
Summary: Failure to optimize equality comparison involving
strstr to strlen+strncmp
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
I should be more precise. Take this test case:
int e = 69;
int main() {
__ibm128 a = -__builtin_ldexpl(
1.9446689187403240306919491832695730985733566864714824565497322973045558e+00l,
e);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 49056
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49056=edit
C source code
Reduced code attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96479
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93671
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Vehreschild :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e00464a5cb4214f5a5de4535de4f684a86aa10d5
commit r11-2689-ge00464a5cb4214f5a5de4535de4f684a86aa10d5
Author: Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96602
Bug ID: 96602
Summary: Partial ordering is ambiguous with default function
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95757
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96387
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96589
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
With this patch:
...
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-21.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-21.c
index 7e0f85ffdf3..87058988780 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90928
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.4 |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Printing the numbers in detail (for all of them the long double and the two
double portions after that)):
a -0x1.f1d5d27f89914ab924b2cd0995p+69 -0x1.f1d5d27f89915000p+69
0x1.51b6d34cbd9ac000p+15
b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96482
--- Comment #22 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f91770216eade83f068528c1e4f00e2ac3b23044
commit r11-2686-gf91770216eade83f068528c1e4f00e2ac3b23044
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Reduced command line:
/home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/dcb/gcc/working/./gcc/ -O2 -c
Interestingly, -O3 not required.
I'll have a look at previous versions of gcc then have a go
at reducing the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) ---
The runtime modf actually returns a large number. This is not about precision
but about completely bogus values. You can adjust the testcase to:
int e = 69;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96600
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, I think this is a glibc bug rather than gcc, because the values
computed at compile time look right, rather than those at runtime.
Consider:
int e = 69;
int main() {
long double a =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
Code seems ok on date 20200724, so someone has broken something recently.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90933
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
New behaviour for the test-case.
Instead of ICE-ing, we have:
...
/home/vries/nvptx/mainkernel-2/source-gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/memcmp-1.c: In
function 'test_strncmp_49_1':^M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95548
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa81d093bf26a263131ecc1add04e27274457bb9
commit r10-8625-gaa81d093bf26a263131ecc1add04e27274457bb9
Author: Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96571
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96604
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96604
Bug ID: 96604
Summary: rejects-valid on befriending specialization of
conversion function template
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95599
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||max at duempel dot org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95491
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93529
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||88323
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96506
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0ad7e730c142ef6cd0ddc1491a89a7f330caa887
commit r11-2692-g0ad7e730c142ef6cd0ddc1491a89a7f330caa887
Author: Peter Bergner
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96601
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||83819
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96603
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12086
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94640
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94839
Bug 94839 depends on bug 94640, which changed state.
Bug 94640 Summary: false-positive leaking FILE pointer assigned to function
passed pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94640
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94503
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94688
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96606
--- Comment #1 from RyuaNerin ---
Created attachment 49059
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49059=edit
msvc vs gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96607
Bug ID: 96607
Summary: GCC feeds SPARC/Solaris linker with unrecognized TLS
sequences
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at gmail dot com
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689
--- Comment #6 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks - I will rerun the static analyzer on the codebase that previously
crashed the static analyzer and report back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94399
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94458
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96603
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-13
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93032
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94689
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94858
Bug 94858 depends on bug 94839, which changed state.
Bug 94839 Summary: False positive with -fanalyzer and direct field assignment
from calloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94839
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94839
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96598
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94011
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93938
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95026
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95042
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96605
Bug ID: 96605
Summary: ICE on C++20 code
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95240
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96606
Bug ID: 96606
Summary: Shift operator not working correctly
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96609
Bug ID: 96609
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/analyzer/init.c has many failures
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96598
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54185
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lhyatt at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608
Bug ID: 96608
Summary: Build failure due to cast to type long on MinGW
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96598
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ec32ddf822887cddc8910ed30dc105890def4ee
commit r11-2695-g2ec32ddf822887cddc8910ed30dc105890def4ee
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54185
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Lewis Hyatt from comment #14)
> I have problems with the test case for this bug
> (libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/condition_variable/54185.cc) failing
> randomly.
It fails reliably on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96592
John changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johnilacqua at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93994
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha ---
It is likely a duplicate of PR95152.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #17 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #16)
> I had another look at this and considerable progress has been made.
> Only six ices left for the C code in the test suite. These are
After the recent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96609
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||powerpc64*-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96610
Bug ID: 96610
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_va_arg_expr, at
gimplify.c:15150
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96610
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] ICE: in |ICE: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96606
RyuaNerin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
83 matches
Mail list logo
