https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90254
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b
commit r11-2704-g320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b
commit r11-2704-g320054784250e572cb75d6f69ab44b2330d61d8b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93711
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE: |[9/10 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95548
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eae728e6597727393b96886c77dbf0727a9fa720
commit r10-8630-geae728e6597727393b96886c77dbf0727a9fa720
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96617
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 regression] ICE in |[10 regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96618
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #19 from David Binderman ---
I tried out the C++ code with -g -O2 -fanalyzer and got the following:
$ cat 20200814.ana.O2.cpp.out | fgrep "internal c" | fgrep analyzer
./g++.dg/expr/ptrmem7.C:20:3: internal comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95407
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90254
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] ice |[8/9/10 Regression] ice on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96618
Bug ID: 96618
Summary: [10 regression] excess errors for
g++.dg/torture/pr95548.C after r10-
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96611
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
The init.c issue should be fixed by commit
r11-2708-g2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313
I'm still investigating the pr93032-mztools.c -Wanalyzer-too-complex warnings
(affects at least arm and aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing this; sorry for not fixing this today, I hope to get to this
early next week.
If you need a temporary workaround to unbreak your build, the analyzer code can
be disabled altogether at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96622
Bug ID: 96622
Summary: gcov misses to count break statement
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96620
Bug ID: 96620
Summary: bogus -Wdeprecated-declarations on attribute
deprecated immediately preceding parameter name
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:866626efd749ed3e2b7014e88e4340b5a4c73560
commit r11-2709-g866626efd749ed3e2b7014e88e4340b5a4c73560
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608
--- Comment #2 from Markus Böck ---
Don't worry there's no rush! It's the master branch after all. Just wanted to
make sure people are aware of it as soon as possible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96609
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313
commit r11-2708-g2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313
commit r11-2708-g2867118ddda9b56d991c16022f7d3d634ed08313
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96619
Bug ID: 96619
Summary: attribute deprecated immediately before a parameter
has no effect
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96611
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee88b536069db8f870c444c441182a9c76ec5bba
commit r11-2707-gee88b536069db8f870c444c441182a9c76ec5bba
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at charter dot net ---
Interesting language if not sort of weird:
"exp is a binary exponent expressed as a decimal integer"
I am in early stages of choosing how to do this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96609
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96621
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96621
Bug ID: 96621
Summary: fold strlen relational expressions after nul stores
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320
--- Comment #23 from Damian Rouson ---
A related issue arises if the procedure in question is a pure function as
demonstrated below. The code compiles cleanly if either
1. The result-spec is absent and the procedure is renamed new_foo in both
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
Bug ID: 96623
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in inject_parm_decls, at
cp/parser.c:23893
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96387
cents2823 at yahoo dot co.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96622
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
In my own code coverage measurer for Go programs, I took the approach of
creating a coverage counter for every true and false branch of a boolean
condition.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
On GCC tip of master from 20200814.
While static analyzing the racket source (github.com/racket/racket), it fails
on (reduced):
struct {
long a;
} * b;
void c();
int d() {
c();
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96536
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> Created attachment 49060 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Attached patch completely rewrites restore_stack_nonlocal expander.
>
> Can someone please test the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96605
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on C++20 code |ICE in tsubst, at
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96613
Bug ID: 96613
Summary: SIGFPE on min1() with -ffpe-trap=invalid switch
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96615
Bug ID: 96615
Summary: Failure to optimize out loop that eventually ends but
has no side effects
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95362
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:630474c8904cf797d0ee022d2ab177e25932c1d7
commit r10-8629-g630474c8904cf797d0ee022d2ab177e25932c1d7
Author: Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96612
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|10.0|11.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96611
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96610
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93388
--- Comment #18 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #17)
> After the recent analyzer overhaul it's probably time to update this list
> once again.
Done.
$ cat 20200814.ana.O2.c.out | fgrep "internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96612
Bug ID: 96612
Summary: [11 Regression][submitted patch] Fails to bootstrap
with older --build= than --host= compiler due to
missing -std=c++11
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95514
Paul Keir changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96614
Bug ID: 96614
Summary: constexpr deletion failure through pointer to base
with virtual base class
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96613
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96617
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96607
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96607
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 49063
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49063=edit
Non-reduced test case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96617
Bug ID: 96617
Summary: [11 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/pr34457-2.c after
r10-8624
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96613
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libfortran |fortran
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616
Bug ID: 96616
Summary: Many new analyzer failures
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96617
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
54 matches
Mail list logo
