https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96787
--- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 49123
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49123=edit
hashtab.c with target power9 attribute on htab_delete()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96787
--- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm seeing some load-past-store code motion that happens when compiling for
power10 vs power9 that makes me suspicious.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96788
Bug ID: 96788
Summary: "integer constant is so large that it is unsigned"
warning is incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96777
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d88c8df70342fcd6817e23f243ff38d0fe42fc6b
commit r11-2854-gd88c8df70342fcd6817e23f243ff38d0fe42fc6b
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96787
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
The divergence occurs after .L75 in the two versions. In the P10 version, we
see that the second bctrl has been converted into a bctr. It looks like a tail
call optimization happening, but we aren't at the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96667
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96791
Bug ID: 96791
Summary: ICE in convert_mode_scalar, at expr.c:412
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96790
Bug ID: 96790
Summary: Indirectly inherited default constructor doesn't
zero-initialize
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
URL: https://godbolt.org/z/3563e1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96031
--- Comment #4 from zhongyunde at tom dot com ---
> As for ivopt, I can see a minor improvement by replacing != exit condition
> with <=, thus saving add 2 instruction computing _22, which happens to
> "disable" the wrong PRE transformation.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96591
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96789
Bug ID: 96789
Summary: x264: sub4x4_dct() improves when vectorization is
disabled
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96562
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96681
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96532
--- Comment #6 from Thorsten Otto ---
Created attachment 49116
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49116=edit
Assembler output produced by gcc 11.0.0 for arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96565
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96671
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96669
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96744
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96752
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96690
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fe2cec41bb2ccb499b6b6c513e00da1a270370f
commit r11-2834-g7fe2cec41bb2ccb499b6b6c513e00da1a270370f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96528
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96778
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96632
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96694
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96693
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
unsigned int var_4 = 140810747U;
bool var_7 = (bool)0;
unsigned char var_20 = (unsigned char)82;
unsigned short var_22 = 42;
long long int arr_9 [23] ;
void __attribute__((noipa)) test(unsigned a, bool b,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96693
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96519
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21137
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0b4e42af26a85da2698e573ac8e32fa0a5709d6
commit r11-2836-ga0b4e42af26a85da2698e573ac8e32fa0a5709d6
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96625
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
There's no promotion on bitfields bigger than int, so yes, this would depend on
the frontends. The zeroing of the upper bits is done by RTL expansion for
bit-field arithmetic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96708
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96729
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96730
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96522
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96572
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96565
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I guess the "usual" way of dealing with this would be to have
> CLOBBERs for all VLAs before the __builtin_stack_restore.
That looks like a good idea.
I didn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96496
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fujii.hironori at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96599
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Might be more often a typo and say, stpcpy (a, b) was meant...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96615
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96714
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96586
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96591
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |c++
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96629
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64242
--- Comment #41 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Chenghua Xu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68e605c93d57c17f07edd50f7e1c80f9216befd2
commit r11-2835-g68e605c93d57c17f07edd50f7e1c80f9216befd2
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96574
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96596
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96760
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] Faulty |[11 Regression] Faulty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96696
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96697
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96730
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:556600286dd312d3ddf3d673a8579576862663e3
commit r11-2838-g556600286dd312d3ddf3d673a8579576862663e3
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96579
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96528
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think that eventually vector lowering should lower
>
> _1 = a == 5;
> _2 = b == 7;
> _3 = _1 | _2;
> _4 = _3 ? -1 : 0;
>
> to
>
> _31 = _1 ? -1 : 0;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96650
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96646
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96688
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96691
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-08-25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96551
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96549
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96548
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96564
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
note alias cannot disabiguate (A) on its own since both a and x could be NULL,
it additionally needs the flow-based info that a is not NULL at (A).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96654
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96730
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96678
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d5ed337cb354c2f85a9caf60377bad887b18d53
commit r11-2849-g3d5ed337cb354c2f85a9caf60377bad887b18d53
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96596
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
The following change avoids the ICE:
diff --git a/gcc/c/c-decl.c b/gcc/c/c-decl.c
index b31d99fcfaf..0d2a95f63d5 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-decl.c
+++ b/gcc/c/c-decl.c
@@ -1712,7 +1712,10 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93553
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cbde60ab63e7b94a664fb8fef8640d0d6a63b13c
commit r10-8663-gcbde60ab63e7b94a664fb8fef8640d0d6a63b13c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96459
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa6563471f5c9f96d2e446b15eb7aa770b4b4f17
commit r10-8662-gfa6563471f5c9f96d2e446b15eb7aa770b4b4f17
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96497
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aaac798d29acb61ab510c6106d10fc641becfcb7
commit r10-8664-gaaac798d29acb61ab510c6106d10fc641becfcb7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96545
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9bb6a5e12cae44a1cbf298b69f28fc6871f81c8
commit r10-8666-gb9bb6a5e12cae44a1cbf298b69f28fc6871f81c8
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96549
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db00336a49707327552e678b59da8e85384bdae6
commit r10-8665-gdb00336a49707327552e678b59da8e85384bdae6
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96571
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c16de18f26df961e00a049f198aeb9dce8de225
commit r10-8668-g5c16de18f26df961e00a049f198aeb9dce8de225
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96616
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
*** Bug 96785 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96785
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96786
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96549
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96786
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Perhaps we should just ignore AltiVec for the .machine selection?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96565
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'd say that the VLAs are more like "malloc" with the stack restore than
performing one or more "free" conceptually, so perhaps we should instead emit
calls to free-like internal function .FREE_VLA (ptr);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96722
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dff497c29a4f2a4cb3f0cb693e14f3073445
commit r10-8671-gdff497c29a4f2a4cb3f0cb693e14f3073445
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95450
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e53436da1902061af797d0aaa744c52bd9829ae
commit r10-8669-g7e53436da1902061af797d0aaa744c52bd9829ae
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96758
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0dbfa88edafbe913a7a9099246041e0190aa3948
commit r10-8670-g0dbfa88edafbe913a7a9099246041e0190aa3948
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96535
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7151b3d700efcd0994bc1a6cfc36f5abc53c7f5a
commit r10-8667-g7151b3d700efcd0994bc1a6cfc36f5abc53c7f5a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87256
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:050fc8b27a852007f8bb667999e1c8cfd31f90e1
commit r11-2851-g050fc8b27a852007f8bb667999e1c8cfd31f90e1
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96786
Bug ID: 96786
Summary: rs6000: We output the wrong .machine for -mcpu=7450
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96678
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96535
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo