[Bug c/96834] [9/10/11 Regression] Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96834 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to z.zhanghaij...@huawei.com from comment #4) > The case like: > test.c: > int f31() { } > void f30() { printf("30\n"); f31(); } > void f29() {

[Bug target/96856] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr92645-4.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "VEC_PACK_TRUNC" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96856 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/96857] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512bw-pr95488-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmullw[^\n]*zmm 2 on Linux/x86_64 (-m64 -march=cascadelake)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96857 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[r11-1301 Regression] FAIL: |[11 Regression] FAIL:

[Bug target/96855] [11 Regression] r11-571 regression FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr92658-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96855 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|r11-571 regression FAIL:|[11 Regression] r11-571

[Bug target/96856] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr92645-4.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "VEC_PACK_TRUNC" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96856 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Summary|[r11-571

[Bug fortran/94672] [10/11 Regression] gfortran/OpenMP chokes on PRESENT(array) despite of SHARED(array): Error: ‘array’ not specified in enclosing ‘parallel’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94672 --- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Tomáš Trnka from comment #12) > The fix for this broke assumed length optional character arguments. I have > noticed this on 10.2.1 20200723, which is currently used by Fedora 32. Thanks for

[Bug target/96854] [10 Regression] avx vectorizer breaks complex arithmetic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96854 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug fortran/96859] New: Wrong answer with intrinsic merge_bits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96859 Bug ID: 96859 Summary: Wrong answer with intrinsic merge_bits Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/96840] [11 Regression] Recursive substitution in constrained commutative operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96840 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

[Bug analyzer/96841] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have nop_expr in to_wide, at tree.h:5904

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96841 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/94672] [10/11 Regression] gfortran/OpenMP chokes on PRESENT(array) despite of SHARED(array): Error: ‘array’ not specified in enclosing ‘parallel’

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94672 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac4f77d2563828324bb6a4f08b52aae3410702ea commit r10-8691-gac4f77d2563828324bb6a4f08b52aae3410702ea Author: Tobias Burnus

<    1   2