https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97177
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97179
Bug ID: 97179
Summary: [LTO][Offloading] LTO's ltrans partiitioning causes
link errors for offload_vars + offload_funcs
("undefined reference")
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97125
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jim at meyering dot net
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97181
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97171
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49262
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49262=edit
Original unreduced test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97181
Bug ID: 97181
Summary: Inlining of leaf case in recursion
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Assignee|marxin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80753
Matthijs Kooijman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthijs at stdin dot nl
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97085
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
I would be happy with a revert of that patch, if the ARM backend gets fixed,
but indeed a missed optimization should not cause an ICE.
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> At least we're not at all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97178
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97171
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
reduced testcase:
template
void transform(_UnaryOperation);
template
void Apply ()
{
extern T Maker (void); // block-scope extern with dependent type
transform (Maker);
}
template void Apply ();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97134
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97180
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-23
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96453
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed on master with r11-3302-g3696a50beeb73f4d.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97085
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97157
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80753
--- Comment #4 from Matthijs Kooijman ---
I looked a bit at the source, and it seems the the problem is (not
surprisingly) that `__has_include` causes the header filename to be put into
the cache, and an error message is only generated when the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97171
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96466
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96466
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc909324bda71543add2229adfa59d8daff5f0db
commit r11-3394-gbc909324bda71543add2229adfa59d8daff5f0db
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97085
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The following also works, and we then expand from
mask__31.28_102 = vect__50.25_95 != { 5, ... };
vect_patt_63.29_105 = VEC_COND_EXPR ;
diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97180
Bug ID: 97180
Summary: warning: ‘__builtin___strncat_chk’ on strncat when it
is not necessary
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97085
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
#1 0x015c8944 in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr (gsi=0x7fffda50,
vec_cond_ssa_name_uses=0x7fffda20)
at ../../src/trunk/gcc/gimple-isel.cc:133
133 gcc_assert (known_eq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84329
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97171
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13f7c5d504b5fe6c233f2e68acd10bd4fc9007ac
commit r11-3398-g13f7c5d504b5fe6c233f2e68acd10bd4fc9007ac
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82721
markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markeggleston at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96453
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Needs -fno-tree-dce to ICE (otherwise the loop is completely elided).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96453
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3457dae55f72bd4ac0f346bbebb02d1613ac4b5c
commit r11-3396-g3457dae55f72bd4ac0f346bbebb02d1613ac4b5c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97125
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c48ffe21f8f3478cf08f9442e3f973df358caf2a
commit r11-3397-gc48ffe21f8f3478cf08f9442e3f973df358caf2a
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97125
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97171
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #37 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:65c9878641cbe0ed898aa7047b7b994e9d4a5bb1
commit r11-3402-g65c9878641cbe0ed898aa7047b7b994e9d4a5bb1
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97182
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The consequence of not using SYS_futex is that we use a mutex + condition
variable for some synchronization, which is obviously suboptimal if futexes are
actually available.
Changing to use a futex would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97178
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f65ebb5210e2fded0f7b339219685f4480124f0c
commit r11-3403-gf65ebb5210e2fded0f7b339219685f4480124f0c
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97182
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97176
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Workaround 3.
>
> Explicitly give entities the SAVE attribute whereby your
> testfunc() becomes
>
> function testfunc(string) result(res)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97182
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #3)
> libgomp works on riscv64-linux. It would only be riscv32-linux that is
> broken.
>
> The riscv32 support was only just recently added to FSF glibc, and hasn't
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97185
Bug ID: 97185
Summary: inconsistent builtin elimination for impossible range
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97175
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97176
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93449
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97183
Bug ID: 97183
Summary: zstd build failure for gcc 10 on Ubuntu 16.04
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ack. I assume you saw PR 97182 and that's what prompted your comment. Otherwise
it's quite a coincidence :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97182
Bug ID: 97182
Summary: Add support for targets that only define
SYS_futex_time64 and not SYS_futex
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96700
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97178
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97127
--- Comment #8 from Michael_S ---
What are values of gcc "loop" cost of the relevant instructions now?
1. AVX256 Load
2. FMA3 ymm,ymm,ymm
3. AVX256 Regmove
4. FMA3 mem,ymm,ymm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker ---
Rather than #if defined(SYS_futex_time64), I think it should be made:
#if defined(SYS_futex_time64) && SYS_futex_time64 != SYS_futex
This is in consideration of support for riscv32 and future archs without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95677
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69855
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97184
Bug ID: 97184
Summary: Incorrect MOVDIRI and MOVDIR64B patterns
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97182
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson ---
libgomp works on riscv64-linux. It would only be riscv32-linux that is broken.
The riscv32 support was only just recently added to FSF glibc, and hasn't
appeared in a release yet, so arguably, there is no ABI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93421
--- Comment #4 from Rich Felker ---
Actually I didn't see it, I just saw Florian added to CC and it reminded me of
the issue, which reminded me I needed to check this for riscv32 issues with the
riscv32 port pending merge. :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97131
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e92779db3304bc96a6b861f87c5edde8dd4d4030
commit r11-3407-ge92779db3304bc96a6b861f87c5edde8dd4d4030
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93355
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b828f69519a50e6e2961b62ea552bf89d287199
commit r11-3415-g6b828f69519a50e6e2961b62ea552bf89d287199
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49263|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97186
Bug ID: 97186
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
maybe_instantiate_noexcept)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96700
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97175
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97131
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97175
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394
--- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Finally managed to shrink it down to self-contained example. It has to be split
into two .c files (and one header) to prevent analyzer from inferring too much:
// node.h:
void bug(void);
void *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96394
--- Comment #11 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 49263
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49263=edit
b.tar.gz
Also attaching tiny example as b.tar.gz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96534
--- Comment #5 from xlwu at synopsys dot com ---
A bug found in the JSON format:
in the lines.count and functions.execute_count fields, when the number is
extremely large , it will be shown as something like: 8.12123199e+08 , even
become a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97107
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:199baa71f7a6c8f255afdda03cd3b2644f8f0fcd
commit r11-3416-g199baa71f7a6c8f255afdda03cd3b2644f8f0fcd
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Fri Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97127
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Michael_S from comment #8)
> What are values of gcc "loop" cost of the relevant instructions now?
> 1. AVX256 Load
> 2. FMA3 ymm,ymm,ymm
> 3. AVX256 Regmove
> 4. FMA3 mem,ymm,ymm
For skylake,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93012
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0075cea0fdccc2efb781f4f3c924007de37a3417
commit r11-3419-g0075cea0fdccc2efb781f4f3c924007de37a3417
Author: Alan Modra
Date: Wed Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
The ICE triggers when streaming the main_argc used in the variable bound
expression in char argv[main_argc + 1]. The bound is included in the attribute
access added to the declaration of main by the C front
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97175
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6edc8f5bfe7d9db8fb8bd37bb8086a69850c6c6d
commit r11-3409-g6edc8f5bfe7d9db8fb8bd37bb8086a69850c6c6d
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97133
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Likely a duplicate of PR97172.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97075
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97187
Bug ID: 97187
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree_list,
have error_mark in tsubst_copy_and_build, at
cp/pt.c:19782
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94508
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Confirmed, -fconcepts started with GCC 6. Is it a valid or invalid code?
clang rejects it, but accepts the following one, on which g++ also ICEs:
template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97075
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5427bd4d57c0376e51fc7b256e76aa46c43aa8cf
commit r11-3422-g5427bd4d57c0376e51fc7b256e76aa46c43aa8cf
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Thu Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02b5377b3766804059b7824330d33d0e1cef2e5b
commit r11-3392-g02b5377b3766804059b7824330d33d0e1cef2e5b
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84329
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97177
Bug ID: 97177
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in dependent_type_p, at
cp/pt.c:26475
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97178
Bug ID: 97178
Summary: gcc/analyzer/program-state.cc:575:54: runtime error:
member call on null pointer of type 'struct engine'
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97171
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97171
Bug ID: 97171
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in symtab_node::get_for_asmname at
gcc/symtab.c:1023 since r11-3192-ge9fdb9a73249f95f
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Component|plugins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97169
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97171
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97158
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97174
Bug ID: 97174
Summary: out-of-namespace function definition
Product: gcc
Version: 7.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97164
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 49260
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49260=edit
gcc11-pr97164.patch
I've tried the above patch overnight, unfortunately libbid uses such construct,
so it broke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97174
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97069
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b4e8bf88f1172ce8561f57b12fb81063b21a78f
commit r11-3384-g6b4e8bf88f1172ce8561f57b12fb81063b21a78f
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97174
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
With an instantiation added:
int main () { N::conv (1); }
we get
t.C: In function 'int main()':
t.C:13:25: error: call of overloaded 'conv(int)' is ambiguous
13 | int main () { N::conv (1); }
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97151
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97160
--- Comment #2 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c: if (targetm.libc_has_function (function_sincos))
I haven't checked why it's used there, but I concluded this wasn't a front end
issue from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97162
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
