[Bug rtl-optimization/97249] Missing vec_select and subreg optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97249 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52e7f09698ecb5ba6d9e921ffe912d1f66158e9e commit r11-4204-g52e7f09698ecb5ba6d9e921ffe912d1f66158e9e Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Oct

[Bug tree-optimization/97520] ICE in calc_stmt, at gimple-range.cc:399 with "-O1 -fno-tree-fre -ftree-vrp"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97520 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:966fdb2e12c0347aa3f9efaf5f4e1cd8237fa024 commit r11-4200-g966fdb2e12c0347aa3f9efaf5f4e1cd8237fa024 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug c++/97525] New: failed to report use before initialization in constructor initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97525 Bug ID: 97525 Summary: failed to report use before initialization in constructor initialization Product: gcc Version: og10 (devel/omp/gcc-10) Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/43892] PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/43892] PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892 --- Comment #31 from Segher Boessenkool --- Performing a jump based on the carry bit is not something we can easily do (there are no simple insns for it, and those sequences that will do the trick are expensive). But I'll look at that, thanks

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||smuccione at agisent dot com ---

[Bug c++/97525] failed to report use before initialization in constructor initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97525 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #56 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3fd5876793ddf882994acafc9c5b28e3be8897bd commit r11-4196-g3fd5876793ddf882994acafc9c5b28e3be8897bd Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Thu

[Bug c/80076] -Wmisleading-indentation doesn't trigger when macro is misindented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80076 --- Comment #4 from Andres Freund --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3) > Fixed for GCC 11. Thanks for the report. Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/97515] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in 'rshift_expr') since r11-3685-gfcae5121154d1c33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97515 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca5f4666f7a9404cdb04832324de3dd7d71e35c3 commit r11-4198-gca5f4666f7a9404cdb04832324de3dd7d71e35c3 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97515] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in 'rshift_expr') since r11-3685-gfcae5121154d1c33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97515 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod --- Furthermore, this PR is also a good example of a case where we want to inject updated values into the Ranger's iterator. : goto ; [INV] : ui_8 = ~xe_3; if (ui_8 == 0) goto ; [INV] else

[Bug rtl-optimization/97249] Missing vec_select and subreg optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97249 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/87767] Missing AVX512 memory broadcast for constant vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87767 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4de7b010038933dd6ca96bf186ca49f243d0def6 commit r11-4202-g4de7b010038933dd6ca96bf186ca49f243d0def6 Author: liuhongt Date: Sat Sep

[Bug target/87767] Missing AVX512 memory broadcast for constant vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87767 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7026bb9504eb0f95e114f832cd6dd14302376861 commit r11-4203-g7026bb9504eb0f95e114f832cd6dd14302376861 Author: liuhongt Date: Sat Sep

[Bug c++/97511] [11 Regression] ICE in template_parm_to_arg, at cp/pt.c:4744 since r11-3296-ge5d72c840a226fdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97511 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/97520] ICE in calc_stmt, at gimple-range.cc:399 with "-O1 -fno-tree-fre -ftree-vrp"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97520 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #53 from Martin Liška --- > It goes from 1 to 1<<63, so each of tests translates to a range. Yes, but these ranges are very large, nothing for a jump table or a bit-test.

[Bug target/97521] [11 Regression] wrong code with -mno-sse2 since r11-3394

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #55 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #54) > > > It goes from 1 to 1<<63, so each of tests translates to a range. > > > > Yes, but these ranges are very large, nothing for a jump table or a > > bit-test. >

[Bug testsuite/97522] New: [11 regression] test cases fail on powerpc64 BE after r11-4077

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97522 Bug ID: 97522 Summary: [11 regression] test cases fail on powerpc64 BE after r11-4077 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #50 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:caaa218f912ccf932fdb79243ded68bb462bbe63 commit r11-4192-gcaaa218f912ccf932fdb79243ded68bb462bbe63 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Wed

[Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #51 from Martin Liška --- > Martin, how does the if chain conversion behave on the example? I don't see how can if-to-switch conversion pass help us here. It's designed to identify compact intervals. In this case we see: : _16

[Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #52 from Jan Hubicka --- > I don't see how can if-to-switch conversion pass help us here. It's designed > to > identify compact intervals. In this case we see: > >: > _16 = _2 & 576460752303423488; > if (_16 == 0) >

[Bug tree-optimization/97520] ICE in calc_stmt, at gimple-range.cc:399 with "-O1 -fno-tree-fre -ftree-vrp"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97520 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||11.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 --- Comment #54 from Jan Hubicka --- > > It goes from 1 to 1<<63, so each of tests translates to a range. > > Yes, but these ranges are very large, nothing for a jump table or a bit-test. Yep, but theoretically you can recover the decision

[Bug tree-optimization/97520] ICE in calc_stmt, at gimple-range.cc:399 with "-O1 -fno-tree-fre -ftree-vrp"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97520 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-21 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/97523] New: [11 Regression] bogus "would use explicit constructor" error for new[]()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97523 Bug ID: 97523 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus "would use explicit constructor" error for new[]() Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/97523] [11 Regression] bogus "would use explicit constructor" error for new[]()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97523 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/97524] New: Compiling with -flto=auto fails in make is not installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524 Bug ID: 97524 Summary: Compiling with -flto=auto fails in make is not installed Product: gcc Version: 10.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/43892] PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892 --- Comment #29 from Segher Boessenkool --- Yup, and that is a more elegant way of writing this anyway. But we still do not handle the exact testcase code optimally ;-)

[Bug tree-optimization/97360] [11 Regression] ICE in range_on_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360 --- Comment #36 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Peter Bergner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84cc3370d6d5972fe495b2114fb32f7b4a49a98d commit r11-4193-g84cc3370d6d5972fe495b2114fb32f7b4a49a98d Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97360] [11 Regression] ICE in range_on_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97360 --- Comment #37 from Peter Bergner --- Fixed on trunk. I'll let this bake a week before backporting the rs6000 part of the fix to GCC 10 (approved by Segher).

[Bug tree-optimization/97515] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in 'rshift_expr') since r11-3685-gfcae5121154d1c33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97515 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Macleod --- Created attachment 49417 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49417=edit check for undefined before not returning a constant value The ranger deals with UNDEFINED slightly differently than

[Bug c/80076] -Wmisleading-indentation doesn't trigger when macro is misindented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80076 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug lto/97508] lto1: internal compiler error: decompressed stream: Destination buffer is too small

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97508 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-21 Keywords|

[Bug sanitizer/97414] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: detect_stack_use_after_return and detect_invalid_pointer_pairs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97414 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c5b08a2ca935c5db68e79d33e5c5b752252115c commit r11-4177-g6c5b08a2ca935c5db68e79d33e5c5b752252115c Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug target/97506] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97506 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Targets shouldn't ICE on unsimplified stuff - the testcase explicitely disables constant propagation so I guess we get what was asked for.

[Bug target/43892] PowerPC suboptimal "add with carry" optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43892 --- Comment #28 from Christophe Leroy --- Looks like we have a way to do it. Works at least with GCC 5.5, 8.2, 9.2, 10.1 unsigned long g(unsigned long a, unsigned long b) { unsigned long long s = (unsigned long long)a + (unsigned long

[Bug tree-optimization/97494] [11 regression] several vector test case failures starting with r11-3966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/97513] New: [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 Bug ID: 97513 Summary: [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/97506] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97506 --- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu --- Should i backport to GCC10? Although it's exposed in GCC11, but it's still a potential bug in GCC10.

[Bug gcov-profile/97507] Move __gcov_exit from per-object .fini_array.00100 to libgcov

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97507 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/97506] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97506 --- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Yeah. On the other side, they don't need to try hard to optimize it because > normally it should be simplified already. So, e.g. the above patch is fine > if it

[Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504 Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stefansf at linux dot

[Bug libgomp/97509] New: [nvptx, offloading] dg-excess-errors directive no longer working in some test-cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97509 Bug ID: 97509 Summary: [nvptx, offloading] dg-excess-errors directive no longer working in some test-cases Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97510] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_bool_attrs, at recog.c:2168 since r9-2793-gf6b95f78f8048e2f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97510 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/97510] New: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_bool_attrs, at recog.c:2168 since r9-2793-gf6b95f78f8048e2f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97510 Bug ID: 97510 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in check_bool_attrs, at recog.c:2168 since r9-2793-gf6b95f78f8048e2f Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97506] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97506 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yes, looks safe to me.

[Bug rtl-optimization/14319] incorrect optimization of union of structs with common initial sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319 Vincent Lefèvre changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net ---

[Bug tree-optimization/97500] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:5094 since r11-3823-g126ed72b9f48f853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97500 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/97506] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97506 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yeah. On the other side, they don't need to try hard to optimize it because normally it should be simplified already. So, e.g. the above patch is fine if it works, but it would be also fine to force_reg

[Bug tree-optimization/96376] [11 regression] vect/vect-alias-check.c and vect/vect-live-5.c fail on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96376 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/96342] [SVE] Add support for "omp declare simd"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96342 --- Comment #5 from yangyang --- Created attachment 49414 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49414=edit part2-patch

[Bug sanitizer/97414] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: detect_stack_use_after_return and detect_invalid_pointer_pairs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97414 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98cd020ebc50a197de17aecd15afdff718cb06d3 commit r10-8932-g98cd020ebc50a197de17aecd15afdff718cb06d3 Author: Martin Liska

[Bug sanitizer/97414] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: detect_stack_use_after_return and detect_invalid_pointer_pairs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97414 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libgomp/97509] [nvptx, offloading] dg-excess-errors directive no longer working in some test-cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97509 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

[Bug c++/97511] New: [11 Regression] ICE in template_parm_to_arg, at cp/pt.c:4744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97511 Bug ID: 97511 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in template_parm_to_arg, at cp/pt.c:4744 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/97506] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97506 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36ee59a2640712a6e24d9e27290bc5ebbef39709 commit r10-8933-g36ee59a2640712a6e24d9e27290bc5ebbef39709 Author: liuhongt Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97500] [11 Regression] ICE in vect_schedule_slp_instance, at tree-vect-slp.c:5094 since r11-3823-g126ed72b9f48f853

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97500 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d94093013877cde3dce5c243099ad54668849400 commit r11-4185-gd94093013877cde3dce5c243099ad54668849400 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug analyzer/97514] [11 Regression] ICE in add_function_entry, at analyzer/engine.cc:1958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/97513] [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/97453] Implement CWG issue 2303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97453 --- Comment #2 from Kamlesh Kumar --- patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/556672.html

[Bug ada/97504] [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap error after r11-4029

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Keywords|

[Bug sanitizer/97414] AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: detect_stack_use_after_return and detect_invalid_pointer_pairs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97414 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||11.0 Status|WAITING

[Bug lto/97508] lto1: internal compiler error: decompressed stream: Destination buffer is too small

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97508 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/97508] [10/11 Regression] ICE: decompressed stream: Destination buffer is too small

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97508 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|lto1: internal compiler |[10/11 Regression] ICE:

[Bug target/96342] [SVE] Add support for "omp declare simd"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96342 --- Comment #3 from yangyang --- Hi, Sorry for the slow reply. After studying the specification of SVE "omp declare simd" and GCC's current implementation of "omp declare simd", I have developed a rough plan to support GCC to generating SVE

[Bug target/96342] [SVE] Add support for "omp declare simd"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96342 --- Comment #4 from yangyang --- Created attachment 49413 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49413=edit part1-patch

[Bug libstdc++/97512] New: Move std::ranges::subrange structured bindings stuff from to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97512 Bug ID: 97512 Summary: Move std::ranges::subrange structured bindings stuff from to Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/97514] New: [11 Regression] ICE in add_function_entry, at analyzer/engine.cc:1958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97514 Bug ID: 97514 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in add_function_entry, at analyzer/engine.cc:1958 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/97511] [11 Regression] ICE in template_parm_to_arg, at cp/pt.c:4744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97511 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug c++/97517] _Up = 'nullptr_type' not supported by simple_type_specifier'nullptr_type' not supported by direct_abstract_declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97517 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/97518] Improving static_assert diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97518 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/97520] New: ICE in calc_stmt, at gimple-range.cc:399 with "-O1 -fno-tree-fre -ftree-vrp"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97520 Bug ID: 97520 Summary: ICE in calc_stmt, at gimple-range.cc:399 with "-O1 -fno-tree-fre -ftree-vrp" Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/97518] Improving static_assert diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97518 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- A related case I encounter often is: static_assert( sizeof(T) == 4 ); if the assertion fails I would like to know what the size is, rather than just "not 4", so I have to add something like Barry's

[Bug libstdc++/97512] Move std::ranges::subrange structured bindings stuff from to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97512 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/97517] New: _Up = 'nullptr_type' not supported by simple_type_specifier'nullptr_type' not supported by direct_abstract_declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97517 Bug ID: 97517 Summary: _Up = 'nullptr_type' not supported by simple_type_specifier'nullptr_type' not supported by direct_abstract_declarator Product: gcc

[Bug c++/97518] New: Improving static_assert diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97518 Bug ID: 97518 Summary: Improving static_assert diagnostics Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |ipa --- Comment #48 from Jan Hubicka ---

[Bug ipa/97445] Some fonctions marked static inline in Linux kernel are not inlined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97445 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||97519, 97503 --- Comment #49 from Jan

[Bug tree-optimization/96129] [11 regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-alias-check.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96129 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/96376] [11 regression] vect/vect-alias-check.c and vect/vect-live-5.c fail on armeb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96376 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from

[Bug lto/97508] [10/11 Regression] ICE: decompressed stream: Destination buffer is too small

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97508 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Then we end up with 2 copies of the compressed stream: $ cat good.txt y.o: file format elf64-x86-64 Contents of section .gnu.lto_.jmpfuncs.c09bc76fb7147437: 28b52ffd 20116d00 00380500 0100

[Bug target/97503] Suboptimal use of cntlzw and cntlzd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97503 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5244b4af5e47bc98a2a9cf36f048981583a1b163 commit r11-4183-g5244b4af5e47bc98a2a9cf36f048981583a1b163 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/97506] [11 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2294 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97506 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b5d50b7c6e34267b40bdeb4c145e9132d83762d commit r11-4184-g9b5d50b7c6e34267b40bdeb4c145e9132d83762d Author: liuhongt Date: Wed Oct

[Bug libstdc++/97512] Move std::ranges::subrange structured bindings stuff from to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97512 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a186ab670e97c4c3883d96506655c4621e7c5515 commit r11-4188-ga186ab670e97c4c3883d96506655c4621e7c5515 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/97517] 'nullptr_type' not supported by simple_type_specifier'nullptr_type' not supported by direct_abstract_declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97517 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/97519] New: builtin_constant_p (x + cst) should be optimized to builtin_constant_p (x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97519 Bug ID: 97519 Summary: builtin_constant_p (x + cst) should be optimized to builtin_constant_p (x) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/97515] [11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in 'rshift_expr')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97515 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/97516] New: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97516 Bug ID: 97516 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87 Product:

[Bug c++/97511] [11 Regression] ICE in template_parm_to_arg, at cp/pt.c:4744 since r11-3296-ge5d72c840a226fdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97511 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/97516] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97516 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug target/97513] [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- Right, but the builds were broken before that (did not work with gcc-4.8.5 on the host), so I didn't notice this problem ealier.

[Bug libstdc++/97512] Move std::ranges::subrange structured bindings stuff from to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97512 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/14319] incorrect optimization of union of structs with common initial sequences

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319 --- Comment #18 from James Kuyper Jr. --- (In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #17) > (In reply to Tim Rentsch from comment #10) > > Four: Despite the last observation, the "one special guarantee" clause > > (and hence also DR 257) is

[Bug analyzer/97514] [11 Regression] ICE in add_function_entry, at analyzer/engine.cc:1958

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97514 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-21

[Bug fortran/45516] [F08] allocatable compontents of recursive type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45516 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:310fe80babe04ccb7d2e15c8fca7dc98180701a8 commit r11-4186-g310fe80babe04ccb7d2e15c8fca7dc98180701a8 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97516] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97516 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0

[Bug target/97513] [11 regression] aarch64 SVE regressions since r11-3822

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97513 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/97515] New: [11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in 'rshift_expr')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97515 Bug ID: 97515 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: type mismatch in 'rshift_expr') Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   >