https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97522
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97526
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 49421
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49421=edit
config.log from the main build directory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 49419
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49419=edit
Preprocessed source of gimple-match.ii (compressed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 49420
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49420=edit
Resulting assember file (which is incomplete)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
The machine is gcc220.fsffrance.org ; if anybody has an account there
and wants to peek into /home/tkoenig to look into more details, be my
guest.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020, crazylht at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
>
> Hongtao.liu changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 49422
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49422=edit
Generated gimple-match.c
All the temporary files were generated by manually adding -save-temps
to the Makefile in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97520
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97519
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Implemented in match.pd it will cover both. SSA backprop would be the most
natural classical pass candidate but that runs after IPA. The other candidate
is of course forwprop where it would be "cheaper"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Well, can't it fall back to serial compilation?
It could, maybe with some diagnostic. It could also use fork-based
parallelism.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97505
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Looking at vr_values::extract_range_builtin(), I see that every single place
where we use ask for a range, we bail on non-integers (symbolics, etc). That
is, with the exception of the UBSAN builtins.
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:346b302d09c1e6db56d9fe69048acb32fbb97845
commit r11-4218-g346b302d09c1e6db56d9fe69048acb32fbb97845
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96759
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3444bed1a0bedf8c5e97ba9b0de6a547bb375ead
commit r10-8936-g3444bed1a0bedf8c5e97ba9b0de6a547bb375ead
Author: Kito Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97526
Bug ID: 97526
Summary: ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:1004
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97526
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97313
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, I think it is certainly desirable to keep using VEC_MERGE, not only
because it is less IL.
But pedantically already what i386 backend does doesn't match the documentation
which says that the last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96456
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96456
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Andreas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97519
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
Bug ID: 97527
Summary: OpenBSD bootstrap fails with error: C++ preprocessor
"/lib/cpp" fails sanity check
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I can test it on skylake-avx512.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> It could, maybe with some diagnostic. It could also use fork-based
> parallelism.
It seems to me extra work.
Expecting make for parallel execution seems to be a reasonable request.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96998
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97526
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-unknown-openbsd6.8
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96998
--- Comment #11 from Alex Coplan ---
The patch series has been restructured to first fix the AArch64 bug, and then
restore code quality with a patch to combine.
The AArch64 patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96759
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97489
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7f2cfbf0fc7bcd5c1e60fca354de8bf60f9acfa
commit r11-4220-gb7f2cfbf0fc7bcd5c1e60fca354de8bf60f9acfa
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97439
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2819cdd8ff8e15ed5efb4095143cf531cf3e50f9
commit r8-10593-g2819cdd8ff8e15ed5efb4095143cf531cf3e50f9
Author: Andreas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Looking at simplify-rtx.c, I think as long as the constants are CONST_INTs,
simplify-rtx.c doesn't care if the non-constant is represented with scalar int
mode registers (etc.) or V*BImode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97511
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b083a14dfe1f53446722f45078e419238d24
commit r11-4229-gb083a14dfe1f53446722f45078e419238d24
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96575
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46fdced6a9f936ae4d5b42347d7d87f69875683a
commit r11-4230-g46fdced6a9f936ae4d5b42347d7d87f69875683a
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97489
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97439
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:523e6e5bd47bcc03e9782039b52fb3f8b3276e64
commit r10-8937-g523e6e5bd47bcc03e9782039b52fb3f8b3276e64
Author: Andreas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97439
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a07af7753004e711d0db8d4e5620a4e8afc8f10c
commit r9-9007-ga07af7753004e711d0db8d4e5620a4e8afc8f10c
Author: Andreas Krebbel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96575
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We don't necessarily need to make it user accessible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b960a9c83a93b58a84a7a370002990810675ac5d
commit r11-4226-gb960a9c83a93b58a84a7a370002990810675ac5d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81358
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97439
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3f25eac67aee77af0b2038cd4d6cbd36d7f1030
commit r11-4223-ge3f25eac67aee77af0b2038cd4d6cbd36d7f1030
Author: Andreas Krebbel
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97502
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3cf5174b19a89aeed5aa2ba82a373ded35a4a96
commit r11-4224-gf3cf5174b19a89aeed5aa2ba82a373ded35a4a96
Author: Andreas Krebbel
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97328
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d423c6f6a69d87ad52ba3af75f3debd8a8b8810
commit r11-4231-g3d423c6f6a69d87ad52ba3af75f3debd8a8b8810
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
Bug ID: 97528
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in decompose_automod_address,
at rtlanal.c:6298 (arm-linux-gnueabihf)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97511
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97514
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7decfaebbcb8522fcb39b03a391a5c2cb64f460
commit r11-4222-gf7decfaebbcb8522fcb39b03a391a5c2cb64f460
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
The *.s file generated with -save-temps is attached, but it
is truncated for a reason that I do not understand.
The binutils is indeed self-compiled from source (because the LLVM
linker cannot handle gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
Speaking about how to represent the V*BImode constants, i think we need to
extend attribute vector_size to handle something like
---
typedef bool v8bi __attribute__ ((vector_size (1)));
---
currently there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Oct 2020, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97521
>
> --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> We don't necessarily need to make it user
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97514
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97502
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97528
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97328
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97527
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 49423
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49423=edit
config.log from libgomp using binutils compiled with gcc 8.4.0
Using the binutils compiled with gcc 8.4 now leads to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95107
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> I ran into an ICE at that same line in that same file, but it was when
> compiling a C source file instead of a Fortran one... should I open a
> separate bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97537
Bug ID: 97537
Summary: gcc -H Option Issue, incomplete dependency tree
listing
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97535
--- Comment #1 from Icenowy Zheng ---
The problem is found to be trying to expand a memcpy() call with fixed length
2181038080.
Handling of memcpy() expansion seem to be corrupted when len >= 2147483648. The
length is mod with 2147483648, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90707
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90709
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #6 from Tom Stellard ---
If I have make installed on my system, but am using something else (e.g. ninja)
to build my project, will I still get parallel execution?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96409
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96410
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96499
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97522
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25814
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97522
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97529
Bug ID: 97529
Summary: Condition not constant folded
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97530
Bug ID: 97530
Summary: Segmentation fault compiling coarray program with
option -fcoarray=shared (not with
-fcoarray={lib,single})
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97531
Bug ID: 97531
Summary: Improve type/non-type declaration diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
Bug ID: 97532
Summary: Error: insn does not satisfy its constraints, internal
compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at
recog.c:2196
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Error: insn does not|[11 Regression] Error: insn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The IRA dump says:
a2(r189,l0) costs: AREG:2000,2000 DREG:2000,2000 CREG:26000,-1000
BREG:2000,2000 SIREG:2000,2000 DIREG:2000,2000 AD_REGS:2000,2000 CLOBBERED_REGS
:2000,2000 Q_REGS:2000,2000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97533
Bug ID: 97533
Summary: ICE encountering operator() within lambda expression
within templated struct
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97328
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8094f781c35b64da68245d351b85546cca5b809b
commit r10-8938-g8094f781c35b64da68245d351b85546cca5b809b
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97328
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> The IRA dump says:
> a2(r189,l0) costs: AREG:2000,2000 DREG:2000,2000 CREG:26000,-1000
> BREG:2000,2000 SIREG:2000,2000 DIREG:2000,2000 AD_REGS:2000,2000
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The operand in this case is the whole
(vec_duplicate:V8DF (mem:DF (reg...) [6 *fact_18(D)+0 S8 A64]))
which matches the
(define_special_memory_constraint "Br"
"@internal bcst memory operand."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95979
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90b83a25b3499ff50a9b7afc0e84e1355191c220
commit r10-8939-g90b83a25b3499ff50a9b7afc0e84e1355191c220
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97536
Bug ID: 97536
Summary: [concepts] parser segfault for concept defined in
function template
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97535
Bug ID: 97535
Summary: ICE when building xmrig on AArch64
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97534
Bug ID: 97534
Summary: [10/11 Regression] ICE in decompose, at rtl.h:2280
(arm-linux-gnueabihf)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93297
--- Comment #9 from John McFarlane ---
And here is an ICE in 10.2:
struct a;
template class b;
template b()->b<>;
template using c = b;
static_assert(c{}
CL: g++ -v -std=c++2a source.cpp
Online: https://godbolt.org/z/54aTr6
95 matches
Mail list logo
