https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97598
--- Comment #1 from Philip R Brenan ---
Created attachment 49454
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49454=edit
Test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97601
Bug ID: 97601
Summary: ICE when using type determined by
std::tuple_element_t<...>, on tuple generated from
type id stored in std::array
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97581
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97497
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b3e722a3ca1b9dcfff1c016e651d0d681de1af0
commit r11-4460-g2b3e722a3ca1b9dcfff1c016e651d0d681de1af0
Author: Andreas Krebbel
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97602
Bug ID: 97602
Summary: #line overflow check incomplete
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97600
Bug ID: 97600
Summary: [ranges] result of static assertion depends on
unrelated statement
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97592
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97491
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a764c40079a493826a3678174f908941a383644e
commit r11-4459-ga764c40079a493826a3678174f908941a383644e
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97600
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
I think all views whose begin()/end() has a placeholder return type and
performs direct initialization of a _Iterator/_Sentinel from *this are affected
by some variant of this issue.
A library-side
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97600
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.0
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97491
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Created attachment 49456
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49456=edit
fix for riscv targets
> Still broken
Sorry, it's the first I hear of this problem on riscv.
The fix is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97606
Bug ID: 97606
Summary: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at
recog.c:2196
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97608
Bug ID: 97608
Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positive when returning
p+1 instead of p
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97604
Bug ID: 97604
Summary: Bad digit separators accepted in pp-numbers
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97607
Bug ID: 97607
Summary: Spurious sign extension
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96892
--- Comment #3 from John Dong ---
(In reply to Thomas Preud'homme from comment #2)
> Wouldn't it be enough to add:
>
> "emit_move_insn (operands[3], gen_rtx_MEM(SImode, operands[3]));"
>
> just before the line "if (TARGET_32BIT)" in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
--- Comment #13 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Tried firefox-82 with LTO+PGO today on gcc-11-4428-g4a369d199bf. It gets a lot
more forward, but still gets stuck. This time on free()->allocate_gcov_kvp
()->alloc() deadloc.
The backtrace:
(gdb) bt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97574
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
Submitted a patch to get the driver to stop mangling nul so it makes it easier
for binutils to detect.
That said Jonathan is right in that there's still a binutils bug here. I had
forgotten that even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97603
Bug ID: 97603
Summary: Failure to optimize out compare into reuse of
subtraction result
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97605
Bug ID: 97605
Summary: unused conditionally freed allocation not eliminated
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97606
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97609
Bug ID: 97609
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that
contains 'decl common' structure, have 'component_ref'
in tree_could_trap_p, at tree-eh.c:2708
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97603
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Shouldn't it be marked as target issue for x86?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97603
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> Shouldn't it be marked as target issue for x86?
Or you means that middle-end should transform code to
int g();
int f(int a, int b)
{
int c = a - b;
if (c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97610
Bug ID: 97610
Summary: [10/11] template argument deduction fails for function
with defaulted lambda as non-type-template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97472
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
I cannot reproduce it w/ gcc-11.0.0-alpha20201025 snapshot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97457
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It's actually a partial cross compiler (-m32), please take a look at the
> build log.
What's this beast exactly? I'm afraid the build log is useless here, it would
be better to post the configure line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97540
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 49445
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49445=edit
Don't extract memory from operand for normal memory constraint.
I'm testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97560
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18cb6195fda69ea8ab8b8a5290dd8c9f8d52b0e6
commit r11-4404-g18cb6195fda69ea8ab8b8a5290dd8c9f8d52b0e6
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97532
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 49444
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49444=edit
Fix invalid address for special memory constraint
I'm testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14e19b82c1e67ead60c3095ac23347317298904b
commit r11-4423-g14e19b82c1e67ead60c3095ac23347317298904b
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97461
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Builds fine for me on powerpc64 LE and BE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928
--- Comment #31 from Richard Biener ---
The following is a testcase triggering the
/* FORNOW: outer loop induction with SLP not supported. */
if (STMT_SLP_TYPE (stmt_info))
return false;
test:
double image[40];
void
foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
This builds for me on powerpc64-linux, so I gather it's on powerpc64le-linux?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It still fails for me with g:2118438f49f0c193abe3fa3def350a8129045746
> Commit Date: Mon Oct 26 19:05:53 2020 +0100
The PowerPC64 issue is different, let me have a quick look at it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
this is patch that moves updates to WPA time. Does it work for you?
Honza
Hi,
this is patch that moves updates to WPA time. Does it work for you?
Honza
2020-10-27 Jan Hubicka
* ipa-modref.c (modref_summaries_lto::duplicate): Check that no clones
happens after modref.
(modref_transform): Rename to ...
(update_signature): ... this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97417
--- Comment #4 from jiawei ---
I had did some tests with this problem and find:
foo.c
#include
extern volatile bool active;
int foo(void)
{
if (!active) {
return 42;
} else {
return -42;
}
}
code generated in foo.s
foo:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97567
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #3)
> The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48722d158cbf692c24025e345ec570f66aa5
>
> commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97589
Bug ID: 97589
Summary: Segementation fault when allocating coarrays.
Product: gcc
Version: coarray_native
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
One can trigger it only with one debug counter value:
-fdbg-cnt=ipa_mod_ref:869-869 (and multiple LTRANS partitions).
The only changed function is in:
comp_unit_maybe_decode_line_info (struct comp_unit *
> So the _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop removes the first unused argument:
>
...
>
> But the analysis is bogus:
>
> ipa-modref: call to _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop/17919 does not clobber
> ref:
> bytes_read alias sets: 7->7
>
> The _read is always modified in the function (if it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
> So the _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop removes the first unused argument:
>
...
>
> But the analysis is bogus:
>
> ipa-modref: call to _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop/17919 does not clobber
> ref:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Thanks for reporting this.
The expansion of assignments to misaligned ssa names
does not handle the case of misaligned stores, which
would result in incorrect code without the assertion.
I have an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97588
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
So the _bfd_safe_read_leb128.constprop removes the first unused argument:
bfd_vma
_bfd_safe_read_leb128 (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
bfd_byte *data,
unsigned int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97581
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #1)
> No, this would be definitely wrong.
Agreed.
> If the original code does not make you happy, do you think sth. along
>
> #define SZ (SZU64 * (sizeof (uint64_t) /
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|[11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
--- Comment #12 from Rimvydas (RJ) ---
Missing #include in testsuite gives
/z/gg/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/memory_resource/new_delete_resource.cc:
In function 'bool aligned(void*)':
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97588
Bug ID: 97588
Summary: Overzealous SRA of boolean bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
So e.g. addr2line is miscompiled:
$ as --32 --compress-debug-sections -o compress.o
/tmp/binutils-gdb/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/dw2-compress-2.s
The .s file is part of the test-suite.
$ ./addr2line 0x0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Points to the following statements:
../bfd/../../bfd/dwarf2.c:2321:13
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/dwarf2.c;h=977bf43a6a181d97fa3ae71329478f9f263b090f;hb=HEAD#l2321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87952
Giuseppe D'Angelo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dangelog at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
I'm going to analyze it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
> There is code in modref-transform that is supposed to update the
> summary. It produces debug output about it, but to be honest I am not
> sure where it will land since we now materialize lazily. Can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97568
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16ad9ae85bb5b9acf80f9d1cf2be5a989ef7ba49
commit r11-4437-g16ad9ae85bb5b9acf80f9d1cf2be5a989ef7ba49
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhonghao at pku dot org.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86577
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97568
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97592
Bug ID: 97592
Summary: Incorrectly set pointer remapping with array pointer
argument to CONTIGUOUS dummy
Product: gcc
Version: og10 (devel/omp/gcc-10)
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97567
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 49448
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49448=edit
Adjust test case for 32 bit
change the testcase type to long long to avoid issues on 32 bit targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92942
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0b09c1296d5334d1d264ba4d39ca932f9572330
commit r11-4441-gc0b09c1296d5334d1d264ba4d39ca932f9572330
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Hi,
> this is patch that moves updates to WPA time. Does it work for you?
Actually it won't help, since it updates only non-lto summary. I am
testing better patch, sorry for that.
Honza
> Hi,
> this is patch that moves updates to WPA time. Does it work for you?
Actually it won't help, since it updates only non-lto summary. I am
testing better patch, sorry for that.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97593
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
The original commit was sent here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01745.html
Git commit: g:315d42482cf3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97590
Bug ID: 97590
Summary: new test case g++.dg/pr97560.C compilation errors
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97590
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31ec7242e1ff1e8da376ec9ffef10b07ac562881
commit r11-4430-g31ec7242e1ff1e8da376ec9ffef10b07ac562881
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97560
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31ec7242e1ff1e8da376ec9ffef10b07ac562881
commit r11-4430-g31ec7242e1ff1e8da376ec9ffef10b07ac562881
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
P.S. if that failure only appeared recently it would be more useful to mail the
libstdc++ list than to add a comment to an old bug that hasn't been touched in
years.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70099
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tonvandenheuvel at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83035
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97591
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Meremyanin ---
g++-10 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/10.2.0/bin/g++-10
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/Cellar/gcc/10.2.0/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin19/10.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97591
Bug ID: 97591
Summary: Segmentation fault by non-type template parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97593
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92942
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97593
Bug ID: 97593
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gt_pch_nx, at
symbol-summary.h:290 since r11-4329-g67f3791f7d133214
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 92942, which changed state.
Bug 92942 Summary: missing -Wstringop-overflow for allocations with a negative
lower bound size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92942
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97594
Bug ID: 97594
Summary: new test case gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr97461.c execution
failure
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 49451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49451=edit
Build log
It's actually a partial cross compiler (-m32), please take a look at the build
log.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #4 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #2)
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
> The expansion of assignments to misaligned ssa names
> does not handle the case of misaligned stores, which
> would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97584
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrea_iob at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97591
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Meremyanin ---
Program source:
// /usr/local/Cellar/gcc/10.2.0/bin/g++-10 -std=c++20 type-level-routes.cpp
#include
#include
// FixedString from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97593
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hmm, this is anoying: we can not store summary to PCH. I guess we want to
collect thunks to a vector and annotate them to callgraph at finalization time
:(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 49449
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49449=edit
preprocessed source, unreduced, gzipped
Here's another example that produces this kind of warning, this time from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #11)
> > Hi,
> > this is patch that moves updates to WPA time. Does it work for you?
> Actually it won't help, since it updates only non-lto summary. I am
> testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97590
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Should be fixed at g:01079b6a9236bd467b445fafaff2659840789a85
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97514
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea0ae4e77a89d4a0492dcbbc13e9cbc19bcc2361
commit r11-4433-gea0ae4e77a89d4a0492dcbbc13e9cbc19bcc2361
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95291
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||v.stiff at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
