[Bug target/97205] arm: Compiler fails with an ICE for -O0 on Trunk and GCC-10 for _Generic feature.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97205] arm: Compiler fails with an ICE for -O0 on Trunk and GCC-10 for _Generic feature.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Bernd Edlinger : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23ac7a009ecfeec3eab79136abed8aac9768b458 commit r11-4668-g23ac7a009ecfeec3eab79136abed8aac9768b458 Author: Bernd Edlinger Date:

[Bug ipa/97698] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in duplicate_thunk_for_node) since r11-4587-gae7a23a3fab74

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97698 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-03 Summary|[11

[Bug c/85019] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85019 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/85019] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85019 ninos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nju044 at hotmail dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug fortran/97692] GNU Fortran is not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97692 --- Comment #3 from ninos --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > aarch64-xilinx-linux-gfortran: command not found > seems like user error. FYI target system: arm64-xilinx-linux build system: ubuntu 16.04 yocto version: zeus (git

[Bug middle-end/97699] New: [11 regression] zero-scratch-regs tests fail on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97699 Bug ID: 97699 Summary: [11 regression] zero-scratch-regs tests fail on arm Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug ipa/97695] [11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu since r11-4587-gae7a23a3fab74.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97695 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.2.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/97697] Segmentation fault on while (true) loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97697 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess an optimization barrier will always work. E.g. adding __asm ("" : "+g" (nrn_pass_num)); before the loop.

[Bug ipa/97698] New: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in duplicate_thunk_for_node)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97698 Bug ID: 97698 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in duplicate_thunk_for_node) Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Created attachment 49495 [details] > Something like this. Doesn't look much better IMHO. A __builtin_cpu_supported_as_compiled () would be nice to have though

[Bug c++/97697] Segmentation fault on while (true) loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97697 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/97627] [9/10/11 Regression] loop end condition missing - endless loop with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97627 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Smaller testcase from other PR, still needs the C++ FE struct S { unsigned short x, y; } m = { 0, 0 }; void __attribute__((noipa)) bar() {} void __attribute__((noipa)) baz() { __builtin_exit (0); } void

[Bug c++/97627] [9/10/11 Regression] loop end condition missing - endless loop with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97627 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- *** Bug 97697 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/97697] Segmentation fault on while (true) loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97697 --- Comment #2 from Marcin Jasinski --- Is there any workaround possible, before next 9.x release?

[Bug c++/97697] Segmentation fault on while (true) loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97697 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/97697] New: Segmentation fault on while (true) loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97697 Bug ID: 97697 Summary: Segmentation fault on while (true) loop Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/97690] (cond ? 2 : 0) is not optimized to int(cond) << 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97690 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/97691] [11 regression] pr91293-3.c fails since r11-4614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97691 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Keywords|

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 49495 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49495=edit Something like this.

[Bug tree-optimization/97693] [11 Regression] SVE: ICE in prepare_load_store_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c since r11-1143-gb05d5563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97693 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/97695] [11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97695 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/97666] [11 Regression] bootstrap fail for powerpc-darwin while building libgfortran after r11-4485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97666 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 80928, which changed state. Bug 80928 Summary: SLP vectorization does not handle induction in outer loop vectorization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/80928] SLP vectorization does not handle induction in outer loop vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 3 Nov 2020, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 > > --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- > FWIW, x86 source in gcc testsuite should be

[Bug sanitizer/97696] ICE since ASAN_MARK does not handle poly_int sized varibales

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97696 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Malcomson --- I guess this may also happen for the emission of ASAN_MARK in `gimple_target_expr`, but haven't yet been able to trigger that.

[Bug sanitizer/97696] New: ICE since ASAN_MARK does not handle poly_int sized varibales

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97696 Bug ID: 97696 Summary: ICE since ASAN_MARK does not handle poly_int sized varibales Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-checking

[Bug tree-optimization/80928] SLP vectorization does not handle induction in outer loop vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80928 --- Comment #32 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac6affba97130bcbffb21bd9f8ca53c7aac89551 commit r11-4652-gac6affba97130bcbffb21bd9f8ca53c7aac89551 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97666] [11 Regression] bootstrap fail for powerpc-darwin while building libgfortran after r11-4485

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97666 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d1b813d0f7c9a8d80b0aee6eb1418b0afdf0f84 commit r11-4653-g9d1b813d0f7c9a8d80b0aee6eb1418b0afdf0f84 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/97695] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

11.0.0 20201103 (experimental) [master revision 682ed7ad230:259379fab27:0caf400a865cb771f76bf1025cfc2a83e8ef00ed] (GCC) [509] % [509] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out [510] % [510] % gcctk -O3 small.c; ./a.out Floating point exception [511] % [511] % cat small.c int *a, b, **c = , d, e; int f(int g

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- FWIW, x86 source in gcc testsuite should be converted to __builtin_cpu_supports().

[Bug fortran/97692] GNU Fortran is not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97692 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/97694] ICE with optional assumed rank class(*) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694 martin changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/97694] New: ICE with optional assumed rank class(*) argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97694 Bug ID: 97694 Summary: ICE with optional assumed rank class(*) argument Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/97693] [11 Regression] SVE: ICE in prepare_load_store_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c since r11-1143-gb05d5563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97693 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug tree-optimization/97693] New: [11 Regression] SVE: ICE in prepare_load_store_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c since r11-1143-gb05d5563

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97693 Bug ID: 97693 Summary: [11 Regression] SVE: ICE in prepare_load_store_mask, at tree-vect-stmts.c since r11-1143-gb05d5563 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/97692] GNU Fortran is not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97692 --- Comment #1 from ninos --- Created attachment 49493 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49493=edit gfortran config log

[Bug fortran/97692] New: GNU Fortran is not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97692 Bug ID: 97692 Summary: GNU Fortran is not working Product: gcc Version: 9.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c/97578] ice during IPA pass: inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- > It needs to refer to the DW_TAG_formal_parameter DIEs, and only the PARM_DECLs > map to those. It has problem with the partitioning (if we call a callee from different parititon) and also if the callee is

Re: [Bug c/97578] ice during IPA pass: inline

> It needs to refer to the DW_TAG_formal_parameter DIEs, and only the PARM_DECLs > map to those. It has problem with the partitioning (if we call a callee from different parititon) and also if the callee is compiled before caller (as it should) we will call cgraph_node::release_body and that will

[Bug c/97578] ice during IPA pass: inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug c/97578] ice during IPA pass: inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, I comitted patch as is and we could see if any memory can be conserved by being more precise. I still think the debug info should not need decls here. Honza

[Bug fortran/97652] [11 Regression] New gfortran.dg/pdt_14.f03 failure after g:617695cdc2b3d950f1e4deb5ea85d5cc302943f4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97652 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- The following works with and without -flto (fixes the endless loop without and the execute fail with) diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c index b7129dcbe6d..4643fff243f

[Bug tree-optimization/97691] New: [11 regression] pr91293-3.c fails since r11-4614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97691 Bug ID: 97691 Summary: [11 regression] pr91293-3.c fails since r11-4614 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/97578] ice during IPA pass: inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97578 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f89dcf93348b44b8ea2b57f940fcdaeae0f764f6 commit r11-4648-gf89dcf93348b44b8ea2b57f940fcdaeae0f764f6 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Tue

[Bug c++/97658] Tired of having to change make files on every new version. Damnit!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97658 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Nonsense. Your code is buggy, the warning tells you about it. If you don't want to know that your code has undefined behaviour, don't enable warnings.

[Bug c++/97658] Tired of having to change make files on every new version. Damnit!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97658 --- Comment #3 from hubert.vansteenhuyse at freecode dot be --- You are killing that marvelous gcc compiler by doing this, this is my point.

[Bug tree-optimization/97690] (cond ? 2 : 0) is not optimized to int(cond) << 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97690 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- More generally, Clang seems to reliably turn cond ? (2<

[Bug tree-optimization/97690] (cond ? 2 : 0) is not optimized to int(cond) << 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97690 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- It seems to be target-independent. For aarch64, -O3 and -Os both give: f(bool): tst w0, 255 csetw0, ne lsl w0, w0, 1 ret g(bool): ubfiz w0, w0, 1, 8

[Bug tree-optimization/97690] New: (cond ? 2 : 0) is not optimized to int(cond) << 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97690 Bug ID: 97690 Summary: (cond ? 2 : 0) is not optimized to int(cond) << 1 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/97678] [11 regression] execution fail for gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-run-5.c after r11-4614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97678 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:80b6f6cf6374a6541a7515d7bfef1a3506db2a3d commit r8-10606-g80b6f6cf6374a6541a7515d7bfef1a3506db2a3d Author: Richard Biener

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e42cb1d48035b85a43adb202433ff0193c151410 commit r9-9021-ge42cb1d48035b85a43adb202433ff0193c151410 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:725244355f83de56f8692abc6c0e1b3d4d248198 commit r10-8968-g725244355f83de56f8692abc6c0e1b3d4d248198 Author: Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/97678] [11 regression] execution fail for gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-run-5.c after r11-4614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97678 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f53e9d40de7212413b361758d66aafb833173dd9 commit r11-4646-gf53e9d40de7212413b361758d66aafb833173dd9 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8414529156e0bca37647c440c71beeca1d04ac86 commit r11-4647-g8414529156e0bca37647c440c71beeca1d04ac86 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c++/97681] noinline attribute ignored on constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97681 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Guess that particular spot could be changed with: --- gcc/cp/typeck2.c2020-09-12 13:36:42.500499341 +0200 +++ gcc/cp/typeck2.c2020-11-03 10:44:10.257021110 +0100 @@ -935,9 +935,11 @@ store_init_value

[Bug c/97689] (ceilf(begin/(float)tstep))*tstep

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97689 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Ah. So I guess > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tree-vect.h > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tree-vect.h > index 5d8d9eba3f8..c4b81441216 100644 > ---

[Bug c/97689] (ceilf(begin/(float)tstep))*tstep

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97689 --- Comment #1 from Jaap Korthals Altes --- Created attachment 49491 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49491=edit gcc -v

[Bug c/97689] New: (ceilf(begin/(float)tstep))*tstep

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97689 Bug ID: 97689 Summary: (ceilf(begin/(float)tstep))*tstep Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/70210] -march=native and -mcpu=native do not detect ARM cortex-a53 in 32 bit mode on Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70210 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, it doesn't work on a i7-8565U either ... Doesn't work means check_vect () does exit (0). Those do not end up UNSUPPORTED (not sure if using a magic exit code to communicate this would be possible).

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- AVX2 should be detected using __get_cpuid_count, because a sub-leaf needs to be specified for leaf 7.

[Bug target/97642] Incorrect replacement of vmovdqu32 with vpblendd can cause fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97642 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ok, but please also during expansion try to detect the all ones mask case and already during expansion emit normal non-masked load (+ we need a define_insn_and_split for it with pre-reload splitting just in

[Bug testsuite/97688] New: check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 Bug ID: 97688 Summary: check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite

[Bug tree-optimization/97678] [11 regression] execution fail for gcc.target/powerpc/p9-vec-length-epil-run-5.c after r11-4614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97678 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Ah, the vectorized epilogue is wrong since we do not represent the initial value there correctly. We still have the {0, 0} invariant in the corresponding SLP tree. Hmm. So previously we're relying on the

[Bug fortran/92793] Fortran Location Data for Diagnostic lacks the column number – when passing on to ME

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92793 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41f7f6178e2d35288273656dc55dae8fcf3edeb5 commit r11-4639-g41f7f6178e2d35288273656dc55dae8fcf3edeb5 Author: Thomas Schwinge Date:

[Bug fortran/92793] Fortran Location Data for Diagnostic lacks the column number – when passing on to ME

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92793 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ceaf8a54abb3f9bd3c268fe420999a7962b2a15 commit r10-8965-g5ceaf8a54abb3f9bd3c268fe420999a7962b2a15 Author: Thomas

[Bug c++/97671] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl or function_decl or field_decl or type_decl or concept_decl or template_decl, have parm_decl in push_template_decl, at cp/pt.c:6102

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97671 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/97670] [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'mem_ref' in finish_omp_clauses, at cp/semantics.c:8251 since r11-4471-g3a8b20947f2b1559

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97670 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

<    1   2