https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And no, the asm isn't marked volatile, that would have prevented it too:
# define THREAD_SELF \
({ struct pthread *__self; \
asm ("mov %%fs:%c1,%0" :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49668|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess with GCC 6 and later one can use:
void
foo (int *p)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++)
{
if (p[i])
{
int *q;
//asm ("mov %%fs:%c1,%0" : "=r" (q) : "i" (16));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98100
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98016
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Ev Drikos from comment #7)
> Created attachment 49659 [details]
> attachment for pr98016-07
>
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 49645 [details]
> > Fix for the PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96075
--- Comment #15 from Christophe Lyon ---
Yes, the test fails on gcc-10 too.
I tried adding xfail vect_load_lanes in gcc-9, and it correctly makes the test
XFAIL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98122
Bug ID: 98122
Summary: [regression] Accessing union member through
pointer-to-member is not a constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93121
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:896048cf43d5eb21ab7c16553bb9d13b0f890b81
commit r11-5704-g896048cf43d5eb21ab7c16553bb9d13b0f890b81
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93740
--- Comment #4 from m.cencora at gmail dot com ---
I have done some more experiments, and it seems the problem applies to all
pointer-to-member (not just pointer to member function, but also for pointer to
data member).
Also it doesn't matter if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98119
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98118
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97770
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #14 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98112
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago at kde dot org
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
The issue here is that what should happen when definitions marked with used
attribute and unmarked definitions are put in the same section. It has nothing
to do with .retain.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69348
David Friberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davveston at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98117
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98118
--- Comment #1 from xzlsmc ---
Created attachment 49671
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49671=edit
ii file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98118
--- Comment #2 from xzlsmc ---
Created attachment 49672
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49672=edit
compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98119
Bug ID: 98119
Summary: SVE: Wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vectorize
-msve-vector-bits=512 -mtune=thunderx
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98120
Bug ID: 98120
Summary: Multiple definitions (single TU) of explicit
specialization of member enumeration of a class
template
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98100
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96075
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96075
>
> Christophe Lyon changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91442
paul.luck...@rwth-aachen.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.luck...@rwth-aachen.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93259
--- Comment #3 from m.cencora at gmail dot com ---
Still fails on gcc 10.2 and trunk, in all std C++11-20 modes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97942
--- Comment #1 from David Friberg ---
Somewhat related, we may note that GCC accepts-valid the following program, say
(D):
class A { class B {}; };
template struct S {};
template struct S {};
template struct S {};
int main() {}
which is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98118
Bug ID: 98118
Summary: [coroutines] ICE with coroutine with parameter with
non-trivial destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
--- Comment #17 from Florian Weimer ---
Jakub's glibc test failures were due to --prefix=/usr/local, so that glibc
wouldn't find the installed system libgcc_s in /usr/lib64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98116
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |nathan at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97078
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d103763b9bc6a998dd4a453861663b229d7a24a
commit r11-5705-g5d103763b9bc6a998dd4a453861663b229d7a24a
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98082
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d103763b9bc6a998dd4a453861663b229d7a24a
commit r11-5705-g5d103763b9bc6a998dd4a453861663b229d7a24a
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98099
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:277ff3406d533990e98cf1c2075b9dc9db6fa48a
commit r11-5706-g277ff3406d533990e98cf1c2075b9dc9db6fa48a
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98100
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, that is because we don't really copy the decl during cloning, because it
isn't really used in the code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98123
Bug ID: 98123
Summary: if-to-switch tests fail on arm
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
("%d\n", c);
}
***
gcc version:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 11.0.0 20201203 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In the glibc bugzilla or on private IRC I've suggested either:
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/tls.h b/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/tls.h
index a08bf972de..ccb5f24d92 100644
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/nptl/tls.h
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98018
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98117
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98105
--- Comment #2 from Peter Foelsche ---
sorry -- adding a definition outside of class for the variable solves the
problem!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
Bug ID: 98121
Summary: __attribute__ ((used)) should not imply
SHF_RETAIN_SECTION
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98099
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98082
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98123
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98086
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49661|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98086
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4fa2ab664324eca33bd67981698c453820f70b86
commit r10-9116-g4fa2ab664324eca33bd67981698c453820f70b86
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Dec 3 17:49:42 2020 +0100
i386: Fix up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98086
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:756f55e62f73eb32787497eb9e564d4b21a6e637
commit r11-5713-g756f55e62f73eb32787497eb9e564d4b21a6e637
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Dec 3 17:49:42 2020 +0100
i386: Fix up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96960
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95342
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:30b606bb9b9314010a446ea4bed3481632008f75
commit r11-5727-g30b606bb9b9314010a446ea4bed3481632008f75
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98126
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 49675
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49675=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98129
Bug ID: 98129
Summary: Failure on reading big chunk of /dev/urandom
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93740
--- Comment #3 from m.cencora at gmail dot com ---
Still broken in gcc 10.2 and trunk, also in C++20 mode.
The problem seems to show up only when address of member function (virtual or
not) is passed as template parameter - only then gcc fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> And no, the asm isn't marked volatile, that would have prevented it too:
> # define THREAD_SELF \
> ({ struct pthread *__self;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98115
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98113
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
With the patch, vxe/popcount-1.c works on s390 again:
vpopctf:
.LFB2:
.cfi_startproc
vpopctf %v24,%v24
br %r14
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128
Bug ID: 98128
Summary: [11 Regression] Bootstrap failed on 32-bit hosts
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97643
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f1a6501994a2d18ec4fe2a6664637f48021b210
commit r11-5728-g9f1a6501994a2d18ec4fe2a6664637f48021b210
Author: Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97543
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f1a6501994a2d18ec4fe2a6664637f48021b210
commit r11-5728-g9f1a6501994a2d18ec4fe2a6664637f48021b210
Author: Michael Meissner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97059
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88812
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 88812, which changed state.
Bug 88812 Summary: Implement C++20 LWG 2499/P0487R1 - Fixing
operator>>(basic_istream&, CharT*)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88812
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98127
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--- Comment #39
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98086
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 93121, which changed state.
Bug 93121 Summary: std::bit_cast missing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93121
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93121
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98130
Bug ID: 98130
Summary: [11 regression] placement new fails on
webkit-gtk-2.28.4
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98131
Bug ID: 98131
Summary: new test case g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-nodiscard1.C in
r11-5719 has excess errors
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98127
Bug ID: 98127
Summary: [11 regression] libada lacks objects needed for
128-bit types
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98019
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98019
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ea36d20c352a3ca436aa764404f6210b090866b
commit r11-5719-g5ea36d20c352a3ca436aa764404f6210b090866b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98086
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:521c839fad4e4a30cdadda254fb3f07706285033
commit r9-9096-g521c839fad4e4a30cdadda254fb3f07706285033
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Dec 3 19:08:23 2020 +0100
i386: Fix up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93121
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e433b3461ab64b38350817392a77efb67bb78b4
commit r11-5722-g9e433b3461ab64b38350817392a77efb67bb78b4
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97459
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig ---
Yep, it's implemented and works great.
For a simple "sum of digits" program in base ten, it's an acceleration
by more than a factor of two.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98123
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tmp]$ cat x.c
struct dtv_slotinfo_list
{
struct dtv_slotinfo_list *next;
};
extern struct dtv_slotinfo_list *list;
static int __attribute__ ((section ("__libc_freeres_fn")))
free_slotinfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #7 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #4)
> > GAS merges the "R" flag state in .section declarations, silently, and with
> > logical OR, and GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98126
Bug ID: 98126
Summary: -Wsequence-point is non-linear for certain cases
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98112
--- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song ---
Note: -fdirect-access-external-data is architecture-independent. For example,
currently Clang on aarch64 can perform the following optimization:
// clang -target aarch64 -fPIE -O3
adrpx8, :got:var
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98124
Bug ID: 98124
Summary: Z: Load and test LTDBR instruction gets not used for
comparison against 0.0
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98116
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7254a78cf4c419a9b9361289d8c535130cf1dfd0
commit r11-5712-g7254a78cf4c419a9b9361289d8c535130cf1dfd0
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98115
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7254a78cf4c419a9b9361289d8c535130cf1dfd0
commit r11-5712-g7254a78cf4c419a9b9361289d8c535130cf1dfd0
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #4)
> GAS merges the "R" flag state in .section declarations, silently, and with
> logical OR, and GCC should do the same. So if you have:
>
> int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #7)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #4)
> > > GAS merges the "R" flag state in .section
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98107
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98107
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62fb1b9e0da44a15b0434def20724f989d61e27b
commit r11-5708-g62fb1b9e0da44a15b0434def20724f989d61e27b
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98116
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98115
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
Bug ID: 98125
Summary: New test case g++.dg/pr93195a.C in r11-5656 has excess
errors
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98122
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98122
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo