https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
--- Comment #10 from Nick Desaulniers ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> I've said in that thread that I don't really like disabling the inlining, if
> we wanted to make sure everything is stack protected, we'd need to disable
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98361
Bug ID: 98361
Summary: L1/L2 cache characteristics not recognized with
-mtune=znver2
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98363
Bug ID: 98363
Summary: C++ 20 module ICE for fast_io library
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98363
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||unlvsur at live dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Started with r10-5250-g8b905e9b0c09530c0f660563540257f3d181c2ac
> Perhaps peephole2s or something similar to catch that?
A patch(with peephole2) is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80588
Ivan Sučić changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sucicf1 at outlook dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98368
Bug ID: 98368
Summary: Seg fault on template method missing required return
statement
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
ted LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 11.0.0 20201217 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98367
Bug ID: 98367
Summary: ICE with CTAD non-type template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98343
--- Comment #4 from Pekka S ---
And indeed the patch works on x86_64-w64-mingw32, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Seems like since that revision we completely elide the memcmp check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98367
--- Comment #1 from Justin Bassett ---
It also ICEs with a segfault even if the `myobject` doesn't do CTAD itself but
has its type explicitly specified: https://godbolt.org/z/Mjfe6c .
Inlining the non-CTAD version does not ICE, though:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98366
Bug ID: 98366
Summary: [11 Regression] wrong-code with memcmp and -m32
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96840
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79f57d5cb070bb02ea0a34b5f42658d6659b19a8
commit r11-6245-g79f57d5cb070bb02ea0a34b5f42658d6659b19a8
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 49791
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49791=edit
new diff with improvements
New diff with a better implementation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98340
Bug ID: 98340
Summary: gcc trunk build with clang failure, part 2
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98340
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97504
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98341
Bug ID: 98341
Summary: [11 Regression] Ada bootstrap fails with Storage_Error
stack overflow or erroneous memory access on m68k
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
URL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
I guess Jakub can chime in. He was actively involved in Linux kernel
discussion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98340
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Before r0-99643-g2defb926479247a61fe0fffbcf95597722a94c40 this used to be
rejected with:
pr98340.C: In member function ‘int uintset::hash::foo() [with T = int]’:
pr98340.C:33:18: instantiated from here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98342
Bug ID: 98342
Summary: Allocatable component in call to assumed-rank routine
causes invalid pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98045
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
---
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
