https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98365
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
> cnt.1_7 = (unsigned char) cnt_21;
> _8 = cnt.1_7 + 1;
> cnt_16 = (char) _8;
> cnt_9 = _3 == _6 ? cnt_16 : cnt_21;
>
In tree_if_conversion, there's is_cond_scalar_reduction, i'm think to extend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98523
Bug ID: 98523
Summary: Bug with class static definition and non-type template
parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519
--- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner ---
I agree with Segher. Given the 'magic' we need to add the missing 'p' and set
the length for normal RTL, I don't see any reasonable way to add it to asm. We
will just need to use a hook (or make one) to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98473
--- Comment #3 from Borislav Stanimirov ---
By the way, this is not just some esoteric synthetic example. A type which is
copy-constructible but not copy-assignable is very useful to model immutable
objects.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98258
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Chinoune from comment #7)
> $ gfortran-10 -O3 -fopenmp -fopenacc -c bug_omp_acc.f90
> $ gfortran-10 bug_omp_acc.o -lgomp -o test.x
Contrary to my suggestion, you have omitted -fopenacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98258
--- Comment #7 from Chinoune ---
$ gfortran -O3 -fopenmp -fopenacc -foffload=-fno-openmp bug_omp_acc.f90 -o
test.x
mkoffload: fatal error: either '-fopenacc' or '-fopenmp' must be set
compilation terminated.
lto-wrapper: fatal error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89126
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98258
--- Comment #6 from Chinoune ---
There is no mention of "-foffload=-fno-openmp" on documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Offloading#Compilation_options
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98365
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
> Shouldn't cnt_21 = PHI , stmt relevant?
>
for stmt: cnt.1_7 = (unsigned char) cnt_21, the operand is defined by a
previous iteration of the loop which is assumed to be handled in
induction/reduction.
But
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92587
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96381
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98518
Bug ID: 98518
Summary: std::array not bound checked with _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98258
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Monakov ---
One possible solution is -foffload=-fno-openmp
Another possible solution is separate compilation and linking, with only
OpenACC enabled at link step (needs explicit -lgomp):
gfortran -fopenmp -fopenacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98323
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The original intent in the C standard was definitely to allow at least
some cases of subobjects; the May 20, 1988 list of changes in the third
public review draft of C89 has as item 10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519
Bug ID: 98519
Summary: rs6000: @pcrel unsupported on this instruction error
in pveclib
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98520
Bug ID: 98520
Summary: nodiscard not diagnosed in comma operator
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98519
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
That fell off the plate. I imagine we are going to need a hook with asm that
makes sure none of the memory references are PC-relative.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98504
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but I don't see how this is possible. The
code in the Go frontend is
if (suffix.compare(2, 5, "thunk") == 0
&& Gogo::is_digits(suffix.substr(7)))
return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98029
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a000eb5918e09d28838ef572f4eea924d32db09b
commit r11-6450-ga000eb5918e09d28838ef572f4eea924d32db09b
Author: Martin Uecker
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
Willy Tarreau changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 98503, which changed state.
Bug 98503 Summary: [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global
variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98381
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 94246, which changed state.
Bug 94246 Summary: [9 Regression] valgrind error for ./gfortran.dg/bessel_5.f90
since r9-1566-g87c789f1c0b2df41
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98177
Przemyslaw Wirkus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98448
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Hm, I've just tried that on x86_64-linux with:
../configure --disable-multilib --with-build-config=bootstrap-O3
--enable-languages=c,c++
and it's fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0926259f9fc21a7f1e09f45f8aede156ef249585
commit r11-6437-g0926259f9fc21a7f1e09f45f8aede156ef249585
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98270
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 98270 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 98270, which changed state.
Bug 98270 Summary: [11 Regression] UBSAN: /gcc/tree-vect-slp.c:2396:16: runtime
error: load of value 112, which is not a valid value for type 'bool' since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90255
Alexander Goomenuk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emerg.reanimator at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98475
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508
--- Comment #2 from Joerg ---
Oh okay. Is it possible to prevent that from happening?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806
>
> --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> > Since -9223372036854775808 is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96782
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 96782, which changed state.
Bug 96782 Summary: Failure to optimize comparison with bitwise not-ed with self
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96782
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98511
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98510
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 98511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98455
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98437
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-04
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302
--- Comment #15 from Alex Coplan ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> > which is miscompiled at -O2 -ftree-vectorize or -O3.
>
> What a great reduction, can you please share knowledge how did you achieve
> that?!
Hi Martin,
Sorry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
But this
sprime = eliminate_avail (gimple_bb (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (use)), use);
should make it more conservative (compared to the more desirable use of
gimple_bb (stmt) aka 'b').
The issue is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98282
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98472
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.4.1 |11.0
--- Comment #9 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461
--- Comment #11 from Denis Yaroshevskiy
---
Previous 128bit contained a bug.
Here is an updated one: https://godbolt.org/z/6vdxro
There is still a bit of a difference between 2 versions, not sure if important.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96782
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ad64e807ffca93e927b68f1aa0cea54dacbe9afd
commit r11-6433-gad64e807ffca93e927b68f1aa0cea54dacbe9afd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200
--- Comment #45 from Mark Wielaard ---
Note that the hack in comment 43 doesn't really work with elfutils since the
.symver attribute doesn't work exactly like the assembly construct with @@@.
The @@@ symver variant see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98291, which changed state.
Bug 98291 Summary: multiple scalar FP accumulators auto-vectorize worse than
scalar, including vector load + merge instead of scalar + high-half insert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98291
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8837f82e4bab1b5405cf034eab9b3e83afc563ad
commit r11-6434-g8837f82e4bab1b5405cf034eab9b3e83afc563ad
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98282
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
So the classification as VN_REFERENCE is wrong. We're doing
case tcc_reference:
/* VOP-less references can go through unary case. */
if ((code ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98288
--- Comment #2 from Matthieu M ---
Richard Smith (Clang) agreed that the following program should return 0, and
fixed the behavior in Clang (trunk) in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48517.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98459
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98499
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88767
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #13)
> Hi Richard，
>
> As checking the changed code as in comment 9, it seems there is another
> opportunity to improve the performance: By improving locality of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98282
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13b80a7d1b9b712651f5ece589634a6e57c26362
commit r11-6440-g13b80a7d1b9b712651f5ece589634a6e57c26362
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b41e6dd50f329b0291457e939d4c0dacd81c82c1
commit r11-6439-gb41e6dd50f329b0291457e939d4c0dacd81c82c1
Author: Richard Sandiford
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98511
Bug ID: 98511
Summary: [11 Regression]: Go build fails on sparc64 with
"error: reference to undefined name 'SYS_SETRESGID'"
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
URL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98437
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Matthew Malcomson :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f2b73175666f678adbf007907c7aa2661284bd3
commit r11-6441-g7f2b73175666f678adbf007907c7aa2661284bd3
Author: Matthew Malcomson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89057
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98500
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Summary|[11 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98511
--- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> dup
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 98510 ***
Odd, I even searched for the error message before reporting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39bd65faee3bafe2dc067e5fedb5079896551a8a
commit r11-6442-g39bd65faee3bafe2dc067e5fedb5079896551a8a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98510
Bug ID: 98510
Summary: [11 Regression] bootstrap broken in libgo on
sparc64-linux-gnu, building the 32bit multilib
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98509
Bug ID: 98509
Summary: BUGURL quotation problem in libcody
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94246
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f448af69b208ba95496748c4596a22d11b1a09b9
commit r9-9148-gf448af69b208ba95496748c4596a22d11b1a09b9
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508
Bug ID: 98508
Summary: Sanitizer disable -Wall and -Wextra
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98508
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90806
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Since -9223372036854775808 is 0x8000 and ar3[0] == 1 it suggests
> that the offset is somewhere truncated to 32bits ... but I can't reproduce
> with a x86_64 to aarch64 cross and your reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
--- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> But this
>
> sprime = eliminate_avail (gimple_bb (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (use)), use);
>
> should make it more conservative (compared to the more desirable use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95771
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24cd9afe617a39801d190418cf3fbab3bc3742a7
commit r11-6443-g24cd9afe617a39801d190418cf3fbab3bc3742a7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98295
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98294
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96320
--- Comment #27 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 49875
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49875=edit
Fix for the cases in comments 23 and 24
Hi Damian,
Happy New Year! or I wish you a better one anyway.
I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513
Bug ID: 98513
Summary: [10/11 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 since
r10-2804-gbf05a3bbb58b3558
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.3.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98337
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98308
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e79d76a16c56df0f838b9aede69c0a158203f56
commit r11-6444-g9e79d76a16c56df0f838b9aede69c0a158203f56
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95771
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Should be fixed now, except that for __uint128_t we aren't able to optimize
away the conditional in if (x) return __builtin_popcountll (x >> 64) +
__builtin_popcountll (x); else return 0; - the phiopt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98258
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openacc, openmp
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98268
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.0|10.2.1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98334
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I think turning (int) (y - 1U) * x + x into unsigned mult is OK even early.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Jan 2021, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98464
>
> --- Comment #8 from Kewen Lin ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> >
emchr (s, c, (unsigned long)-1);
|^~~~~~
Seen with: 11.0.0 20210104 (experimental)
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
