https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95434
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98692
--- Comment #8 from Nick Child ---
Hello all,
Thanks for taking a look at this. In response to some questions:
I am using Valgrind 3.16.1 (latest release).
And I have encountered this issue on a Power 8 and Power 9 LE machine with
multiple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98746
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98355
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98690
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a9e37150c448d7058550398ad98c74fcb33b595
commit r10-9280-g0a9e37150c448d7058550398ad98c74fcb33b595
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66dd412feeab29783fcdcf7ab36f20c5dd7b2332
commit r11-6791-g66dd412feeab29783fcdcf7ab36f20c5dd7b2332
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98659
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98749
Bug ID: 98749
Summary: No precondition checks in , and
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98656
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95465
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nbkolchin at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nbkolchin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98682
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98708
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98638
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98638
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f27cd6f42261e838677dfd0652f09cc0dfd6a42b
commit r11-6790-gf27cd6f42261e838677dfd0652f09cc0dfd6a42b
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
>
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
> So modref allocates a fnspec_summary for an unknown indirect call (NULL
> callee)
> but then in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
>
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
> So modref allocates a fnspec_summary for an unknown indirect call (NULL
> callee)
> but then in compute_parm_map calls function_or_virtual_thunk_symbol on
> that NULL callee unconditionally. We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
> I can't reproduce the CCP ICE on trunk, I guess that was fixed at some point.
Yes, this one got fixed with r10-4264-g6773658a809fbebc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
At least the
firstprivate(detach_event1, detach_event2)
on parallel look incorrect, the vars are uninitialized at that point, so
copying those copies uninitialized values.
private(detach_event1,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98748
ptomsich at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ptomsich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98330
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So modref allocates a fnspec_summary for an unknown indirect call (NULL callee)
but then in compute_parm_map calls function_or_virtual_thunk_symbol on
that NULL callee unconditionally. We have a meaningful
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98748
Bug ID: 98748
Summary: Increased precision for points-to analysis
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98463
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sguelton at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98579
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98638
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97673
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97673
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d6f7e92c3b737736a2d8ff97a71af9f230c2f88
commit r11-6788-g7d6f7e92c3b737736a2d8ff97a71af9f230c2f88
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98349
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
So on gimple (with a cc1 cross) I can't see anything obviously wrong but we
vectorize the check_union128 function and apply IPA constprop around the TU.
So please see what's actually wrong here - you have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98130
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess the first ICE could be fixed by using just "const_int_operand" through
define_mode_iterator for the altivec non-vsx modes in:
(define_expand "vec_set"
[(match_operand:VEC_E 0 "vlogical_operand")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97673
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> that is, we end up with
>
>[local count: 73320728]:
> _99 = {j$b_2(D)};
> _100 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(_99);
> _101 = [vec_duplicate_expr]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50001|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98746
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
the -j4 build is configured with
--enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++
--prefix=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot
--with-gcc-major-version-only
--program-prefix=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98145
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97673
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is that we are inlining
# .MEM_5 = VDEF <.MEM_1(D)>
master.0.sub3noiso.constprop (1, z_2(D), y_3(D), x_4(D), 0B, 0B, 1, 1, 0, 0);
$12 = void
and duplicate the clones BLOCK tree via
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98747
Bug ID: 98747
Summary: aarch64: __ARM_FEATURE_MEMORY_TAGGING is defined on
ilp32
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98065
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98476
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98476
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:049bfd186fae9fb764a3ec04acb20d3eaacda7a3
commit r11-6787-g049bfd186fae9fb764a3ec04acb20d3eaacda7a3
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98746
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
the reports are too big, please find them at
https://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/ usage-*
eog isn't able to disaply those, I used gwenview to display the svg files.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98746
Bug ID: 98746
Summary: [11 Regression] memory hog for a lto+pgo build on
powerpc64*-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98745
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98744
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98745
Bug ID: 98745
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
print_mem_ref / c_pretty_printer::primary_expression)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98744
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98744
Bug ID: 98744
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_arg, at
gimple.h:3246 since r11-6735-g424deca72b63e644
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98699
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 5
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5=edit
patch
Can somebody test this? As said I believe there's a wrong-code piece left
(but the testcase in this PR is too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is that hi_start isn't halved I think or hi_start isn't
added when i&1 != 0. So probably all non-single round duplicate
are broken right now.
@@ -5091,13 +5091,14 @@ duplicate_and_interleave
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98690
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b8741c98f2876a430c12c85b396d29a87c9c488
commit r11-6786-g9b8741c98f2876a430c12c85b396d29a87c9c488
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98743
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98743
Bug ID: 98743
Summary: ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:220
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98476
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98476
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98737
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98742
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98731
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98737
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> This can be optimized with peephole2, we already have similar case in
> sync.md:
>
> ;; This peephole2 and following insn optimize
> ;; __sync_fetch_and_add (x,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98686
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88356
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Can't reproduce any of the issues in comment#0 and comment#1
> with current HEAD on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Confirmed for GCC10 r10-9193 and GCC11 r11-6032 and above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98740
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98740
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:921fbde7ae928bb258ea4d3f3adb0fdf0bfa4854
commit r9-9189-g921fbde7ae928bb258ea4d3f3adb0fdf0bfa4854
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98740
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4779ef35735e32b8a8418ad20c36919bd19c19a8
commit r10-9278-g4779ef35735e32b8a8418ad20c36919bd19c19a8
Author: Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98740
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:665e80ca5ec84ccf77d5e18d7ca802d38d5e270d
commit r11-6785-g665e80ca5ec84ccf77d5e18d7ca802d38d5e270d
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98742
Bug ID: 98742
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected class
'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in
finish_omp_clauses, at cp/semantics.c:7435
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98740
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org |
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98740
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98736
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] Wrong|[10/11 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
So the question is whether we can make vect_compute_data_ref_alignment
vectype agnostic (to also fix the required same vectype for multi SLP nodes
covering the same DRs) and instead make DR_MISALIGNMENT a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98739
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98739
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96109
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
> Sorry for late response. The option that seemed to be causing the issue was
> arm_fp16_format.
How do the string values differ? Are they also different string pointers but
having a same value?
> The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
> Yeah, good point.
>
> But we do not have a complete program here at all, so this doesn't
We do have:
https://github.com/randombit/botan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98549
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #12)
> for (long i; i != compress_n_blocks; ++i)
It's not the code I pasted:
> for (long i = 0; i < compress_n_blocks; ++i) {
>unsigned char S[32], S2[32];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98738
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Also on Darwin:
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/task-detach-6.c execution test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task-detach-6.f90 -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90859
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98737
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
This can be optimized with peephole2, we already have similar case in sync.md:
;; This peephole2 and following insn optimize
;; __sync_fetch_and_add (x, -N) == N into just lock {add,sub,inc,dec}
;; followed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98741
Bug ID: 98741
Summary: [modules] ICE/SIGSEGV reading compiled module cluster
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98740
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
The summary you quote is the 'gnat' testsuite. IIRC acats doesn't have any
(it's just a shell script wrapping some proprietary testsuite harness)
101 - 197 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
