https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49701|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97683
--- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm pretty sure this is a gas bug. I used git bisect to track it down to
binutils commit ae9d2233e61a98ff8dba56be10219aa5306ffc9a which caused gcc to
start passing --gdwarf-5 on the gas command
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94669
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95644
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:89100826acec92dfaa6ab8f2646b8053e7dbc67c
commit r11-6874-g89100826acec92dfaa6ab8f2646b8053e7dbc67c
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88548
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8cef3cba6945730c69e15dcdad726e74b50fe58
commit r11-6878-ga8cef3cba6945730c69e15dcdad726e74b50fe58
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8cef3cba6945730c69e15dcdad726e74b50fe58
commit r11-6878-ga8cef3cba6945730c69e15dcdad726e74b50fe58
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98801
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think we need a builtin. Because we could just improve the code
generation instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63792
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98732
郑之为 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 50039
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50039=edit
ELFv1 support
Revised patches. I wasn't happy with the use of a ".text" symbol in the
previous patch since some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Created attachment 50040
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50040=edit
Patch
Patch in testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98801
Bug ID: 98801
Summary: Request for a conditional move built-in function
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97399
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] g++|[9/10 Regression] g++ 9.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e3beaca15cab2de88a68d76f0aabc68e68f678a
commit r11-6850-g4e3beaca15cab2de88a68d76f0aabc68e68f678a
Author: Prathamesh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97960
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Is it maybe fixed with the latest re-org of split_constant_offset?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51b23ba76f00610360a023de4cdae1641ca3b961
commit r10-9287-g51b23ba76f00610360a023de4cdae1641ca3b961
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98771
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
> I can't reproduce these failures with my solaris2.11 cross. The dump and the
Please note that the failure only occurs for i386-pc-solaris2.11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98744
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The
+ if (!fn || DECL_HAS_IN_CHARGE_PARM_P (fn))
+/* The base constructor has more parameters, so we can't just change the
+ call target. It would be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97960
--- Comment #7 from Alex Coplan ---
FWIW, the testcase now exits cleanly on AArch64 with current trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
> So I wasn't able to reproduce on a x86_64 host bootstrapping a 32bit
> compiler configured as
>
> --enable-languages=c++,ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-09-23 00:00:00 |2021-1-22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98535
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, can you see whether just the
diff --git a/gcc/tree-data-ref.c b/gcc/tree-data-ref.c
index 9d07b415e9d..d19c5eb51e4 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-data-ref.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-data-ref.c
@@ -3924,9 +3924,25 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98787
Bug ID: 98787
Summary: Aliasing not detected with array elements or some
intents
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98636
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|5.4.0 |
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98255
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e287a2a11d7958e5d9f7c6172e59cc83495e393a
commit r11-6852-ge287a2a11d7958e5d9f7c6172e59cc83495e393a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] larger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 50032
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50032=edit
another reduced test case
another reduced test case (this seems to be wrong code)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
https://bugs.debian.org/980629 points to similar issue reported at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918341 for the trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792
Bug ID: 98792
Summary: Fail to use SHRN instructions for narrowing shift on
aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98129
--- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> I had one (random?) failure with append_1.f90 which I am unable to reproduce.
Likely origin: parallel make -j4 check-fortran and
% grep -il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98452
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98771
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50027
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50027=edit
patch
Patch I am testing (note I couldn't reproduce the issue so it would be nice if
you can verify the fix).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98255
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11 Regression] wrong|[10 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98789
Bug ID: 98789
Summary: Error with bit-operation after macro operation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98791
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97301
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98788
Bug ID: 98788
Summary: simplify_replace_fn_rtx crash on
riscv64-glibc-linux-gnu for glibc sincos32.c
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98777
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 50031
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50031=edit
reduced test case
the reduction from https://bugs.debian.org/980429
$ x86_64-linux-gnu-g++-10 -std=c++17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85804
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Note the cited fix is also on the GCC 10 branch now so checking whether it's
fixed there would be nice (as Joel said on trunk it's got latent).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98785
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #0)
> The behavior looks strange: if we consider forced unwinding a special
> exception type, both throw() and throw(int) should catch it.
It's not strange if you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bad25eb56bd16f3482f856a75b1c1ae5cfe1c4f
commit r11-6854-g8bad25eb56bd16f3482f856a75b1c1ae5cfe1c4f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> I think it's fixed with r11-6804-g2b27f37f90cb66e2.
But it fails on gcc-10 branch since g:ff22b4e8d0613170601d28eec9462ea31147c7c7.
@Marek: Can you please take a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
I tried to apply the trunk fix for PR98659 on the gcc-10 branch, but it still
shows an ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98793
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Looks like an interaction between threading and vector lowering, with
-mavx512bw it works (using SDE).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98793
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] wrong code |[11 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd61ca67f97acc5462d02676380af92329c37bb2
commit r11-6851-gfd61ca67f97acc5462d02676380af92329c37bb2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90248
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36fe1cdc9534c36c02803ce97557130354d2b2a0
commit r11-6853-g36fe1cdc9534c36c02803ce97557130354d2b2a0
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98791
Bug ID: 98791
Summary: ICE in paradoxical_subreg_p (in ira) with SVE, LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[10 Regression]
ted LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 11.0.0 20210122 (experimental) (GCC)
I am unable to further reduce the testcase. I have several similar testcases,
all seem to be related to higher values of
--param=max-jump-thread-duplication-stmts=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787
--- Comment #14 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #9)
> > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> >
> > > I guess it is because -mxgot is supposed to be handled by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98792
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98794
Bug ID: 98794
Summary: @file error checking is inconsistent
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782
Feng Xue changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxue at os dot
amperecomputing.com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98771
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so it's eventually a multilib building (--enable-targets=all) though the
errors sound like frontend errors ...
But if just the tree-data-ref.c hunk is enough to trigger it then it
hints at an issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98786
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97683
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790
Bug ID: 98790
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in append_to_statement_list_1
(Segmentation Fault)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
> Patch I am testing (note I couldn't reproduce the issue so it would be nice if
> you can verify the fix).
Sure: I'll first try another
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98789
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98790
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
the last archive test rebuild from 2020/12/26 didn't show this, using gcc-10
20201224
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98788
--- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer ---
Indeed, thanks, seems to be working again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82547
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98773
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
[...]
> Sure: I'll first try another i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap. Solaris will
The i686-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98766
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98783
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98794
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31566.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Version|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Sidwell :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eee8ed2f22b36dfe64a9516171871476e8ede477
commit r11-6860-geee8ed2f22b36dfe64a9516171871476e8ede477
Author: Nathan Sidwell
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94368
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98783
--- Comment #3 from hasse.christoph at cern dot ch ---
--help=optimizers on GCC 10.2.0 build with --enable-frame-pointer prints:
-fomit-frame-pointer[enabled]
This flag should however be disabled by default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98093
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Xiong Hu Luo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3a8ef8ef2ac077b393687624b09db6ab31c7746
commit r11-6858-ge3a8ef8ef2ac077b393687624b09db6ab31c7746
Author: Xionghu Luo
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98756
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98573
--- Comment #6 from David Neill Asanza ---
Thanks for looking into this Paul.
I'm looking forward to having this fixed. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98739
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b46027c6544d3680b3647d3c771c9844b8b95772
commit r11-6856-gb46027c6544d3680b3647d3c771c9844b8b95772
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98795
Bug ID: 98795
Summary: modules testsuite testnames
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98783
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to hasse.christoph from comment #5)
> I wasn't aware of this fix yet, sorry for the duplicate.
That's fine, you could not know about it :)
> I really appreciate you taking the time to solve this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98783
--- Comment #5 from hasse.christoph at cern dot ch ---
I wasn't aware of this fix yet, sorry for the duplicate.
I really appreciate you taking the time to solve this so quickly! :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98796
Bug ID: 98796
Summary: Incorrect .debug_line emitted for DWARF5
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98796
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-01-22
Ever confirmed|0
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo