https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100255
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:297bfacdb448c0d29b8dfac2818350b90902bc75
commit r12-112-g297bfacdb448c0d29b8dfac2818350b90902bc75
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100240
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Peter Taraba from comment #3)
> unfortunately this is using nvcc, which calls probably gcc internally, so
> adding option "-save-temps to the complete compilation command" is not going
> to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Version|10.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100254
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99929
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98136
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94605
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100262
--- Comment #1 from Romain Naour ---
Seems related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> > I think SLP did not mark the load as unaligned even though it knows it is
> > one:
> But gimple tree is marked as aligned.
Right and we are saying the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100255
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100253
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100254
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100243
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.3.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100257
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. We fail to elide the 'pixel' temporary, that is, express
memcpy (, src_33, 6);
_1 = pixel.b;
_2 = pixel.g;
_3 = pixel.r;
in terms of loads from src. Then the backend intrinsic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94605
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18dd25a17d30bc9038b5693fdd664b3b1f340cf3
commit r8-10917-g18dd25a17d30bc9038b5693fdd664b3b1f340cf3
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98136
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ced791a38484705f9d2a009c76674d8e7f0ca57
commit r8-10918-g5ced791a38484705f9d2a009c76674d8e7f0ca57
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99929
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42a8453ae895c232082d0bcff9ae0edbe599ffc6
commit r8-10919-g42a8453ae895c232082d0bcff9ae0edbe599ffc6
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100262
Bug ID: 100262
Summary: warning on sparc64: 'strcmp' reading 1 or more bytes
from a region of size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overread]
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100257
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100250
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100258
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Is it really so much more efficient? The store from reg is 4 bytes
while a movl is 6 - for a larger loop keeping its size small would be
important.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100238
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-26
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100254
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99473
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:577d05fc914338cd7ddc254f3bee4532331f5c13
commit r12-114-g577d05fc914338cd7ddc254f3bee4532331f5c13
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98117
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6da7015827a0557108a65f384419cddd6f8ba57
commit r8-10920-gc6da7015827a0557108a65f384419cddd6f8ba57
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6a720bf5b1328ff018880063ae3d1e777e5b61d
commit r8-10922-ge6a720bf5b1328ff018880063ae3d1e777e5b61d
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96591
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0669d6ac82726cd751b73c7fb04194b446dfd49
commit r8-10921-gd0669d6ac82726cd751b73c7fb04194b446dfd49
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100257
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> for vec_init, if higher part is zero, we can use vmovd/vmovq instead of
> vector concat.
That is related to PR 94680 if not the same.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100262
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100254
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think the problem is during Cross-jumping in jump2 pass, so the r11-5391
change just likely triggered a latent problem. Will have a look in detail
soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99880
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99954
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee16f803357725df96e8c232b8066d9db3ec16a8
commit r10-9768-gee16f803357725df96e8c232b8066d9db3ec16a8
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100053
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be0093e7273f00fe850578415c0b06bc7dec6dc0
commit r10-9769-gbe0093e7273f00fe850578415c0b06bc7dec6dc0
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99956
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99956
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ff66d1ea48960fe96bb51a750c01135e65fe452
commit r12-125-g6ff66d1ea48960fe96bb51a750c01135e65fe452
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100257
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> > for vec_init, if higher part is zero, we can use vmovd/vmovq instead of
> > vector concat.
>
> That is related to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100233
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to gcc-bugs from comment #0)
> https://eel.is/c++draft/range.elements#iterator-3
>
> With some good-will you could say that `get` should be called unqualified :)
Nope, that call is required to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100264
--- Comment #1 from Christoph M. ---
A patch can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568680.html
It does not show any regressions (target riscv*).
The patch does not include a new test case to demonstrate it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99880
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05b35bc2ba6c96ef3d468b246ab141f95694d95a
commit r10-9767-g05b35bc2ba6c96ef3d468b246ab141f95694d95a
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100265
Bug ID: 100265
Summary: [RISCV] Use proper fences for atomic load/store
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100267
Bug ID: 100267
Summary: gcc -O2 for avx512 instrincts generates extra warnings
and less optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100266
--- Comment #1 from Christoph M. ---
A patchset to resolve this can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568684.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100261
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100260
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55578
Vadim Zeitlin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100238
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100266
Bug ID: 100266
Summary: [RISCV] Provide programmatic implementation of CAS
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100243
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It should be already fixed on the branch by
32a859531e854382c18abf0b14a306d83f793eb5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100257
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
> const __m128i in = _mm_setr_epi16(val_0, val_1, val_2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
in ix86_expand_vector_init, we can generate asm like
vmovd val_0, %xmm0
pinsrw $1, val_1, %xmm0
pinsrw $2, val_2, %xmm0
and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301
--- Comment #10 from Andre Vehreschild ---
Created attachment 50674
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50674=edit
Delta from Steve's patch to one submitted for acceptance to implement
random_init for coarray=shared.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98301
Andre Vehreschild changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #11 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96591
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||8.4.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98117
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.4.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 98117, which changed state.
Bug 98117 Summary: [8 Regression] wrong code with "-O3 -fno-tree-scev-cprop"
since r8-1163-g7078979b291419f3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98117
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100259
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-26
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100251
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100259
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f4aa4579a6c03e0a0b0a6aec68aa5a301264d45
commit r12-120-g3f4aa4579a6c03e0a0b0a6aec68aa5a301264d45
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263
Bug ID: 100263
Summary: Wrong removal of statement in copyprop3
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
--- Comment #8 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch (version 2) posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055991.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100264
Bug ID: 100264
Summary: REE does not work on PARALLEL expressions with a
single register SET child
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100262
--- Comment #3 from Romain Naour ---
Created attachment 50677
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50677=edit
arch/sparc/kernel/mdesc.o generated with gcc -E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100265
--- Comment #1 from Christoph M. ---
A patchset to resolve this can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568684.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100243
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100239
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 50678
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50678=edit
gcc11-pr100239.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100252
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Internal compiler error |[8/9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88580
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100262
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
I should add: because mdesc is a member of another struct it can't have a
flexible array member, but as long as the enclosing struct mdesc_handle is not
embedded as a member in another struct it can have a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100236
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100270
Bug ID: 100270
Summary: _Generic can't distinguish VLS SVE vectors and GNU
vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100270
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100250
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
This is a consequence of fixing pr97172 by clearing the VLA bounds encoded by
the front end in function attributes before the IL enters the middle end: they
VLA bounds aren't used to decide whether to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100271
Bug ID: 100271
Summary: ICE in in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16480
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217
--- Comment #9 from Ilya Leoshkevich ---
Created attachment 50679
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50679=edit
regtesting this patch now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100262
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, looking at the r11-39 optimized dump, I actually don't see anything
wrong.
The path taken in the testcase should be:
[local count: 1073741824]:
b.0_1 = b;
if (b.0_1 != 2)
goto ;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-26
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100261
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100200
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100055
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
This fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99465#c1 but not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99465#c0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100269
Bug ID: 100269
Summary: [12 Regression] i686 biarch compiler fails for Darwin
after r12-36.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100268
Bug ID: 100268
Summary: lm32-uclinux:
../.././gcc/config/lm32/uclinux-elf.h:70: error:
"LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC" redefined [-Werror]
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100269
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-04-26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100263
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And, just to verify it, I've compiled the testcase with r11-39 with a
breakpoint on pass_expand::execute and set global_options.x_optimize = 0 there,
and resulting testcase passes.
So most likely things go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100250
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100271
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95317
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zchendd at connect dot ust.hk
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100256
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96168
Jeffrey Walton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||noloader at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274
Bug ID: 100274
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
gfc_conv_procedure_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:6131
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
Bug ID: 100273
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
gfc_create_module_variable, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:5352
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100275
Bug ID: 100275
Summary: ICE in gfc_build_null_descriptor, at
fortran/trans-array.c:417
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100275
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0120cd9382728fdc99d4cfdcb72cd0f55aca2ce3
commit r12-136-g0120cd9382728fdc99d4cfdcb72cd0f55aca2ce3
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo