https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100705
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|warn about dead store |RFE: warn about dead store
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97938
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5e7801808d2e9e99dc2931462c69a80c6f0e89cc
commit r10-9840-g5e7801808d2e9e99dc2931462c69a80c6f0e89cc
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91217
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a12ae580e13f5856983142a0234651d8e8aad599
commit r10-9841-ga12ae580e13f5856983142a0234651d8e8aad599
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b13ac26df5e401ce5914b8ec0c862d56edd57913
commit r10-9842-gb13ac26df5e401ce5914b8ec0c862d56edd57913
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99643
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dce71e0a274f58fe7cbabba8760f78469ba13548
commit r10-9843-gdce71e0a274f58fe7cbabba8760f78469ba13548
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99201
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c365bb1462a7a9dadf9b8f8668a0c832b18056c
commit r10-9844-g7c365bb1462a7a9dadf9b8f8668a0c832b18056c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95870
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff24ef677edee888012aaddeb0ec9bbe366b4f57
commit r10-9845-gff24ef677edee888012aaddeb0ec9bbe366b4f57
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96311
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8909ed58700694f5ba66499739edfea90a0fc813
commit r10-9846-g8909ed58700694f5ba66499739edfea90a0fc813
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99901
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5b68416a940b32b739cdc033e018bab5161a721d
commit r10-9847-g5b68416a940b32b739cdc033e018bab5161a721d
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96673
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e206f71eaf98149224269b00407bc5def6ae2dca
commit r10-9848-ge206f71eaf98149224269b00407bc5def6ae2dca
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:decd38f99dd05eb54ddcaee7c52f21a56a844613
commit r10-9849-gdecd38f99dd05eb54ddcaee7c52f21a56a844613
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de47fb31b13e6bd20d693cb1eef47cbfb5de20ce
commit r10-9850-gde47fb31b13e6bd20d693cb1eef47cbfb5de20ce
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96089
--- Comment #2 from Antoni ---
Created attachment 50851
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50851=edit
Add patch to set an arbitrary value to a global variable
I made this patch to set an arbitrary value to a global variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100690
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:317a38cd468d565dc8ce45c6da0dbccf38808f70
commit r12-958-g317a38cd468d565dc8ce45c6da0dbccf38808f70
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100606
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11784fe27d879a10dc8a79212c37f50d4f7146f3
commit r12-959-g11784fe27d879a10dc8a79212c37f50d4f7146f3
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100710
Bug ID: 100710
Summary: static_cast to derived* of base* pointing to
non-static data member of base type not rejected in
constant expression
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84fd1b5dff70cd74aee7e8b18f66959d8b8e1ce7
commit r12-954-g84fd1b5dff70cd74aee7e8b18f66959d8b8e1ce7
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a1010428b3861464eb319c629c68cb13b9ca01e
commit r11-8449-g0a1010428b3861464eb319c629c68cb13b9ca01e
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100694
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-20
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100693
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Confirmed. The define_insn for it is for SImode only as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100693
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100656
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Using a temporary may help:
subroutine s(x)
character(:), allocatable, optional :: x(:)
character(:), allocatable :: y(:)
if ( present(x) ) then
if ( allocated(x) ) then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711
Bug ID: 100711
Summary: Miss optimization for pandn
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41723
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e41d610696b81e72d1d06db176b281424e32fc23
commit r10-9851-ge41d610696b81e72d1d06db176b281424e32fc23
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93295
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99180
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93867
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99118
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96873
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95486
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
commit r10-9852-g92e9b2a995f718f1c2ab1cd0840b439c24d3535f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91933
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59d821d3cce3496b3f4ede6293ffe192d0e56014
commit r10-9853-g59d821d3cce3496b3f4ede6293ffe192d0e56014
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100032
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d83c30ec6c4865ca23a135c067eb9b56ac74a1f2
commit r10-9854-gd83c30ec6c4865ca23a135c067eb9b56ac74a1f2
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90479
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe0f9ef823dda3205638a2f23d08eb7d0bc497b9
commit r10-9855-gfe0f9ef823dda3205638a2f23d08eb7d0bc497b9
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100054
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe0f9ef823dda3205638a2f23d08eb7d0bc497b9
commit r10-9855-gfe0f9ef823dda3205638a2f23d08eb7d0bc497b9
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80456
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75c5c4ab2662a92f0e3811cb17e27cc61814b400
commit r10-9856-g75c5c4ab2662a92f0e3811cb17e27cc61814b400
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a335afe208cd27cf8ee4cb028fb7769700ab6245
commit r10-9857-ga335afe208cd27cf8ee4cb028fb7769700ab6245
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100489
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100676
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b42b5a8a207de5e021a2916281f46bcd60b20d2
commit r12-952-g6b42b5a8a207de5e021a2916281f46bcd60b20d2
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100700
gnzlbg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100463
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100712
Bug ID: 100712
Summary: The vec_splatid instruction allows the creation of
XXSPLTIDP instructions which produces undefined
results.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Christophe Lyon :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a9b3f04c11eb467a8dc504a37dad57a371a0d4c
commit r12-938-g1a9b3f04c11eb467a8dc504a37dad57a371a0d4c
Author: Christophe Lyon
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42579
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100692
Bug ID: 100692
Summary: [11 Regression] ICE in fld_incomplete_type_of, at
tree.c:5452
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 19 May 2021, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #21 from Bernd Edlinger ---
> Hi Srinath,
>
> when we add new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91859
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, but those optimizations are just doing what they are designed to do. I
suspect that the bug is due to the front end inserting a CLOBBER that says it's
ok for those optimizations to do that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-05-20
Summary|[11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100692
--- Comment #1 from Luke Street ---
Preprocessed source was too large to attach, so here's a GitHub gist:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c++
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100685
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
--- Comment #37 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:271fc1caac433e84e6389e73a5bf07350ea545e2
commit r11-8445-g271fc1caac433e84e6389e73a5bf07350ea545e2
Author: Tobias Burnus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100646
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d15a2d261b24adcbfe5e663b15dde3df5d2b3486
commit r12-934-gd15a2d261b24adcbfe5e663b15dde3df5d2b3486
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b536797f7e43c55072a3215735f5833f1d6d218
commit r12-935-g2b536797f7e43c55072a3215735f5833f1d6d218
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99928
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94fa4c67b95c12482b6087d8eef2d72f7b7ea254
commit r12-936-g94fa4c67b95c12482b6087d8eef2d72f7b7ea254
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100693
Bug ID: 100693
Summary: PPC: missing 64-bit addg6s
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100694
Bug ID: 100694
Summary: PPC: initialization of __int128 is very inefficient
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e0a5e3ea37f9d7d2b6f2dab7c0bfbeaf08466a3
commit r12-937-g9e0a5e3ea37f9d7d2b6f2dab7c0bfbeaf08466a3
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100695
Bug ID: 100695
Summary: Format decoder, quoting in 'dump_printf' etc.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
--- Comment #38 from Tobias Burnus ---
I think GCC 12/mainline is now fixed.
The second patch was only applied to GCC 12 – it might need to be backported?
(I have not checked GCC 11 with PowerPC.)
(If there are remaining/new issues, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100692
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100692
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100692
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 50849
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50849=edit
reduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
--- Comment #23 from bernd.eggen at gmail dot com ---
Many thanks Tobias, noted - bw, Bernd
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 09:12, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96711
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100697
Bug ID: 100697
Summary: Missing fwprop for argument register
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100698
Bug ID: 100698
Summary: Error when initializing a struct member of type
char[N] with short string literal
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651
--- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz ---
Simplified a bit :
$ cat z1.f90
module m
type :: t
contains
procedure, pass(this) :: assign_to_string
generic :: assignment(=) => assign_to_string
end type
contains
subroutine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100699
Bug ID: 100699
Summary: g++ doesn't warn uninitialized field when the class is
derived from another class
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210520 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 20 May 2021, sripar01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
>
> --- Comment #23 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #217 from John Buddery ---
Thanks very much for adding the binutils patch.
Sorry, I'm new to .md definitions, so I've probably got this wrong. Did you
mean something like:
(define_insn "call_nogp_longcall"
[(call (mem:DI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100696
Bug ID: 100696
Summary: mult_higpart is not vectorized
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100655
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100676
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100700
Bug ID: 100700
Summary: -Wreturn-type has many false positives
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #23 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #22)
> On Wed, 19 May 2021, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
> >
> > --- Comment #21 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100637
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:507359e1d4d18614eb9679043995edf0675b6ff5
commit r12-940-g507359e1d4d18614eb9679043995edf0675b6ff5
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
--- Comment #25 from SRINATH PARVATHANENI ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #24)
> On Thu, 20 May 2021, sripar01 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97205
> >
> > --- Comment #23 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100702
Bug ID: 100702
Summary: Strict overflow warning regression in gcc 8 onwards
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100703
Bug ID: 100703
Summary: __vector_pair and __vector_quad cannot be passed by
reference
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100702
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100675
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Maybe we should just get rid of the __constant_string_p stuff entirely.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100696
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100688
--- Comment #5 from Antoni ---
This is much less work as I'm reusing the rustc front-end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100702
--- Comment #2 from David Brown ---
Runtime diagnostics can be very useful - but they are a different kind of
warning. In particular, they only show what errors have occurred during your
testing - they don't show what errors /might/ occur.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joern Rennecke :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66c5f24788652a49b528f14e23e8121ad0935ace
commit r12-942-g66c5f24788652a49b528f14e23e8121ad0935ace
Author: Joern Rennecke
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99977
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a193c95590779aad4036f18258b0eebb9f70a62
commit r10-9838-g0a193c95590779aad4036f18258b0eebb9f70a62
Author: Alex Coplan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Joern Rennecke
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5f772bd9847cdbf6a7a6d856de87cb65472d56f4
commit r11-8446-g5f772bd9847cdbf6a7a6d856de87cb65472d56f4
Author: Joern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #219 from John Buddery ---
Great, thanks - I'll look at ia64.c and build and test with that change.
Yes, "b" on ia64 seems to be a branch register, and the brl op only accepts
immediate values not registers. Initially I hoped the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100675
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97051
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96488
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ebotcazou at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #223 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2021-05-20 10:59 a.m., jvb at cyberscience dot com wrote:
> The simplest variant I have is:
>
> (define_insn "call_nogp"
> [(call (mem:DI (match_operand:DI 0 "call_operand" "?b,s"))
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100705
Bug ID: 100705
Summary: warn about dead store
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, I didn't realize we can't push %xmm regs... With loads+stores the pushes
do not look less efficient for this particular example? I suppose a nice
architectural enhancement would be a push-multiple -
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo