[Bug target/11877] gcc should use xor trick with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11877 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/41505] GCC choosing poor code sequence for certain stores (x86)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41505 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/50286] Missed optimization, fails to propagate bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50286 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2011-12-14 00:00:00 |2021-7-26 --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug fortran/101632] New: NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 Bug ID: 101632 Summary: NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101629] New: ICE: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7826

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101629 Bug ID: 101629 Summary: ICE: in cp_finish_decl, at cp/decl.c:7826 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/78888] toupper(x) can be assumed not to be in the range 'a' - 'z'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c/101630] New: ICE with -Wall: in get_constant, at c-family/c-format.c:325

version 12.0.0 20210726 (experimental) [master revision :c09cf6429:124bb55777c280a85d0c72ec13e293a32917a6b9] (GCC) $ cat mutant.c printf(char[][], ...) { printf(printf); } $ gcc-trunk -Wall mutant.c mutant.c:1:12: error: array type has incomplete element type ‘char[]’ 1 | printf(char

[Bug target/26656] Optimization flaw on conditional set of a bit.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26656 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target Target|

[Bug target/49127] -Os generates constant mov instead of instruction xor and mov when zeroing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49127 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/101632] NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- F2018 introduced the NON_RECURSIVE prefix for procedures and also made procedures recursive by default. This code is conforming to F2018. module bah contains ! ! non_recursive is

[Bug fortran/101632] NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 51207 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51207=edit Diff that implements F2018 NON_RECURSIVE and makes things recursive by default.

[Bug tree-optimization/24696] missing optimization in comparison of results of bit operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24696 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68136] missed tree-level optimization with redundant computations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68136 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-10-28 00:00:00 |2021-7-26 --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/78888] toupper(x) can be assumed not to be in the range 'a' - 'z'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5a8c1382718ae084d46ff9b8a26d6b1d0cb684c commit r12-2519-gd5a8c1382718ae084d46ff9b8a26d6b1d0cb684c Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug rtl-optimization/70782] zero-initialized long returned by value generates useless stores/loads to the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70782 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-26

[Bug target/67510] x86: Faster code is possible for integer absolute value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67510 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/71461] missed optimization in conditional assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71461 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-06-09 00:00:00 |2021-7-26 Severity|normal

[Bug middle-end/19466] [meta-bug] bit-fields are non optimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19466 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/24568] [meta-bug] Missed optimization: trivialization of silly code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24568 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2008-11-22 10:41:24 |2021-7-26 --- Comment #10 from Andrew

[Bug target/66663] gcc misses optimization emits useless test of (a & 31) with 32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/84431] Suboptimal code for masked shifts (x86/x86-64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84431 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fuz at fuz dot su --- Comment #9 from

[Bug target/66663] gcc misses optimization emits useless test of (a & 31) with 32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Andrew

[Bug tree-optimization/101626] [12 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.c:2376

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101626 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization CC|

[Bug c++/55436] g++ compiles invalid code with child class of nested class in template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/51716] access to private member possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51716 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/24926] gcc ignores access level violation for anonymous structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kuba at et dot pl --- Comment #7 from

[Bug c++/52618] Explicit template specialization ignores access rights

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52618 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug c++/52761] [C++11] Missing diagnostic for opaque unscoped enum declaration without base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52761 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- clang declared this as a GNU extention :) :2:6: error: redeclaration of already-defined enum 'E' is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-redeclared-enum] enum E; // illegal ^ :1:6: note: previous definition

<    1   2