[Bug tree-optimization/101763] New: Comments in tree-vrp.c are way out of date

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101763 Bug ID: 101763 Summary: Comments in tree-vrp.c are way out of date Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/101761] Random hang with 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101761 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Probably related to PR97936.

[Bug tree-optimization/57162] Ofast does not make use of avx while O3 does

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57162 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug fortran/101762] ICE in ix86_push_argument, at config/i386/i386.c:4203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target|

[Bug fortran/101762] New: ICE in ix86_push_argument, at config/i386/i386.c:4203

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101762 Bug ID: 101762 Summary: ICE in ix86_push_argument, at config/i386/i386.c:4203 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #40 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #39) > Please open a new bugreport, failures in Comment 37 and Comment 38 have > nothing with r7-1112-gbeed3701c796842abbfb27d7484b35bd82818740 which was > fully reverted. >

[Bug target/101761] New: Random hang with 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101761 Bug ID: 101761 Summary: Random hang with 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.cc Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/101758] Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101758 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 51253 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51253=edit Better patch here is the better patch which also handles the alignment check :).

[Bug fortran/101760] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:290

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101760 Bug ID: 101760 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.c:290 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #39 from Uroš Bizjak --- Please open a new bugreport, failures in Comment 37 and Comment 38 have nothing with r7-1112-gbeed3701c796842abbfb27d7484b35bd82818740 which was fully reverted. (FTR, fixed peepholes were ineffective, so

[Bug tree-optimization/101758] Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101758 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > UBSAN_NULL doesn't check just whether it is non-NULL, but also the alignment. > So no, this doesn't look like the right fix. Ok, I will add the check for align

[Bug tree-optimization/101758] Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101758 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- UBSAN_NULL doesn't check just whether it is non-NULL, but also the alignment. So no, this doesn't look like the right fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/101758] Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101758 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- This is the fix which works: diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.c b/gcc/gimple-fold.c index ad7b140173f..f1fbdbd40c2 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.c +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.c @@ -5587,6 +5587,16 @@ gimple_fold_call

[Bug target/100182] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of atomic_float/1.cc and atomic_float/wait_notify.cc on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182 --- Comment #38 from H.J. Lu --- This time is 29_atomics/atomic_ref/wait_notify.cc in 64-bit on Skylake server: (gdb) bt #0 0x7f897288cc1d in syscall () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x004018be in std::__detail::__platform_wait (

[Bug c/29970] mixing ({...}) with VLA leads to massive breakage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29970 Martin Uecker changed: What|Removed |Added CC||muecker at gwdg dot de --- Comment #8

[Bug tree-optimization/101758] Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101758 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > + && DECL_WEAK (TREE_OPERAND (t, 0))) typo, should have been !DECL_WEAK :).

[Bug target/100438] `_serialize` macro clashes with user defined identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100438 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Filipe Brandenburger from comment #8) > We encountered an issue due to the introduction of the `_serialize()` define > in the build of the fbthrift package on GCC 11 (Fedora 34/35.) > > The error we

[Bug tree-optimization/101758] Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101758 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/101759] #pragma omp declare simd/variant or oacc routine parsing bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101759 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 51252 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51252=edit gcc12-pr101759.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/100438] `_serialize` macro clashes with user defined identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100438 Filipe Brandenburger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||filbranden at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/101759] #pragma omp declare simd/variant or oacc routine parsing bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101759 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/101759] New: #pragma omp declare simd/variant or oacc routine parsing bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101759 Bug ID: 101759 Summary: #pragma omp declare simd/variant or oacc routine parsing bug Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/101757] [9 Regression] Simple integer assigment fails (off-seted by -1) when compiling with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101757 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Summary|Simple integer

[Bug tree-optimization/101758] Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101758 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- You can see the difference here: float b(unsigned a) { return *(float*) } float d1(unsigned a) { unsigned t = a; return *(float*) }

[Bug tree-optimization/101758] Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101758 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|sanitizer

[Bug libbacktrace/101753] ld: Unrecognized argument: --build-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101753 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug sanitizer/101758] New: Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101758 Bug ID: 101758 Summary: Inconsistent optimizations with UBSan Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/101697] [11/12 regression] ICE compiling uClibc-ng for h8300-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101697 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I can't reproduce this on the trunk or with the referenced git hashes. (insn 1444 1443 164 31 (parallel [ (set (mem/f:SI (pre_dec:SI (reg/f:SI 7 sp)) [3 S4 A32]) (reg/f:SI 7

[Bug preprocessor/85211] Document that -isystem automatically adds extern "C" to includes on some targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85211 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||4225 Target|

[Bug ipa/92801] Drop unused struct fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92801 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug ipa/92811] Odd optimisation differences with lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92811 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/101726] target_clone resolver does not generate PIC despite -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Kneifel --- OK, so declaring the default function as local might make gcc assume that the function body is available in the same translation unit, thus rendering the relocation locally resolvable. Thus said, I tried

[Bug fortran/101757] Simple integer assigment fails (off-seted by -1) when compiling with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101757 --- Comment #2 from federico --- Tested on godbolt.org: https://godbolt.org/z/sPsdE6Y3W works on: 5.5, 6.3, all 10, all 11 error on: all 7, all 8, all 9

[Bug c++/101663] [11/12 Regression] GCC crashes when assigning one single_view to another.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101663 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/101725] simple requirement of parameter in defaulted non-type template parameter considered non-dependent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101725 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/92802] Struct field reordering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92802 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug ipa/91771] Optimization fails to inline final override.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91771 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug ipa/89989] missed devirtualization opportunity on final function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89989 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/91771] Optimization fails to inline final override.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91771 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The other thing to note is that for "d.do_foo", the front-end decides it is direct call to Derived::do_foo and IPA is not involved there.

[Bug ipa/91771] Optimization fails to inline final override.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91771 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2019-09-16 00:00:00 |2021-8-3 Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/101757] Simple integer assigment fails (off-seted by -1) when compiling with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101757 --- Comment #1 from federico --- Actually, the results are not "off-seted": whatever was to be set to 0 is properly set; values that should be set "+1" are given "-1" instead: itest(1)= 0 itest(2)=-1 test(1)= F test(2)= T Federico

[Bug fortran/101757] New: Simple integer assigment fails (off-seted by -1) when compiling with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101757 Bug ID: 101757 Summary: Simple integer assigment fails (off-seted by -1) when compiling with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug sanitizer/101749] gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4) > Wrong comment, please disregard it (or better "mark it as a spam :) That would lock your account. I'll tag it as obsolete instead.

[Bug tree-optimization/101756] [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion in 'ssa_name')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101756 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #0) > ea; Which could be simply !!ea, of course.

[Bug tree-optimization/101756] New: [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion in 'ssa_name')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101756 Bug ID: 101756 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: non-trivial conversion in 'ssa_name') Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/96160] Building gcc with multiple make jobs fails with: gcc/xgcc: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96160 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||enrico.scholz+bugsgcc@sigma

[Bug testsuite/95840] Parallel build fails due to missing "gcc/xgcc"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95840 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/101751] asan_test.C fails with excess error with glibc-2.34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101751 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/101755] [12 regression] gcc.target/arm/reg_equal_test.c fails on arm since r12-2637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101755 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/101755] New: [12 regression] gcc.target/arm/reg_equal_test.c fails on arm since r12-2637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101755 Bug ID: 101755 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.target/arm/reg_equal_test.c fails on arm since r12-2637 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug d/101692] Referenses in Slist are not counted by GC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101692 Eugene Zhiganov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/101692] Referenses in Slist are not counted by GC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101692 --- Comment #8 from Eugene Zhiganov --- Created attachment 51250 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51250=edit eventDriivenStateMachines in D, working version attached the file, maybe someone will be interested

[Bug fortran/101632] NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:37:40PM +, jb at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 > > Janne Blomqvist changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug fortran/101632] NON_RECURSIVE procedure prefix is unsupported. F2018 defaults to recursive procedures.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101632 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/101750] [12 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc fails on aarch64 since r12-2523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750 --- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > On x86_64 the testcase is optimized to the following now: > not sure how we conclude that 'n' is not written to anywhere. The issue > persists even when I

[Bug c++/101663] [11/12 Regression] GCC crashes when assigning one single_view to another.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101663 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/101754] New: Missed fold for a/b*b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101754 Bug ID: 101754 Summary: Missed fold for a/b*b Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug target/101742] [12 Regression] ICE in expand_mult, at expmed.c:3585 since r12-2666-g29f0e955c97da002

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101742 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- A

[Bug tree-optimization/101636] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: conversion of register to a different size in 'view_convert_expr')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101636 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- > Please bisect with -fno-vect-cost-model then Doing that, it starts with r11-1450-g8a9e230f41eb4063.

[Bug sanitizer/101749] gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 --- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #3) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > This was last changed for PR100114 > > It's very strange that the fix is only backported to GCC 10 & 9, not 11. > > I

[Bug tree-optimization/101548] dependence analysis fails with .MASK_STORE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101548 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/101752] vectorizer failed due to comilattion tme alias of same pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101752 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug sanitizer/101749] gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 --- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > This was last changed for PR100114 It's very strange that the fix is only backported to GCC 10 & 9, not 11. I think just backporting it can resolve this issue.

[Bug libbacktrace/101753] New: ld: Unrecognized argument: --build-id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101753 Bug ID: 101753 Summary: ld: Unrecognized argument: --build-id Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/101636] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: conversion of register to a different size in 'view_convert_expr')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101636 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 3 Aug 2021, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101636 > > Martin Liška changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug sanitizer/101749] gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||100114 --- Comment #2 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/101752] New: vectorizer failed due to comilattion tme alias of same pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101752 Bug ID: 101752 Summary: vectorizer failed due to comilattion tme alias of same pointer Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/101750] [12 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc fails on aarch64 since r12-2523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Ever confirmed|0

[Bug testsuite/101751] asan_test.C fails with excess error with glibc-2.34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101751 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/101626] [12 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.c:2376 since r12-622-ge2bc5b6c04df8200

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101626 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/101720] compile time hog with -g -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101720 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- OK, so there's nothing obvious apart from that we accumulate lots of debug stmts/insns which, compared to regular stmts, are not "optimized", so they simply pile up when doing any IL copying like inlining.

[Bug testsuite/101751] New: asan_test.C fails with excess error with glibc-2.34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101751 Bug ID: 101751 Summary: asan_test.C fails with excess error with glibc-2.34 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/101750] [12 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc fails on aarch64 since r12-2523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Target|

[Bug tree-optimization/101636] [11/12 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (error: conversion of register to a different size in 'view_convert_expr')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101636 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/101750] New: [12 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc fails on aarch64 since r12-2523

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101750 Bug ID: 101750 Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc fails on aarch64 since r12-2523 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/101663] GCC crashes when assigning one single_view to another.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101663 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-03

[Bug middle-end/101690] failure to shrink wrap simple loop with more aggressive jump threading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101690 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/101749] gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 --- Comment #1 from Xi Ruoyao --- I guess it's fixed in trunk by something in 90e46074e6b3561ae7d8ebd205127f286cc0c6b6: @@ -166,9 +158,10 @@ bool SupportsColoredOutput(fd_t fd) { #if !SANITIZER_GO // TODO(glider): different tools may require

[Bug sanitizer/101749] gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-08-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug sanitizer/101744] [12 regression] hwasan new failures since r12-2424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101744 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matmal01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/101746] [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/20050826-2.c and gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c fail since r12-2591

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101746 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- OK, sorry for the duplicates, I tried to find reports about 20050826-2.c, found none, and forgot to check about the other two.

[Bug sanitizer/101749] New: gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101749 Bug ID: 101749 Summary: gcc -static-libasan broken because libasan.a needs __cxa_guard_release in libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101670] Internal compiler error with concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101670 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c++/101748] New: ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have vector_type in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1206

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101748 Bug ID: 101748 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or qual_union_type, have vector_type in digest_init_r, at cp/typeck2.c:1206 Product: gcc

[Bug target/101685] [12 Regression] -march=amdfam10 -mno-lzcnt Defines __LZCNT__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101685 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Thanks for the fix!

[Bug tree-optimization/101741] [12 Regression] ICE in fold_stmt, at gimple-range-fold.cc:541 since r12-2517-g1ce0b26e6e1e6c34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101741 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #2) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > > why is the test-case marked as "invalid"? > > It is definitely well-formed syntactically, but I'm not sure how

[Bug target/101726] target_clone resolver does not generate PIC despite -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101726 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/101737] SH4 -Os causes internal compiler error when building pixman

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101737 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101747] New: Two-argument version of attribute malloc does not perform overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101747 Bug ID: 101747 Summary: Two-argument version of attribute malloc does not perform overload resolution Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/101741] [12 Regression] ICE in fold_stmt, at gimple-range-fold.cc:541 since r12-2517-g1ce0b26e6e1e6c34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101741 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > why is the test-case marked as "invalid"? It is definitely well-formed syntactically, but I'm not sure how to classify a case of redefining a standard function

[Bug c++/101730] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_ctor_initializer_opt_and_function_body, at cp/parser.c:24549 since r11-723-g020d86db8896f088

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101730 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/101741] [12 Regression] ICE in fold_stmt, at gimple-range-fold.cc:541 since r12-2517-g1ce0b26e6e1e6c34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101741 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug sanitizer/101111] xgcc cross-compiler for x86_64-apple-darwin in GCC 11.1 doesn't generate weak symbols, resulting in undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:759f3854f0fdb4add2961bfafd1ee793f392f70a commit r12-2686-g759f3854f0fdb4add2961bfafd1ee793f392f70a Author: Mosè Giordano Date:

[Bug c++/101740] The symbol "<" after a name follows "~" as an id-expression of a member access expression should be interpreted as a delimiter of template-argument-list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101740 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/101696] Function multiversioning not usable with new x86-64-v*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101696 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug analyzer/101721] [12 Regression] ICE in DECL_FUNCTION_CODE, at tree.h:4006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101721 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/101743] [12 Regression] Error: insn does not satisfy its constraints since r12-2640-gf7bf03cf69ccb7dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101743 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/101746] [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/20050826-2.c and gcc.dg/uninit-pred-9_b.c fail since r12-2591

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

<    1   2   3   >