[Bug target/103330] [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-vector-complex-float.c by r12-5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103330 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-19 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/103330] New: [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-vector-complex-float.c by r12-5378

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103330 Bug ID: 103330 Summary: [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512fp16-vector-complex-float.c by r12-5378 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status:

[Bug target/103097] ICE in move_for_stack_reg, at reg-stack.c:1186

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103097 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- The checking patch also trigers on coroutines.exp testing (as expected).

[Bug ipa/103052] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Function is found to be pure looping but has a call to a noreturn function in it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103052 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka --- There is wrong order of conditionals in code merging previously known info with current info. IPA propagation gets state NEITHER by walking around the non-trivial cycle while function was earlier detected as

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Basically with lower_gimple_bind we re-wire the BLOCK tree to match the GIMPLE_BLOCK IL nesting. Whatever gets "unreachable" in that process is "lost". The following shows this, but it seems it is

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17) > > I don't mind closing this as invalid, however this isn't a known limitation, > > it's a new limitation. > > Yes, it may be a new limitation or we may be

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- The first stmt we complain on remains in the same function. The functions scope tree at the point of complaint is { Scope block #0 { Scope block #0 (unused) struct coroutine_handle

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- > I don't mind closing this as invalid, however this isn't a known limitation, > it's a new limitation. Yes, it may be a new limitation or we may be affected by the same issue by now for ref size.

[Bug tree-optimization/103222] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103222 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #10 from Avi Kivity --- It's reducing with the stricter test, expect something in around 24 hours.

[Bug middle-end/103149] cc1: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' with -fharden-conditional-branches and SVE turned on

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103149 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/103325] 1 << -1 is never reduced to a constant during gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103325 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libgomp/102838] [12 regression] Several tests SEGV in gomp_loop_ull_init

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102838 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #9 from Avi Kivity --- btw, I also noticed these warnings: raft/server.cc: In member function ‘virtual seastar::future<> raft::server_impl::abort()’: raft/server.cc:932:1: warning:

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #8 from Avi Kivity --- Aha, I'll validate against g++ -O0.

[Bug middle-end/103314] [12 regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault since r12-5358

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103314 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So can you perhaps check that g++ -O0 -std=gnu++20 -fno-checking -fno-inline accepts it without errors while g++ -O2 -std=gnu++20 ICEs on it?

[Bug middle-end/103314] [12 regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault since r12-5358

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103314 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea2954df43d4162af23a20c84f4c5485463977ac commit r12-5400-gea2954df43d4162af23a20c84f4c5485463977ac Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #6 from Avi Kivity --- Unfortunately, clang doesn't accept the preprocessed source, only the original.

[Bug libstdc++/89740] reading from cin & writing to cout sync_with_stdio(false) has race conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89740 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #14) > > > Richi the configury bits you shared once upon a time had > > > -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations for 500.perlbench. Are there known issues > > > with > >

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #5 from Avi Kivity --- Sure, I'll redo the reduction.

[Bug c++/102217] co_awaiting a temporary produced by ternary operator crashes (double-free)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102217 --- Comment #2 from Max Kellermann --- Also crashes with "gcc version 12.0.0 2027 (experimental) [master r12-5346-gd3a9082d7ac] (Debian 12-2027-1)"

[Bug tree-optimization/103317] [12 regression] Spec 2017 benchmark blender_r fails with -Ofast on PowerPc (power9, power10)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103317 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/103321] [12 regression] ICE at tree-ssa.c:1211 after r12-5300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103321 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Andrew

[Bug c++/102217] co_awaiting a temporary produced by ternary operator crashes (double-free)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102217 --- Comment #1 from Max Kellermann --- Tested again with "g++-11 (Debian 11.2.0-10) 11.2.0", and my demo program still crashes.

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 103088, which changed state. Bug 103088 Summary: [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/103282] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/modref-dse-5.c in r12-5292 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103282 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- > > Richi the configury bits you shared once upon a time had > > -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations for 500.perlbench. Are there known issues > > with > > this test for -ffast-math that we had

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 103230, which changed state. Bug 103230 Summary: ipa-modref-tree.h:550:33: runtime error: load of value 255, which is not a valid value for type 'bool' https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103230 What

[Bug ipa/103230] ipa-modref-tree.h:550:33: runtime error: load of value 255, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103230 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/103230] ipa-modref-tree.h:550:33: runtime error: load of value 255, which is not a valid value for type 'bool'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103230 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74a4ece02df1b1b6f396fd0e24dbbf8b0897858a commit r12-5399-g74a4ece02df1b1b6f396fd0e24dbbf8b0897858a Author: Martin Liska Date:

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is a bad bisection, just change it like: --- pr103328.C~ 2021-11-19 06:20:59.0 -0500 +++ pr103328.C 2021-11-19 06:21:57.0 -0500 @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ void

[Bug target/103302] wrong code with -fharden-compares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103302 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/102988] ICE with -fharden-conditional-branches and C++ and pass by reference return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102988 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 51837 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51837=edit candidate patch under test

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808 --- Comment #54 from Jonathan Wakely --- Looks like it's missing a check for m_alloc having vacuous initialization, i.e. not actually needing any initialization before it's usable.

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Summary|ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/103321] [12 regression] ICE at tree-ssa.c:1211 after r12-5300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103321 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/103322] [12 Regression] galgel from spec2000 is now broken on x86_64 with -Ofast -march=native -flto (on core)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103322 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

)) {} | ^~~ $ /home/dcb/gcc/results/bin/gcc -v gcc version 12.0.0 2029 (experimental) (0e510ab53414430e) $

[Bug c++/103313] nontype_argument_pack - compile error due to unsupported tree

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103313 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-19 CC|

[Bug fortran/103312] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_find_component since r9-1098-g3cf89a7b992d483e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103312 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE in gfc_find_component |[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug c++/103328] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- 1916 /* If STMT has a block defined, map it to the newly constructed block. */ 1917 if (tree block = gimple_block (copy)) 1918{ 1919 tree *n; 1920 n = id->decl_map->get

[Bug c++/103329] [11/12 Regression] Code divergence in debug info with -fdump-tree-original since r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103329 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/103328] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/103329] New: [11/12 Regression] Code divergence in debug info with -fdump-tree-original since r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103329 Bug ID: 103329 Summary: [11/12 Regression] Code divergence in debug info with -fdump-tree-original since r11-291-g0f50f6daa140186a Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status:

[Bug debug/103241] Odd 0 length entries in location lists

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103241 --- Comment #14 from Alexandre Oliva --- Hi, Will, Jakub, Martin, There's nothing particularly unusual about apparently empty ranges, especially when views are enabled, since the very point of location views is to enable multiple states to be

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez --- (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #11) > Historically it has always only been for the test dataset with the problem > Aldy encountered before with the signed zeros. See >

[Bug c++/103328] New: IC in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 Bug ID: 103328 Summary: IC in remap_gimple_stmt, at tree-inline.c:1921 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/102988] ICE with -fharden-conditional-branches and C++ and pass by reference return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102988 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c++/103326] constexpr crashing when uses with vector extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103326 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/103326] constexpr crashing when uses with vector extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103326 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd85c42c36a5d4e00b41ed40bca98598a2fb57c5 commit r12-5398-gdd85c42c36a5d4e00b41ed40bca98598a2fb57c5 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug c++/70796] [DR 1030] Initialization order with braced-init-lists still broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808 --- Comment #52 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #51) > At last, implemented. Marvellous. I will test it by compiling Fedora rawhide and report back with any errors. Nearly 17 years is quite a wait for a fix.

[Bug c++/70796] [DR 1030] Initialization order with braced-init-lists still broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70796 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a84177aff7ca86f501d6aa5ef407fac5e71f56fb commit r12-5397-ga84177aff7ca86f501d6aa5ef407fac5e71f56fb Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug libstdc++/103305] Cannot build libstdc++ with newlib on aarch64-none-elf or bfin-elf with new version of newlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, I think so, otherwise you can only use GCC trunk with the latest newlib. Maybe give it a week to see if anybody notices problems with the new code, then backport. Thanks!

[Bug libstdc++/103305] Cannot build libstdc++ with newlib on aarch64-none-elf or bfin-elf with new version of newlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305 --- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina --- Fixed on master, is this something we'd want to backport to active branches?

[Bug libstdc++/103305] Cannot build libstdc++ with newlib on aarch64-none-elf or bfin-elf with new version of newlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103305 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e510ab53414430e93c6f5b64841e2f40031cda7 commit r12-5396-g0e510ab53414430e93c6f5b64841e2f40031cda7 Author: Tamar Christina

[Bug tree-optimization/102436] [11/12 Regression] Lost Load/Store Motion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102436 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.1, 12.0 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/103249] [11/12 Regression] ICE in clear_padding_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103249 Bug 103249 depends on bug 103248, which changed state. Bug 103248 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in operation_could_trap_helper_p, at tree-eh.c:2479 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103248 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/103181] [9/10/11 Regression] wrong code at -O1 due to conditional division by 0 being executed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103181 Bug 103181 depends on bug 103248, which changed state. Bug 103248 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in operation_could_trap_helper_p, at tree-eh.c:2479 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103248 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/103248] [12 Regression] ICE in operation_could_trap_helper_p, at tree-eh.c:2479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103248 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/103248] [12 Regression] ICE in operation_could_trap_helper_p, at tree-eh.c:2479

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103248 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb15abdc9b61a0b7fa24a37f85d19dc449cfd5bf commit r12-5395-gfb15abdc9b61a0b7fa24a37f85d19dc449cfd5bf Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/102436] [11/12 Regression] Lost Load/Store Motion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102436 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fc859f5efcb4624a8b4ffdbf34d63972af179a8 commit r12-5394-g0fc859f5efcb4624a8b4ffdbf34d63972af179a8 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/103316] PowerPC: Gimple folding of int128 comparisons produces suboptimal code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103316 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Do you maybe have some simple example (of what we generate, and what you say it should be)?

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug regression/103318] Spec 2017 benchmark perlbench_r fails on PowerPC for -Ofast and -O3, passes with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103318 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103088] [12 regression] 500.perlbench from spec 2017 fails since r12-4698

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103088 --- Comment #11 from Tamar Christina --- > > Richi the configury bits you shared once upon a time had > > -fno-unsafe-math-optimizations for 500.perlbench. Are there known issues > > with > > this test for -ffast-math that we had

<    1   2