https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99911
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 85846, which changed state.
Bug 85846 Summary: [Concepts] Concept as value in initializer: bogus
declared-as-implicit-template error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85846
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85846
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98394
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102933
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100493
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d33f68865f6f71c28cfee5dfd91765e86d471ef1
commit r11-9391-gd33f68865f6f71c28cfee5dfd91765e86d471ef1
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103198
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:648d5aa56abd2a0ab36403dd1e14dd225402301a
commit r11-9390-g648d5aa56abd2a0ab36403dd1e14dd225402301a
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99911
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a2c4c1e171d2681a506f6de2235a32293e69b3f
commit r11-9389-g5a2c4c1e171d2681a506f6de2235a32293e69b3f
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85846
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a94867f67e0b48ba53691f1d5f43f5c7d60adecb
commit r11-9388-ga94867f67e0b48ba53691f1d5f43f5c7d60adecb
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98394
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a94867f67e0b48ba53691f1d5f43f5c7d60adecb
commit r11-9388-ga94867f67e0b48ba53691f1d5f43f5c7d60adecb
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102933
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76c730cbf051281ff088ec18ee4f89fee4a8305a
commit r11-9387-g76c730cbf051281ff088ec18ee4f89fee4a8305a
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103735
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103732
--- Comment #2 from gnzlbg ---
> ICC and MSVC both accept it like GCC
That's correct, please feel free to report the bug to them as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77760
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103719
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103718
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103717
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a5c50c3ad2a2f66f1232d25b0f0c15ee1bf449f
commit r11-9386-g1a5c50c3ad2a2f66f1232d25b0f0c15ee1bf449f
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103719
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:689f8fed9b2a250e6cbeeec4fa882b8afd34eec8
commit r11-9385-g689f8fed9b2a250e6cbeeec4fa882b8afd34eec8
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103718
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:689f8fed9b2a250e6cbeeec4fa882b8afd34eec8
commit r11-9385-g689f8fed9b2a250e6cbeeec4fa882b8afd34eec8
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #18)
> The location is still present at g:45f4e2b01b82c72b3a11ff4ad184d7edcf0e63d4
> but is lost after:
>
> commit 9f55df63154a39d67ef5b24def7044bf87300831
> Author:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd43568cc54e17c8b4a845677872c6282bc6dbb7
commit r12-6003-gfd43568cc54e17c8b4a845677872c6282bc6dbb7
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bogus name and location in |[12 Regression] bogus name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103737
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor ---
With the patch in comment #13 committed in
g:9695e1c23be5b5c55d572ced152897313ddb96ae GCC 12 prints the following for the
test case in comment #0:
pr40635.c: In function ‘server_init’:
pr40635.c:14:9:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103737
Bug ID: 103737
Summary: new test case decltype-bitfield1.C fails in r11-9363
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92292
Tomas Kalibera changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54924
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130
--- Comment #5 from Tomas Kalibera ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> See bug 92292. The extra attribute isn't ignored, it simply means the
> function has multiple format attributes, which is valid, but should
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90906
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80532
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130
--- Comment #4 from Tomas Kalibera ---
Created attachment 52008
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52008=edit
Example from comment 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Kalibera ---
Created attachment 52007
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52007=edit
Patch to ignore first format for builtins that have more than one
This patch for 10.3.0 instructs gcc to ignore the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 85651, which changed state.
Bug 85651 Summary: Invalid -Warray-bounds warning with -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85651
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85651
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103736
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 91457, which changed state.
Bug 91457 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for
warnings, line 25)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
Give me money
MR CRABS
MOENTY
NOW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98166
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81592
Bug 81592 depends on bug 78969, which changed state.
Bug 78969 Summary: bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|8.0 |10.3.0, 11.2.0, 8.3.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:639ece7abfa3688008cb791aec4c7a1a4f76e59f
commit r12-6002-g639ece7abfa3688008cb791aec4c7a1a4f76e59f
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103736
Bug ID: 103736
Summary: snprintf bogus format-truncation, disregarding modulo
on argument
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324
R. Diez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdiezmail-gcc at yahoo dot de
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103735
Bug ID: 103735
Summary: [12 Regression] Extra glibc "make check" failures
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992
--- Comment #37 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
OS bug confirmed to be still present on macOS 12.1 (darwin 21.2.0), at least on
Intel. I don't have a non-patched compiler on ARM right now to confirm, but I
don't expect it to be arch-dependent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is still not equivalent, I bet you meant return !__builtin_memcmp.
Anyway, the reason we can optimize memcmp and can't optimize the loop that the
defaulted operator== emits is that there is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
--- Comment #2 from Jan Engelhardt ---
== New input ==
$ cat x.cpp
struct S {
char b[16];
#if __cplusplus >= 202000L
bool operator==(const S &) const = default;
#else
inline bool operator==(const S ) const { return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103734
--- Comment #1 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
I think ipa-cp heuristics still needs some work. It is nice that we got
it to do something, but I just checked and with LTO+PGO build of clang
it produces cca 30 clones that are not "for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103194
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #15)
> > Is the behavior well defined for n >= 64? I got
> >
> > foo.c:11:19: warning: left shift count >= width of type
> > [-Wshift-count-overflow]
> >11 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103094
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103734
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||26163
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103094
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73c3dacef9a30d7d66918606a97c496c71289f1b
commit r12-5998-g73c3dacef9a30d7d66918606a97c496c71289f1b
Author: Richard Sandiford
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782
--- Comment #30 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #29)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #23)
> > I wonder if we can get rid of the final magic parameter too, we run with
> > --param ipa-cp-unit-growth=80
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103734
Bug ID: 103734
Summary: IPA-CP opportunity for imagick in SPECCPU 2017
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7527ddecef4721b3f4b00e8ad22d390b457c310b
commit r12-5997-g7527ddecef4721b3f4b00e8ad22d390b457c310b
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57690
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
Bug ID: 103733
Summary: Missed optimization: defaulted op== for trivially
comparable types worse than memcmp
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103732
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
ICC and MSVC both accept it like GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103723
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually this is more complex, I had missed the original add too.
the full loop:
[local count: 958878296]:
_18 = (unsigned int) ivtmp.7_15;
len_test_12 = _18 + 1;
ivtmp.7_7 = ivtmp.7_15 + 1;
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103732
Bug ID: 103732
Summary: Incorrect constexpr evaluation of runtime expression
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-15
Summary|Loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103666
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103721
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 regression] wrong code |[12 regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101846
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For bar, the problem is that while vpmovdw is AVX512F, we actually recognize it
only at combine time as vpermw (with selected exact permutation) combined with
low part extraction. And vpermw is only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103715
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|[10/11/12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86973
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86973
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86973
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103350
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103350
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5c965374cd688b0a8ad0334c85c971c1e9c3f44
commit r12-5996-gd5c965374cd688b0a8ad0334c85c971c1e9c3f44
Author: Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103408
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bf5d9108ae2dcb6cb883442d7bd299fd8fc15e9
commit r12-5995-g6bf5d9108ae2dcb6cb883442d7bd299fd8fc15e9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
--- Comment #9 from Zhendong Su ---
Perhaps the following is due to the same root cause?
[558] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
[559] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
Aborted
[560] % cat small.c
int a;
int main() {
unsigned b = 0;
for (a = 2; a <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103729
--- Comment #1 from Przemyslaw Wirkus ---
Cheers! I will have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103563
--- Comment #4 from Samuel Hangouët ---
Ok. Thanks for the tip and sorry for the wrong report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103730
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103730
--- Comment #2 from Jan Smets ---
PEBKAC. Thanks for clarifying.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99217
--- Comment #7 from huangpei at loongson dot cn
---
Created attachment 52006
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52006=edit
patch 0001
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99217
huangpei at loongson dot cn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huangpei at loongson dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103704
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103730
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
What do you find wrong about it?
((logger_msginfo *) & logger)->Fn
where logger is a pointer and logger_msginfo is a 2 * sizeof (void*) sized
struct does reference the pointer after the logger variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103731
Bug ID: 103731
Summary: 390: inefficient 64-bit constant generation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103711
Sebastian Redl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.redl@getdesigned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103730
Bug ID: 103730
Summary: ubsan: store with insufficient space for an object of
type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103619
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e75a0a03588977c8c758091f9b50d456a5f67227
commit r12-5994-ge75a0a03588977c8c758091f9b50d456a5f67227
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:127c7178d5ec502d95862fd823537cbca1a0cb99
commit r12-5993-g127c7178d5ec502d95862fd823537cbca1a0cb99
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86976
Bug 86976 depends on bug 71557, which changed state.
Bug 71557 Summary: time_get is case sensitive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71557
What|Removed |Added
101 - 200 of 216 matches
Mail list logo