https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105445
Bug ID: 105445
Summary: miscompile on ia64 with -foptimize-sibling-calls
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105446
--- Comment #1 from KL ---
gcc-12.1.0-RC-20220429
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
--- Comment #9 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6)
> Created attachment 52910 [details]
> untested patch
when will this patch be applied to the main? I am working on building a new
series of canadian toolchains.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105447
Bug ID: 105447
Summary: load introduction when reading an adjacent variable
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105445
--- Comment #1 from matoro ---
Created attachment 52914
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52914=edit
Preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6)
> Created attachment 52910 [details]
> untested patch
FWIW, patch fixes bootstrap for {powerpc,i686,x86_64}-apple-darwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105446
Bug ID: 105446
Summary: [modules] Partitions: Segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
Bug ID: 105449
Summary: suspicious optimization since GCC 10.1.0 from -
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
--- Comment #1 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
Created attachment 52916
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52916=edit
a simple reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
--- Comment #4 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
Thanks for the clarification!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449
Gilles Gouaillardet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gilles.gouaillardet at gmail
dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105351
--- Comment #4 from Gawain Bolton ---
I am confused as to how the requirement expression be valid and yet not be
evaluated.
This is also not consistent with how the requirement check is done for
functions.
Finally, this also begs the question
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75bbc3da3e5f75f683fa33e309045c582efd20eb
commit r13-60-g75bbc3da3e5f75f683fa33e309045c582efd20eb
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373
--- Comment #14 from Avi Kivity ---
Do you confirm that my observation about the generated gimple corresponds to
the bug?
If so, is there a central point where this anonymous variables are named?
Perhaps we can breakpoint on D.2741 and see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105448
Bug ID: 105448
Summary: load introduced when passing a struct as argument
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fsb4000 at yandex dot ru
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105435
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|diagnostic |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105450
Bug ID: 105450
Summary: get_time %y reads more than 2 digits (and differ from
strptime)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, the above is GCC 12 behavior, in 11.x and earlier it has been indeed
broken and %y and %C were aliases to %Y.
25 matches
Mail list logo