[Bug libstdc++/105450] get_time %y reads more than 2 digits (and differ from strptime)

2022-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105450 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug target/105445] New: miscompile on ia64 with -foptimize-sibling-calls

2022-05-01 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105445 Bug ID: 105445 Summary: miscompile on ia64 with -foptimize-sibling-calls Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/105446] [modules] Partitions: Segfault

2022-05-01 Thread deco33000 at yandex dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105446 --- Comment #1 from KL --- gcc-12.1.0-RC-20220429

[Bug tree-optimization/105432] [13 regression] bootstrap build error in mpfr in stage2

2022-05-01 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432 --- Comment #9 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6) > Created attachment 52910 [details] > untested patch when will this patch be applied to the main? I am working on building a new series of canadian toolchains.

[Bug c/105447] New: load introduction when reading an adjacent variable

2022-05-01 Thread absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105447 Bug ID: 105447 Summary: load introduction when reading an adjacent variable Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/105445] miscompile on ia64 with -foptimize-sibling-calls

2022-05-01 Thread matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105445 --- Comment #1 from matoro --- Created attachment 52914 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52914=edit Preprocessed source.

[Bug tree-optimization/105432] [13 regression] bootstrap build error in mpfr in stage2

2022-05-01 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6) > Created attachment 52910 [details] > untested patch FWIW, patch fixes bootstrap for {powerpc,i686,x86_64}-apple-darwin.

[Bug c++/105446] New: [modules] Partitions: Segfault

2022-05-01 Thread deco33000 at yandex dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105446 Bug ID: 105446 Summary: [modules] Partitions: Segfault Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/105449] New: suspicious optimization since GCC 10.1.0 from -

2022-05-01 Thread gilles.gouaillardet at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449 Bug ID: 105449 Summary: suspicious optimization since GCC 10.1.0 from - Product: gcc Version: 10.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/105449] suspicious optimization since GCC 10.1.0 from -

2022-05-01 Thread gilles.gouaillardet at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449 --- Comment #1 from Gilles Gouaillardet --- Created attachment 52916 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52916=edit a simple reproducer

[Bug c/105449] suspicious optimization since GCC 10.1.0 from -O2

2022-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/105449] suspicious optimization since GCC 10.1.0 from -O2

2022-05-01 Thread gilles.gouaillardet at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449 --- Comment #4 from Gilles Gouaillardet --- Thanks for the clarification!

[Bug c/105449] suspicious optimization since GCC 10.1.0 from -O2

2022-05-01 Thread gilles.gouaillardet at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105449 Gilles Gouaillardet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gilles.gouaillardet at gmail dot

[Bug c++/105351] [concepts] Constraint checking does correctly match static member attributes

2022-05-01 Thread gawain.bolton at free dot fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105351 --- Comment #4 from Gawain Bolton --- I am confused as to how the requirement expression be valid and yet not be evaluated. This is also not consistent with how the requirement check is done for functions. Finally, this also begs the question

[Bug tree-optimization/105432] [13 regression] bootstrap build error in mpfr in stage2

2022-05-01 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75bbc3da3e5f75f683fa33e309045c582efd20eb commit r13-60-g75bbc3da3e5f75f683fa33e309045c582efd20eb Author: Aldy Hernandez Date:

[Bug c++/105373] miscompile involving lambda coroutines and an object bitwise copied instead of via the copy constructor

2022-05-01 Thread avi at scylladb dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373 --- Comment #14 from Avi Kivity --- Do you confirm that my observation about the generated gimple corresponds to the bug? If so, is there a central point where this anonymous variables are named? Perhaps we can breakpoint on D.2741 and see

[Bug c/71176] trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.c:162: bad % specifier

2022-05-01 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/105432] [13 regression] bootstrap build error in mpfr in stage2

2022-05-01 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105432 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/105448] New: load introduced when passing a struct as argument

2022-05-01 Thread absoler at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105448 Bug ID: 105448 Summary: load introduced when passing a struct as argument Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/103612] get_time %y parsing error for two digits year

2022-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/103612] get_time parsing error for two digits year

2022-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fsb4000 at yandex dot ru --- Comment

[Bug target/105435] clang warning about Wtautological-constant-compare for a target macro

2022-05-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105435 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|diagnostic |

[Bug libstdc++/105450] New: get_time %y reads more than 2 digits (and differ from strptime)

2022-05-01 Thread fsb4000 at yandex dot ru via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105450 Bug ID: 105450 Summary: get_time %y reads more than 2 digits (and differ from strptime) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/103612] get_time %y parsing error for two digits year

2022-05-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/103612] get_time %y parsing error for two digits year

2022-05-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103612 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, the above is GCC 12 behavior, in 11.x and earlier it has been indeed broken and %y and %C were aliases to %Y.