https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82383
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96363
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mate.kelemen.12 at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105718
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99501
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96363
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johelegp at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891
--- Comment #8 from Qing Zhao ---
> On May 24, 2022, at 11:42 AM, arjan at linux dot intel.com
> wrote:
>
> --- Comment #7 from Arjan van de Ven ---
> from a performance angle, the xor-only sequence is not so great at all; modern
> CPUs are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101891
--- Comment #9 from Arjan van de Ven ---
I don't have recent measurements since we did this work quite some time ago.
basically on the CPU level (speaking for Intel style cpus at least), a CPU can
eliminate (meaning: no execution resources
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104630
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2540e2c604142889308857657d3510874955336a
commit r13-746-g2540e2c604142889308857657d3510874955336a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48626
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> > detecting things
> > automatically instead of requiring
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651
--- Comment #4 from James McKelvey ---
Still fails with gcc-12-20220521 and gcc-13-20220522, but not gcc-11-20220520.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105722
Bug ID: 105722
Summary: [10 regression] std/ranges/adaptors/elements.cc fails
after r10-10724-g93ec7bf2253061
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103608
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104964
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #18)
> Thanks. I reported the Qt issue upstream at
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-103782.
Note the Qt6 code is fine (uses reinterpret_cast(this)) and it's
what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104964
--- Comment #18 from Sam James ---
Thanks. I reported the Qt issue upstream at
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-103782.
I've hit the ACL issue independently in Gentoo and will forward that upstream
too (https://bugs.gentoo.org/847280).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104816
--- Comment #12 from peterz at infradead dot org ---
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 04:06:08PM +, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104816
>
> --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
> The master
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105723
Bug ID: 105723
Summary: Optimization false positive warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105719
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105623
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105604
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37036
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jay from comment #4)
> Here is a lame workaround that works, from my Python wrapper:
>
> if (Host == Target) and (Host != Build):
> ExtraConfig += " -with-sysroot=/"
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37036
--- Comment #6 from jayk123 at hotmail dot com ---
I'm sorry the Python is surely very long gone. It was so many years ago.
It was a wrapper around a series of configure + make
to build several gcc toolsets, i.e. native, cross, etc.
At the time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105725
Bug ID: 105725
Summary: [ICE] segfault with `-Wmismatched-tags`
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105604
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10d1986aee47c592f903527bb68546efc557735d
commit r13-750-g10d1986aee47c592f903527bb68546efc557735d
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
Current code is like this:
# Enable C extension for fixed-point arithmetic.
AC_ARG_ENABLE(fixed-point,
[AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-fixed-point],
[enable fixed-point arithmetic extension to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105724
Bug ID: 105724
Summary: [11 regression] gcc.dg/pr105140.c fails after
r11-10012-g740d64815c6c8a
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
--- Comment #32 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #26)
> That's one option, certainly easier for the users. At the least, the
> issue should be documented in install.texi so they can add
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-01-22 00:58:46 |2022-5-24
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105726
Bug ID: 105726
Summary: spurious warning with -Warray-bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105706
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105627
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:149d04ccbb908b3a251485b43faf204752942b9f
commit r13-720-g149d04ccbb908b3a251485b43faf204752942b9f
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105706
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8fa8bca9f53fcfdedc2b4fa55093dbd1ab7abbd1
commit r13-721-g8fa8bca9f53fcfdedc2b4fa55093dbd1ab7abbd1
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105627
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100221
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105708
roc at ocallahan dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roc at ocallahan dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105706
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104482
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105710
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
nk//binary-trunk-r13-723-20220524082011-g1adf11822bd-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 13.0.0 20220524 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104964
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #16)
> I think I might have hit the same thing in qt_readlink:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/847145. Martin, did you chase down the Qt issue you
> had?
Yes, for Qt5, one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105710
--- Comment #6 from Sergey Fedorov ---
> Correct (even if it did exist it would only be for 10.7+) so --enable-tls is
> a configuration error.
>
> (as I have said several times, the idea of configure is to choose the
> correct settings for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, sorry, bad archeology, the pass_post_ipa_warn was indeed added by me and
the rationale for placing it where it is was given in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78817#c9
The warning shouldn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Confirmed. We are expanding
MEM [(char *)] = { 0, 0 };
with 'c' expanded as
(concat:CQI (reg/v:QI 93 [ c ])
(reg/v:QI 94 [ c+1 ]))
doing read_complex_part from
(subreg:CQI (const_vector:V2QI [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 103865, which changed state.
Bug 103865 Summary: virtual function can have a requires clause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103865
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Jakub - do you remember why you added the pass at this point, right after
> inlining but before scalar cleanup gets the chance to remove dead code?
Which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105712
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this code is invalid (no diagnostic required; there was some talk about
changing this for C++23 to require a diagnostic) and GCC actually does the
right thing here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105699
--- Comment #2 from Fedor Chelnokov ---
Another aspect is that the order of destructors in the class change its
behavior:
#include
template
struct X {
~X() requires (N==1);
virtual ~X();
};
// X is NOT polymorphic in GCC
static_assert(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105713
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105713
Bug ID: 105713
Summary: [gimplefe] need a way to specify TREE_ADDRESSABLE
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d918faea1217596877a35c4946500399731fbbd3
commit r13-722-gd918faea1217596877a35c4946500399731fbbd3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b43836914bdc2a37563cf31359b2c4803bfe4374
commit r13-724-gb43836914bdc2a37563cf31359b2c4803bfe4374
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103865
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
Bug ID: 105714
Summary: ASan in gcc trunk missed a buffer-overflow at -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100221
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1adf11822bd48f4d65156b7642514630c08c4d00
commit r13-723-g1adf11822bd48f4d65156b7642514630c08c4d00
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105712
Bug ID: 105712
Summary: [13 Regression] Rejected valid code since
r13-76-gdcb4bd0789d13dd4
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||67491
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
Summary|ASan in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The warning started to be given without -Wsystem-headers with r12-1992
It was already present with -Wsystem-headers, but suppressed by default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I'll have a look...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105708
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105711
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91c7c5edd2c1d31bf379be1d077b39644391cc31
commit r13-727-g91c7c5edd2c1d31bf379be1d077b39644391cc31
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105708
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105717
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So I guess the trick might be to notice that ...
;; _2 = a_1(D) < b_10(D);
(insn 12 11 13 (set (reg:CCGC 17 flags)
(compare:CCGC (reg/v:DI 86 [ a ])
(reg/v:DI 87 [ b ]))) -1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3677eb80b683cead7db972bc206fd2e75d997bd2
commit r13-728-g3677eb80b683cead7db972bc206fd2e75d997bd2
Author: Bruno Haible
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4fb2b4f7ea6b80ae75d3efb6f86e7c6179080535
commit r13-726-g4fb2b4f7ea6b80ae75d3efb6f86e7c6179080535
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105378
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem is we have:
[local count: 354334800]:
# h_21 = PHI
*c.3_5 = *d.2_4;
h_15 = h_21 + 1;
if (h_15 != 3)
goto ; [75.00%]
else
goto ; [25.00%]
[local count: 118111600]:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688
--- Comment #20 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note gcc sources have its own local copy of libtool so it does not matter what
the distros have.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688
--- Comment #19 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
I'm curious: Fedora 36 takes probably half an hour to be downloaded and
installed in a VM/chroot/etc., so you could probably debug the issue in a few
minutes ;-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715
Bug ID: 105715
Summary: [13 Regression] missed RTL if-conversion with
COND_EXPR change
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105716
Bug ID: 105716
Summary: CTAD failure with member function returning auto as
template argument
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 24 May 2022, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> The warning started to be given without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105714
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105705
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The warning seems to have started with r11-5391
Before that there was no warning even with -Wsystem-headers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105688
--- Comment #18 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #17)
> libtool recently got a new maintainer and had a new release (2.4.7). It's
> possible 2.4.7 is related.
Fedora 36 still features an old version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105716
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|CTAD failure with member|[12/13 Regression] CTAD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105717
Bug ID: 105717
Summary: [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] cannot create unordered_map
from range of types convertible to value_type
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105708
--- Comment #12 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> How can changing the constructor priority in libgcc affect anything?
> Constructor priorities are within the same shared library or within the same
> executable, not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4c0f9257ef2615add8ecb30e7a568755b692473
commit r12-8411-gf4c0f9257ef2615add8ecb30e7a568755b692473
Author: Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105527
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Liska
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:394ff2fbfc84eb6d6cfc56b04e28ee9b42a5ab57
commit r12-8412-g394ff2fbfc84eb6d6cfc56b04e28ee9b42a5ab57
Author: Bruno Haible
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105716
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-24
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105718
Bug ID: 105718
Summary: Forward Declarations of Constrained Partially
Specialized Class Templates Rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105717
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52171
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e7a0e42a15eb53850496e91f2e484ed74ac3617
commit r13-738-g9e7a0e42a15eb53850496e91f2e484ed74ac3617
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Bootstrap error with|Bootstrap error with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48626
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90835
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93082
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
> OK I'll open a separate bug for that and self-assign
(that's bug 105719 now, for reference)
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
