[Bug bootstrap/106137] New: baremetal cross builds broken in libgfortran since g:133d0d422ebd18dbd215cfa5394aff9f938e7060

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106137 Bug ID: 106137 Summary: baremetal cross builds broken in libgfortran since g:133d0d422ebd18dbd215cfa5394aff9f938e7060 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/106136] New: gcc-12.1.1 - libsanitizer fails when compiled for MIPS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106136 Bug ID: 106136 Summary: gcc-12.1.1 - libsanitizer fails when compiled for MIPS Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/106112] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-2711-g3ed01d5408045d80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106112 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2dbb45d6dc0d20dc159b3d8e27ebb6825074827a commit r13-1341-g2dbb45d6dc0d20dc159b3d8e27ebb6825074827a Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/106101] [12/13 Regression] ICE in reg_bitfield_target_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106101 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5) > Thanks for tracking this down! > > Interesting it survived so long. We could use some RTL checking on this :-) We have almost no "RTL IL checking", but

[Bug ipa/101279] Function attributes often block inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to David Brown from comment #7) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > > Can you provide a specific example that you would allow this way? > > > > > > I'd go back to my original

[Bug c++/106135] New: Found a bug in gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106135 Bug ID: 106135 Summary: Found a bug in gcc Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug sanitizer/106132] ICE: in report_conflicting_sanitizer_options, at opts.cc:1011 with -fsanitize=thread,address,kernel-hwaddress

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106132 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to kargl from comment #5) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > > GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5. > > That's a shame. The patch in comment 1 and the correction

[Bug c++/106134] [13 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2134 since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106134 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/106134] New: [13 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2134 since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106134 Bug ID: 106134 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2134 since r13-1204-gd68d366425369649 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/106114] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106114 --- Comment #6 from Zhendong Su --- Two additional recent miscompiles that are likedly related: (1) [638] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out [639] % gcctk -O1 small.c [640] % ./a.out Aborted [641] % cat small.c int a, b; int main() { int c = 0,

[Bug rust/105913] gccrs doesn't compile on 32-bit targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105913 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge --- > But now really assuming fixed via additional > "Fix remaining misuses of format > specifiers

<    1   2