https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106707
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106700
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106704
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So perhaps the r12-1834-g28560c6d4043d8f6ac570f3 change for TARGET_AVX &&
!TARGET_AVX2 should be done only if we can fold the VEC_COND_EXPR into a
constant or something it can handle and otherwise keep the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106686
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106705
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So you expect us to somehow generate
val2 = -len;
switch (len) {
case 7:
do_sd(val, mem, val2++);
case 6:
do_sd(val, mem, val2++);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105937
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 22 Aug 2022, janisozaur+gcc at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105937
>
> --- Comment #7 from janisozaur+gcc at gmail dot com ---
> Will the fix get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|rguenth at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105937
--- Comment #7 from janisozaur+gcc at gmail dot com ---
Will the fix get merged to 12.3 as well? This currently prevents the project I
work on from compiling with GCC
(https://github.com/OpenRCT2/OpenRCT2/issues/17371)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106704
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|X86_64 |x86_64-*-*
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
Summary|Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106693
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2022-08-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106688
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, as of coalescing I think the only coalescing we should do at out-of-SSA
time
is coalescing to avoid copies on edges (aka for PHIs and abnormals), the rest
should be left to the RA (OTOH we're going to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106688
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> _33 = (const unsigned char *) ivtmp.18_7;
> invariant up to level 2, cost 1.
Yep, that's an "old" thing, PRE would have moved it but LIM has something they
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106687
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105937
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105937
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c77fae1ca796d6ea06d5cd437909905c3d3d771c
commit r13-2134-gc77fae1ca796d6ea06d5cd437909905c3d3d771c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo