https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107554
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107323
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95e5c07aa216fe2863ea02e8508a51b5f7528839
commit r10-11178-g95e5c07aa216fe2863ea02e8508a51b5f7528839
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107554
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5d62d86d958a217cdb4155a557aeda1d0e644aba
commit r10-11179-g5d62d86d958a217cdb4155a557aeda1d0e644aba
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
--- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Created attachment 54351 [details]
> gcc13-pr108540.patch
>
> Untested fix.
LGTM. Thanks for looking at this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108554
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108432
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Analyzer fails to detect|RFE: analyzer could detect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105300
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f353b0c1dc9385ba8b8a64b65d66d5452383c11
commit r13-5390-g9f353b0c1dc9385ba8b8a64b65d66d5452383c11
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107323
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108557
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108520
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly cleaned up testcase:
static void foo () {}
struct S { void (*f) (); };
[[gnu::nonnull (1)]]
void
bar (void *x)
{
struct S a[3] = { { foo }, { foo }, { foo } };
for (struct S *i = a, *e = a +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108558
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
> I bet that this is a problem of 'gfc_split_omp_clauses': [...]
Heh, so indeed as I suspected:
(In reply to myself from comment #0)
> (Decomposed combined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108507
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1eab269288ffa80ba924ddb4c4b36f8f781d613
commit r13-5389-gf1eab269288ffa80ba924ddb4c4b36f8f781d613
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108524
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7bffea89f1f164efc10dd37d979a83c4c5fbfa7e
commit r13-5388-g7bffea89f1f164efc10dd37d979a83c4c5fbfa7e
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108558
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-26
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
--- gcc/range-op-float.cc.jj2023-01-16 09:39:36.191929750 +0100
+++ gcc/range-op-float.cc 2023-01-26 13:33:48.712018907 +0100
@@ -607,6 +607,10 @@ foperator_equal::fold_range (irange ,
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108553
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3)
> I'm trying to reproduce this - in the meantime does the obvious fix solve
> the problem for you?
>
> diff --cc gcc/m2/gm2-lang.cc
> index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108555
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|gaius at gcc dot gnu.org |iains at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108520
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108507
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108524
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 108507, which changed state.
Bug 108507 Summary: [13 regression] new test case
gcc.dg/analyzer/SARD-tc841-basic-00182-min.c in r13-5244-gc6a09bfa03 fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108507
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608
--- Comment #44 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #43)
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2023, xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107608
> >
> > --- Comment #42 from Xi Ruoyao ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Everything we needed is listed at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108555
Bug ID: 108555
Summary: gm2_langhook_option_lang_mask causes all
(unappropriate) C language options to be recognized
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108553
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108554
--- Comment #2 from Jan de Cuveland ---
Thanks for the insight!
Adding a check on empty() for my_map.extract(it) resolves the issue.
So it is just that the static analyzer does not see that (to my understanding)
"it" has to be a valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108557
Bug ID: 108557
Summary: Stuck compilation for empty file
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108555
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108503
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This goes wrong during thread1 pass I think.
Before that we have in the IL early exits for x != 42, d NAN or d +-INF, and
then:
[local count: 96926676]:
if (d_16(D) == 0.0)
goto ; [50.00%]
else
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #8 from Tang, Feng ---
Created attachment 54350
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54350=edit
i386 kernel config
In https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202301170941.49728982-oliver.s...@intel.com/t/
Oliver Sang provided
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, so back_threader::find_taken_edge_cond calls
path_range_query::range_of_stmt
on the d_1 == 0.0 with the assumption that d_1 is -0.0,
fold_using_range::range_of_range_op sees
(gdb) p debug (range1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108547
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-01-25 00:00:00 |2023-1-26
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108539
arheik at dnainternet dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108547
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c71a128a3e1ff6ee5274fc2df49ea650bc9e6c2d
commit r13-5383-gc71a128a3e1ff6ee5274fc2df49ea650bc9e6c2d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> I might reduced that:
>
> $ cat Termbase.mod
> IMPLEMENTATION MODULE Termbase ;
> TYPE
>ReadMethods = POINTER TO RECORD
>s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107107
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58e39fcaaf298ff54b6f1a45fa9d15390e8113fb
commit r10-11177-g58e39fcaaf298ff54b6f1a45fa9d15390e8113fb
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106934
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0a3e323a0c0e3db7dcd428587f0633209f9ceec
commit r10-11176-gd0a3e323a0c0e3db7dcd428587f0633209f9ceec
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108554
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3376467ce090aa0966d59ca3aea35db4f17a4b47
commit r13-5386-g3376467ce090aa0966d59ca3aea35db4f17a4b47
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108530
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93e2bf51dedd0870b78b770b72e34b15a7a0d14a
commit r13-5385-g93e2bf51dedd0870b78b770b72e34b15a7a0d14a
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108535
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105300
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #1 from Tang, Feng ---
Created attachment 54346
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54346=edit
kernel log with error message
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108553
Bug ID: 108553
Summary: GM2 ICEs on mistyped command line options
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108554
Bug ID: 108554
Summary: Warning "null pointer dereferece" raised when
extracting a unique_ptr from a map and any "-O" flag
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108541
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-26
Summary|ASAN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108546
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12/13 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108556
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Compiling with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG shows the problem:
/home/jwakely/gcc/13/include/c++/13.0.1/bits/stl_algo.h:4892:
In function:
void std::sort(_RAIter, _RAIter, _Compare) [with _RAIter =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108554
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108554
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jan de Cuveland from comment #2)
> So it is just that the static analyzer does not see that (to my
> understanding) "it" has to be a valid iterator and thus will always result
> in a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108556
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
Tang, Feng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54345|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #4 from Tang, Feng ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Do you have the preprocessed source that is used generate the bad object
> file?
> How about the exact command line?
Thanks for the prompt response!
The error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108553
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> diagnosing options in gm2_langhook_init_options is probably not the way to
> go.
>
> Looks like this creeped in by recent refactoring?
Yeah, there is no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108553
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
I'm trying to reproduce this - in the meantime does the obvious fix solve the
problem for you?
diff --cc gcc/m2/gm2-lang.cc
index 4d9cae205a7,4d9cae205a7..a30e626620c
--- a/gcc/m2/gm2-lang.cc
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108545
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108503
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d427407a199a0c276cb02d6bbb64e6ecc02e590d
commit r13-5379-gd427407a199a0c276cb02d6bbb64e6ecc02e590d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108556
--- Comment #1 from gnu.iodaj at simplelogin dot com ---
Created attachment 54347
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54347=edit
source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #7 from Tang, Feng ---
Created attachment 54349
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54349=edit
original job-script from Oliver (0Day)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
OK, I have a reduced
MODULE Test;
PROCEDURE X (VAR Y : BOOLEAN) : BOOLEAN;
BEGIN
IF Y
THEN
RETURN FALSE
ELSE
RETURN TRUE
END
END X ;
END Test.
and
> ./cc1gm2 -quiet test.mod -I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108542
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108547
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13 Regression] ice in |[13 Regression] ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108554
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jan de Cuveland from comment #0)
> This behavior does not show up in GCC 9, 10, and 11.
It does if you use -Wsystem-headers -- the only thing that changed is that the
compiler now ignores
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108555
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
CL_DRIVER should also not be there
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108556
Bug ID: 108556
Summary: std::sort changes objects' member values
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108558
Bug ID: 108558
Summary: OpenMP/Fortran 'has_device_addr' clause getting lost?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108522
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0573a0778af88e805f7630ac8640ecd67d692665
commit r13-5382-g0573a0778af88e805f7630ac8640ecd67d692665
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108555
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> We do claim the ones that modula-2 actually uses in gm2-lang.opt
>
> (previous to r13-5373-g80cf2c5e8f496b we had a large and growing set to
> accommodate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
Bug ID: 108552
Summary: Linux i386 kernel 5.14 memory corruption for
pre_compound_page() when gcov is enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108553
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
I might reduced that:
$ cat Termbase.mod
IMPLEMENTATION MODULE Termbase ;
TYPE
ReadMethods = POINTER TO RECORD
s : StatusProcedure ;
END ;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think
int
foo (int x, double d)
{
if (x == 42)
d = -0.0;
if (d == 0.0)
return 42;
return 12;
}
behaves similarly with threading. The above function is basically return (x ==
42 || d == 0.0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559
Bug ID: 108559
Summary: A new crash with using a simple class, inheritance and
a function
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108400
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 54356
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54356=edit
Reduced reproducer
False positive
seen here with no optimization:
https://godbolt.org/z/cfqz1fYKx
with -O2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108463
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Oops, ignore the 0 && part in the above patch, I've added that while trying to
get the ICE on this PR back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108560
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108551
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaius at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108540
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09176201ec6a21c25b1edb07f19f83be22a123f9
commit r13-5397-g09176201ec6a21c25b1edb07f19f83be22a123f9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108553
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6dd4578f4779b27b2115d78226ff7df46c939061
commit r13-5398-g6dd4578f4779b27b2115d78226ff7df46c939061
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108555
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 54355
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54355=edit
Partch under test - partial reversion of r13-5373-g80cf2c5e8f496b
This reverts the part of r13-5373-g80cf2c5e8f496b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
Bug ID: 108561
Summary: std::endl causes a flush on a bad stream
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The standard doesn't say anything about not flushing if the put (or any
previous output function) failed.
> Calls os.put(os.widen(’\n’)), then os.flush().
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108463
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>From what I can see, the r13-5252 change removed for DEBUG_INSNs two things,
one is the
cselib_lookup_from_insn call with 1 as create and the other is the
shallow_copy_rtx +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
--- Comment #2 from lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov ---
Indeed, it does not. But the reason the endl manipulator is there, is to flush
_after_ '\n'. If the stream has gone bad in between, it is the gray area, but
for the output device (the stream
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108560
Bug ID: 108560
Summary: builtin_va_arg_pack_len is documented to return
size_t, but actually returns int
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108560
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108559
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This might be related to C++ core issue cwg2403: https://wg21.link/cwg2403
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
--- Comment #3 from lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov ---
Also, the standard seems to mention that flush() is an "unformatted output
function", meaning it is supposed to build and check a sentry object (which in
case of a bad stream, would fail, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108561
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That changed with https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue581 which I implemented
for GCC 12 in r12-1817-gf8c5b542f6cb6a so I guess you're looking at gcc-11 or
older.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88853
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #9 from Tang, Feng ---
For original report
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202301170941.49728982-oliver.s...@intel.com/t/, it
was reported by Sang Oliver from 0Day team, but I failed to add him too cc
(probably due to he is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552
--- Comment #10 from Tang, Feng ---
Created attachment 54352
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54352=edit
page_alloc.i.xz
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
