https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105554
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I have tried
--- gcc/cgraphclones.cc.jj 2023-02-24 11:05:19.704595633 +0100
+++ gcc/cgraphclones.cc 2023-03-16 19:12:30.452503051 +0100
@@ -1094,6 +1094,15 @@
096
```
Output of godbolt's gcc(trunk):
```
# g++ --version
g++
(Compiler-Explorer-Build-gcc-0c061da91a3657afdb3fac68e4595af685909a1a-binutils-2.38)
13.0.1 20230316 (experimental)
# g++ -std=c++20
: In substitution of 'template,
Traits>] rhsBar> void Foo::doNothing(const Foo&)
[with auto [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109162
Bug ID: 109162
Summary: C++23 improvements to std::format
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108242
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b323f52ccf966800297b0520b9e1d4b3951db525
commit r13-6722-gb323f52ccf966800297b0520b9e1d4b3951db525
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109030
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31cdfdef04701e10cffcec4578b2337684f0e4bc
commit r13-6716-g31cdfdef04701e10cffcec4578b2337684f0e4bc
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107630
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77924dff144cf934e7a73417d237a99f0d9d66ed
commit r13-6718-g77924dff144cf934e7a73417d237a99f0d9d66ed
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109161
Bug ID: 109161
Summary: Bad CTF generated for stub in function scope
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81323
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Or the ranger could do it itself, similarly to how it handles .ASSUME, but
> without actually querying anything but the global range of the return value
> if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Note that section 3.1 ("File Format" > "General") specifies:
"A SARIF log file SHALL be encoded in UTF-8 [RFC3629]."
https://docs.oasis-open.org/sarif/sarif/v2.1.0/sarif-v2.1.0.html
Though I suppose it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109166
Bug ID: 109166
Summary: Built-in __atomic_test_and_set does not seem to be
atomic on ARMv4T
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105554
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 54686
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54686=edit
gcc13-pr105554.patch
This untested patch seems to work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38220
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #8)
> For what it's worth, ISO/IEC DIS 1539-1:2022 (E) now contains the following:
>
> All standard procedures in the intrinsic module ISO_C_BINDING, other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:78b3bf0e65072f5fa42a8da43698711220d4f8ef
commit r13-6723-g78b3bf0e65072f5fa42a8da43698711220d4f8ef
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100288
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c630157fd01140dbce120c1409c413a97dc17104
commit r13-6715-gc630157fd01140dbce120c1409c413a97dc17104
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109159
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #7)
[...snip...]
> There some variation due to json::object using a hash_map for the key/value
> pairs, which means (annoyingly) it outputs things in arbitrary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109164
Bug ID: 109164
Summary: aarch64 thread_local initialization error with
-ftree-pre and -foptimize-sibling-calls
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109164
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109166
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Armv4t does not have smp so the question is how do you think the below is not
atomic? Yes interrupts but that requires more.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109166
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/4f596367.2050...@redhat.com/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #8 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Alas, yes. This system is quite old and not being updated any more. It
hopefully will be retired soon.
This probably isn't a big deal and as far as I am concerned can be ignored.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109140
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davem at davemloft dot net
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100288
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106188
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106713
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109165
Bug ID: 109165
Summary: std::hash>::operator() should be
const
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109159
Bug ID: 109159
Summary: explicit constructor is used in copy-initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109125
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f231bca93ca92f6fd55de6fbe4bf8935f9ec558a
commit r13-6719-gf231bca93ca92f6fd55de6fbe4bf8935f9ec558a
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105089
Indu Bhagat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-01-30 00:00:00 |2023-03-16
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109163
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
This would also help with one of the requests from a SARIF expert's review of
GCC's output:
https://github.com/oasis-tcs/sarif-spec/issues/531#issuecomment-1181191100
which is that the "version" property
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101869
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cc8814098bb46f9fca58a0b831fbf9a8574bdc9
commit r13-6721-g1cc8814098bb46f9fca58a0b831fbf9a8574bdc9
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109164
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|thread_local initialization |thread_local initialization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109167
Bug ID: 109167
Summary: rs6000: _mm_slli_si128 and _mm_bslli_si128 are
inconsistent in wrapper header
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108242
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109159
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109163
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109159
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109159
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109163
Bug ID: 109163
Summary: SARIF (and other JSON) output files are
non-deterministic
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109164
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am not 100% if this is a front-end issue or a gimple level optimization
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109169
--- Comment #1 from steve02081504 ---
(Corrected code)
```c++
template
struct type_info_t{
//...
template
static constexpr bool can_convert_to=XXX;
//...
};
template
constexpr type_info_ttype_info{};
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109169
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
You provide a full example of what you want?
Because right now your example your provided does not even compile with msvc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109169
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect the thing you are requesting is having the template keyword as being
optional but I am not sure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109167
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target|
on my system with version: g++ (GCC) 13.0.1 20230219
(experimental)
Here is the gcc version on compiler explorer at the time of writing: g++
(Compiler-Explorer-Build-gcc-0c061da91a3657afdb3fac68e4595af685909a1a-binutils-2.38)
13.0.1 20230316 (experimental)
BTW, should I be selecting the oldest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105959
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #8)
> Note that section 3.1 ("File Format" > "General") specifies:
> "A SARIF log file SHALL be encoded in UTF-8 [RFC3629]."
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109169
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109168
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to waffl3x from comment #0)
> BTW, should I be selecting the oldest version that a bug occurs or the
> newest version? I observed the behavior all the way back to 10.1, which
> appears to be when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109169
Bug ID: 109169
Summary: Feature request: Allow omitted template prompts
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109169
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is a defect report in this area of gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109169
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> There is a defect report in this area of gcc.
Sorry c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109123
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.0
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109011
--- Comment #19 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 54678
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54678=edit
gcc13-pr109011-3.patch
Fix an ICE when gimple_call_lhs (call_stmt) is NULL in
vect_recog_ctz_ffs_pattern, recognize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108985
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd425a35ec2b157b520cee68a67c6296712f441b
commit r12-9268-gcd425a35ec2b157b520cee68a67c6296712f441b
Author: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109149
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109141
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adb70c2d1060b3e8d410b45c698796c5d88818b3
commit r13-6706-gadb70c2d1060b3e8d410b45c698796c5d88818b3
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109123
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a07bfad12530bca5dc5188057ad910198780dbc
commit r13-6707-g0a07bfad12530bca5dc5188057ad910198780dbc
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104075
Bug 104075 depends on bug 109141, which changed state.
Bug 109141 Summary: failure to diagnose -Wuse-after-free early
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109141
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105406
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0ed0690f1e86621a5cb62eec1d144036feb16f8
commit r13-6711-gd0ed0690f1e86621a5cb62eec1d144036feb16f8
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109004
--- Comment #10 from bugreporter66 at gmail dot com ---
I checked the simple version of the test with QEMU 6.2.0 and 7.0.0:
ubuntu-mate@ubuntu-mate:~/Downloads/test_p64$
ubuntu-mate@ubuntu-mate:~/Downloads/test_p64$ powerpc64le-linux-gnu-g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109156
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #0)
> 2. It looks like all targets that implement SAD do so with an instruction
> that does ABD and then perform a reduction. So it looks like no target has
> the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108927
--- Comment #4 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
> This issue should be fixed since patch is merged.
Shouldn't you also include a reference / mark the bug as assigned+confirmed ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109153
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109153
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
On the GIMPLE side we should canonicalize here I think, at which point
inserts into a splatted vector become more profitable depends?
_4 = VEC_PERM_EXPR ;
_5 = VEC_PERM_EXPR ;
_6 = {_4, _5};
we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109153
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> On the GIMPLE side we should canonicalize here I think, at which point
> inserts into a splatted vector become more profitable depends?
>
> _4 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109004
--- Comment #3 from bugreporter66 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 54680
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54680=edit
binaries and output files as text
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109144
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:46c4be98d1e759a406069487e5dbaad0346e7e7d
commit r13-6710-g46c4be98d1e759a406069487e5dbaad0346e7e7d
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109144
ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.0|12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109155
Bug ID: 109155
Summary: A note is diagnosed, without any warning or error
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106912
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/614071.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/614070.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109094
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> Fixed?
Sadly no, the comment above is just to mention that at least the crash is now
captured in the .sarif dump.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109154
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
Thanks for the report, taking a look!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109094
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-03-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109144
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ca6dba641fa56ce70c3e1c78729389b3ed40076
commit r12-9269-g2ca6dba641fa56ce70c3e1c78729389b3ed40076
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109004
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The program uses xsmincdp and xsmaxcdp instructions and it feels as if qemu
implements the latter exactly the same as the former.
So, I guess simpler testcase would be compile with -O2 -mcpu=power9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109154
Bug ID: 109154
Summary: [13 regression] aarch64 -mcpu=neoverse-v1 microbude
performance regression
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106947
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109155
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109004
--- Comment #9 from bugreporter66 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 54683
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54683=edit
sample_p64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109004
--- Comment #11 from bugreporter66 at gmail dot com ---
Created a QEMU bug here:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1547
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109156
Bug ID: 109156
Summary: Support Absolute Difference detection in GCC
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109082
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109148
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103784
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
I get, for -mcpu=power9 or power10
foo:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
cmpwi 0,3,2
bgt 0,.L3
cmpwi 0,4,9
li 3,1
isel 3,0,3,1
blr
.p2align 4,,15
.L3:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109153
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109153
Bug ID: 109153
Summary: missed vector constructor optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109004
--- Comment #4 from bugreporter66 at gmail dot com ---
The test prints two array values (farr[11], farr[3]) and then calculates and
prints their respective minimum and maximum values. The first line
(unoptimized) is a correct behavior (only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109146
--- Comment #2 from David Spickett ---
A detail that might be useful. The callee function uses UB because it compares
pointers that don't point to the same object.
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1570.pdf 6.5.8 Relational
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109004
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109094
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109151
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Ah, but
> 1690 if (flag_checking
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109004
--- Comment #5 from bugreporter66 at gmail dot com ---
The exact command line used to produce the new binaries (added -static):
ubuntu-mate@ubuntu-mate:~/Downloads/bug$ powerpc64le-linux-gnu-g++ -o
test_p64-test{0,.ii} -mcpu=power9 -O0 -fpie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109137
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, but
1690 if (flag_checking
1691 && (lra_assignment_iter_after_spill
1692 > LRA_MAX_ASSIGNMENT_ITERATION_NUMBER))
1693internal_error
1694 ("maximum number of
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
