https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105452
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109192
--- Comment #15 from chenglulu ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #14)
> The upcoming patch for 109274 should resolve this.
The problem has been solved. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
--- Comment #22 from Rama Malladi ---
I will close this issue as we were unable to reproduce the perf drop going from
gcc-7 to gcc-8 on a Graviton2 based instance. The performance of 519.lbm_r
built with gcc-7.4 was same as that with gcc-8.5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109282
--- Comment #5 from Chris Johns ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> My bet if you do /bin/sh you would also get into trouble too ...
I do not think it is /bin/sh but you are right with the link bring MacOS
blocking an exe that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107769
Xionghu Luo (luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yinyuefengyi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
--- Comment #23 from Rama Malladi ---
(In reply to Rama Malladi from comment #22)
> I will close this issue as we were unable to reproduce the perf drop going
> from gcc-7 to gcc-8 on a Graviton2 based instance. The performance of
> 519.lbm_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109326
--- Comment #6 from Steve Thompson ---
(In reply to Steve Thompson from comment #5)
> 18 16 32
> 64B code:
>
> 1.2K code:
Sorry, my touchpad glitched and sent prematurely.
For the overlarge vectorized version I hate:
[28]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109326
--- Comment #5 from Steve Thompson ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Steve Thompson from comment #3)
> > However I don't understand why olock_reset_op() is so large. It's
> > a trivial initializer for a descriptor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970
--- Comment #14 from Siddhesh Poyarekar ---
(In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #13)
> This fix seem too radical. It now prevents this from working even when there
> is an explicit attribute but there is also a VLA bound. Also I think it
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109334
Bug ID: 109334
Summary: tree-object-size: Improve size computation in
arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107561
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 54784
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54784=edit
another hack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
--- Comment #31 from Costas Argyris ---
This was initially done only for the 64-bit mingw Windows host
(x86_64-*-mingw*).
This is the patch that extended it to the 32-bit version as well
(i[34567]86-*-mingw32*):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
--- Comment #33 from Costas Argyris ---
It should be noted that with the current implementation, windres (part of
binutils) is mandatory when building for the mingw (Windows) hosts, both 32 and
64-bit versions.
That is, a build failure will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109310
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b2766e87dbf0d20808bc92d8e6ee7f876d19ab2
commit r13-6929-g8b2766e87dbf0d20808bc92d8e6ee7f876d19ab2
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108357
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #5)
> The test fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu. foo is kept in 114t.threadfull1,
> but removed in 135t.forwprop3.
>
> Does this mean something is wrong for LoongArch,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109319
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109318
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106608
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Egor Pugin from comment #1)
> All major compilers (MSVC, GCC, Clang) of all (tried) modern versions (in
> case of GCC — before 12) build this code without problems. Is this a GCC
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109327
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fd1d28d2436065da7fc0fe01d787fcdf3c14b83
commit r13-6926-g7fd1d28d2436065da7fc0fe01d787fcdf3c14b83
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109332
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108357
--- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #5)
> > The test fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu. foo is kept in 114t.threadfull1,
> > but removed in 135t.forwprop3.
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109318
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|csmith: -fipa-cp seems to |csmith: -fipa-cp seems to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109327
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109318
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92960
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 92960, which changed state.
Bug 92960 Summary: ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal'
structure, have 'component_ref' in add_decl_as_local, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:261
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109333
Bug ID: 109333
Summary: Use std::move in std::accumulate etc. for std::string
for C++11/14/17
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109319
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109331
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:86efc490ab86bfa00720479b4714da23cd7df797
commit r13-6928-g86efc490ab86bfa00720479b4714da23cd7df797
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109330
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109310
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ugh, that sounds like an uninitialized use of something somewhere,
unfortunately if it is really my commit, I don't understand how it could cause
it.
All it changes is that when tree_versioning is called,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107561
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865
--- Comment #32 from Costas Argyris ---
Followed by:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e70e36cbef4f01e7d32bafe17698c3bf3e4624b8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.2.0
--- Comment #4 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109319
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109336
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109336
Bug ID: 109336
Summary: The -fmod= and -fdef= options do not work.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109335
Bug ID: 109335
Summary: -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak false positives and false
negatives
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
[...]
> Perhaps try to undo my patch in a different way, like
> --- gcc/tree-inline.cc 2023-03-17 18:59:50.226199917 +0100
> +++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109283
--- Comment #2 from ncm at cantrip dot org ---
Betting this one is fixed by deleting code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109213
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
We have large-stack-frame-growth that is relative, so yes, increasing stack
size of caller makes gcc to think that it is heavy and making it event heavier
will not hurt that much.
We originally ran into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #24)
> > --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> [...]
> > Perhaps try to undo my patch in a different way, like
> > --- gcc/tree-inline.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #24)
>> > --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>> [...]
>> So far, I've tried
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109303
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109324
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Thanks. It is a mystery so far :(.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109154
--- Comment #38 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9954996cd647daf0ba03e34dd279b97982f671f
commit r13-6923-gc9954996cd647daf0ba03e34dd279b97982f671f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109301
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109301
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8dd57939c20b5e218404a838f514429f8e414dea
commit r13-6924-g8dd57939c20b5e218404a838f514429f8e414dea
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109154
--- Comment #39 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #37)
> Created attachment 54780 [details]
> in progress patch
>
> Well call me a liar.
>
> It took me a while to understand why, but if we leave it to single
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109318
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
With -O2 -fno-early-inlining it can be simplified:
#pragma pack(1)
struct S {
signed : 31;
unsigned f4 : 20;
};
static struct S global;
static struct S func_16(struct S *ptr) { return *ptr; }
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106608
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |std::optional requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108357
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #7)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #5)
> > > The test fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu. foo is kept in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109332
Bug ID: 109332
Summary: Bug in gcc (13.0.1) support for ARM SVE, which
randomly ignore the predict register
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106124
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106124
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109328
Bug ID: 109328
Summary: Build fail in RISC-V port
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109330
Bug ID: 109330
Summary: ASAN since GCC-9 missed a stack-use-after-scope at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109328
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
https://github.com/compiler-explorer/compiler-explorer/issues/4900#issuecomment-1488009231
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106124
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36330e2e95564a360e6dbcfb4e7566d5c2177415
commit r13-6925-g36330e2e95564a360e6dbcfb4e7566d5c2177415
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106124
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] ICE |[11/12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108357
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Created attachment 54783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54783=edit
threadfull1 dump on LoongArch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109327
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
It's really an old issue I think. We record a lattice in forwprop, marking
stmts to be removed. But the early forwprop phase runs on the IL with
the stmt operands not substituted, instead relying on old
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109331
Bug ID: 109331
Summary: ice: definition in block 7 does not dominate use in
block 8
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109283
Steven Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||StevenSun2021 at hotmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109327
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |13.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109318
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109317
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109329
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109329
Bug ID: 109329
Summary: rs6000: New testcases {mul,div}ic3* should run on
systems without QP
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>> Tried valgrind on the cross d21 on x86_64 and didn't see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108896
--- Comment #34 from Martin Uecker ---
Created attachment 54787
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54787=edit
patch for C FE to add size expressions to VM types in structs
Here is a preliminary patch for C FE just to see how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109315
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3be4e43a6a0f429648ea188c8e110b74268fed27
commit r13-6931-g3be4e43a6a0f429648ea188c8e110b74268fed27
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109336
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3be4e43a6a0f429648ea188c8e110b74268fed27
commit r13-6931-g3be4e43a6a0f429648ea188c8e110b74268fed27
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107396
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106573
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c63e5a234d0193e1f41024cf0eee840998e04c7f
commit r12-9355-gc63e5a234d0193e1f41024cf0eee840998e04c7f
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106573
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62a565e56763c65ec9e134735aa780cf2b1c3cfa
commit r12-9354-g62a565e56763c65ec9e134735aa780cf2b1c3cfa
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59498
--- Comment #22 from ncm at cantrip dot org ---
CWG 1430 seems to be about disallowing a construct that requires capturing an
alias declaration into a name mangling. This bug and at least some of those
referred to it do not ask for any such
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108733
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98558117ba870d47398927f2066e469e47f39c16
commit r12-9365-g98558117ba870d47398927f2066e469e47f39c16
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106325
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02fbda165b74179469d9eae436fed613aa6a6ebb
commit r12-9362-g02fbda165b74179469d9eae436fed613aa6a6ebb
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107948
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7cc8ecefb72f06368b055fa60f5a2ff2eb6dfdb
commit r12-9360-ga7cc8ecefb72f06368b055fa60f5a2ff2eb6dfdb
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108968
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:833d822ff0e83478a4fe536d55dfb22cde8ddc40
commit r12-9366-g833d822ff0e83478a4fe536d55dfb22cde8ddc40
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109303
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And the problem is similar to PR108605, most of IPA uses unsigned int as type
for byte offsets and while some spots check for offsets while bit offsets are
typically using HOST_WIDE_INT. So, some larger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109322
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91645
--- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez ---
It looks like what we want for this test is actually !isgreaterequal() not
isless(), since we want to exclude the possibility of a NAN. Like this:
float test (float x)
{
if (!__builtin_isgreaterequal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105784
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c66f1c6d69dbe0a855f7adb61df8d92ca523899
commit r12-9359-g1c66f1c6d69dbe0a855f7adb61df8d92ca523899
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107582
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7f7483d50069fede8450091449714d122c58fca
commit r12-9358-ge7f7483d50069fede8450091449714d122c58fca
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107345
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:111fb5d3cafd0f7f2a0d01aa9e1213013fa0cc83
commit r12-9357-g111fb5d3cafd0f7f2a0d01aa9e1213013fa0cc83
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108704
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5da2126c4df8d83c2b2f9de7bb393ab4f5832840
commit r12-9364-g5da2126c4df8d83c2b2f9de7bb393ab4f5832840
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109094
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by David Malcolm
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7903e0bca003840751c109cfa41e5a1528ece12a
commit r12-9367-g7903e0bca003840751c109cfa41e5a1528ece12a
Author: David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109328
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Summary|Build fail in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109328
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54788
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54788=edit
Patch which improves the depedencies
Note I am not 100% sure this is all the way. But you should get the idea and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103559
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy R. ---
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109315
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109336
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
