https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110435
Bug ID: 110435
Summary: ICE in in convert_move, at expr.cc:297 on Aarch64 with
-Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Sascha Scandella from comment #4)
> I found also this issue regarding init_priority:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/15363
So that is the intentional behaviour (upstream clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110420
--- Comment #7 from Jan-Benedict Glaw ---
Confirmed: This patch fixes the issue for me with the Linux PPC builds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
--- Comment #4 from Sascha Scandella ---
I found also this issue regarding init_priority:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/15363
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110434
Bug ID: 110434
Summary: tree-nrv introduces incorrect CLOBBER(eol)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
interesting - Apple clang does seem to accept __attribute__((init_priority))
but it still does not actually work **between TUs** unless LTO is engaged.
Actually GCC for Darwin could adopt a similar scheme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110428
--- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #3)
> Hi, I think for VLS vectors, we should be able the enhance CSE for this
> following case:
>
> #include
>
> void __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
> foo (int *out,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
--- Comment #2 from Sascha Scandella ---
> Still libstdc++ ;-)
True that ;-)
> Patrick, we talked about this and IIRC your suggestion was to move the
> __has_attribute check into configure, so that it depends on GCC, not on
> whichever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110428
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110431
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110430
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 110428 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110237
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 27 Jun 2023, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110237
>
> --- Comment #21 from Alexander Monakov ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110433
Bug ID: 110433
Summary: ASAN reports mismatching new/delete when compiling
analyzer testcases
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110432
Bug ID: 110432
Summary: macOS: Segmentation fault when using stdlibc++ from
gcc 13.1 in combination with clang-16
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110237
--- Comment #21 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #19)
> But the size argument doesn't have anything to do with TBAA (and
> may_alias is about TBAA). I don't think we have any way to circumvent
> C object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110431
Bug ID: 110431
Summary: Incorrect disambiguation of wide accesess from
store-merging or SLP
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110379
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
I thought that ADDR_EXPR of refenence is just fancy way to represent NOP_EXPR
or POINTER_PLUS in today gimple. How that affects builtin_object_size? :)
However I think ipa-sra will eventually need to handel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110413
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110406
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
OTOH there was a second issue with zero-sized objects which was fixed thus:
diff --git a/gcc/d/types.cc b/gcc/d/types.cc
index a1f69bb02b7..020cc7de83f 100644
--- a/gcc/d/types.cc
+++ b/gcc/d/types.cc
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110430
Bug ID: 110430
Summary: Fail to CSE for LEN_MASK_STORE
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110429
Bug ID: 110429
Summary: Redundant vector extract instruction on P9
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106081
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
I don't think the splat creates a new layout, but instead a
splat should be allowed to change its layout at zero cost.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110406
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110428
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110428
Bug ID: 110428
Summary: missed CSE with VLA vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110427
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106081
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110427
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110427
Bug ID: 110427
Summary: a
int main() {
int a = 0;
if (a < a--) {
a = 1;
}
printf("%d\n", a);
return 0;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106081
Bug 106081 depends on bug 96208, which changed state.
Bug 96208 Summary: non-grouped load can be SLP vectorized for 2-element vectors
case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96208
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 96208, which changed state.
Bug 96208 Summary: non-grouped load can be SLP vectorized for 2-element vectors
case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96208
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96208
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd86a5a69cbda40cf76388a65d3317c91cb2b501
commit r14-2117-gdd86a5a69cbda40cf76388a65d3317c91cb2b501
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110377
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-27
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110237
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dbf8ab449417aa24669f6ccf50be8c17f8c1278e
commit r14-2116-gdbf8ab449417aa24669f6ccf50be8c17f8c1278e
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110237
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110237
>
> --- Comment #18 from Alexander Monakov ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110398
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|Program_Error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334
>
> --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Hi,
> what about this. It should make at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110414
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110413
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82735
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a90f558bbb87c0b5d2b1e07d55bd585b2285cf3d
commit r14-2114-ga90f558bbb87c0b5d2b1e07d55bd585b2285cf3d
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110215
--- Comment #6 from Hongyu Wang ---
Thanks for the fix, now for the attached test, main loop will not have any
load.
There is a remaining issue that the loop epilogue still contains load from
stack and constant pool
.L9:
movslq
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
