[Bug libstdc++/110542] use of allocated storage after deallocation in a constant expression: std::array of std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110542 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83cae6c4b788544635a71748e1881c150f42efef commit r14-2306-g83cae6c4b788544635a71748e1881c150f42efef Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug tree-optimization/110538] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since r14-368-ge1366a7e4ce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110538 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/110539] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at since r14-338-g1dd154f6407

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110539 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/110541] Invalid VEC_PERM_EXPR mask element size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110541 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/110544] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c ICEs after r14-2150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110544 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gcov-profile/110545] gcda files not generated for some shared libs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110545 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Are the shared libraries that are missing gcda files possibly loaded via dlopen()?

[Bug tree-optimization/110540] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since r14-1163-gd8b058d3ca4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110540 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0 Keywords|

[Bug testsuite/110419] [14 regression] new test case gfortran.dg/value_9.f90 in r14-2050-gd130ae8499e0c6 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin --- Created attachment 55480 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55480=edit -m32 final rtl dump at -O0

[Bug testsuite/110419] [14 regression] new test case gfortran.dg/value_9.f90 in r14-2050-gd130ae8499e0c6 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin --- Created attachment 55479 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55479=edit -m32 rtl exand dump at -O0

[Bug testsuite/110419] [14 regression] new test case gfortran.dg/value_9.f90 in r14-2050-gd130ae8499e0c6 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin --- The three previous dumps are generated with the example in comment #4. The problem seems to turn around the val function needing to take the address of the c argument, which is passed by value. On powerpc,

[Bug libstdc++/110542] use of allocated storage after deallocation in a constant expression: std::array of std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110542 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55475|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/110515] [12/13/14 Regression] llvm-15.0.7 possibly invalid code on -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110515 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/110557] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code for x86_64-linux-gnu with -O3 -mavx2: vectorized loop mishandles signed bit-fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110557 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|needs-bisection

[Bug preprocessor/110558] __has_include argument expansion results in unexpected filename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/107860] Compilation failure, ambiguous fisttp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107860 --- Comment #9 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > You need to do "arch -x86_64 bash" to this build really. > Otherwise you end up with the arm64 assembler. > So if you start with that, it should

[Bug c++/110562] New: GCC does not report the error about lambda contains unexpanded parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110562 Bug ID: 110562 Summary: GCC does not report the error about lambda contains unexpanded parameter pack Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug testsuite/110419] [14 regression] new test case gfortran.dg/value_9.f90 in r14-2050-gd130ae8499e0c6 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin --- I finally got my access on gcc110 working. (gdb) r Starting program: /home/mmorin/gcc-pr110360/pr110360/pr110419_comment4 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x1684 in val (x=...,

[Bug testsuite/110419] [14 regression] new test case gfortran.dg/value_9.f90 in r14-2050-gd130ae8499e0c6 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin --- Created attachment 55478 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55478=edit -m32 tree optimized (at -O0) dump

[Bug tree-optimization/110544] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c ICEs after r14-2150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110544 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I just tried it with current trunk and I no longer see an ICE either. However... g:429905d809bbf2398bf666d65322b87ac7381e43, r14-2320-g429905d809bbf2 make -k check-gcc

[Bug preprocessor/110558] __has_include argument expansion results in unexpected filename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558 --- Comment #2 from provisorisch at online dot de --- Not quite, but you will run into bug 80753 if the header file does not exist: The second #include will not cause an error in that case. The first #include however will cause an error as

[Bug gcov-profile/110561] New: gcov counts closing bracket in a function as executable, lowering coverage statistics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561 Bug ID: 110561 Summary: gcov counts closing bracket in a function as executable, lowering coverage statistics Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/110541] Invalid VEC_PERM_EXPR mask element size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110541 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/110556] Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 --- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> --- Created attachment 55474 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55474=edit The compiler output

[Bug target/104914] [MIPS] wrong comparison with scrabbled int value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104914 --- Comment #6 from YunQiang Su --- In RTL (xx.c.256r.expand), there is (insn 10 9 11 2 (set (zero_extract:DI (reg/v:DI 200 [ val ]) (const_int 8 [0x8]) (const_int 0 [0])) (subreg:DI (reg:QI 202) 0))

[Bug c/110556] Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 --- Comment #2 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> --- The reduced sequence: -O3 -fno-inline-small-functions -fno-tree-fre -fno-delete-dead-exceptions -fexpensive-optimizations -fipa-pure-const -fipa-sra -fthread-jumps -ftree-dce

[Bug bootstrap/110467] Bootstrap with Ada enabled fails with --enable-host-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110467 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon at pushface dot org

[Bug target/110557] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code for x86_64-linux-gnu with -O3 -mavx2: vectorized loop mishandles signed bit-fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110557 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu Target Milestone|---

[Bug analyzer/109365] Double delete yields -Wanalyzer-use-after-free instead of -Wanalyzer-double-free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109365 Benjamin Priour changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vultkayn at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/110559] New: Bad mask_load/mask_store codegen of RVV

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110559 Bug ID: 110559 Summary: Bad mask_load/mask_store codegen of RVV Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/110515] [12/13/14 Regression] llvm-15.0.7 possibly invalid code on -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110515 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- So IMHO it's the fault of invariant motion moving _145 = MEM[(struct LargeRep *) + 8B].Slots; and _34 = MEM[(struct LargeRep *) + 8B].Capacity; out of loop 10 as these loads are executed conditional.

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 --- Comment #36 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79b6a4875f3dcc4bbca9242313b3edc1bad69660 commit r13-7533-g79b6a4875f3dcc4bbca9242313b3edc1bad69660 Author: Richard

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/110557] New: Wrong code for x86_64-linux-gnu with -O3 -mavx2: vectorized loop mishandles signed bit-fields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110557 Bug ID: 110557 Summary: Wrong code for x86_64-linux-gnu with -O3 -mavx2: vectorized loop mishandles signed bit-fields Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/110542] use of allocated storage after deallocation in a constant expression: std::array of std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110542 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Created attachment 55475 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55475=edit Reduced test case

[Bug middle-end/110228] [13 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.1.0 Known to work|

[Bug target/100711] Miss optimization for pandn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3186ef0cb9e2d25e8455f9990e50187e3d1eee19 commit r14-2312-g3186ef0cb9e2d25e8455f9990e50187e3d1eee19 Author: Jan Beulich Date: Wed

[Bug target/100711] Miss optimization for pandn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa58c2871a1235cb5ba475303a2bd11ae90416d5 commit r14-2313-gfa58c2871a1235cb5ba475303a2bd11ae90416d5 Author: Jan Beulich Date: Wed

[Bug target/100711] Miss optimization for pandn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100711 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e007369c8b67bcabd57c4fed8cff2a6db82e78e6 commit r14-2314-ge007369c8b67bcabd57c4fed8cff2a6db82e78e6 Author: Jan Beulich Date: Wed

[Bug c/110556] New: Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 Bug ID: 110556 Summary: Floating point exception with specific optimizations Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/106907] gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:23155: strange expression ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907 Jeevitha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug tree-optimization/110541] Invalid VEC_PERM_EXPR mask element size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110541 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fed1ec67f83f3c56c030fe2a501b01ceb6e243f commit r14-2311-g9fed1ec67f83f3c56c030fe2a501b01ceb6e243f Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug bootstrap/110550] libintl build without -fPIC even though --enable-shared is configured

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110550 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-netbsd CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/110554] veclowering introduces invalid wide Boolean values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110554 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > Created attachment 55472 [details] > Fix veclowering types > > So the problem is veclowering should have just use boolean_type_node here > for the comparison.

[Bug target/110551] [11/12/13/14 Regression] an extra mov when doing 128bit multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110551 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5

[Bug tree-optimization/110544] [14 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr71264.c ICEs after r14-2150

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110544 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #2 from Richard

[Bug c/110376] Wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110376 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Shaohua Li from comment #3) > > You post a commit for fixing this bug. Does this mean this report is not a > > DUP of 110228? > > The commit was

[Bug target/93768] Use vpternlog for composite logical operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93768 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d11c99dfca3cc603dbbfafb3afc41689a68e40f commit r14-2310-g2d11c99dfca3cc603dbbfafb3afc41689a68e40f Author: Jan Beulich Date: Wed

[Bug target/93768] Use vpternlog for composite logical operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93768 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:607613e516670dd817e7467e774ed2e3440bdb21 commit r14-2309-g607613e516670dd817e7467e774ed2e3440bdb21 Author: Jan Beulich Date: Wed

[Bug middle-end/110515] [12/13/14 Regression] llvm-15.0.7 possibly invalid code on -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110515 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-07-05

[Bug preprocessor/110558] New: __has_include argument expansion results in unexpected filename

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110558 Bug ID: 110558 Summary: __has_include argument expansion results in unexpected filename Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/110560] New: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.cc:2704

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110560 Bug ID: 110560 Summary: internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.cc:2704 Product: gcc Version: 13.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/110560] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.cc:2704

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110560 --- Comment #1 from Mathieu Malaterre --- Created attachment 55476 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55476=edit preprocessed source

[Bug target/110567] GCC fails using a register to initialize multiple variables with a constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110567 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/110556] Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Reducing this but it is taking a little longer as I get to the case where we get undefined code on accident so I need to test it using -fsanitize=undefined,address also.

[Bug c++/110566] New: [13/14 Regression] ICE when instantiating function template with template template parameter with 2 or more auto parameters with a dependent member template, ICE in tsubst, at cp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110566 Bug ID: 110566 Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE when instantiating function template with template template parameter with 2 or more auto parameters with a dependent member template,

[Bug c++/110566] [13/14 Regression] ICE when instantiating function template with template template parameter with 2 or more auto parameters with a dependent member template, ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110566 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/110564] Incorrect results from floating point computations on x86 when optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110564 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- Comment #228 from Vincent Lefèvre --- PR64410 and PR68180 should also be removed from "See Also".

[Bug c/110567] New: GCC fails using a register to initialize multiple variables with a constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110567 Bug ID: 110567 Summary: GCC fails using a register to initialize multiple variables with a constant Product: gcc Version: 13.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/110567] GCC fails using a register to initialize multiple variables with a constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110567 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug middle-end/110556] Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Reducing this but it is taking a little longer as I get to the case where we > get undefined code on accident so I need to test it using >

[Bug c++/110565] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Incomplete note on why initializing int& with int is ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110565 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Incomplete note on why |[10/11/12/13/14 Regression]

[Bug c++/110562] GCC does not report the error about lambda contains unexpanded parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110562 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libffi/67801] error in libffi documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67801 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug sanitizer/105614] mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38: error: static assertion failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614 YunQiang Su changed: What|Removed |Added CC||syq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #21

[Bug libffi/67801] error in libffi documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67801 --- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey --- This was fixed by commit 92456a4e5658e138e2cea79e390e3306b07685b0 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Aug 31 07:14:47 2021 -0700 libffi: Sync with libffi 3.4.2 Merged commit:

[Bug target/110201] RISC-V: __builtin_riscv_sm4ks and __builtin_riscv_sm4ed produce invalid assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110201 --- Comment #7 from Craig Topper --- Here is my attempt and defining scalar crypto intrinsics https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/44

[Bug other/44209] [meta-bug] Some warnings are not linked to diagnostics options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- additional example raised on gcc mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-July/241970.html

[Bug c/102989] Implement C2x's n2763 (_BitInt)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55435|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/105325] power10: Error: operand out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fc075626012b9fd09b20049d8681f2d72395f5c commit r12-9755-g7fc075626012b9fd09b20049d8681f2d72395f5c Author: Michael

[Bug gcov-profile/110561] gcov counts closing bracket in a function as executable, lowering coverage statistics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561 Ivan Sorokin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vanyacpp at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug gcov-profile/110561] gcov counts closing bracket in a function as executable, lowering coverage statistics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/12076] gcov misreports coverage of return statement [NRV]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12076 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carlosgalvezp at gmail dot com ---

[Bug target/110564] Incorrect results from floating point computations on x86 when optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110564 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >undefined or unspecified behavior Neither. Basically GCC uses excess-precision for the fpu as supplied by x87 (80bit IEEE FPU). Anyways read bug 323 and all of the specifications around FP math and more.

[Bug target/105325] power10: Error: operand out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gcov-profile/110561] gcov counts closing bracket in a function as executable, lowering coverage statistics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561 --- Comment #3 from Carlos Galvez --- I forgot to clarify that this bug is _not_ present on gcc 7.5.0 (from where we are bumping), so I believe it's a regression in that regard. Do you still believe it's a duplicate of the bug mentioned above?

[Bug tree-optimization/110563] New: [14 regression] Many ICEs after r14-2281

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110563 Bug ID: 110563 Summary: [14 regression] Many ICEs after r14-2281 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ada/110564] New: Incorrect results from floating point computations on x86 when optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110564 Bug ID: 110564 Summary: Incorrect results from floating point computations on x86 when optimized Product: gcc Version: 9.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drh at sqlite dot org --- Comment #226

[Bug c/110556] Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- It is a division by 0 being kept around ...

LOONEY, CLIFTON HNGPQWQIHG8233990856861 gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

_LQRU_83938464_QIHG_1765706886_ 3181LQRU.pdf Description: Binary data

[Bug gcov-profile/110561] gcov counts closing bracket in a function as executable, lowering coverage statistics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110561 --- Comment #4 from Carlos Galvez --- To clarify, the .gcov file looks like this (correct) on GCC 7.5.0, which I believe is newer than the duplicated bug mentioned here: -:0:Source:main.cpp -:0:Graph:main.gcno

[Bug target/105325] power10: Error: operand out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68aa17cff9279d2f3acebaf4d5cb9ababe743046 commit r13-7535-g68aa17cff9279d2f3acebaf4d5cb9ababe743046 Author: Michael

[Bug libstdc++/110542] use of allocated storage after deallocation in a constant expression: std::array of std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110542 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #55477|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ada/110564] Incorrect results from floating point computations on x86 when optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110564 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/110565] New: Incomplete note on why initializing int& with int is ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110565 Bug ID: 110565 Summary: Incomplete note on why initializing int& with int is ill-formed Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/105325] power10: Error: operand out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105325 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1896ab1cab76df1ebf12b876f696eac23436170b commit r11-10895-g1896ab1cab76df1ebf12b876f696eac23436170b Author: Michael

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 --- Comment #227 from Vincent Lefèvre --- In "See Also", there are several bugs that are related only to vectorization optimizations. What is the relation with this bug? For instance, PR89653 is "GCC (trunk and all earlier versions) fails to

[Bug sanitizer/105614] mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38: error: static assertion failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614 --- Comment #22 from gagan sidhu (broly) --- yes it’s fixed sorry. i foolishly forgot to set the architecture when installing the headers, which caused the alleged problems. after i did that, it was completely fixed. hat tip to the serb on

[Bug sanitizer/105614] mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38: error: static assertion failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614 YunQiang Su changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/110556] Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 --- Comment #6 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Reducing this but it is taking a little longer as I get to the case where we > get undefined code on accident so I need to test it using >

[Bug tree-optimization/110474] Vect: the epilog vect loop should have small VF if the loop is unrolled during vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110474 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Hao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7339e725b995912747c01c3ec80ce602512f45df commit r14-2335-g7339e725b995912747c01c3ec80ce602512f45df Author: Hao Liu Date: Thu Jul 6

[Bug middle-end/110556] Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55485 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55485=edit Reduced testcase Compile with ` -O2 -fno-tree-fre -fno-delete-dead-exceptions -fnon-call-exceptions` to make sure

[Bug middle-end/110556] Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to CTC from comment #6) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > > Reducing this but it is taking a little longer as I get to the case where we > > get undefined code on accident so I need

[Bug tree-optimization/110474] Vect: the epilog vect loop should have small VF if the loop is unrolled during vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110474 Hao Liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/106907] gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:23155: strange expression ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106907 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by jeevitha : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1669fad496ed6cc7ddea142e12af15e0b9f7f3b4 commit r14-2336-g1669fad496ed6cc7ddea142e12af15e0b9f7f3b4 Author: Jeevitha Palanisamy Date:

[Bug middle-end/110556] [12/13/14 Regression] Floating point exception with specific optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110556 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/110170] Sub-optimal conditional jumps in conditional-swap with floating point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110170 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37a231cc7594d12ba0822077018aad751a6fb94e commit r14-2337-g37a231cc7594d12ba0822077018aad751a6fb94e Author: liuhongt Date: Wed

[Bug middle-end/110568] New: ftrivial-auto-var-init= has no effect on return values in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110568 Bug ID: 110568 Summary: ftrivial-auto-var-init= has no effect on return values in C Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal