https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #34 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7758cb4b53e8a33642709402ce582f769eb9fd18
commit r14-5772-g7758cb4b53e8a33642709402ce582f769eb9fd18
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112678
Bug ID: 112678
Summary: Massive slowdown of compilation time with PGO
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112672
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, fw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
>
> --- Comment #32 from Florian Weimer ---
> There's this in standards.texi:
>
> Most
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, clang makes the same assumption apparently (while MSVC emits rep movs
inline and
ICC either that, or calls _intel_fast_memcpy). As I mentioned earlier, if
glibc and other libraries provide an alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112673
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112672
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112677
Bug ID: 112677
Summary: ASAN reports stack-buffer-overflow in
tree-vect-loop.cc vect_is_simple_use when compiling
with -mavx512
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112670
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35a688f434159a923420310860c5bc721e29a741
commit r14-5777-g35a688f434159a923420310860c5bc721e29a741
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35a688f434159a923420310860c5bc721e29a741
commit r14-5777-g35a688f434159a923420310860c5bc721e29a741
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112670
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #32 from Florian Weimer ---
There's this in standards.texi:
Most of the compiler support routines used by GCC are present in
@file{libgcc}, but there are a few exceptions. GCC requires the
freestanding environment provide
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112676
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112675
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail, wrong-code
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9982ef4f55bd3a63745e03ac6d68b4a92fa8bce
commit r14-5776-gf9982ef4f55bd3a63745e03ac6d68b4a92fa8bce
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
c
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/mjires/built/master/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/14.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/mjires/git/GCC/master/configure
--prefix=/home/mjires/built/master --disable-bootstrap --enable-checking
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto
Thread mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110279
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Di Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:746344dd53807d840c29f52adba10d0ab093bd3d
commit r14-5779-g746344dd53807d840c29f52adba10d0ab093bd3d
Author: Di Zhao
Date: Thu Nov 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110348
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ce952188ab39e303e4f63e474b5cba83b5b12fd
commit r14-5771-g6ce952188ab39e303e4f63e474b5cba83b5b12fd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110345
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The fallthrough stuff is still outstanding I think and I'll have a look.
part is done in r14-5561-g52eedfa00960f2d255ec542626e3531a65aa8bb8
The rest unresolved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 112547, which changed state.
Bug 112547 Summary: 9% exec time regression of 462.libquantum SPEC on AMD zen4
CPU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112547
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112547
Filip Kastl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110348
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to corentinjabot from comment #16)
> Clang always evaluate if i recall, the error is actually a warning that
> defaults to error.
I initially had a warning for it, but Jason preferred not to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112680
Bug ID: 112680
Summary: g++-13 segfault on std::regex_match with c++11 or
above -O2 and lto
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
ux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r14-5779-20231123205631-g746344dd538-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231123 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70
--- Comment #12 from Costas Argyris ---
I think this can be considered as fixed now, since the new
--disable-win32-utf8-manifest configure option leaves out the utf8 manifest and
you shouldn't have a problem running gcc even on XP if you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110348
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 110348, which changed state.
Bug 110348 Summary: [C++26] P2741R3 - User-generated static_assert messages
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110348
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110879
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:256d64b3460807f33ff2f70e676801bdcf908c1c
commit r14-5774-g256d64b3460807f33ff2f70e676801bdcf908c1c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112676
--- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss ---
Created attachment 56671
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56671=edit
another testcase
Another testcase, one of a few from virtualbox:
g++ -O2 -march=znver4 -mtune=znver4 -mno-avx -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112678
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110348
--- Comment #16 from corentinjabot at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15)
> Now implemented for GCC 14.
Thanks for working on this
> As I wrote already in the PR, in addition to looking through the paper
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112406
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112694
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iamanonymous.cs at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112336
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112690
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112344
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7d82b45edeed99a850595eee0e59d16c4df7aff
commit r14-5813-ga7d82b45edeed99a850595eee0e59d16c4df7aff
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112686
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46089
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112687
Bug ID: 112687
Summary: missed-optimization: switch statement does not
simplify to it's expression
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111880
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> Potential fix:
Regtests ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112675
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108762
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #54452|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96341
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111796
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> On aarch64 I see
>
> t.c:5:1: warning: GCC does not currently support mixed size types for 'simd'
> functions
> 5 | foo (int a, short b)
> | ^~~
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110941
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111012
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111292
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112619
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c44bd92a86db3fcdeb4a66ce2f3222d13af0681
commit r14-5814-g1c44bd92a86db3fcdeb4a66ce2f3222d13af0681
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112599
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Pan Li :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d83013b88b74d1f1f774d94ca950d3b6dba26e5d
commit r14-5812-gd83013b88b74d1f1f774d94ca950d3b6dba26e5d
Author: Juzhe-Zhong
Date: Fri Nov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112694
--- Comment #2 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I am going to do a similar testing with -march=armv9-a+sve on aarch64 to see
> if there is similar ones for the vectorizer.
No, I think ARM SVE won't have those
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112695
Bug ID: 112695
Summary: ICE: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.cc:1208 with
-fsanitize=address -c
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112694
Bug ID: 112694
Summary: RISC-V: zve64d testing expose many ICE on C/C++
testing
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111948
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||112439
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112666
--- Comment #2 from Francisco Paisana ---
Jonathan Wakely, thanks a lot for your clarification. I finally got it.
In summary, we established that:
1. if a type T (in my case C) has no user-defined ctor, it will be
zero-initialized.
2. and for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112680
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112672
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2d17bdd45b582b93e89c00b04763a45f97d7a34
commit r14-5785-gb2d17bdd45b582b93e89c00b04763a45f97d7a34
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112666
--- Comment #4 from Francisco Paisana ---
One last thing, I might have misread this as well.
> "Zero-initialization is performed in the following situations:
> ...
> 2) As part of value-initialization sequence [...] for members of
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112609
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c2ecfd4a29161d6c2bd3a83335387f42ff38ffe
commit r14-5797-g0c2ecfd4a29161d6c2bd3a83335387f42ff38ffe
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104819
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7646b5d88056cf269ff555afe95bc361dcf5e5c0
commit r14-5798-g7646b5d88056cf269ff555afe95bc361dcf5e5c0
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112676
--- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss ---
I think PR112681 is the same issue.
-r14-5791-20231123115417-g24592abd68e-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231123 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112685
Bug ID: 112685
Summary: missed-optimization: division / modulo loops
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112685
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I thought I had saw this a while back.
Note the Linux kernel does this kind of loop explicity to avoid the division
though as the cases where it does is known to be only a few iterations (1 or 2)
to get
-r14-5791-20231123115417-g24592abd68e-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 14.0.0 20231123 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111880
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-11-23
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.0|---
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107398
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cff1fa6625d1273fcfaf473e436ba918262d8afa
commit r14-5810-gcff1fa6625d1273fcfaf473e436ba918262d8afa
Author: Nathaniel Shead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598
--- Comment #9 from Li Pan ---
Before tracer
-
ENTRY
|
+---+
| B2 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107823
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110841
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110942
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111457
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #37 from Rich Felker ---
Also: has anyone even looked at what happens if a C memcpy with proper use of
restrict gets LTO-inlined into a caller with GCC-generated memcpy calll where
src==dest? That sounds like a case likely to blow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112569
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from TC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
--- Comment #42 from Rich Felker ---
> I'm not saying that such an implementation will be a good idea, but just a
> remark: You could, in fact, keep restrict for the arguments in this case,
> because the object pointed to by src and dest is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112685
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111880
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112683
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112688
Bug ID: 112688
Summary: [14 Regression] testcases: gcc.target/aarch64/movk.c
and vmulxd_*_2.c need to updated after
r14-5628-g53ba8d669550d3
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112689
Bug ID: 112689
Summary: [14 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-prof/time-profiler-[237].c
fail
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112689
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112691
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112691
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112645
--- Comment #2 from gooncreeper ---
I am going to move the second problem to it's own bug since I realize it
actually quite a different problem, and deserves it's own thread of discussion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112690
Bug ID: 112690
Summary: [14 Regression] gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-17.c failure
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112690
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112692
Bug ID: 112692
Summary: LSAN is not compatiable with qemu user
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98885
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d89903ff29473e6e64f032ecee5c72d1584546dc
commit r14-5808-gd89903ff29473e6e64f032ecee5c72d1584546dc
Author: Nathaniel Shead
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107071
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2022-09-28 00:00:00 |2023-11-23
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112693
Bug ID: 112693
Summary: declare-simd-4.f90 fails on aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112643
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Haochen Jiang :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1f8e65dee2d9e929cd083f36501d08bdc9c8072
commit r14-5809-ga1f8e65dee2d9e929cd083f36501d08bdc9c8072
Author: Haochen Jiang
Date:
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo