[Bug tree-optimization/113078] [14 regression] reduction of cond_sub is not vectorized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113076] [14] RISC-V: gfortran.dg/dec_io_1.f90 runtime error after r14-4971-g0beb1611754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113076 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv --- Comment #1 from Richard

[Bug target/113073] [14] RISC-V: segfault from out of bounds memory access in gcc.dg/torture/pr112736.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113073 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113070] [14 regression] [AArch64] [PGO/LTO] Miscompilation of go compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113070 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug middle-end/113082] builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 19 Dec 2023, fw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 > > --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045 --- Comment #15 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12) > Because otherwise I'm going to get blamed for every bug older than > 2022-11-01! > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111270#c1 My apologies

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #51 from David Brown --- (In reply to M Welinder from comment #48) > It's your (1). gcc is changing a program that can rely on errno not being > changed to one where the C library can change it. (The current C library or > any

[Bug target/113045] armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf: valgrind error during build of libcc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113045 --- Comment #14 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > Does it work correctly without valgrind? Yes. No one has yet attempted to reproduce my results. vld1q_u8 is a 128 bit ARM hardware instruction. I assume

[Bug libfortran/110651] libgfortran.spec links twice with libgcc spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110651 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch

[Bug middle-end/113082] builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Joseph - I wonder if the standard folks can be convinced to amend most > library function documentation as to not altering 'errno' (like memcpy, > strlen,

[Bug middle-end/113082] builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-12-19

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug middle-end/113082] New: builtin transforms do not honor errno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113082 Bug ID: 113082 Summary: builtin transforms do not honor errno Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/56888] memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888 --- Comment #49 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to M Welinder from comment #48) > It's your (1). gcc is changing a program that can rely on errno not being > changed to one where the C library can change it. (The current C library or > any

<    1   2