[Bug libstdc++/113283] missing C++26 freestanding headers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113283 --- Comment #9 from Arsen Arsenović --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6) > if someone writes an operating system or libc，he can ensure the abi being > the same. that's a job of theirs. they can and should add OS defines for their OS.

[Bug target/87281] [14 Regression] qsort checking ICE in ia64_reorg building libgo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87281 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/113156] [11/12/13/14 Regression] AVR build broken due to ICE while compiling libgcc, started with r14-6201-gf0a90c7d7333fc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113156 --- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay --- -mdouble and -mlong-double are more complicated than other options because they depend on each other in way that (to my knowledge) cannot be described by option properties. For example, in -mdouble=64

[Bug target/112817] RISC-V: RVV: provide attribute riscv_rvv_vector_bits for VLS codegen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112817 --- Comment #12 from JuzheZhong --- Hi, Vineet. Are you going to support VLS compile option and attributes? If not, I can ask other RISC-V folks to do that. Thanks.

[Bug c++/113307] New: fails to diagnose an explicit object parameter to be a function parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113307 Bug ID: 113307 Summary: fails to diagnose an explicit object parameter to be a function parameter pack Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/112958] [12/13/14 regression] s-exnllf.ads etc. don't compile on 32-bit FreeBSD/x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > Someone motivated enough should add a specific libgnat/s-dorepr__freebsd.adb > unit where Rep64 is an array of two Interfaces.Unsigned_64 and

[Bug tree-optimization/113120] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV with _BitInt() at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113120 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2611cdc329e0229330b228e441934f386d6d5ff7 commit r14-7095-g2611cdc329e0229330b228e441934f386d6d5ff7 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug fortran/113305] ICE with do concurrent and ivdep

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-10

[Bug sanitizer/113304] zero-length array and bound checking error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113304 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/113156] [11/12/13/14 Regression] AVR build broken due to ICE while compiling libgcc, started with r14-6201-gf0a90c7d7333fc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113156 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Maybe the case is mdouble=64 is not being set correctly after the __optimize__ attribute. If I get some more time, I will look into what other targets do for these kind of options.

[Bug target/113077] [14 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset with `-O2 -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113077 --- Comment #10 from Alex Coplan --- Testing a v2 patch that addresses the review feedback.

[Bug target/113229] [14 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr70083.c ICEs when compiled with -march=armv9-a+sve2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113229 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug target/109636] [14 Regression] ICE: in paradoxical_subreg_p, at rtl.h:3205 with -O -march=armv8.4-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109636 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/110512] C++20 random access iterators run sequentially with PSTL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110512 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > = std::__or_

[Bug target/113059] [14 regression] fftw fails tests for -O3 -m32 -march=znver2 since r14-6210-ge44ed92dbbe9d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > IMHO REG_UNUSED notes should stay correct or be removed. Instead of a full > solution can we just wipe them in postreload-cse as we know that pass will >

[Bug target/113247] RISC-V: Performance bug in SHA256 after enabling RVV vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113247 --- Comment #7 from JuzheZhong --- Hi, Robin. I sent a patch switching cost model into generic cost model: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/642428.html But I tweak the cost back to default cost. Since current generic

[Bug ipa/111960] [14 Regression] ICE: during GIMPLE pass: rebuild_frequencies: SIGSEGV (Invalid read of size 4) with -fdump-tree-rebuild_frequencies-all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111960 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug sanitizer/113304] New: zero-length array and bound checking error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113304 Bug ID: 113304 Summary: zero-length array and bound checking error Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/113115] [14 Regression] ICE In extract_constrain_insn_cached recog.cc with ppc64le-linux-gnu crosscompiler from r14-3592-g9ea1248604d7b6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113115 --- Comment #7 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5) > I really dislike the -mpower{8,9}-vector options, but maybe it's too late to > remove them for this release? I'm not sure how involved/invasive that patch > would

[Bug middle-end/113205] [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in backward_pass, at tree-vect-slp.cc:5346 since r14-3220

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113205 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/109987] ICE in in rs6000_emit_le_vsx_store on ppc64le with -Ofast -mno-power8-vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109987 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/111682] [14 regression] valgrind error in tsubst_template_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111682 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|unknown

[Bug target/109636] [14 Regression] ICE: in paradoxical_subreg_p, at rtl.h:3205 with -O -march=armv8.4-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109636 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||testsuite-fail --- Comment #9 from

[Bug target/113059] [14 regression] fftw fails tests for -O3 -m32 -march=znver2 since r14-6210-ge44ed92dbbe9d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- IMHO REG_UNUSED notes should stay correct or be removed. Instead of a full solution can we just wipe them in postreload-cse as we know that pass will break them? Any user then should recompute the

[Bug target/113156] [11/12/13/14 Regression] AVR build broken due to ICE while compiling libgcc, started with r14-6201-gf0a90c7d7333fc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113156 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Is there as comprehensible explanation when option property "Save" is needed? The internals just state > Build the cl_target_option structure to hold a copy of the option, > add the functions

[Bug target/109636] [14 Regression] ICE: in paradoxical_subreg_p, at rtl.h:3205 with -O -march=armv8.4-a+sve

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109636 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > The following testcases now fail due to this ICE when compiled with > -march=armv9-a+sve2 (something which I have been testing recently too): >

[Bug target/113255] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -mtune=k8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, trying to fix find_base_term isn't enough, init_alias_analysis find_base_value needs to be adjusted as well. One "obvious" mistake there is a missing diff --git a/gcc/alias.cc b/gcc/alias.cc index

[Bug tree-optimization/113301] [12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization: (1/(x+1))/2 => 0 since gcc-12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113301 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r12-6924-gc2b610e7c6c89fd422c5c31f01023bcddf3cf4a5

[Bug target/113059] [14 regression] fftw fails tests for -O3 -m32 -march=znver2 since r14-6210-ge44ed92dbbe9d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059 > > --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug tree-optimization/113301] [12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization: (1/(x+1))/2 => 0 since gcc-12

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113301 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Thinking about if 1/x or (x+1u) <= 2 ? x : 0 is more conconial for gimple. I suspect 1/x is . Which case this should be move to late gimple. I will look at that tomorrow.

[Bug tree-optimization/110603] [14 Regression] GCC, ICE: internal compiler error: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:1104 since r14-255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110603 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com ---

[Bug fortran/113305] New: ICE with do concurrent and ivdep

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113305 Bug ID: 113305 Summary: ICE with do concurrent and ivdep Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/113306] New: constexpr cast from void* fails with typeid result target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113306 Bug ID: 113306 Summary: constexpr cast from void* fails with typeid result target Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/113297] during GIMPLE pass: esra ICE: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.cc:356 with _BitInt() with -fstack-check=generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113297 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/113304] zero-length array and bound checking error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113304 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/110512] C++20 random access iterators run sequentially with PSTL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110512 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/112651] RISC-V Vector new option -mvect-lmul required to force LMUL values (rather than --param=riscv-autovec-lmul to hint at values)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112651 --- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong --- I guess it's more reasonable to have -mrvv-vector-lmul like we will have -mrvv-vector-bits. the option can be m1/m2/m4/m8/dynamic.

[Bug tree-optimization/113287] wrong code with __builtin_mul_overflow_p() and _BitInt() with -O3 -msse4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113287 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/113287] wrong code with __builtin_mul_overflow_p() and _BitInt() with -O3 -msse4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113287 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91fd5c94965b4077490c6bfcc9aa4b0e4146b38a commit r14-7109-g91fd5c94965b4077490c6bfcc9aa4b0e4146b38a Author: Tamar Christina

[Bug tree-optimization/110450] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 since r14-261-g0ef3756adf0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110450 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug c++/110065] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [C++20/2b] auto return type in template argument causes ICE, also accepts-invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110065 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/113144] [14 regression] ICE when building dpkg-1.21.15 in verify_dominators (error: dominator of 9 should be 48, not 12)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144 --- Comment #16 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349 commit r14-7101-g9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349 Author: Tamar Christina

[Bug tree-optimization/113145] [14 regression] ICE in verify_dominators when building mit-krb5-1.21.2 since r14-6822-g01f4251b8775c8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113145 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349 commit r14-7101-g9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349 Author: Tamar Christina

[Bug middle-end/112740] [14 Regression] wrong code with vector compare on riscv64 at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2023-11-30 00:00:00 |2024-1-10

[Bug middle-end/113182] [14 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/udlit-namespace.C -std=c++14 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113182 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2024-01-09 3:03 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > The new code in process_pending_assemble_externals() doesn't strip the name > encoding > from XSTR (symbol, 0).  Maybe that's the

[Bug ipa/110705] [11/12 Regression] ICE at -O2 and above: in gimplify_modify_expr, at gimplify.cc:6255 (on GCC-12.x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110705 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/110091] [12/13/14 Regression] bogus -Wdangling-pointer on non-pointer values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110091 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/113312] New: Update __attribute__((interrupt)) for Intel FRED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113312 Bug ID: 113312 Summary: Update __attribute__((interrupt)) for Intel FRED Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/113247] RISC-V: Performance bug in SHA256 after enabling RVV vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113247 Li Pan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pan2.li at intel dot com --- Comment #8 from

[Bug c++/113308] New: derived class doesn't currently allow inherited explicit object member function post increment operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113308 Bug ID: 113308 Summary: derived class doesn't currently allow inherited explicit object member function post increment operator Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug tree-optimization/113287] wrong code with __builtin_mul_overflow_p() and _BitInt() with -O3 -msse4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113287 --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina --- Created attachment 57023 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57023=edit branch_check.patch Patch undergoing testing

[Bug tree-optimization/113144] [14 regression] ICE when building dpkg-1.21.15 in verify_dominators (error: dominator of 9 should be 48, not 12)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/112971] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv_zvl256b vector -O3: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112971 --- Comment #21 from JuzheZhong --- Hi, Robin. Will you continue on this issue ? I have seen a benchmark has the same ICE. Thanks.

[Bug target/113247] RISC-V: Performance bug in SHA256 after enabling RVV vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113247 --- Comment #9 from Robin Dapp --- I also noticed this (likely unwanted) vector snippet and wondered where it is being created. First I thought it's a vec_extract but doesn't look like it. I'm going to check why we create this. Pan, the test

[Bug ipa/113197] [14 Regression] ICE in in handle_call_arg, at tree-ssa-structalias.cc:4119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113197 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/111291] ASAN error: heap-use-after-free gcc/fortran/parse.cc:359 in decode_statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mjambor at suse dot cz |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/113311] [C++23] Implement P2445R1, std::forward_like

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113311 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/110294] [11 Regression] Segmentation fault with '-O3 -fno-dce -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-pta -fno-tree-sink -ftoplevel-reorder'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110294 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libgomp/113192] [11/12/13 Regression] ERROR: couldn't execute "../../../gcc/libgomp/testsuite/flock": no such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113192 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fb3ee3ee82874e160309344bc3e52afeed8f26a commit r14-7099-g2fb3ee3ee82874e160309344bc3e52afeed8f26a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug ipa/113291] [14 Regression] compilation never (?) finishes with recursive always_inline functions at -O and above since r14-2172

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113291 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug libstdc++/113309] New: [C++23] Implement P2165R4, Compatibility between tuple and tuple-like objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113309 Bug ID: 113309 Summary: [C++23] Implement P2165R4, Compatibility between tuple and tuple-like objects Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/113310] New: [C++26] Implement P2819R2 Add tuple protocol to complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113310 Bug ID: 113310 Summary: [C++26] Implement P2819R2 Add tuple protocol to complex Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/113078] [14 regression] reduction of cond_sub is not vectorized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/113078] [14 regression] reduction of cond_sub is not vectorized.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cac9d2d2346bf06b29b34e12cf0a005c37eacdc9 commit r14-7108-gcac9d2d2346bf06b29b34e12cf0a005c37eacdc9 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 113078, which changed state. Bug 113078 Summary: [14 regression] reduction of cond_sub is not vectorized. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/110941] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r14-2379-gc496d15954c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110941 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/112989] [14 Regression] GC ICE with C++, `#include ` and `-fsanitize=address`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- BTW, the registration alternates on svmla_za32_vg2x1 svmla_za32_f16_vg2x1 svmla_za32_vg2x1 svmla_za32_f16_vg2x1 etc. So, that is one thing that should be fixed, this being registered just once, and another

[Bug tree-optimization/112734] ICE verify_gimple failed since r14-3751-g8c984a1c3693df - BitInt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac6bcce1d0a364129c7e9f6cf7f75233bdd5c5f1 commit r14-7111-gac6bcce1d0a364129c7e9f6cf7f75233bdd5c5f1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/113297] during GIMPLE pass: esra ICE: in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.cc:356 with _BitInt() with -fstack-check=generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113297 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d790565afa219a2b38cd74f419b3e56d9ed6f5a4 commit r14-7100-gd790565afa219a2b38cd74f419b3e56d9ed6f5a4 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug target/112989] [14 Regression] GC ICE with C++, `#include ` and `-fsanitize=address`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/113308] derived class doesn't currently allow inherited explicit object member function post increment operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113308 Nathaniel Shead changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathanieloshead at gmail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/111012] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r14-573-g69f1a8af45d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111012 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/112734] ICE verify_gimple failed since r14-3751-g8c984a1c3693df - BitInt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- This doesn't ICE any more since r14-6051-gb1fe98dee21773b9d908469effe2580567b903fb aka PR112770 fix. So guess I should include the testcase into testsuite and close.

[Bug tree-optimization/113281] [14 Regression] Wrong code due to vectorization of shift reduction and missing promotions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/112989] [14 Regression] GC ICE with C++, `#include ` and `-fsanitize=address`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/111003] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r14-2161-g237e83e2158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111003 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/110942] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 since r14-1165-g257c2be7ff8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110942 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug target/112989] [14 Regression] GC ICE with C++, `#include ` and `-fsanitize=address`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989 Richard Sandiford changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/112989] [14 Regression] GC ICE with C++, `#include ` and `-fsanitize=address`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989 --- Comment #12 from Richard Sandiford --- > another is try > #pragma GCC aarch64 "arm_sve.h" > after a couple of intentional declarations of the SVE builtins with > non-standard return/argument types and make sure that while it emits some >

[Bug libstdc++/113311] New: [C++23] Implement P2445R1, std::forward_like

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113311 Bug ID: 113311 Summary: [C++23] Implement P2445R1, std::forward_like Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/112734] ICE verify_gimple failed since r14-3751-g8c984a1c3693df - BitInt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/112740] [14 Regression] wrong code with vector compare on riscv64 at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- The issue is the code expects 1-bit masks but doesn't check for it. Of course it would also work for multi-bit masks, not sure if that would ever trigger - maybe for vector lowering code.

[Bug tree-optimization/110768] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since r14-2623-gc11a3aedec2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110768 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/113083] [14 Regression][arm] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.cc:2602 since r14-5979-g99d114c15523e0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/113172] [14 Regression] ice in move_early_exit_stmts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113172 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/113178] [14 Regression] ice in find_uses_to_rename_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113178 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/112971] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv_zvl256b vector -O3: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112971 --- Comment #22 from Robin Dapp --- Yes, going to the thread soon.

[Bug libstdc++/113283] missing C++26 freestanding headers.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113283 --- Comment #10 from cqwrteur --- also. how do deal with other headers. like cstdlib which C++26 requires qsort to be freestanding.

[Bug c++/112632] [14 Regression] Non-type template parameter created with converting constructor sometimes has original type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/112734] ICE verify_gimple failed since r14-3751-g8c984a1c3693df - BitInt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 regression] ICE |ICE verify_gimple failed

[Bug tree-optimization/110841] [14 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression since r14-2675-gef28aadad6e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110841 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug libgomp/110842] [14 Regression] Openmp loops with KIND=16 DO loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110842 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor

[Bug libstdc++/113311] [C++23] Implement P2445R1, std::forward_like

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113311 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Assignee|ppalka at

[Bug libstdc++/106749] Implement C++23 library features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106749 Bug 106749 depends on bug 113311, which changed state. Bug 113311 Summary: [C++23] Implement P2445R1, std::forward_like https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113311 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/110001] [13/14 regression] Suboptimal code generation for branchless binary search

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110001 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/112468] [14 Regression] Missed phi-opt after recent change (phi-opt-24.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/113305] ICE with do concurrent and ivdep

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113305 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/113315] New: during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower0 ICE: in lower_mergeable_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:2310 with _BitInt() used as array index

el: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.0 20240110 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/113298] RFE: allow suppressing warnings for void * conversions with -fpermissive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113298 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-01-10 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/113308] derived class doesn't currently allow inherited explicit object member function post increment operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113308 --- Comment #3 from waffl3x --- I meant to post this link instead of one of the others. https://godbolt.org/z/oMP8185Yh I guess I shouldn't be replying to things while still waking up, sorry!

  1   2   3   >