https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113714
Bug ID: 113714
Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization for
redundancy computation elimination: -(w+d-x)-x =>
-(w+d)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112862
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e439c7827f5c5723fdd7df9c5fac55319db204af
commit r14-8732-ge439c7827f5c5723fdd7df9c5fac55319db204af
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112863
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bec7100445f07259d5df69c9f442ea72a90fc37e
commit r14-8733-gbec7100445f07259d5df69c9f442ea72a90fc37e
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113713
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2016-April/446612.html might be
related to the whole caching situtation but I could be wrong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112861
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
I suppose we are going to have to consider back porting this, if we want to
avoid the same problems on open branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112862
--- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe ---
I suppose we are going to have to consider back porting this, if we want to
avoid the same problems on open branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113716
Bug ID: 113716
Summary: Missed optimization: (2/a)*b*(!b) => 0
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113692
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb28d5cdae149f08f0d472c210a5143a64771410
commit r14-8747-gfb28d5cdae149f08f0d472c210a5143a64771410
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113705
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113718
Bug ID: 113718
Summary: std::bit_cast making the compiler generate unnecessary
code.
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113699
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108636
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b36925576d1097b20cddd29cf96c5b9ecfffc3d
commit r12-10127-g4b36925576d1097b20cddd29cf96c5b9ecfffc3d
Author: Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113692
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108636
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That's now fixed for 12.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113715
Bug ID: 113715
Summary: RISC-V: If the Zcmp is enabled, the a0 register
operates abnormally when the program returns
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113716
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113705
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64-linux-gnu, |aarch64-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113699
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49e75666c592d23dfa17f062974e660edd01d5fb
commit r14-8746-g49e75666c592d23dfa17f062974e660edd01d5fb
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Bruno Haible from comment #12)
> For reference: The Gnulib unit tests for posix_spawn* pass on
> sparc-linux-gnu (both in 32-bit mode and in 64-bit mode).
But the issue sounds very
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113717
Bug ID: 113717
Summary: m2date and testclock failures on all darwin platforms
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f5caef53e7808fef2baf8e6ffac230b9863
commit r14-8750-g9f5caef53e7808fef2baf8e6ffac230b9863
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112864
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
I suppose we are going to have to consider back porting this, if we want to
avoid the same problems on open branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112863
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
I suppose we are going to have to consider back porting this (and the fixes for
data layout), if we want to avoid the same problems on open branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112506
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
When looking at the 64-bit libgcc_s.so.1 on both Solaris/x86 and
Linux/i686, I noticed that all the new GCC_14.0.0 symbols from
libgcc-glibc.ver (and now libgcc-sol2.ver) have been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113691
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a049acabcb11d6ae9e54c81e5835e4f3372e80fb
commit r14-8748-ga049acabcb11d6ae9e54c81e5835e4f3372e80fb
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51492
--- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina ---
Awesome! Feel free to reach out if you need any help.
It’s likely easier to start with add and sub and get things pipe cleaned and
expand incrementally than to try and do it all at once.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553
Bruno Haible changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bruno at clisp dot org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113716
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Or what we could get in reassociation:
_2 = b_6(D) == 0;
_3 = (int) _2;
_4 = _3 * b_6(D);
WHich is just:
(simplify
(mult:c @0 (convert (eq:c@2 @0 integer_zerop@1)))
@0)
We already handle the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I didn't know what it is.
But seems you're right, on x86_64-linux
252: 0001c1c0 1974 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 13 __floatbitintbf
253: 0001b200 1972 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The reason tests work is that we default to -static-libgcc in C, which contains
the symbols.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113705
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8f335ccb61bf6105192a4197ef2d84900614dc1
commit r14-8742-ga8f335ccb61bf6105192a4197ef2d84900614dc1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90276
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:723a7c1ad29523b9ddff53c7b147bffea56fbb63
commit r14-8743-g723a7c1ad29523b9ddff53c7b147bffea56fbb63
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113713
Bug ID: 113713
Summary: static_assert result depends on optimization settings
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113713
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113713
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113134
--- Comment #22 from JuzheZhong ---
I have done this following experiment.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc
index bf017137260..8c36cc63d3b 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112864
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4aa644dbbbde8c97f41c8abfbb7925c2242e31f
commit r14-8734-gf4aa644dbbbde8c97f41c8abfbb7925c2242e31f
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
> On Solaris, when compiling this
>
> #include
>
> __attribute__ ((weak))
> int
> f (int a)
> {
>return memchr ("aE", a, 2) != NULL;
> }
>
> as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90276
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:723a7c1ad29523b9ddff53c7b147bffea56fbb63
commit r14-8743-g723a7c1ad29523b9ddff53c7b147bffea56fbb63
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97119
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Local aliases are created by ipa-visibility pass. Most common case is that
function is declared inline but ELF superposition rules say that the symbol can
be overwritten by a different library. Since GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113615
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] internal|internal compiler error: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113711
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 57288
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57288=edit
Add BN constraint for APX NDD instructions
Since the instruction length of APX NDD instructions:
op imm, mem, reg
may
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104739
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113720
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113721
Bug ID: 113721
Summary: [14 Regression][OpenMP][nvptx] cuCtxSynchronize fail
when calling 'free' in the target regsion
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-02-02
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113722
Bug ID: 113722
Summary: Folding of __builtin_bswap128 doesn't work anymore
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113723
Bug ID: 113723
Summary: -freorder-blocks-and-partition emits bogus asm
directives on aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104739
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
> I wonder how to handle this: while DejaGnu has an ucn effective-target
> keyword,
> the gdc.test testsuite doesn't use those at all.
What I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113638
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:69f04177fed0de2c5f121b7607b7b59d3ba93451
commit r13-8272-g69f04177fed0de2c5f121b7607b7b59d3ba93451
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112439
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8bae2c531d2ea8f7872ed41f273b6fabaa6a9965
commit r13-8271-g8bae2c531d2ea8f7872ed41f273b6fabaa6a9965
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113615
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113720
Bug ID: 113720
Summary: [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in
extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 targeting
alpha-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113720
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 57292
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57292=edit
Patch that introduces umul_highpart RTX
Please try the attached (untested) patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106749
Bug 106749 depends on bug 113335, which changed state.
Bug 113335 Summary: [C++23] Implement LWG3617 function/packaged_task deduction
guides and deducing this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113335
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113716
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Maybe ranger could figure out that at least one of the multiplication
> operands is zero in this case, because the second one is non-zero only if
> the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113713
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113615
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113335
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113448
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113724
Bug ID: 113724
Summary: [14 Regression][OpenMP] ICE (segfault) when mapping a
struct in omp_gather_mapping_groups_1
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112580
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #6)
> (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5)
> > Not entirely, xtreme-header_b.C is still failing, as indicated above. See
> > recently:
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113318
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I have a patch to add partial std::text_encoding support on Windows, using
GetACP() and _MSVC_EXECUTION_CHARACTER_SET to query the system codepage and the
execution charset codepage, and then mapping from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113335
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f75149488b74ae696788b8761d6fcfa754a0af7
commit r14-8752-g6f75149488b74ae696788b8761d6fcfa754a0af7
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113711
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #57288|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113723
--- Comment #1 from Mathias Stearn ---
As a workaround sticking [[gnu::optimize("no-reorder-blocks-and-partition")]]
on each function that triggers this seems to work. But that is obviously not a
scalable solution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107371
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110422
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fda015646b9450a2147bd9f01e49e3836b724da4
commit r12-10128-gfda015646b9450a2147bd9f01e49e3836b724da4
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
Bug ID: 113719
Summary: g++.target/i386/pr103696.C FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 57289
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57289=edit
32- bit i386-pc-solaris2.11 pr103696.C.265t.optimized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112737
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Looks like this also fixed one of the remaining FAILs logged in PR112580,
specifically
"FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors)".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113638
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112769
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113607
Patrick O'Neill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110084
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e17a122d417fc0d606bcb3a3705b93ee81745cab
commit r14-8759-ge17a122d417fc0d606bcb3a3705b93ee81745cab
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113712
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113712
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57297
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57297=edit
testcase
Compile with `-r -fprofile-generate -O3 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
-flto-partition=max`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113727
Bug ID: 113727
Summary: csmith: differences from nothing to -O1
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I think gcc.target/aarch64/sve/mask_struct_load_3_run.c is the runtime
failure I mentioned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59778
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by John David Anglin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c3cfb5a95dcc7f797ec2815690a6291878580c4
commit r14-8758-g1c3cfb5a95dcc7f797ec2815690a6291878580c4
Author: John David Anglin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113726
Bug ID: 113726
Summary: sanitizer reports signed overflow but not underflow
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110084
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:28f95c81382243fc4e6f1b22741d258f5fd7541f
commit r12-10129-g28f95c81382243fc4e6f1b22741d258f5fd7541f
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113722
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression |middle-end
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112439
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110084
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113722
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 57296
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57296=edit
gcc14-pr113722.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111222
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110084
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b5d906b2de6fd28dd329b70b014ab9784b5
commit r13-8273-g3b5d906b2de6fd28dd329b70b014ab9784b5
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113721
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113711
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Hongyu Wang from comment #4)
> Previously I added
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;
> h=d564198f960a2f5994dde3f6b83d7a62021e49c3
>
> to prohibit several *POFF constant usage in NDD add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113710
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111948
Bug 111948 depends on bug 112439, which changed state.
Bug 112439 Summary: [13/14 Regression] Modification of a member overlapping
with a [[no_unique_address]] member in the constructor is incorrectly rejected
in constant evaluation since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113725
Bug ID: 113725
Summary: ICE during GIMPLE pass: cunroll
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113712
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
I should have a fully reduced testcase by the end of the day. I have it done to
one file with the added option of `-flto-partition=max` .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] Constant|[14 Regression] Constant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113726
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|sanitizer |middle-end
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo