[Bug libstdc++/113335] [C++23] Implement LWG3617 function/packaged_task deduction guides and deducing this

2024-02-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113335 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/113720] [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 targeting alpha-linux-gnu

2024-02-02 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113720 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 57292 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57292=edit Patch that introduces umul_highpart RTX Please try the attached (untested) patch.

[Bug libstdc++/113318] [C++26] Implement P1885R12, Naming text encodings to demystify them

2024-02-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113318 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- I have a patch to add partial std::text_encoding support on Windows, using GetACP() and _MSVC_EXECUTION_CHARACTER_SET to query the system codepage and the execution charset codepage, and then mapping from

[Bug d/104739] gdc.test/runnable/mangle.d etc. FAIL with Solaris as

2024-02-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104739 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/112737] [14 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors)

2024-02-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112737 --- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- Looks like this also fixed one of the remaining FAILs logged in PR112580, specifically "FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header_b.C -std=c++2b (test for excess errors)".

[Bug c++/112580] [14 Regression]: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-4_b.C et al; ICE tree check: expected class 'type', have 'declaration'

2024-02-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112580 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #6) > (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #5) > > Not entirely, xtreme-header_b.C is still failing, as indicated above. See > > recently: > >

[Bug target/113615] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812

2024-02-02 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113615 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[14 Regression] internal|internal compiler error: in

[Bug target/113720] New: [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 targeting alpha-linux-gnu

2024-02-02 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113720 Bug ID: 113720 Summary: [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 targeting alpha-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug target/113615] [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812

2024-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113615 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/113615] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812

2024-02-02 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113615 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/113719] g++.target/i386/pr103696.C FAILs

2024-02-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 57289 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57289=edit 32- bit i386-pc-solaris2.11 pr103696.C.265t.optimized

[Bug c++/113719] New: g++.target/i386/pr103696.C FAILs

2024-02-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113719 Bug ID: 113719 Summary: g++.target/i386/pr103696.C FAILs Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/113711] APX instruction set and instructions longer than 15 bytes (assembly warning)

2024-02-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113711 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 57288 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57288=edit Add BN constraint for APX NDD instructions Since the instruction length of APX NDD instructions: op imm, mem, reg may

[Bug tree-optimization/110422] asm goto vs SRA

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110422 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fda015646b9450a2147bd9f01e49e3836b724da4 commit r12-10128-gfda015646b9450a2147bd9f01e49e3836b724da4 Author: Martin Jambor

[Bug tree-optimization/113718] New: std::bit_cast making the compiler generate unnecessary code.

2024-02-02 Thread cassio.neri at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113718 Bug ID: 113718 Summary: std::bit_cast making the compiler generate unnecessary code. Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/51492] vectorizer does not support saturated arithmetic patterns

2024-02-02 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51492 --- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina --- Awesome! Feel free to reach out if you need any help. It’s likely easier to start with add and sub and get things pipe cleaned and expand incrementally than to try and do it all at once.

[Bug target/113700] libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700 --- Comment #9 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9f5caef53e7808fef2baf8e6ffac230b9863 commit r14-8750-g9f5caef53e7808fef2baf8e6ffac230b9863 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug libstdc++/108636] [10 Regression] C++20 undefined reference to `std::filesystem::__cxx11::path::_List::type(std::filesystem::__cxx11::path::_Type)' with -fkeep-inline-functions

2024-02-02 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108636 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- That's now fixed for 12.4

[Bug middle-end/113699] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV in var_to_partition (tree-ssa-live.h:163) with _BitInt() used in __asm__

2024-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113699 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/108636] [10 Regression] C++20 undefined reference to `std::filesystem::__cxx11::path::_List::type(std::filesystem::__cxx11::path::_Type)' with -fkeep-inline-functions

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108636 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b36925576d1097b20cddd29cf96c5b9ecfffc3d commit r12-10127-g4b36925576d1097b20cddd29cf96c5b9ecfffc3d Author: Jonathan

[Bug tree-optimization/113692] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5444 at -O with _BitInt() in a condition

2024-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113692 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/97119] Top level option to disable creation of IPA symbols such as .localalias is desired

2024-02-02 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97119 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Local aliases are created by ipa-visibility pass. Most common case is that function is declared inline but ELF superposition rules say that the symbol can be overwritten by a different library. Since GCC

[Bug middle-end/113705] [14 Regression] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 on aarch64-linux-gnu since r14-8680-g2f14c0dbb78985

2024-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113705 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/113692] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5444 at -O with _BitInt() in a condition

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113692 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb28d5cdae149f08f0d472c210a5143a64771410 commit r14-8747-gfb28d5cdae149f08f0d472c210a5143a64771410 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/113691] ICE: in lower_stmt, at gimple-lower-bitint.cc:5444 with function declaration with no parameter specification

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113691 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a049acabcb11d6ae9e54c81e5835e4f3372e80fb commit r14-8748-ga049acabcb11d6ae9e54c81e5835e4f3372e80fb Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug middle-end/113699] during GIMPLE pass: bitintlower ICE: SIGSEGV in var_to_partition (tree-ssa-live.h:163) with _BitInt() used in __asm__

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113699 --- Comment #4 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49e75666c592d23dfa17f062974e660edd01d5fb commit r14-8746-g49e75666c592d23dfa17f062974e660edd01d5fb Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug libstdc++/90276] PSTL tests fail in Debug Mode

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90276 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:723a7c1ad29523b9ddff53c7b147bffea56fbb63 commit r14-8743-g723a7c1ad29523b9ddff53c7b147bffea56fbb63 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug middle-end/113705] [14 Regression] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 on aarch64-linux-gnu since r14-8680-g2f14c0dbb78985

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113705 --- Comment #10 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8f335ccb61bf6105192a4197ef2d84900614dc1 commit r14-8742-ga8f335ccb61bf6105192a4197ef2d84900614dc1 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date:

[Bug libstdc++/90276] PSTL tests fail in Debug Mode

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90276 --- Comment #11 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:723a7c1ad29523b9ddff53c7b147bffea56fbb63 commit r14-8743-g723a7c1ad29523b9ddff53c7b147bffea56fbb63 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug target/113700] libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16

2024-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- The reason tests work is that we default to -static-libgcc in C, which contains the symbols.

[Bug target/113700] libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16

2024-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I didn't know what it is. But seems you're right, on x86_64-linux 252: 0001c1c0 1974 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 13 __floatbitintbf 253: 0001b200 1972 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 13

[Bug target/113700] libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16

2024-02-02 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- When looking at the 64-bit libgcc_s.so.1 on both Solaris/x86 and Linux/i686, I noticed that all the new GCC_14.0.0 symbols from libgcc-glibc.ver (and now libgcc-sol2.ver) have been

[Bug tree-optimization/113716] Missed optimization: (2/a)*b*(!b) => 0

2024-02-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113716 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/113705] [14 Regression] ICE in decompose, at wide-int.h:1049 on aarch64-linux-gnu since r14-8680-g2f14c0dbb78985

2024-02-02 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113705 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-linux-gnu, |aarch64-linux-gnu,

[Bug tree-optimization/113716] Missed optimization: (2/a)*b*(!b) => 0

2024-02-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113716 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Or what we could get in reassociation: _2 = b_6(D) == 0; _3 = (int) _2; _4 = _3 * b_6(D); WHich is just: (simplify (mult:c @0 (convert (eq:c@2 @0 integer_zerop@1))) @0) We already handle the

[Bug modula2/112506] gm2 test failures on x86_64-apple-darwin21

2024-02-02 Thread gaius at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112506 Gaius Mulley changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug modula2/113717] New: m2date and testclock failures on all darwin platforms

2024-02-02 Thread gaius at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113717 Bug ID: 113717 Summary: m2date and testclock failures on all darwin platforms Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/113716] Missed optimization: (2/a)*b*(!b) => 0

2024-02-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113716 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug tree-optimization/113716] New: Missed optimization: (2/a)*b*(!b) => 0

2024-02-02 Thread 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113716 Bug ID: 113716 Summary: Missed optimization: (2/a)*b*(!b) => 0 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/113700] libgcc_s does not include symbols for _Float16 and __bf16 on Solaris/Illumos even though gcc generates code for _Float16 and __bf16

2024-02-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113700 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/113706] c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c FAILs as C++

2024-02-02 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113706 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- > On Solaris, when compiling this > > #include > > __attribute__ ((weak)) > int > f (int a) > { >return memchr ("aE", a, 2) != NULL; > } > > as

[Bug target/112864] [14 regression] Many libphobos tests FAIL on macOS 12+

2024-02-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112864 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe --- I suppose we are going to have to consider back porting this, if we want to avoid the same problems on open branches.

[Bug target/112863] [14 regression] Many obj-c++ tests FAIL on macOS 14

2024-02-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112863 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- I suppose we are going to have to consider back porting this (and the fixes for data layout), if we want to avoid the same problems on open branches.

[Bug target/112862] [14 regression] gfortran.dg coarray tests FAIL on macOS 12+

2024-02-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112862 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe --- I suppose we are going to have to consider back porting this, if we want to avoid the same problems on open branches.

[Bug target/112861] [14 regression] Most gdc tests FAIL on macOS 12+

2024-02-02 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112861 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- I suppose we are going to have to consider back porting this, if we want to avoid the same problems on open branches.

[Bug target/112864] [14 regression] Many libphobos tests FAIL on macOS 12+

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112864 --- Comment #2 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4aa644dbbbde8c97f41c8abfbb7925c2242e31f commit r14-8734-gf4aa644dbbbde8c97f41c8abfbb7925c2242e31f Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug target/112863] [14 regression] Many obj-c++ tests FAIL on macOS 14

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112863 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bec7100445f07259d5df69c9f442ea72a90fc37e commit r14-8733-gbec7100445f07259d5df69c9f442ea72a90fc37e Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug target/112862] [14 regression] gfortran.dg coarray tests FAIL on macOS 12+

2024-02-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112862 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e439c7827f5c5723fdd7df9c5fac55319db204af commit r14-8732-ge439c7827f5c5723fdd7df9c5fac55319db204af Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug c/113715] New: RISC-V: If the Zcmp is enabled, the a0 register operates abnormally when the program returns

2024-02-02 Thread mumuxi_ll at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113715 Bug ID: 113715 Summary: RISC-V: If the Zcmp is enabled, the a0 register operates abnormally when the program returns Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/113134] gcc does not version loops with early break conditions that don't have side-effects

2024-02-02 Thread juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113134 --- Comment #22 from JuzheZhong --- I have done this following experiment. diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc index bf017137260..8c36cc63d3b 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc +++

[Bug rust/113553] rust fails to build on sparc64-linux-gnu

2024-02-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Bruno Haible from comment #12) > For reference: The Gnulib unit tests for posix_spawn* pass on > sparc-linux-gnu (both in 32-bit mode and in 64-bit mode). But the issue sounds very

[Bug rust/113553] rust fails to build on sparc64-linux-gnu

2024-02-02 Thread bruno at clisp dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113553 Bruno Haible changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bruno at clisp dot org --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/113713] constexpr function values (incorrectly?) depend on optimization level

2024-02-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113713 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2016-April/446612.html might be related to the whole caching situtation but I could be wrong.

[Bug tree-optimization/113714] New: [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination: -(w+d-x)-x => -(w+d)

2024-02-02 Thread 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113714 Bug ID: 113714 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missed optimization for redundancy computation elimination: -(w+d-x)-x => -(w+d) Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug c++/113713] static_assert result depends on optimization settings

2024-02-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113713 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/113713] static_assert result depends on optimization settings

2024-02-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113713 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c++/113713] New: static_assert result depends on optimization settings

2024-02-02 Thread fchelnokov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113713 Bug ID: 113713 Summary: static_assert result depends on optimization settings Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

<    1   2