https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118945
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117760
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5193b9d250a8ecec669a87708a1a98abae94130f
commit r16-4219-g5193b9d250a8ecec669a87708a1a98abae94130f
Author: Matteo Nicoli
Date: Sat Oc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122165
Bug ID: 122165
Summary: [PDT] gfortran does catch F2023:R916
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122166
Bug ID: 122166
Summary: Look into setting PROP_last_full_fold for -Og earlier
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122083
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14a825d4891f12ae0e2595b6b08a318f5dcb
commit r16-4220-g14a825d4891f12ae0e2595b6b08a318f5dcb
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107968
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e3431c6fd4691d5a0c48ee78869e5f9a79f217c3
commit r16-4222-ge3431c6fd4691d5a0c48ee78869e5f9a79f217c3
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122167
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I get a different warning:
:3:22: warning: type attributes ignored after type is already defined
[-Wattributes]
3 | class [[deprecated]] Foo;
| ^~~
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121845
--- Comment #1 from Robin Dapp ---
Quickly looked into this and it appears to be an issue with the "series
pattern" recognition. Working on a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117760
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159
--- Comment #4 from Christoph & Ursula Grein ---
Eric
Excuse me for insisting and wasting your time. But dormant is the same
as suspended.
Why is this so? Do you think about raising an AI? IMHO it's a bad
experience if an RM example does ot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122166
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117687
--- Comment #3 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Examples:
https://godbolt.org/z/M5T5GPrrr
int *f()
{
return false;
}
enum : int { E = 0 };
int *g()
{
return E;
}
int *h()
{
constexpr _BitInt(4) b = 0;
return b;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120782
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
In response to c#8, yes the alignment data attached to a MEM should be
conservatively correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122104
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 62497
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62497&action=edit
gcc16-pr122104.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122160
Bug ID: 122160
Summary: String concatenation: Ada RM 4.5.3(5) not followed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122158
Bug ID: 122158
Summary: [16 Regression] PowerPC64LE: Trigger internal error at
O2
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122163
Bug ID: 122163
Summary: Lambda use of rvalue ref not considered an lvalue
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122157
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
How did you build the cross to the target ?
Or you didn't?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122161
Bug ID: 122161
Summary: Visibility problem
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118945
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b4d5fc649a2678d539f6ed119ee2a1bb4db9a2e
commit r16-4215-g4b4d5fc649a2678d539f6ed119ee2a1bb4db9a2e
Author: Zhongyao Chen
Date: Sat O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122114
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64869
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70639fc6067b315b3527e17077eba72b74eb42b4
commit r16-4214-g70639fc6067b315b3527e17077eba72b74eb42b4
Author: Eric Botcazou
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122104
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:867f777cee9f44027a3724fbad266c5cfb3a311f
commit r16-4218-g867f777cee9f44027a3724fbad266c5cfb3a311f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122153
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ee5a05da06078975a933be849431eee1d4c6989
commit r16-4211-g5ee5a05da06078975a933be849431eee1d4c6989
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114457
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f256a13f8aed833fe964a2ba541b7b30ad9b4a76
commit r16-4212-gf256a13f8aed833fe964a2ba541b7b30ad9b4a76
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122156
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://eel.is/c++draft/sort
https://eel.is/c++draft/iterator.concept.random.access#concept:random_access_iterator
{ j[n] } -> same_as>;
This is looking more and more like a QT issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107968
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159
--- Comment #2 from Christoph & Ursula Grein ---
By the way: What does mean SUSPENDED?
Am 04.10.2025 um 12:02 schrieb ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159
>
> Eric Botcazou changed:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110338
Bug 110338 depends on bug 114457, which changed state.
Bug 114457 Summary: [C++26] P2795R5 - Erroneous behavior for uninitialized reads
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114457
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122162
Bug ID: 122162
Summary: constexpr and set but not used
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122160
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117658
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122083
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> The other issue is SRA is Disqualifying due to D.8570 being const but since
> it is a local const that does not matter.
>
> ! Disqualifying D.8570 - Encountered
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122127
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5ee5a05da06078975a933be849431eee1d4c6989
commit r16-4211-g5ee5a05da06078975a933be849431eee1d4c6989
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159
Bug ID: 122159
Summary: Ada RM example does not compile
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117658
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a8ecf4580442e463c3a023b6724fb27e6b7e0804
commit r16-4210-ga8ecf4580442e463c3a023b6724fb27e6b7e0804
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64869
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122161
--- Comment #2 from Christoph & Ursula Grein ---
Understood.
This was the way I reported bugs at the time when I was a supported
customer, and also when I sent public reports.
Am 04.10.2025 um 12:13 schrieb ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org:
> See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> By the way: What does mean SUSPENDED?
It means that the bug is in a dormant state for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122160
--- Comment #2 from Christoph & Ursula Grein ---
Dear Eric,
in the contrary, I think it might be helpful when there is a hint to
something you have already been working on.
But OK, I'll refrain from sending cross-report.
Have a nice day.
Ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122161
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101140
--- Comment #6 from Nathaniel Shead ---
The testcase in comment #0 still fails after the fixes for ADL in PR117658,
because the 'operator new' declaration in new.hpp has been discarded. This can
be worked around by adding a 'using ::operator ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117652
--- Comment #5 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can't reproduce this on 15/16 anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122155
Bug ID: 122155
Summary: cond_if_else_store_replacement_1 does not need to
create an extra name if the rhs is equal
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122158
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122083
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-October/696684.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122114
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ab429ea91d50e5ddb8eb5bc2098c6a476860a01b
commit r16-4217-gab429ea91d50e5ddb8eb5bc2098c6a476860a01b
Author: Raphael Moreira Zinsly
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122164
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121933
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122165
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122147
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
53 matches
Mail list logo
