--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2004-10-27 06:55 ---
Good and fast work!
I applied the patch and the ICE went away.
Michael Cieslinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17956
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 07:54
---
I'm going to commit this as obvious in a few hours unless someone screams.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17991
The following code fails to compile with GCC 2.95.3, but is OK with GCC 3.3.3
(and also GCC 2.96 from RedHat):
/* test.c:2: badly punctuated parameter list in `#define' */
#define TRACE(args ...) printf(## args)
#define log(format, args...) printf(%s:%s:%d, format, __FILE__,
__FUNCTION__,
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 09:22
---
It turns out that #pragma ident is ignored on Solaris, too.
Yes, the bug is fully reproducible anywhere. That's why I put *-*-* as the
triplets.
Eric, can you test this patch in your Solaris setup?
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 09:25
---
This is fixed on mainline with Zdenek's patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-09/msg00234.html
Well, it is probably only papered over, since the RTL optimizer remains
unfixed. However, the testcase
Getting the following testsuite failures on ppc-linux:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-20.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-20.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 3 loops 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-22.c execution test
These testcases actually fail even with vectorization disabled - it aborts when
--- Additional Comments From davidm at hpl dot hp dot com 2004-10-27 11:04 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 01:49, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
The compiler seemed to get stuck
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 11:32
---
2.95.x is not going to be updated/changed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Getting the following testsuite failures on ppc-linux:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-30.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-8.c execution test
These failures seem to be related to alignment - when the array types are
changed from float to afloat:
typedef float afloat __attribute__
I just wanted to add an std::priority_queue usage example in the documentations,
since it's not obvious when you don't know how tu use it.
Since there isn't an html target in the root Makefile of gcc i didn't check
for validity of the patch, but i think it's ok.
$ uuencode
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 11:42
---
Confirmed, on most PowerPC targets (except for darwin), char is unsigned by default
which causes the
problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression |target
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 11:45
---
Could you send your patch to gcc-patches@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also could you make
it off the HEAD (aka
4.0.0)?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18174
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2004-10-27 11:48 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Can anyone reproduce the problem on i686-linux (P4)?
I wasn't able to reporoduce it on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
This might be related to PR18173.
Is PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY !=
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 11:54
---
What version of binutils are you using?
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++
--- Additional Comments From Number_42 at caramail dot com 2004-10-27 12:00
---
(In reply to comment #1)
Could you send your patch to gcc-patches@ and [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also could you make
it off the HEAD (aka
4.0.0)?
I can send it to these mailing lists but i can't download the
--- Additional Comments From inaoka dot kazuhiro at renesas dot com 2004-10-27
12:05 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
What version of binutils are you using?
GNU assembler version 2.15.94 (m32r-elf) using BFD version 2.15.94 20041022
--
The following class will not compile with GCJ version 3.3.3 (cygwin special),
succeeds with Sun javac. The workaround is obvious, but not always easy with
other people's code.
$ gcj -classpath . -C Test.java
Test.java:3: error: Can't find default package `com.example'. Check the CLASSPAT
H
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 12:25
---
Surely this is not valid?
A statement expression is an _expression_ so any kind of control
flow into or out of a statement expression is just wrong IMHO.
It's like jumping into a + b, try defining semantics
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 12:42
---
Proposed patch here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02304.html
Part of the discussion here (broken mailer :-/)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02310.html
--
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-10-27 12:55
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE jumping into statement
expression
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Surely this is not valid?
The validity is the subject of bug 772 and the
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 13:05
---
Confirmed. Almost certain that is related to (or even the same bug as) PR 6818.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 13:06
---
Yes that fixes the Ada problem also. Thanks David.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17956
Bootstrap current CVS mainline GCC terminated with errors:
--8X--
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/gcc/obj/prev-gcc/xgcc -
B/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/gcc/obj/prev-gcc/ -B/home/wanderer/pkg/gcc/i386-
unknown-freebsd5.3/bin/ -I/home/wanderer/pkg/build/gcc/src/gcc/gcc/libcpp -
I.
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-27 13:21 ---
A similar problem are jumps via 'break'/'continue' out of statement
expressions. Here's a place where people have really used this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg00706.html
(Isn't the ability
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-10-27 13:24 ---
Some more discussion here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02310.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=772
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 13:30
---
This is not a bug. Using the submitter's test case against
JDK 1.4.2_03 from Sun on Linux:
-- 8 --
~/src/tmp/r1 java -version
java version
--
Bug 18175 depends on bug 6818, which changed state.
Bug 6818 Summary: Can't find default package when package has no classes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6818
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 13:35
---
Subject: Bug 14684
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 13:35:45
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog opts.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 13:37
---
Andrew, did you try it with the current mainline? I don't see this bug any more
at all. IMHO, this should be closed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18175
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 13:41
---
I used gcc version 4.0.0 20041026 (experimental)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18175
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 13:42
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From bkorb at veritas dot com 2004-10-27 13:46 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Two-process fixincludes
broken: pz_mn_name_pat undefined
bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27
The following invalid code snippet causes an ICE when compiled with mainline:
=
void foo()
{
X;
const_castint(X);
}
=
bug.cc: In function `void foo()':
bug.cc:3: error: 'X' was not declared in this scope
bug.cc:4: internal compiler
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 13:57
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
;
import com.example.*;
class Test { }
~/src/tmp/r1 $MYGCJ -classpath . -C com/example/Test.java
~/src/tmp/r1 $MYGCJ --version
gcj (GCC) 4.0.0 20041027 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty
We miss an opportunity to remove the bounds checking code in the following case (this
shows up a
huge amount in libjava and other code):
class t
{
void f(int a[])
{
for(int i=0;ia.length;i++)
a[i] = 0;
}
}
--
Summary: Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:13
---
Note you compiling with the full path to the package/java source where the problem
comes into play.
If you compile with just gcj -c Test.java, it fails.
--
--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:15
---
Oh! I see.
In that case, I do not see the error with JDK 1.4.2_03
(Linux), but I do see it with GCJ (mainline, Linux). So
yeah, it is sort of a bug.
But note that it is still not quite the same as
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:15
---
The tree level looks like after optimization:
t.f(int[]) (this, a)
{
int i;
int D.385;
unsigned int i.3;
int D.376;
bb 0:
D.376 = a-length;
if (D.376 = 0) goto L8; else goto L17;
L17:;
i =
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:29
---
Mark, the regression appears with your patch for PR14401:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-03/msg00427.html
Could you please have a look?
--
What|Removed |Added
The following testcase:
===
struct s{
int m;
int n[N][N][N];
};
struct test1{
struct s a; /* array a.n is unaligned */
int b;
int c;
struct s e[N]; /* array e.n is aligned */
};
int main ()
{
int i,j;
struct test1 tmp1;
for (i = 0; i
The documentation on GCC states that in freestanding environment, no
assumptions are made:
To make it act as a conforming freestanding
implementation for a freestanding environment, use the option
`-ffreestanding'; it will then define `__STDC_HOSTED__' to `0' and not
make
--- Additional Comments From alex dot neyman at auriga dot ru 2004-10-27 14:38
---
Created an attachment (id=7416)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7416action=view)
The test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18180
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2004-10-27 14:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=7417)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7417action=view)
testcase.
Forgot to mention - occurs when compiling with '-O2 -ftree-vectorize
-maltivec'.
Attached is the
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:43
---
Subject: Bug 17991
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 14:42:57
Modified files:
fixincludes: ChangeLog configure configure.ac
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:44
---
Fixed by the above commit.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
Bug 17832 depends on bug 17991, which changed state.
Bug 17991 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Two-process fixincludes broken: pz_mn_name_pat
undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17991
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:48
---
This is a known problem, and is due to the fact that paired
FP registers can't be treated as separate entities. This leads
to an internal representation of double loads that appears to
indicate a
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:49
---
I basically just posted your patch with an addtional comment:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02341.html.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From alex dot neyman at auriga dot ru 2004-10-27 14:55
---
Created an attachment (id=7418)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7418action=view)
Proposed patch
The patch, however, leads to a build failure:
optabs.h and c-common.h have a clash with
--- Additional Comments From alex dot neyman at auriga dot ru 2004-10-27 14:56
---
Just to make it clear: this test case never produces variable might be
clobbered warning, another test case was used for that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18180
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 15:00
---
Try with -fno-builtins.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18180
The loop peeling mechanism in the vectorizer (which is used to force alignment
of stores - by peeling the first few iterations, and to support unknown loop
bound - by peeling te last few iterations) does not handle correctly the case
where a loop invariant is used after the loop; there are two
--- Additional Comments From alex dot neyman at auriga dot ru 2004-10-27 15:09
---
Tried, the result of -ffreestanding -fno-builtin is the same as just
-ffreestanding. Also, IIRC -ffreestanding implies -fno-builtin, doesn't it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18180
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-27 15:29
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] unaligned xmm movaps on the stack with -O2 -msse
because of the frame pointer
uros at kss-loka dot si wrote:
target/12902: Invalid assembly generated when using SSE /
--- Additional Comments From jgrimm2 at us dot ibm dot com 2004-10-27 15:38
---
What I've finally done to get my 64-bit biarch default64 compiler is to first
build a 32-bit biarch default64 compiler. I can then make bootstrap using this
intermediate compiler as the host compiler to
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-10-27 15:39
---
Subject: Re: New: Disable special handling of functions with
--freestanding
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, alex dot neyman at auriga dot ru wrote:
- different code is generated for function issuing the setjmp()
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-27 15:43
---
Debora, I'm working on a patch which should definitely fix this bug. I hope to
be able to finish it before 4.0 gets out and/or 3.3 is definitely closed.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 15:56
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02342.html.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From berndtrog at yahoo dot com 2004-10-27 15:56 ---
Hmm, there seems to be a relation between the
version of glibc an this bug:
glibc-2.2 segfault
glibc-2.2.5 NO segfault
glibc-2.3.3 NO segfault
Can anyone try
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=vect.exp
with an old
--- Additional Comments From alex dot neyman at auriga dot ru 2004-10-27 16:01
---
The bug 14411 was submitted by me as well, though from a different email
address. I updated the patch in it to apply to 4.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18180
The C++ parser appears to ignore attributes that apply to nested declarators.
E.g. when trying to define an 'SImode-pointer to int' by
typedef int * __attribute__ ((mode (SI))) t;
on s390x-ibm-linux, the C++ parser silently ignores the attribute.
The following test case:
#include stdio.h
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 16:27 ---
I'll see if I can reduce it a little.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17926
It would be nice to get a warning for the code below when bar is used.
Using something documented as unused is likely a bug.
void
foo (int __attribute__((unused)) bar)
{
bar++;
}
gcc-3.4 -W -Wunused -Wall -O2 -c ~/foo.c
--
Summary: Warning when supposedly unused parameters are
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 16:34
---
I think there was another bug about this and it was closed because we use unused to
mean it might be
unused not that it is just unused.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18183
Using pointers of non-default mode via __attribute__ ((mode))
produces incorrect code in many cases as the tree optimizers
treat an __attribute__ ((mode) qualified pointer type as
equivalent to the corresponding non-qualified type.
(This is a regression over 3.4 introduced by the tree-ssa
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 16:46
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 16:58
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02366.html.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From robertmh at gnu dot org 2004-10-27 16:59 ---
I've been sending patches to maintain k*bsd-gnu support since it was started
in GCC, but have no commit rights. I would gladly become the official
maintainer for that system if you like.
OTOH, if one of the GCC
--- Additional Comments From robertmh at gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:01 ---
Erm, I forgot my mail signature is not quoted here ;) Please refer to
http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18117
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:03
---
This is just caused by the fact that there are warnings in libcpp still.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-10-27 17:05
---
Subject: Re: Disable special handling of functions with
--freestanding
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, alex dot neyman at auriga dot ru wrote:
The bug 14411 was submitted by me as well, though from a different
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:18 ---
(From update of attachment 7415)
fix mime type, mark as patch
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:19 ---
Jason, this is the bug I talked about briefly. Do you think the Redmond offsetof
work is also applicable here?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:22
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02358.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:29
---
Subject: Bug 18075
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 17:29:31
Modified files:
libcpp : ChangeLog directives.c
Log
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:31 ---
fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--
Bug 17265 depends on bug 18075, which changed state.
Bug 18075 Summary: [4.0 Regression] #pragma implementation broken in presence of
#pragma ident
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18075
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:44
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:45
---
Libjava builds for me now on sparc64-sun-solaris2.9 and sparc-sun-solaris2.8.
Testsuite results are decent (42 and 24 failures respectively).
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 17574 depends on bug 17265, which changed state.
Bug 17265 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Libjava doesn't build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17265
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:45
---
Subject: Bug 17133
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 17:45:25
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfg.c tree-dfa.c
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:59
---
Reproducible on x86 too.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot
--- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru 2004-10-27 18:01 ---
Warning fixed in patch for http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18075
But now bootstrap terminate with errors:
---8X---
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/gcc/obj/prev-gcc/xgcc -
When a thread is terminated from within an exception handling block, exception
object(s) (__cxa_exeption) are leaked, as the TSD destructor for __cxa_eh_globals
instance does delete them. The following program demonstrates the leak. A patch
and a ChangeLog entry follows.
#include pthread.h
In option.c, optionlist and common.opt the word parameter is
written paramter (e between m and t is missing).
It shows up on the first lines when doing a cc1 --version | less
--
Summary: Spelling error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 19:07 ---
Got another report for this on powerpc-apple-darwin7.5.0, gcj 3.4.2.
I have added a workaround for it in GNU Classpath CVS
--- java/security/cert/X509Certificate.java 20 Oct 2004 07:11:40 - 1.7
+++
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 19:14 ---
Does this mean that you've actually been able to duplicate the bug?
Can you at least let me have a backtrace?
Surely it's better to fix the bug than install a workaround in Classpath.
--
During garbage collection, the WeakHashMap will throw a NoSuchElementException
when performing the methods:
.keySet().toArray()
.clear();
and maybe more. Sun's java does not.
Here is an example:
gcc version 4.0.0 20041014 (experimental)
gcj -main=WH WH.java
import java.util.*;
public
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 19:46
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16998 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 19:46
---
*** Bug 18187 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-27 19:50 ---
Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns
(missing epilogue)
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 04:05, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote:
This was on a Debian/unstable system. How do you run
--- Additional Comments From mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 20:06 ---
Does this mean that you've actually been able to duplicate the bug?
Can you at least let me have a backtrace?
Surely it's better to fix the bug than install a workaround in Classpath.
I have seen the bug
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 20:14
---
Subject: Bug 17832
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 20:13:58
Modified files:
fixincludes: ChangeLog fixfixes.c
Log message:
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-10-27 20:17
---
Fixed on mainline. I think this is the end of fixincludes problems for Windows.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 17462 depends on bug 17832, which changed state.
Bug 17832 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap broken by fixincludes failures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17832
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 18107 depends on bug 17832, which changed state.
Bug 17832 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Bootstrap broken by fixincludes failures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17832
What|Old Value |New Value
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
