--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 07:22 ---
Fixed on 4.0.2 and fixed on 4.1
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #14 from c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2005-10-13 07:50
---
FX's recent commit to trap IEEE exceptions via the -ffpe-trap command-line
option is affected by this bug as well
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18452
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:36
---
Subject: Bug 23694
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:36:38
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:36
---
Subject: Bug 22464
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:36:38
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:36
---
Subject: Bug 22405
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:36:38
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:36
---
Subject: Bug 22352
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:36:38
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:36
---
Subject: Bug 23307
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:36:38
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:36
---
Subject: Bug 22180
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:36:38
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:38
---
Subject: Bug 23694
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:38:41
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c pt.c semantics.c ChangeLog
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:38
---
Subject: Bug 22464
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:38:41
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c pt.c semantics.c ChangeLog
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:38
---
Subject: Bug 22405
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:38:41
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c pt.c semantics.c ChangeLog
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:38
---
Subject: Bug 22352
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:38:41
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c pt.c semantics.c ChangeLog
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:38
---
Subject: Bug 22180
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:38:41
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c pt.c semantics.c ChangeLog
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:38
---
Subject: Bug 23307
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 08:38:41
Modified files:
gcc/cp : call.c decl.c pt.c semantics.c ChangeLog
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:39
---
Fixed in 4.0.3.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:39
---
Fixed in 4.0.3.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:40
---
Fixed in 4.0.3.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:40
---
Fixed in 4.0.3.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:40
---
Fixed in 4.0.3.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 08:41
---
Fixed in 4.0.3.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-13 09:06 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
This locking code looks really strange to me.
void
release() // nothrow
{
if (__gnu_cxx::__exchange_and_add(_M_use_count, -1) == 1)
{
dispose();
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 09:06
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20721 ***
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 09:06
---
*** Bug 21491 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 09:07 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q4/msg00230.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 09:10 ---
See also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q4/msg00241.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 09:11 ---
And http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q4/msg00270.html.
Hans' threading seems to be broken.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
In our GNU version rather puzzling solutions appear like:
void
release() // nothrow
{
if (__gnu_cxx::__exchange_and_add(_M_use_count, -1) == 1)
{
dispose();
__glibcxx_mutex_lock(_M_mutex);
__glibcxx_mutex_unlock(_M_mutex);
weak_release();
}
}
with
building a CVS 20051008 cross compiler, built with 20051008 native compiler
Matthias
/scratch/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20051008/build-hppa64/./gcc/xgcc
-B/scratch/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20051008/build-hppa64/./gcc/
-B/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/hppa64-linux-gnu/bin/
--- Comment #3 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2005-10-13
10:15 ---
down to 474 test failures with 20051008
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-13 10:54 ---
An additional, important, clarification, not present in the public exchange: in
any case, passing -lpthread is necessary for the problem to appear, because
otherwise no (uninitialized) mutexes are actually involved.
--
--- Comment #5 from espie at nerim dot net 2005-10-13 11:11 ---
I added FLT_EVAL_METHOD to OpenBSD's math.h in january 2005.
Currently, all releases up to OpenBSD 3.5 have been discontinued.
OpenBSD 3.6 reaches end-of-life in a few months.
As far as OpenBSD is concerned, this bug is
--- Comment #10 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 11:22
---
Closing, since the problem is fixed on mainline.
I'll submit a patch to remove the obsolete code once 4.1 has branched.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 11:53
---
Subject: Bug 24262
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 11:52:58
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-data-ref.c
Log message:
/usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.1.0/cc1plus -fpreprocessed test_bind.ii -quiet
-dumpbase test_bind.cc -march=i586 -mtune=i686 -auxbase-strip test_bind.o -O2
-Wall -version -fmessage-length=0 -o test_bind.s
test_bind.cc: In function int main():
test_bind.cc:62: internal compiler error:
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 12:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=9982)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9982action=view)
testcase
Reduced testcase from libsigc++2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24351
--- Comment #8 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:11 ---
Wont fix for pre 4.0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21117
--- Comment #15 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:12 ---
wont fix for pre 4.0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21592
--- Comment #12 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:14 ---
probably should be backported to 3.4
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:14 ---
wont fix for 3.4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22180
--- Comment #5 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:15 ---
wont fix for 3.4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23694
--- Comment #10 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:16 ---
could probably backport to 3.4
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:17 ---
could probably backport to 3.4
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:19 ---
Could probably backport to 3.4
--
nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:46 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 13:56 ---
Reopening for now as this change causes netbsd to fail to compile. There are
more == below which I did not noticed until now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23307
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22464
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.3 |3.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22352
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24348
--- Comment #2 from erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-10-13 14:49
---
Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-10/msg00292.html
--
erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:09 ---
Confirmed, nice small testcase:
struct adaptor_base {
};
struct bound_argument {
bound_argument();
};
template class T_functor struct adaptor_functor : public adaptor_base {
explicit adaptor_functor(const
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:24
---
Subject: Bug 23926
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005-10-13 15:24:11
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog acinclude.m4 configure
Log message:
--- Comment #6 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:25
---
Fixed again (hopefully).
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
I built gcc-3.3.2 with the ADA bootstrap binary from Rainer Orth,
gcc-3.3.2-alpha-dec-osf5.1b-bin.tar.gz. I then tried to build gcc-3.4.3 with
the ADA binaries from the gcc-3.3.2 build:
$ cd /opt/build
$ gtar jxf /opt/src/devel/gcc-3.4.3/src/gcc-3.4.3.tar.bz2
$ mkdir gcc-3.4.3-objdir
$ cd
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:32 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13470 ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:32
---
*** Bug 24352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:47 ---
Reopen ...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:48 ---
... to mark as dup of PR24351, as this now looks like
#0 0x00ac7920 in do_simple_structure_copy (lhs=
{type = SCALAR, var = 15, offset = 0}, rhs=
{type = SCALAR, var = 11, offset = 0}, size=24)
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:48 ---
*** Bug 23949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 15:59 ---
Why can't build_range_check first cast to an unsigned type?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:01 ---
Reduced a little further without any labels or gotos:
extern int *F2 (void) __attribute__ ((__const__));
void
S4 (int *i)
{
int *D2171;
D2171 = F2 ();
do
*D2171 = 62;
while (*i !=0);
}
--
pinskia at
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:01 ---
Maybe you could add a reload_completed split to not use autoincrements if Rd ==
Rn?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20972
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
GCC build triplet|x86_64-linux-gnu|
GCC
--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:05 ---
Sorry, let me rephrase. Could build_range_check not cast to the unsigned type
if flag_wrapv?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22429
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09 ---
As in:
if (value != 0
(!flag_wrapv || TREE_OVERFLOW (value))
(flag_wrapv || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
which in turn means
if (value != 0
(flag_wrapv ? TREE_OVERFLOW (value) :
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09
---
As in:
if (value != 0
(!flag_wrapv || TREE_OVERFLOW (value))
(flag_wrapv || !TYPE_UNSIGNED (etype)))
which in turn means
if (value != 0
(flag_wrapv ? TREE_OVERFLOW
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:12
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] -1073741824 = n n = 1073741823 is true
where n is 1073741824
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:09
---
As in:
if (value != 0
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:15 ---
Reconfirmed with current mainline :(
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC build triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
GCC host triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu |
Target
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 16:35 ---
This still happens with mainline GCC built a few hours ago.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24093
--- Comment #8 from law at redhat dot com 2005-10-13 17:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Dominator opts
slows down bresenham line drawing by roughly 20%
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 00:37 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
int g(int);
int f(int i, int j)
{
i +=1;
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 17:36
---
Subject: Bug 24251
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-13 17:36:07
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog link.cc
Log message:
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work||4.1.0
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 18:41 ---
I think this a dup of bug 24251 which was just fixed on the mainline, if you
want to try again, that would be nice.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21326
--- Comment #6 from laurent at guerby dot net 2005-10-13 18:48 ---
Fixed on x86 and x86_64-linux as of:
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Oct 13 05:13:16 UTC 2005
--
laurent at guerby dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
When compiled with -O1 -finline-functions -funroll-loops cxg1003 fails on x86
(but passes on x86_64) as of
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Oct 13 05:13:16 UTC 2005
,.,. CXG1003 ACATS 2.5 05-10-13 15:22:26
CXG1003 Check that the subprograms defined in the package
Text_IO.Complex_IO
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:01 ---
hmm, we need some more checking to catch this ICE earlier than out of SSA and
then people will believe me when I say this is a PRE bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24231
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:13 ---
A regression hunt identified this patch from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-07/msg00934.html
(Note that GCC doesn't build just before or after that patch was added without
the patch from
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:22 ---
Moving to 4.2 since java and netbsd are not primary/secondary
targets/languages.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:23 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I think the relevant part of the C++ standard here is [temp.inst] paragraph 5:
So closing as invalid then.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |trivial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21312
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:25 ---
I am going to move this to 4.2 since 5.5 is a very old release of darwin and it
is semi useless when it comes to java and C++ coding.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:27 ---
: Search converges between 2004-02-01-trunk (#445) and 2004-03-01-trunk (#446).
: Search converges between 2004-02-02-3.4 (#1) and 2004-03-01-3.4 (#2).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22434
I tried building Ada from a bootstrap binary found on the net. HP-UX 11.23
unlike 11.00 and 11i, doesn't allow executing code on the stack by default. To
enable this for individual binaries:
$ chatr +es enable [binary]
To enable execution of code on the stack system-wide, the executable_stack
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:36 ---
This also effects some C code too like:
int f(int (*fptr)(void))
{
return fptr();
}
int main(void)
{
int t;
int g(void){ return t; }
t = 2;
f(g);
}
Compile at -O0 and you will see that it fails too.
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:40 ---
Confirmed, because this was really a break out from another bug and I had
written this small testcase for that.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:48 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Working on a patch.
Been a couple of months now, any progress?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22293
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:49 ---
Does this work now or do we still need the patch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17789
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:51 ---
: Search converges between 2004-07-17-trunk (#488) and 2004-07-18-trunk (#489).
I suspect this was caused by:
2004-07-16 Mark Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* class.c (finish_struct_methods): Remove
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:55 ---
Any news on getting this partial patch committed, as this will at least bring
us back to pre 4.0 times.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238
--- Comment #25 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 19:57
---
Moving to 4.2 as sh-linux-gnu is not a primary/secondary target.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-13 20:00 ---
If I have time, I will look into this in the next hour or two. I just have to
look at where the types are compared.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23103
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
