--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=12434)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12434action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29474
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=12435)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12435action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29474
--- Comment #12 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 08:40
---
(In reply to comment #10)
This trimmed down example is invalid code. The if (i0)
statement tries to use before it is defined.
Sorry about that: the following code is valid, and also fails to compile with
the
--- Comment #8 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-15 08:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=12436)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12436action=view)
testcase
another testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28181
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 11:38
---
Also fails on SPARC with -O3 -g.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 14:52 ---
Confirmed, a regression from 3.3.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 15:25 ---
Confirmed, a regression from 4.1.2.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 15:31
---
(In reply to comment #3)
Confirmed. The warning is correct - we emit it with explicit casts, too. But
surprisingly -Wno-cast-qual does not get rid of it.
Except it is not correct and is a regression, see PR
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 15:41 ---
Janis,
Could you do a regression hunt on this bug?
Thanks,
Andrew
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 16:33 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 17:03 ---
Not yet for -fno-unit-at-a-time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29299
--- Comment #4 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-10-15 18:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=12440)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12440action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-10-15 18:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=12441)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12441action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 18:35 ---
This worked in 4.2.0 20061002 but failed in 4.2.0 20061014
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 18:56 ---
The call int_const_binop to seems to be wrong, if the comment is correct the
following is more correct:
tree tmp = int_const_binop (TRUNC_DIV_EXPR,
res,
--- Comment #1 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2006-10-15 19:10 ---
The line is actually in gcc/cgraphunit.c and not graphunit.c (sorry).
cgraphunit.c was subjected to change by Jan Hubicka and Richard Guenther to fix
PR middle-end/29299 on 2006-10-15.
Probably something went
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:12 ---
Already fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2006-10/msg00428.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from robert at linuxfromscratch dot org 2006-10-15 19:41
---
echo '#include unistd.h
int main () {
chdir( / );
}' example.c
$ gcc -o example example.c -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE -O2
example.c: In function 'main':
example.c:5: warning: ignoring return value of 'chdir', declared
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:45 ---
That is because assert checks the result except when -DNDEBUG.
This in turn is really a dup or bug 6906 which is about warning on side effects
to assert.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6906 ***
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:45 ---
*** Bug 29480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from malitzke at metronets dot com 2006-10-15 19:46 ---
This shows fantastic turnaroud; even on a weekend. Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29481
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:46 ---
Subject: Bug 29241
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Oct 15 19:46:26 2006
New Revision: 117753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117753
Log:
PR middle-end/29241
* cgraphunit.c
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29363
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29388
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 21:21
---
There is long-standing confusion in the C++ standard regarding the naming of
destructors in various situations. (Part of the issue is to what extent
destructors have names, and how the injection of class names
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29415
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29417
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29436
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29438
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 21:27
---
Is there a C/C++ equivalent?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29439
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29470
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29475
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29478
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 21:30
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Is there a C/C++ equivalent?
No because it depends on non constant subtypes.
But that does not mean we could get the wrong answer from VRP because overflow
is incorrectly set.
--
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-10-15 22:20 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] missed-optimization (in unneeded code
elimination)
(insn:TI 38 37 26 2 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 1 dx [+4 ])
(ashiftrt:SI (reg:SI 1 dx [+4 ])
--- Comment #9 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-10-15 22:33 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regresion] gcc used attribute has no effect on local-scope
static variables
Reopening because it is not fixed for non unit at a time mode (-O0 for C).
-O0 gets it right, just -O1 -fno-unit-at-a-time
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 22:54 ---
Subject: Bug 29300
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Oct 15 22:54:36 2006
New Revision: 117754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117754
Log:
PR target/29300
* inclhack.def
--- Comment #7 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 22:58 ---
Subject: Bug 29300
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Oct 15 22:58:29 2006
New Revision: 117755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117755
Log:
PR target/29300
* inclhack.def
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 00:15
---
Mine.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 00:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29403
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Oct 16 00:51:46 2006
New Revision: 117764
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117764
Log:
2006-10-15 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 00:54 ---
Subject: Bug 29403
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Oct 16 00:54:01 2006
New Revision: 117765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117765
Log:
2006-10-15 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #32 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:06
---
Subject: Bug 20491
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Oct 16 01:05:51 2006
New Revision: 117766
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117766
Log:
PR middle-end/20491
--- Comment #33 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:08
---
Subject: Bug 20491
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Oct 16 01:08:04 2006
New Revision: 117767
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117767
Log:
PR middle-end/20491
--- Comment #34 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:09
---
Subject: Bug 20491
Author: danglin
Date: Mon Oct 16 01:09:23 2006
New Revision: 117768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117768
Log:
PR middle-end/20491
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Summary|[DR 224] error: non-template|[DR
--- Comment #35 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:40
---
I think the PR can be closed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20491
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 01:42 ---
Fixed by:
2006-10-15 John David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* pa64-hpux.h (LINK_SPEC): Force __cxa_finalize to be an undefined
symbol in the output file for non-shared links when -nostdlib or
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-10-16
01:48 ---
Subject: Re: Unable to build Python
Fixed by:
2006-10-15 John David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* pa64-hpux.h (LINK_SPEC): Force __cxa_finalize to be an undefined
symbol in the output
52 matches
Mail list logo
