--- Comment #5 from rashmihegde at hp dot com 2006-12-20 08:24 ---
thanks for this input.
I would not be able to move to 4 line immediately.
Can you tell me how to make this declaration in 3.4.6 so that I can create a
patch for my own use.
--
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 09:58 ---
Maybe we can do something with this in PHIopt...
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 10:58 ---
I must have cleared this but I do not recall so doing - consider it unfixed!
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29992
--- Comment #5 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2006-12-20 12:20 ---
Paolo, thanks for the explanation! The problem originates from PR 22372, so I
will not open another bug report for it.
Thanks,
Ira
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30210
--- Comment #8 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2006-12-20 12:22 ---
As explained by Paolo in PR 30210, it is not an Altivec problem after all.
Ira
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22372
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 12:24 ---
Note the patch was submitted 19/12 but the tracking system seems to have lost
it.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-12-20 12:28 ---
Ok, so we have an agreement on why this is bad.
I've reopened the bug myself and made it block 22372. A fix for 22372 can be
done independent of this PR, but it will be inefficient memory-wise.
--
bonzini at gnu dot
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 13:48 ---
Subject: Bug 29992
Author: pault
Date: Wed Dec 20 13:48:06 2006
New Revision: 120072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120072
Log:
2006-12-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 13:48 ---
Subject: Bug 30081
Author: pault
Date: Wed Dec 20 13:48:06 2006
New Revision: 120072
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120072
Log:
2006-12-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 14:16 ---
The patch will be submitted, as soon as it has regtested.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
This program shows that some range propagation became worse between
gcc 4.0.2 and gcc 4.1.1.
=== foo.c
int notneg (int x)
{
return (~ -x) = (-2147483647-1);
}
int negnot (int x)
{
return (- ~x) = 2147483647;
}
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-20 15:01 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30190
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01444.html
--
--- Comment #7 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-12-20 15:25 ---
To make it clearer, there is a fix for this PR other than
The way to solve this bug could be to pass the two operands to
rs6000_builtin_mul_widen_even, and get back the fully-built tree,
including conversions to the
--- Comment #3 from carlos at codesourcery dot com 2006-12-20 16:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=12828)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12828action=view)
Only relocate paths which start with the configured prefix.
This fixes the boostrap failure for i686-mingw32. I
--- Comment #4 from carlos at codesourcery dot com 2006-12-20 16:05 ---
Bob Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I were working on this issue last night on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2006-12/msg00279.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30242
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from edmar at freescale dot com 2006-12-20 16:11 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Subject: Re: [4.1 branch] ICE on valid code
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, edmar at freescale dot com wrote:
Still, On December 16 I had a complete build, and on December 17 I have an
ICE.
--
dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
Target Milestone|---
--- Comment #5 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-12-20 16:35 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] internal error in gcc break compilation
carlos at codesourcery dot com wrote:
--- Comment #3 from carlos at codesourcery dot com 2006-12-20 16:01
---
Created an attachment
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 17:50 ---
Subject: Bug 30143
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Dec 20 17:50:17 2006
New Revision: 120080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120080
Log:
2006-12-20 Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 17:52 ---
I will post a patch for 4.2 also.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30266
i486-linux-gnu-gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__
-DWINE_UNICODE_API= -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -Wall -g -O2
-fno-stack-protector -o c_1254.o c_1254.c
i486-linux-gnu-gcc -c -I. -I.
--- Comment #1 from juw148 at psu dot edu 2006-12-20 18:59 ---
Ubuntu Edgy i386 fresh install with updates to latest packages.
Processor = athlon64
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30269
--- Comment #3 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 20:46 ---
Subject: Bug 30213
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Dec 20 20:46:15 2006
New Revision: 120083
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120083
Log:
PR target/30213
* i386.c
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 21:11 ---
Subject: Bug 30190
Author: pault
Date: Wed Dec 20 21:10:51 2006
New Revision: 120084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120084
Log:
2006-12-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 21:39 ---
This is regtesting right now:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(revision 120083)
--- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
--- Comment #13 from jimbob at google dot com 2006-12-20 21:44 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
I had it mostly working, but the changes are pretty invasive as no one ever
has
to set or clear SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT any more, its always simply right. Its
too
invasive for stage 3 thats
--- Comment #6 from carlos at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 22:34 ---
Subject: Bug 30242
Author: carlos
Date: Wed Dec 20 22:34:14 2006
New Revision: 120088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120088
Log:
gcc/
2006-12-20 Carlos O'Donell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #12 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 23:01
---
Jean-Pierre, Roger,
could you please add the following files to your attachments of this PR (or
send them by private mail):
* /usr/include/features.h
* /usr/include/sys/stat.h
* /usr/include/bits/string2.h
*
--
lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |lmillward at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-21 01:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30202
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01473.html
--
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-21 01:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/19439
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01475.html
--
Testcase:
struct a { short t, t1;};
int f(struct a b) { return b.t; }
Without -mstrict-align, we get:
.L.f:
srawi 3,3,16
extsw 3,3
blr
But with we get:
.L.f:
stw 3,48(1)
nop
nop
nop
lha 3,48(1)
extsw 3,3
blr
--
--- Comment #8 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 03:05 ---
Subject: Bug 25392
Author: tobi
Date: Thu Dec 21 03:04:43 2006
New Revision: 120099
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120099
Log:
PR fortran/25392
fortran/
* trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_return): Fix
--- Comment #9 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 03:17 ---
Keeping this open, until the fix is also in 4.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25392
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 03:44 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|hubicka
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 03:44 ---
Fixed I say.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 03:45 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 03:48 ---
Can you attach the preprocessed source as mentioned on
URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 03:50 ---
Next time don't copy and paste the preprocessed source into the bug but instead
attach it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30266
--- Comment #8 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-12-21 03:52 ---
I've applied the fix to 4.2 branch, built and tested it, and it works fine. I
guess the bug can be closed now. Thanks all.
--
deji_aking at yahoo dot ca changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #18 from carlos at codesourcery dot com 2006-12-21 04:23
---
This is fixed in 4.3.
If I understand correctly the PR should be closed and the Target Milestone
marked as 4.3?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17621
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 04:37
---
Keep open until we remember to commit to 4.2 Thanks for confirming the fix.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
45 matches
Mail list logo
