--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 08:15 ---
Subject: Bug 29612
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 29 08:15:08 2006
New Revision: 120257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120257
Log:
PR preprocessor/29612
* directives.c
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 08:16 ---
Subject: Bug 29612
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 29 08:16:32 2006
New Revision: 120258
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120258
Log:
PR preprocessor/29612
* directives.c
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 08:17 ---
Subject: Bug 29612
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 29 08:17:43 2006
New Revision: 120259
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120259
Log:
PR preprocessor/29612
* directives.c
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 08:25 ---
Fixed in 4.3/4.2/4.1.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 08:43 ---
4.2 version of the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01504.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30143
--- Comment #1 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2006-12-29
09:03 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30321 ***
--
toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2006-12-29
09:03 ---
*** Bug 30320 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30321
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 09:50 ---
I'll do this.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 09:51 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I will work at it.
Thanks, I'll be happy to assist with discussions and review.
(Those who can, fix; those who can't, review :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-29 12:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR24325
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01813.html
--
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 12:16 ---
I just submitted the patch.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 12:52 ---
Subject: Bug 30226
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Dec 29 12:52:14 2006
New Revision: 120261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120261
Log:
2006-12-29 Paolo Carlini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-12-29 12:53 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30226
--- Comment #7 from gin at mo dot msk dot ru 2006-12-29 14:35 ---
Subject: Re: -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/
Can you give the output of the original confgure which should show you which
ld/as GCC is going to use?
No. Version 4 just does not build on that system at all (or this
requires
--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-29 17:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR23060
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01834.html
--
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-29 17:35 ---
Subject: Bug number PR preprocessor/28227
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01835.html
--
--- Comment #33 from pfaff at mcmaster dot ca 2006-12-29 17:40 ---
While trying to build some C++ code with g++-3.3.6 we encountered error
messages similar to those mentioned in earlier comments in this discussion:
`xxx' referenced in section `.rodata' of somefile.o: defined
in
--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-12-29 17:47 ---
Subject: Bug 29544
Author: bonzini
Date: Fri Dec 29 17:47:06 2006
New Revision: 120272
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120272
Log:
2006-12-29 Paolo Bonzini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-12-29 17:47 ---
committed
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #14 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-29 18:35 ---
Subject: Bug number PR7651
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01837.html
--
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 18:54 ---
Subject: Bug 25392
Author: tobi
Date: Fri Dec 29 18:54:41 2006
New Revision: 120274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=120274
Log:
Backport from trunk:
fortran/
PR fortran/25392
* trans-stmt.c
--- Comment #11 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 18:56 ---
Fixed in 4.2 and trunk.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-29 19:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR7651
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01842.html
--
--- Comment #25 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-29 20:28
---
So the solution for 4.3 here, from what i understand, seems pretty easy at the
tree level, no matter what reading we wish to give this.
If we add a placement_new_expr, and not try to revisit our interpretation of
There is one mention of -Wdeprecated in the manual, but it is
not documented anywhere.
--
Summary: -Wdeprecated is not documented
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
--- Comment #2 from trog24 at comcast dot net 2006-12-29 23:41 ---
I was able to make and install via --disable-multilib as suggested by pinskia
which reduces the problem to minor since a work around exists; however, the
multilib should be disabled automatically if gcc is not being
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-30 00:22 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The real problem behind this has already been fixed on the mainline. It was an
automake issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30327
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-30 00:55 ---
Confirmed, I thought I saw this somewhere else too but I cannot find it right
now.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from gary at intrepid dot com 2006-12-30 06:34 ---
I looked into fixing GCC's DWARF 2
generation for types that are qualified (for example, const
and volatile, and in the case of UPC, shared, strict,
and relaxed) in order to ensure that GDB has an accurate
understanding
--- Comment #8 from jean-marc dot valin at usherbrooke dot ca 2006-12-30
06:42 ---
Shouldn't the priority of this bug be increased considering that it produces
wrong code on valid input and the affected package (Speex) is included in most
Linux distributions (fortunately most of these
//const_test.cpp
struct A
{
A(unsigned int n)
{
aa=n;
}
void const_fun() const
{
static_castA(*this).fun(); //ok
// fun(); //err
}
void fun()
{
}
unsigned int aa;
};
int main()
{
const A a(56);
a.const_fun();
}
// g++ const_test.cpp
33 matches
Mail list logo
