[Bug fortran/30625] Array pointers to components of derived type arrays do not work

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 09:52 --- (In reply to comment #6) Paul, I take it you are aware of PR21881 (Array descriptors limit derived type sizes)... I don't fully grasp the way array descriptor work for derived types, but I wanted to mention

[Bug fortran/30660] [4.2 and 4.1 only] Allocatable components of a derived type require the SAVE attribute.

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 09:56 --- Toon, This is the next job on my list - I have an opportunity to work on it tonight. I have a patch that mostly works but does something very peculiar for a couple of the testcase - the compiler just stops; no

[Bug rtl-optimization/30761] New: [4.3 regression] Error: unsupported relocation against sfp

2007-02-11 Thread schwab at suse dot de
This is caused by the lower-subreg patch (adding -fno-split-wide-types is a workaround): $ ../../xgcc -B../../ -c -O2 -fno-common -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I../rts -I. -I ../../../../gcc/ada ../../../../gcc/ada/make.adb -c /tmp/ccXcjvZm.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccXcjvZm.s:6958: Error:

[Bug c/30762] New: inlining destroys type information

2007-02-11 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
$ gcc-4.2.orig-HEAD -Os -c double-int.i tree-ssa-loop-niter.i -o libbackend.o -combine tree-ssa-loop-niter.i: In function 'derive_constant_upper_bound': tree-ssa-loop-niter.i:28: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of 'double_int_negative_p' where gcc-4.2.orig-HEAD is a pristine checkout

[Bug c/30762] inlining destroys type information

2007-02-11 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:24 --- Created an attachment (id=13031) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13031action=view) reduced from gcc/double-int.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30762

[Bug c/30762] inlining destroys type information

2007-02-11 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:24 --- Created an attachment (id=13032) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13032action=view) reduced from tree-ssa-loop-niter.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30762

[Bug c/30762] inlining destroys type information

2007-02-11 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:26 --- May be related to 29478 according to apinski. This one blocks compilation rather than just generating an unpleasant warning, tough. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30762

[Bug c/30762] [4.2 Regression] inlining destroys type information

2007-02-11 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:28 --- Works with gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21) -- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/30761] [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] Error: unsupported relocation against sfp

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:31 --- Actually this has nothing to do with -fsplit-wide-types, This shows up in some cases without that, There is a reload patch floating about which fixes this. The problem is that reload does not elimate the soft frame

[Bug rtl-optimization/30761] [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] Error: unsupported relocation against sfp

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 10:47 --- (In reply to comment #1) I actually saw it in a modified version of 4.1.1. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/15516] assembly snippets for nano second resolution wall clock time

2007-02-11 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-02-11 10:55 --- (In reply to comment #0) If you extract the object file get_clockfreq.o from /usr/lib/librt.a then you can call the function __get_clockfreq() to determine clock frequency. To extract the routine, try: ar xv

[Bug c/30762] [4.2 Regression] inlining destroys type information

2007-02-11 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 11:05 --- Created an attachment (id=13033) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13033action=view) smaller testcase for the tree-ssa-loop-niter part -- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug c++/30534] [4.3 regression] ICE with invalid template argument

2007-02-11 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 11:39 --- Testing a patch. -- reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/30762] [4.2 Regression] inlining destroys type information

2007-02-11 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 11:57 --- Created an attachment (id=13034) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13034action=view) minimal testcase file 1 -- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c/30762] [4.2 Regression] inlining destroys type information

2007-02-11 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 11:58 --- Created an attachment (id=13035) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13035action=view) minimal testcase file 2 -- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c/30762] [4.2/4.3 Regression] inlining destroys type information

2007-02-11 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 11:59 --- Fails to merge type information from different TUs? -- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/30763] New: problem with bit-fields assignment

2007-02-11 Thread vovanec at gmail dot com
Test case: #include stdio.h #define INT_INVALID -1 class Test { int b : 16; int a; int c : 16; public: Test() { b = a = c = INT_INVALID; //a = b = c = INT_INVALID; } void dump()const { printf(a: %d\tb: %d\tc: %d\n,a,b,c); } }; int main() { Test a;

[Bug c++/30763] problem with bit-fields assignment

2007-02-11 Thread vovanec at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from vovanec at gmail dot com 2007-02-11 13:20 --- When order of assignment has changed (a = b = c = INT_INVALID;) test case returns correct values. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30763

[Bug fortran/30764] New: GFortran ICE if real constants in module

2007-02-11 Thread engel at itp1 dot uni-stuttgart dot de
GFortran on Fedora Core 6 (gcc-gfortran-4.1.1-51.fc6) can't compile module files that contain real constants (parameter attribute). Example: Module file const.f90: module const real, parameter :: a=3.5 end module const Compile command gfortran -c const.f90 leads to ICE: const.f90:0: internal

[Bug fortran/30478] FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

2007-02-11 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #24 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-11 14:46 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error) A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is

[Bug libgcj/30606] [4.3 Regression] natVMURLConnection.cc:21: error: 'magic_t' does not name a type

2007-02-11 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-11 14:49 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] natVMURLConnection.cc:21: error: 'magic_t' does not name a type With the above patch, the problem still exists but it's moved to a different file:

[Bug fortran/30764] GFortran ICE if real constants in module

2007-02-11 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 16:52 --- This works OK on gfortran 4.3. and on my FC6 install: $ gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man

[Bug middle-end/30751] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2108

2007-02-11 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #1 from ian at airs dot com 2007-02-11 16:55 --- This works for me on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 at svn revision 121803. I don't have access to a SPARC GNU/Linux system. Which exact sources are you building? Do you have any local patches? How did you run configure? --

[Bug fortran/30764] GFortran ICE if real constants in module

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 17:42 --- We don't support binaries from redhat. You might as well report this bug to them instead. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30764] GFortran ICE if real constants in module

2007-02-11 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 17:43 --- Works for me with these compilers: GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.3.0 20070130 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. troutmask:sgk[209] gfc42 --version GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20070126

[Bug fortran/30764] GFortran ICE if real constants in module

2007-02-11 Thread engel at itp1 dot uni-stuttgart dot de
--- Comment #2 from engel at itp1 dot uni-stuttgart dot de 2007-02-11 17:40 --- (In reply to comment #1) This works OK on gfortran 4.3. and on my FC6 install: $ gfortran -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr

[Bug c++/30763] problem with bit-fields assignment

2007-02-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 18:20 --- Confirmed, but I remember seeing this elsewhere so it must be a dup. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/30763] problem with bit-fields assignment

2007-02-11 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet|linux-i386 | Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/30763] problem with bit-fields assignment

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 18:27 --- This works for me in 4.3.0: .[pinskia-laptop:gcc/objdir-noboot/gcc] pinskia% ./a.out a: -1 b: -1 c: -1 -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/29487] Shared libstdc++ fails to link

2007-02-11 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #44 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 18:58 --- Subject: Bug 29487 Author: mmitchel Date: Sun Feb 11 18:58:05 2007 New Revision: 121819 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121819 Log: PR target/29487 * tree.h

[Bug middle-end/30761] [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] Error: unsupported relocation against sfp

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 19:12 --- This is caused by the lower-subreg patch Exposed by, not caused by in this case. It exposed an issue with reload and register elimination which was originally exposed by Jakub's patch. I was able to reproduce the

[Bug target/29487] Shared libstdc++ fails to link

2007-02-11 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #45 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 19:20 --- Fixed in 4.2.0, mainline. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/27500] iWMMXT bootstrap failure with recent binutils

2007-02-11 Thread s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Comment #3 from s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk 2007-02-11 19:34 --- The problem is resolved in current binutils/gcc so marking as FIXED. -- s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30372] kill intrinsic doesn't diagnose invalid argument kinds

2007-02-11 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 19:39 --- Contrary to this, the docs of g77-3.4.6 [1] state: Status: INTEGER(KIND=1); OPTIONAL; scalar; INTENT(OUT). Also, the comment at the beginning of libgfortran/intrinsics/kill.c [2] states: /* SUBROUTINE

[Bug libfortran/30765] New: generating files from m4

2007-02-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
There is something mighty strange going on with the dependencies for the files generated with m4 with --enable-maintainer-mode. In http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-02/msg00353.html , I committed a change to Makefile.am which removed $(srcdir) from a lot of targets. This is required to get

[Bug libfortran/30533] minval, maxval missing for kind=1 and kind=2

2007-02-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 19:42 --- Created an attachment (id=13036) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13036action=view) patch This fixes the missing intrinsics, and removes type conversion from minloc. This also reverses

[Bug c++/30766] New: Template functions now use declaration scope instead of call scope

2007-02-11 Thread 9ugsa9j02 at sneakemail dot com
- int overridable (int v) { return (v); } template typename T int call_override (const T v) { return (overridable (v)); } int overridable (float) { return (1); } int main (void) { return (call_override (0.0f)); }

[Bug c++/30766] Template functions now use declaration scope instead of call scope

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:07 --- And this is the correct behavior as described by the C++ standard. I have to find the specific section but basically the overloaded set for depedent functions happen like the following: 1) find all functions

[Bug c++/26988] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] template constructor in template class derived from virtual base can not be specialized

2007-02-11 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:15 --- Subject: Bug 26988 Author: mmitchel Date: Sun Feb 11 20:15:13 2007 New Revision: 121822 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121822 Log: PR c++/26988 * pt.c

[Bug driver/29931] following argv[0] symlink in process_command breaks symlinked-together toolchain

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug middle-end/30151] [4.3 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Duplicate symbol global destructors keyed to _ZNSt3tr112_GLOBAL__N_16ignoreE

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker Keywords||build,

[Bug libgcj/30419] [4.3 Regression] libjava failed to build

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:22 --- Fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/30649] [4.1.x] possible bogus checkin of g++.dg/debug/debug9.C

2007-02-11 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:33 --- Subject: Bug 30649 Author: mmitchel Date: Sun Feb 11 20:33:36 2007 New Revision: 121823 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121823 Log: PR gcc/30649 * g++.dg/debug/debug9.C:

[Bug testsuite/30649] [4.1.x] possible bogus checkin of g++.dg/debug/debug9.C

2007-02-11 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:34 --- I have removed debug9.C from the 4.1 branch. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30372] kill intrinsic doesn't diagnose invalid argument kinds

2007-02-11 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:43 --- (In reply to comment #2) Contrary to this, the docs of g77-3.4.6 [1] state: Status: INTEGER(KIND=1); OPTIONAL; scalar; INTENT(OUT). INTEGER(KIND=1) in g77 is the default integer kind, which is

[Bug fortran/30319] internal error in gfc_resolve_expr() for character parameter

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:59 --- Subject: Bug 30319 Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 11 20:58:48 2007 New Revision: 121824 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121824 Log: 2007-02-11 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/30554] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ICE in mio_pointer_ref at module.c:1945

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:59 --- Subject: Bug 30554 Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 11 20:58:48 2007 New Revision: 121824 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121824 Log: 2007-02-11 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libfortran/30617] recursive I/O hangs under OSX

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 20:59 --- Subject: Bug 30617 Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 11 20:58:48 2007 New Revision: 121824 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121824 Log: 2007-02-11 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug libfortran/30765] generating files from m4

2007-02-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 21:00 --- I have a fix. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30733] VOLATILE: Missed optimization - attribute not restricted to scope

2007-02-11 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 21:02 --- Confirmed. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30372] kill intrinsic doesn't diagnose invalid argument kinds

2007-02-11 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 21:02 --- Ouch. Thanks for clarification. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30372

[Bug bootstrap/30767] New: [4.3 regression]: compare is no longer enabled by default

2007-02-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
make bootstrap used to compare stage2 and stage3 after gcc was bootstrapped. make bootstrap would abort if comparison was failed. Now, compare stage2 and stage3 is not longer done for make bootstrap. Is that intentional? I think it is a very bad idea. -- Summary: [4.3 regression]:

[Bug middle-end/30151] [4.3 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Duplicate symbol global destructors keyed to _ZNSt3tr112_GLOBAL__N_16ignoreE

2007-02-11 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-11 21:08 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Duplicate symbol global destructors keyed to _ZNSt3tr112_GLOBAL__N_16i pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/30767] [4.3 regression]: compare is no longer enabled by default

2007-02-11 Thread drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 21:21 --- What evidence do you have that comparison was not done? bootstrap calls stage3-bubble which calls make compare. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30767

[Bug bootstrap/30767] [4.3 regression]: compare is no longer enabled by default

2007-02-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-02-11 21:38 --- I saw it now. -- hjl at lucon dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/26988] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] template constructor in template class derived from virtual base can not be specialized

2007-02-11 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 21:41 --- Subject: Bug 26988 Author: mmitchel Date: Sun Feb 11 21:40:56 2007 New Revision: 121826 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121826 Log: PR c++/26988 * pt.c

[Bug c++/26988] [4.0/4.1 Regression] template constructor in template class derived from virtual base can not be specialized

2007-02-11 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 21:41 --- Fixed in 4.2.0, 4.3.0. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30372] various intrinsics do not diagnose invalid argument kinds

2007-02-11 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 21:51 --- Also affected: chmod, exit, getcwd, hostnm, link, rename, sleep, system_clock, unlink, umask (maybe others). SYSTEM_CLOCK accepts INTEGER(1) if exactly one or all of its optional arguments are of that type.

[Bug fortran/30372] various intrinsics do not diagnose invalid argument kinds

2007-02-11 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 22:26 --- daniel, It's just an inconsistency in implementations. First, note that FX and myself implemented a lot of the g77 intrinsics procedures as our first foray into gfortran, so we may have missed some of the finer

[Bug fortran/30478] FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

2007-02-11 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #25 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 22:36 --- Subject: Bug 30478 Author: tobi Date: Sun Feb 11 22:35:56 2007 New Revision: 121830 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121830 Log: 2007-02-11 Tobias Schlueter [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/30478

[Bug middle-end/30751] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2108

2007-02-11 Thread jim at amarooas dot com dot au
--- Comment #2 from jim at amarooas dot com dot au 2007-02-11 22:53 --- I configure like this in ~/gcc/build ../configure --prefix=/usr/local/4.3 --enable-java-awt=gtk,xlib The error was seen with no local patches. I updated and rebuilt several times over the past 2 weeks before

[Bug middle-end/30751] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2108

2007-02-11 Thread jim at amarooas dot com dot au
--- Comment #3 from jim at amarooas dot com dot au 2007-02-11 22:56 --- The souces was checked out as follows: svn -q checkout svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk gcc -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30751

[Bug c++/30768] New: [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

2007-02-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
For 121818 this test passed. For 121819 (author of named revision CC:ed), I see: Running /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... ... FAIL: ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc (test for excess errors) with the message in libstdc++.log being:

[Bug c++/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

2007-02-11 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-11 23:54 --- I didn't see the bug in my native testing. (I've just rechecked my test logs to confirm that.) Please post preprocessed source and command-line. This is probably going to be a latent bug in the middle end,

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 00:00 --- /* This aborts e.g. when there is _no_ path from ENTRY to EXIT at all. */ gcc_assert (di-nodes == (unsigned int) n_basic_blocks - 1); Sounds like inlining is messing up the CFG with slightly different

[Bug c++/30567] -fPIC -O3 optimizer bug (32-bit target only)

2007-02-11 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Comment #7 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-02-12 00:02 --- (In reply to comment #6) I immediately believe that Andrew's and Wolfgang's findings are accurate, but I never claimed that the mainline has a problem. I never even tried it. I didn't want to imply that there was

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

2007-02-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 00:22 --- Created an attachment (id=13037) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13037action=view) Preprocessed and bzip2-compressed (3MeB uncompressed) code. cc1plus -O2 is sufficient. Though -quit is recommended

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

2007-02-11 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 00:23 --- s/-quit/-quiet/ in last comment. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30478] FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

2007-02-11 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #26 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 00:51 --- Subject: Bug 30478 Author: tobi Date: Mon Feb 12 00:51:43 2007 New Revision: 121837 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121837 Log: 2007-02-10 Tobias Schlueter [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/30478

[Bug middle-end/30768] [4.3 regression]: ICE in ext/pb_ds/regression/list_update_data_map_rand.cc

2007-02-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 00:54 --- I can reproduce this on powerpc-darwin. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768

[Bug fortran/30478] FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

2007-02-11 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #27 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 01:03 --- (In reply to comment #6) Fortran is not release-critical and this bug appears to be purely within the Fortran front end. Should I commit the patch for the next release candidate once the branch is unfrozen?

[Bug fortran/30478] FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

2007-02-11 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #28 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2007-02-12 01:11 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error) tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #27 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 01:03 --- (In reply to comment #6)

[Bug fortran/30478] FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

2007-02-11 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #29 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-02-12 01:15 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error) --- Comment #27 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 01:03 --- (In reply to comment #6) Fortran is not

[Bug fortran/30478] FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

2007-02-11 Thread Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
--- Comment #30 from Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2007-02-12 01:21 --- Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/enum_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error) dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: --- Comment #29 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca

[Bug c/30769] New: compile error / segmentation fault / 64bit compiler

2007-02-11 Thread armin at xos dot net
during compile of Template::Toolkit::Stash::XS (perl module) gcc -v -save-temps -c -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wdeclaration-after-statement -mcpu=v9 -m64 -Wa,-xarch=v9 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O -DVERSION=\2.18\ -DXS_VERSION=\2.18\ -fPIC

[Bug target/30770] New: BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -mtune=nocona miscompiled thes stage 3 compiler

2007-02-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
When I built gcc 4.3 revision 121818 with # make bootstrap BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe thes stage 3 compiler was miscompiled: checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile See `config.log' for more details. make[4]: ***

[Bug target/30770] BOOT_CFLAGS=-O2 -g -mtune=nocona miscompiled thes stage 3 compiler

2007-02-11 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-02-12 05:21 --- I also saw bash-3.1$ make compare Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs Bootstrap comparison failure! ./tree-vrp.o differs ./tree-ssa-operands.o differs ./build/genpreds.o differs ./build/gengtype-yacc.o

[Bug c++/30567] -fPIC -O3 optimizer bug (32-bit target only)

2007-02-11 Thread rwgk at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #8 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2007-02-12 05:23 --- I'm in the process of narrowing down the revision bracket the really hard way (make bootstrap; make; make install for each revision, using a binary search). Currently my best bracket is: 119819 fails 119788 works I should

[Bug c++/30583] [ODR] Non-static inline functions cause bugs when defined more than once in different files

2007-02-11 Thread Ivan dot Scherbakov at acronis dot com
--- Comment #3 from Ivan dot Scherbakov at acronis dot com 2007-02-12 06:03 --- The way of declaring inline functions as static is evident, but in fact, when building large projects containing several libraries the case when the same inline function is defined more than once in

[Bug c/30769] compile error / segmentation fault / 64bit compiler

2007-02-11 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:05 --- What compiler did you use to build this one? -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30284] [4.2 and 4.1 only] ICE in gfc_add_modify with internal reads

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:35 --- Subject: Bug 30284 Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 12 07:34:51 2007 New Revision: 121841 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121841 Log: 2007-02-12 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] BACKPORTS FROM

[Bug fortran/30514] [4.2 and 4. only] zero-sized array wrongly rejected: integer :: i(1:-1)

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:35 --- Subject: Bug 30514 Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 12 07:34:51 2007 New Revision: 121841 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121841 Log: 2007-02-12 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] BACKPORTS FROM

[Bug fortran/30626] [4.2 and 4.1 only] Wrong-code for internal read

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:35 --- Subject: Bug 30626 Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 12 07:34:51 2007 New Revision: 121841 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121841 Log: 2007-02-12 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] BACKPORTS FROM

[Bug fortran/30407] [4.2 and 4.1 only] Elemental functions in WHERE assignments wrongly rejected

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:35 --- Subject: Bug 30407 Author: pault Date: Mon Feb 12 07:34:51 2007 New Revision: 121841 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121841 Log: 2007-02-12 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] BACKPORTS FROM

[Bug fortran/30284] [4.1 only] ICE in gfc_add_modify with internal reads

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:36 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.2. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30626] [4.1 only] Wrong-code for internal read

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:36 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.2. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/30617] recursive I/O hangs under OSX

2007-02-11 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #22 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-02-12 07:37 --- Subject: Re: recursive I/O hangs under OSX PR fortran/30319 Thanks Paul ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30617

[Bug fortran/30407] [4.1 only] Elemental functions in WHERE assignments wrongly rejected

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:37 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.2. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30514] [4.1 only] zero-sized array wrongly rejected: integer :: i(1:-1)

2007-02-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:37 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.2. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/30769] compile error / segmentation fault / 64bit compiler

2007-02-11 Thread armin at xos dot net
--- Comment #2 from armin at xos dot net 2007-02-12 07:51 --- Subject: Re: compile error / segmentation fault / 64bit compiler hi! the c compiler of gcc version 4.1.1 --- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-12 07:05 --- What compiler did you use to