--- Comment #4 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2007-02-16 07:42
---
looks like a similar analysis for a bigger case was proposed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg01395.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30807
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 07:05
---
You should set CONFIG_SHELL as explained in the build instructions.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2007-02-16 07:04
---
Created an attachment (id=13053)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13053&action=view)
Add testcase.
compile with sh-superh-elf-gcc (3.4.3) -O2 sh_postreload_bug.c -S -da
at line 28 of sh_postre
--- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 06:54
---
*** Bug 30817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 06:54
---
This is already PR30391, known from a long time and recently fixed. Try rev >=
122030.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30391 ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30391 ***
--
fxc
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 06:54
---
I am a little out of phase here. Let me update with Rogers patch and test
again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30817
Encountered this ICE with:
gfc -c -O3 -ffast-math -march=nocona
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc43/configure --prefix=/home/jerry/gcc/usr
--enable-languages=c,fortran --disable-libmudflap --enable-libgomp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.3.0 20070216
--- Comment #67 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 06:50
---
PR 30391 is fixed with rev. 122030, so we should close this PR. Please reopen
if we regress.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #66 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 06:33
---
With todays trunk:
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc43/configure --prefix=/home/jerry/gcc/usr
--enable-languages=c,fortran --disable-libmudflap --enable-libgomp
Thread model: posix
gcc ver
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 06:12
---
Fixed in 4.1.2 and later.
Note that you don't need -fno-strict-aliasing with -O, it's the default.
You don't need -mcpu=v9 -m64 -Wa,-xarch=v9 either, it's also the default.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot or
--- Comment #65 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-02-16 05:57 ---
(In reply to comment #64)
> I now have a machine at home here running i686-pc-gnu-linux that I plan to set
> up daily compile test on. Joost, does that link in coment #63 get updated
> daily?
>
No, the idea is that y
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 05:26 ---
What Ian said is probably right, and the patch below should fix it. I haven't
tried it yet, though...
Index: local-alloc.c
===
--- local-alloc.c
--- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 05:16 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> [...] It may be darwin-specific.
> This is my best guess. Consider
> program j
> x = erf(1.5)
> end program j
> With a 4.2 gfortran prior to your patches, -fdump-tree-original gives
> MAIN
--- Comment #5 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 05:08 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 3. I'm suspicious about the mpfr you grabbed. Try building mpfr yourself
> from
> source and run it's testsuite to make sure it's healthy. Then link gcc with
> that and retry. I seem to
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 03:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I'll try to help but I don't think this has anything to do with my patches.
> Fortran was using mpfr for evaluating intrinsics way before I touched
> anything,
> and I believe it uses it's
--- Comment #3 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 03:44 ---
I'll try to help but I don't think this has anything to do with my patches.
Fortran was using mpfr for evaluating intrinsics way before I touched anything,
and I believe it uses it's own historical mechanism from it's
--- Comment #10 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 03:38 ---
Subject: Bug 30391
Author: sayle
Date: Fri Feb 16 03:38:22 2007
New Revision: 122030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122030
Log:
PR middle-end/30391
* tree.c (expr_align): Hand
--- Comment #64 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 02:50
---
I now have a machine at home here running i686-pc-gnu-linux that I plan to set
up daily compile test on. Joost, does that link in coment #63 get updated
daily?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 02:32 ---
You might want to start thinking to update the prerelease of the compiler, it
is a couple months old now. THis works for me on the trunk and in 4.1.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30797
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 02:06 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|norma
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||30770, 30778
Keywords||build
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Known to fail||3
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30778
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.3 regression]: |[4.3 regression]
|BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -g - |BOOT
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 02:00 ---
If it fails, then the ABI for x86 solaris is different from almost all other
x86 targets.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30777
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:58 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRM
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
Summary|[4.2/4.3 Regression]|[4.2/4.3 Regre
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:49
---
I am still reducing this source.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:48 ---
>I believe this is due to BOOT_CFLAGS missing in the top-level's Makefile lists
They are passed down, see EXTRA_GCC_FLAGS.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:36 ---
Usually you set CONFIG_SHELL to a different shell as /bin/sh on solaris is not
a POSIX compatiable shell.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#x-x-solaris2 .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:34 ---
3.0.4 and 2.95.3 did not ICE on this. Confirmed a regression. I don't know if
this is valid or not.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:30 ---
One more thing: I'm fairly sure the bug didn't appear with r118042 where erf
handling via mpfr was introduced.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30816
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|pending |rtl-optimization
Summary|Spec cpu2k6/h264ref and |[4.3
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:28 ---
Fixed on the trunk will apply to the branches next week.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:27 ---
Subject: Bug 30433
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Feb 16 01:27:42 2007
New Revision: 122029
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122029
Log:
2007-02-15 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #1 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:25 ---
My mpfr is version 2.2.1 as distributed by fink.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30816
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:24 ---
Fixed on the trunk, might apply later next week to the other branches.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:23 ---
Subject: Bug 30158
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Feb 16 01:23:35 2007
New Revision: 122028
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122028
Log:
2007-02-15 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR C+
The testcase started to fail recently, I'm not sure if this points to a bug in
gcc or mpfr. CCing Kaveh, as it's probably one of his mpfr patches that caused
this. Here's a debug run:
tobias-schluters-computer:~/src/dev tobi$ uname -a
Darwin tobias-schluters-computer.local 8.8.3 Darwin Kernel Ve
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:20 ---
Fixed on the trunk, will apply to the other branches later.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 01:19 ---
Subject: Bug 30729
Author: pinskia
Date: Fri Feb 16 01:19:23 2007
New Revision: 122027
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122027
Log:
2007-02-15 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #5 from ian at airs dot com 2007-02-16 00:38 ---
I believe this is also related to the failure of gcc.c-torture/execute/simd-1.c
on i686-pc-linux-gnu at -O1 and above.
I think the problem is that we fail to add a REG_EQUIV note here in
local-alloc.c:
if (REG_N_SET
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 00:37 ---
Oh, the ICE I get is:
t.c:8: error: fallthru edge after unconditional jump 2
t.c:8: error: wrong amount of branch edges after unconditional jump 2
t.c:8: error: verify_flow_info: Incorrect fallthru 2->3
t.c:8: error:
Reduced testcase without OpenMP:
int f(unsigned section1)
{
switch (section1)
{
case 1: for(;;);
default : __builtin_trap ();
}
}
--
Summary: [4.3 Regression] pr29965.c fails on the mainline,
switches and __builtin_trap
Product: gcc
Hi All
Using the command line: gfortran -fbounds-check test.f95, I compiled this:
program test
integer :: it, neighbrs(var)
neighbrs = pack( (/ ( it, it=1, 30 ) /), (/ ( it, it=1, 30 ) /) < 3, (/ ( 0,
it=1, 30 ) /) )
end program test
substituting different values for var to get different res
--- Comment #5 from pthaugen at us dot ibm dot com 2007-02-15 23:36 ---
Seeing similar behavior on PPC for CPU2000. Comparing revisions 119759 and
119760, 179.art degrades 24% and 200.sixtrack degrades 50%.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30735
--- Comment #4 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2007-02-15 23:06 ---
The wording proposed in N1970 for the C++ __func__ indentifier reads:
-1- The identifier __func__ shall be implicitly declared by the translator
as if, immediately following the opening brace of each function defin
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 22:54 ---
IIRC __FUNCTION__ is really __func__ defined by the C99 standard. So is
__func__ allowed as a default argument in the C++0x?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30811
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 22:35 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.3
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 22:33 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.3
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 22:31 ---
Subject: Bug 26494
Author: manu
Date: Thu Feb 15 22:31:17 2007
New Revision: 122017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122017
Log:
2007-02-15 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 22:15 ---
Subject: Bug 28943
Author: manu
Date: Thu Feb 15 22:15:20 2007
New Revision: 122016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122016
Log:
2007-02-15 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c+
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 21:48 ---
Just a quick note here, the argument list is way below the max of 8k.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30806
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-02-15 21:43 ---
I have the ICE
pr25252.f90:6.46:
MODULE PROCEDURE sreal, schar, sint => sreal
1
Error: Syntax error in MODULE PROCEDURE statement at (1)
pr25252.f90:0: intern
--- Comment #20 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 21:43 ---
In reply to comment #19, it's because the dg-bogus test trigs for that target;
it hits the ICE. As Mark didn't see the fail when testing, and noone else
complained, I originally thought only cris-*-* and perhaps one or
--- Comment #2 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2007-02-15 21:29 ---
No, I'm not aware of any such paper. AFAIK, neither __FUNCTION__ nor
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is specified by either C or C++, or proposed for inclusion
either of them (I could be wrong). They're gcc extensions, aren't they?
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 21:28 ---
You mentioned BOOT_STRAP in your comment is that correct?
Also did you use "make bootstrap" and not just a plain make?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30810
--- Comment #2 from kevin dot glass at pnl dot gov 2007-02-15 21:26 ---
Subject: RE: Numerical error--#define value differs from declared variable
value
I ran on a 64-bit Itanium running Red Hat linux, I'm not sure which
version.
-Original Message-
From: pinskia at gcc dot g
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 21:23 ---
This works correctly on powerpc-linux-gnu.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30813
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 21:17 ---
Do you know the status of the C++0x paper about this C99 "extension"?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30811
I've used a #define to set a value, I've set a declared variable to the same
text value and I've set a second declared variable to the #define value. The
declared values are the same, the #define value differs.
If this were a simple round off error, all three values should be the same. As
they are
Even though a function's exception specification isn't part of its type
(neither is the fact that the function is virtual) it would be useful to
include it in __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ (just as virtual is). This is a request for
such an enhancement.
--
Summary: enhancement: exception specif
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 20:50 ---
Does this still fail for others? I can't get the ICE to occur.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25252
The manual says __FUNCTION__ is just another name for __func__ but the two
behave slightly differently (the former is not allowed in function declarations
while the latter is). __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is also allowed but with slightly
different (and, IMO, rather unusual) effects.
I propose that __FUNC
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 20:15 ---
NB we don't add the REG_EQUIV note because insn 136 has multiple sets. Such
insns can't have REG_EQ* notes according to set_unique_reg_note. But that, I
think, is not the bug. More likely is that I exposed a latent
--- Comment #31 from aesok at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 20:13 ---
Fixed in 4.1.3, 4.2.0 and 4.3.0.
--
aesok at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 20:06 ---
The third hunk of the patch changes something:
Index: local-alloc.c
===
--- local-alloc.c (revision 121794)
+++ local-alloc.c (working copy)
--- Comment #30 from aesok at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 20:02 ---
Subject: Bug 19087
Author: aesok
Date: Thu Feb 15 20:01:59 2007
New Revision: 122013
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122013
Log:
PR target/19087
* config/avr/avr.c (DWARF2_ADDR_
When I pass BOOT_STRAP="-march=athlon -O2" on the command line of make to
bootstrap gcc then they are not being used. The flags for bootstrapping always
default to "-g -O2".
I believe this is due to BOOT_CFLAGS missing in the top-level's Makefile lists
for variables to pass on to sub-level Makefil
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 19:47 ---
Fixed on 4.1, 4.2, and trunk.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 19:33 ---
Subject: Bug 30799
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Feb 15 19:33:13 2007
New Revision: 122012
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122012
Log:
2007-02-15 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 19:30 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12603 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 19:30 ---
*** Bug 30794 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|00
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 17:51 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15638 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 17:51 ---
*** Bug 30808 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 17:50 ---
The command line you quoted is much less than 8192 characters (I count 3744
characters), so I guess your build environment is somehow creating additional
limitations, and/or some shell artefact or a bug in make is ca
--- Comment #2 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-02-15
17:40 ---
Hello Arno,
I reported a few similar bugs to the PolyORB team long ago and we found the
reason as well:
Windows:
---
gnat-mingw-gcc-4.2.0.log:checking the maximum length of command line
--- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-02-15 17:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30793
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01366.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 17:23 ---
Why DECL_INLINE is tested?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30794
--- Comment #32 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 16:22 ---
Fixed.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #31 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 16:20 ---
Subject: Bug 30478
Author: tobi
Date: Thu Feb 15 16:20:46 2007
New Revision: 122002
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122002
Log:
PR fortran/30478
fortran/
* decl.c (create_enum_history, gfc_free_
--- Comment #19 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-02-15 16:06 ---
Also, I don't think the XFAIL-ing has been implemented in the correct way. We
are now seeing logs like:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-02/msg00570.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=307
--- Comment #2 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2007-02-15 15:55
---
Created an attachment (id=13052)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13052&action=view)
Proposed fix for postreload combine
the following patch fixes the problem in the sh 3.4.3 compiler.
Since
--- Comment #1 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2007-02-15 15:37
---
The bug might be clearer to explain like this
we have
16: (set reg:r1) (const_int 188)
17: (set reg:r1) (plus (reg:r1 reg:r2)
18: (set reg:r1) (mem (plus (reg:r1) (const_int 4))
is transformed into
16: (set reg
During installation of gcc-4.1.2 ("gmake MAKE=gmake install") the following
error occurred on our Solaris systems:
echo 'SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR="'"`echo /usr/include | sed -e :a -e "s,[^/]*/\.\.\/,,"
-e ta`"'"' \
>
/slt/devel/toolsbase/gcc/4.1.2/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 15:03 ---
Looks like a mingw/environment issue to me.
Never seen such thing myself.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from krischik at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-02-15
15:00 ---
Hello Andreas,
If you say so I believe you.
And it is not that important: I tried with gcc-4.2-20070207 and the problem did
not appear again. Only now Ada fails with "Argument list to long" see bug#3080
One of the most common problems I face in compiling programs with many
dependancies is that, if a dependency is missing, the resulting error messages
almost invariably scroll off the screen instantly, and even apart from the
scrolling, the single relevant error ("Cannot open : No such file or
direc
I can only reproduce this problem on the sh target with a gcc version 3.4.3.
However my analysis makes me believe the problem still exists on the trunk.
After greg I have the following sequence :
(insn:HI 11 10 12 0 (set (reg/v/f:SI 2 r2 [orig:160 PrivateData_p ] [160])
(const_int 128 [0x
--- Comment #14 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 14:25 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Another candidate to warn for undefined behaviour PR 968 ?
>
Argh, I meant PR 986.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334
--- Comment #13 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 14:24 ---
Another candidate to warn for undefined behaviour PR 968 ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30334
Hello,
When trying to build compiler on mingw I get the following error message:
-
gcc -c -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-Iada -I../../gcc-4.2-20070207/gcc
The 2-line source that triggers the error:
#define A(x,...) x##,##__VA_ARGS__
A(1)
Error message:
a.c:6: internal compiler error: Geannuleerd
Please submit a full bug report
The source file is from:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/josh/sparse.git;a=blob;f=validation/preprocessor13.
--- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 12:41
---
It triggers on the c++tester (x86_64) for boost and tramp3d as well. Can we
please fix this asap? Thanks.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from med04hrt at studserv dot uni-leipzig dot de 2007-02-15
12:17 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The following simple c code gives segmentation fault on a GNU-Linux system
> (Redhat-9.0) running on a Pentium 4 machine with 512 MB RAM.
>
>
> Source file : test.c
>
> ---
--- Comment #11 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2007-02-15 10:42 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> > > I have still to re-read the test case to check whether TARGET is required
> >
> > However the accessed component is a POINTER to a derived type [...]
>
> Ok, I somehow didn't realiz
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-15 10:32 ---
> > I have still to re-read the test case to check whether TARGET is required
>
> However the accessed component is a POINTER to a derived type [...]
Ok, I somehow didn't realize
type field
type(mesh),
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
